{"id":183839,"date":"2019-02-18T14:05:43","date_gmt":"2019-02-18T14:05:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=183839"},"modified":"2019-02-22T08:41:14","modified_gmt":"2019-02-22T08:41:14","slug":"winston-churchill-greatest-british-hero-or-genocidal-war-criminal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=183839","title":{"rendered":"Winston Churchill: Greatest British Hero or Genocidal War Criminal?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Author Unknown,<\/h2>\n

sourced from\u00a0The Week.<\/a><\/h2>\n

Abridged by Lasha Darkmoon
\nwith added commentary and an extended endnote,
\n\u201cWinston Churchill: Zionist Puppet\u201d<\/em><\/h1>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u201cTo achieve the extirpation of Nazi tyranny
\nthere are no lengths of violence to which we will not go.\u201d
\n<\/strong>\u2014 Winston Churchill, September 1943<\/h3>\n
British shadow chancellor John McDonnell, an avowed Communist,\u00a0 has come under fire for calling Winston Churchill a \u2018villain\u2019.\u00a0 Responding to quick-fire questions at the end of a live video interview with\u00a0Politico, McDonnell was asked if Churchill was a hero or a villain, to which he replied: \u201cTonypandy \u2014 villain.\u201d (See picture<\/a><\/strong><\/span>)<\/h5>\n
McDonnell was referring to a series of violent confrontations between striking coal miners and the police in the Welsh town of Tonypandy in 1910. One miner was killed and hundreds injured in the clashes. Churchill\u2019s decision, as then-home secretary, to send the Army to reinforce police \u201ccaused considerable ill-feeling towards him in south Wales and with some in the trade union and Labour movement\u201d, says\u00a0Politico.<\/h5>\n
However, it \u201chas been long disputed whether Churchill personally sanctioned the decision\u201d to deploy troops, reports\u00a0The Guardian<\/em>.<\/h5>\n
The response to McDonnell\u2019s comments has been swift and severe, with Churchill\u2019s grandson Nicholas Soames telling the\u00a0Daily Telegraph<\/em>: \u201cFrankly, it\u2019s a very foolish and stupid thing to say.\u201d<\/h5>\n
British Tory MP Soames added: \u201cI think my grandfather\u2019s reputation can withstand a publicity seeking assault from a third-rate, Poundland Lenin.\u201d<\/h5>\n
Former foreign secretary Boris Johnson, who has written a Churchill biography, told the newspaper that the wartime prime minister \u201csaved this country and the whole of Europe from a barbaric fascist and racist tyranny, and our debt to him is incalculable. McDonnell should be utterly ashamed of his remarks, and should withdraw them forthwith\u201d.<\/h5>\n
But some commentators have echoed McDonnell\u2019s views.<\/h5>\n
The Guardian\u2019s Owen Jones\u00a0tweeted a list of major indiscretions by Churchill, who worked as a soldier and a journalist before entering politics. Labour MP Steve Reed also weighed in with criticism of the late leader. \u201cMy grandad hated him,\u201d he said, and wouldn\u2019t hear his name spoken because he sent in troops to shoot striking miners.\u201d<\/h5>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In 2002, Churchill was voted \u201cthe greatest Britain who ever lived\u201d, beating Shakespeare and Darwin to the top spot. However, when closely questioned, few of those voters had read a Shakespeare play or could quote a single line written by the Bard. And half of them had never heard of Darwin.\u00a0 (LD)<\/strong><\/h5>\n
\u2014\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a7\u00a0 \u00a0\u2014<\/h5>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s a danger in Churchill gaining a purely iconic status because that actually takes away from his humanity,\u201d Allen Packwood, director of the Churchill Archives Centre, told the\u00a0BBC.<\/h5>\n
Many fellow historians agree. John Charmley\u00a0argues\u00a0that it is important to remember that \u201cgreat men can commit great mistakes, and Churchill\u2019s are on the same gargantuan scale as his achievements\u201d.<\/h5>\n
Churchill was a keen supporter of eugenics, something he had in common with the leaders of Nazi Germany, where an estimated 400,000 disabled people were forcibly sterilised. He once said that \u201cthe multiplication of the feeble-minded is a very terrible danger to the race\u201d, and drafted a highly controversial piece of legislation which mandated that those suffering from mental illness be sterilised, according to the\u00a0New Statesman.<\/em><\/h5>\n
Many historians also refuse to forgive Churchill for his views on race.\u00a0The Guardian<\/em>\u00a0reports that he once said: \u201cI do not admit\u2026 that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia\u2026 by the fact that a stronger race, a higher grade race\u2026 has come in and taken its place.\u201d<\/h5>\n
LD: <\/strong>A side note on eugenics.<\/strong><\/em> Many White Nationalists see nothing wrong with eugenics and point out correctly that Darwin himself would have approved of eugenics, as would (naturally) his supergenius cousin Sir Francis Galton, known as the \u201cfather of eugenics<\/span><\/a>\u201c. <\/strong><\/h5>\n
Many eminent thinkers have believed in eugenics, including H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Alexander Graham Bell, Helen Keller, and DNA Nobel prizewinner Francis Crick. The fact that Hitler believed in eugenics does not make eugenics unacceptable or invalid. <\/strong><\/h5>\n
Crick notes in a letter: \u201cThe main difficulty is that people have to start thinking out eugenics in a different way. The Nazis gave it a bad name and I think it is time something was done to make it respectable again.\u201d <\/strong><\/h5>\n
Crick went on to suggest that \u201cirresponsible people\u201d who were \u201cpoorly endowed genetically\u201d should be stopped from having \u201clarge numbers of unnecessary children\u201d. The best way to do this \u2014 \u201csterilization is the only answer\u201d \u2014 is to bribe them by paying them cash. He points out that the Indian government had bribed its people to stop breeding like rabbits by offering them free transistor radios.<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Another Nobel prizewinner, Alexis Carrel, had been even more extreme in his advocacy of eugenics, suggesting in 1935 that\u00a0\u201cdeviant\u201d human beings should be suppressed so that the \u201chereditary biological aristocracy\u201d could increase. <\/strong><\/h5>\n
In his book, Man, The Unknown<\/span><\/a>\u00a0Carrel writes: \u201cA euthanasia establishment, equipped with a suitable gas, would allow the humanitarian and economic disposal of those who have killed, committed armed robbery, kidnapped children, robbed the poor or seriously betrayed public confidence,\u201d\u00a0 <\/strong><\/h5>\n
As a result of these controversial recommendations for getting rid of criminal deviants, Carrel has been dubbed \u201cFather of the Gas Chamber\u201d. (LD)\u00a0<\/strong><\/h5>\n
(The article continues)\u00a0<\/em><\/h5>\n
The announcement in 2013 that Churchill would feature on the new \u00a35 note (see picture<\/span><\/a><\/strong>) was met with anger by Labour candidate Benjamin Whittingham, who called the late leader a \u201cracist and white supremacist\u201d, according to the\u00a0Daily Mail.<\/em><\/h5>\n
When the Kurds rebelled against British rule in 1920, Churchill said he did not understand the \u201csqueamishness\u201d surrounding the use of gas as a weapon. \u201cI am strongly in favour of using gas against uncivilised tribes,\u201d he said. \u201c[It] would spread a lively terror.\u201d<\/h5>\n
\u201cMany of the wounds Churchill inflicted have still not healed,\u201d argues Johann Hari in\u00a0The Independent<\/em>. \u201cYou can find them on the front pages any day of the week.\u201d<\/h5>\n
Hari blames Churchill for arbitrarily locking together warring ethnic groups in Iraq that \u201chave been bleeding ever since\u201d. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict can also be traced back to Churchill\u2019s decision to hand over the \u201cOver-Promised Land\u201d to both Arabs and Jews, even though\u00a0\u201che seems to have privately felt racist contempt for both,\u201d says Hari.<\/h5>\n
When Barack Obama took office in the White House, he returned a bust of Churchill to Britain. \u201cIt\u2019s not hard to guess why,\u201d says Hari. \u201cHis Kenyan grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, was imprisoned without trial for two years and was tortured on Churchill\u2019s watch, for resisting Churchill\u2019s empire.\u201d<\/h5>\n
As secretary of state for war, Churchill sent in the infamous Black and Tans to fight the\u00a0IRA in 1920. The unit became known for vicious attacks on civilians and violent reprisals.<\/h5>\n
Historian Peter Hart described it as an \u201castoundingly counterproductive\u201d move by Churchill, according to\u00a0The Independent<\/em>. \u201cIRA violence only increased,\u201d he said.<\/h5>\n
Churchill was also known for his strong anti-union sentiment. In 1910, he ordered the Army to intervene when striking miners staged riots in Wales, and again the next year in Liverpool \u2013 where soldiers fired their weapons, killing two people. Nine years later he deployed 10,000 troops to Glasgow amid strike-related unrest.<\/h5>\n
Churchill also exhibited a strong hatred for Mahatma Gandhi and his campaign of peaceful resistance, which he saw as threat to the British Empire.<\/h5>\n
He once raged that Gandhi \u201cought to be lain bound hand and foot at the gates of Delhi, and then trampled on by an enormous elephant with the new Viceroy seated on its back\u201d.<\/h5>\n
LD :\u00a0\u201cI hate Indians,\u201d Churchill remarked on one occasion. \u201cThey are a beastly people with a beastly religion.\u201d\u00a0 I\u2019m sure the Vedic sages who gave us the <\/strong>Upanishads<\/strong><\/em> and the <\/strong>Bhagavad-Gita<\/strong><\/em> would be amused to hear that.\u00a0<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Source<\/a><\/strong><\/h5>\n

\u2014\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a7\u00a0 \u00a0\u2014<\/p>\n

Endnote by Lasha Darkmoon<\/h1>\n

Winston Churchill: Zionist Puppet<\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Conspiracy theorists sometimes like to assert that Churchill was a Jew because everything he did served Jewish interests.<\/h5>\n
They say the same about Hitler, Stalin, and Angela Merkel. They provide weird genealogical details, giving elaborate family trees,\u00a0 \u201cproving\u201d that Frau Merkel is Hitler\u2019s illegitimate daughter. All this, I think,\u00a0must be taken with a pinch of salt.<\/h5>\n
Stalin was certainly no Jew. Still less was Hitler. If they were, then here we have two Jewish titans inflicting severe wounds on each other, wiping out in the process allegedly six million other Jews. Which is not the way the Jews work. Jews always work together, networking closely, so as to advance the Jewish agenda. This is the secret of their survival.\u00a0 Jews didn\u2019t rise to the top of the totem pole, to the peak of the power pyramid,\u00a0 by tearing each other apart.\u00a0That\u2019s what the goyim do, united only in their disunity.<\/h5>\n
What would most people think if you told them that the father of England\u2019s greatest hero of all time, Winston Churchill, was Jack the Ripper<\/em>? \u2014 Yes, Jack the Ripper! \u2014 They would laugh out loud and roll their eyes in wonder. And yet, there is a sensational article to be found on the internet giving us all the gory details about Churchill\u2019s dad carving up prostitutes in the Whitechapel district of London\u2019s East End in the time of good Queen Victoria! (See\u00a0\u201cJack the Ripper\u201d was Winston Churchill\u2019s Father<\/span><\/strong><\/a>).<\/h5>\n
Even if this were true\u00a0and if Churchill were the son of the Ripper, iconic serial killer of all time, it\u2019s hard to see how Churchill himself can be held responsible for what his dreadful dad did under the flickering gas lamps of foggy London town in the late 19th century.<\/h5>\n
There is more than enough evidence to show that Churchill was a Zionist shill. That he was on the Jewish payroll. But this does not make him a Jew. It makes him a shabbos goy<\/em>, a loyal servitor of the Jews. Churchill\u00a0 has no problem praising the Jews lavishly whenever he can. (See this picture quote<\/a><\/strong><\/span>)<\/h5>\n
Without Churchill behind them, the Jews would have found it much harder to steal Palestine from the Arabs. Churchill\u2019s rhetoric played right into Jewish hands.\u00a0In 1920 he declared: \u201cIf, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown, which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event will have occurred in the history of the world which would from every point of view be beneficial\u201d.<\/h5>\n
Churchill thought the Arab population of Palestine was a \u201clower manifestation\u201d and argued that the \u201cdog in a manger has no final right to the manger\u201d. Meaning that the Arabs had no automatic right to Palestine just because Palestine had been their ancestral home for centuries. Not if a superior race like the Jews managed to occupy their homelands and turf them out.<\/h5>\n
In England, where Churchill lived, the land belonged by law to the landowners; in the Middle East, where the Arabs lived, the land belonged by force of arms to the land grabbers.<\/h5>\n
Machiavelli would have chortled at this Churchillian logic.<\/h5>\n
For his services to Zionism, Churchill was to have a statue erected in Jerusalem in 2012 as a thank you gift.<\/h5>\n
Churchill, like Machiavelli before him, was all for the doctrine of Might is Right, the ius gladii<\/em>\u00a0(\u201claw of the sword\u201d) of the Ancient Romans. If you could steal something, it was yours if you managed to keep it. \u201cFinders, keepers,\u201d to quote the slogan all schoolboys love to chant as they nick each other\u2019s possessions. Many Jews who arrived in Palestine in 1948, penniless, walked straight into sumptuous Arab houses and took them over, including the furniture, cutlery, crockery, bed linen, and the paintings on the walls.<\/h5>\n
No great wrong, Churchill believed, had \u201cbeen done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia\u201d by the Anglo-Saxon settlers who felt like parking their wagons on someone else\u2019s parking space. \u201cI do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people,\u201d Churchill opined,\u00a0 \u201cby the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race, has come in and taken their place\u201d.<\/h5>\n
We now know that Churchill was a chronic alcoholic, spendaholic and gambler who ran up\u00a0enormous debts\u00a0and faced bankruptcy and ruin on multiple occasions. He would spend \u00a340,000 a year in French casinos. A wine bill\u00a0 once landed on his doorstep demanding \u00a354,000, including \u00a316,000 just for Champagne. In 1940, when he rose to become Prime Minister of Britain, he received a mysterious \u201cgift\u201d of \u00a31million from a secret benefactor called Sir Henry Strakosch, a naturalised Briton born in Austria who had made his money in the South African mines.<\/h5>\n
An article in the Daily Mail<\/em>, which reveals all these sensational details about Churchill, curiously forgets to mention the all-important fact that Churchill\u2019s rescuer from ruin was a Jew \u2014<\/em>\u00a0an Austrian Jew who had managed to pick up a knighthood from the British government. (For full details of Churchill\u2019s obsessive-compulsive gambling, spendaholic and alcoholic habits, see here<\/span><\/a><\/strong>).<\/h5>\n
Sir Henry Strakosch\u2019s unflagging generosity to Churchill in bailing him out and paying his extravagant debts \u2014 not once but several times \u2014 came at a high price. It seems there was a quid pro quo<\/em>.\u00a0 Sir Henry, the munificent Jewish financier, would pay off Churchill\u2019s mounting debts if Churchill agreed to toe the Jewish line and did exactly what he was told to do by international Jewry.<\/h5>\n
Proof that Sir Henry Strakosch was Jewish is found in a separate article in Wikipedia on Strakosch:<\/h5>\n
Sir Henry Strakosch\u00a0\u2026 was an Austrian-born British banker and businessman. His parents were the merchant Edward Strakosch and his wife Mathilde, (n\u00e9e Winters). He was born at\u00a0Hohenau, Austria, and educated at the Wasa Gymnasium in\u00a0Vienna\u00a0and privately in England.<\/strong><\/h5>\n
He entered banking in the\u00a0City of London\u00a0in 1891, then began working for the Anglo-Austrian Bank of South Africa in the 1895. Strakosch became a naturalized British citizen in 1907.<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Strakosch was\u00a0knighted\u00a0in 1921 \u2026\u00a0He was chairman of\u00a0The Economist<\/em>\u00a0between 1929 and 1943.<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Strakosch being a Jew and his involvement in the payment of the private debts of Sir\u00a0Winston Churchill, in 1938, has been cited as evidence of Jewish involvement in British politics in the run up to World War Two. Strakosch had supplied Churchill with figures on German arms expenditure during the latter\u2019s political campaign for rearmament against the Nazi regime, and the financial arrangement enabled Churchill to withdraw his home\u00a0Chartwell\u00a0from sale at a time of financial pressures.<\/strong><\/h5>\n
Here then was a man, Winston Churchill, who was a compulsive gambler whose monetary problems were compounded by his chronic alcoholism. He was to face financial ruin on several occasions. He was repeatedly at his wit\u2019s end, literally tearing his hair out. With the bailiffs banging at his door.<\/h5>\n
On each occasion, it was a Jewish moneylender who came to Churchill\u2019s rescue.<\/h5>\n
All debts paid.<\/h5>\n
No need to repay the debts!<\/em><\/h5>\n
This particular\u00a0 Jewish moneylender didn\u2019t need cash. He was rolling in it. He had enough cash to last him twenty lifetimes. What Sir Henry needed in exchange for his money was political favours.<\/h5>\n
Like, for example, a Jewish state in Palestine for his fellow Jews.<\/h5>\n

Source <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Many people have misgivings about the man who was voted the \u201cgreatest Briton\u201d. Lasha Darkmoon explains why there are good reasons to question his legacy<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":133,"featured_media":183842,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15,37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-Hidden_and_Revisionist_History","category-Israel_Anti-Semitism_Zionism_and_US-UK_allies"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/133"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=183839"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183839\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":183846,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183839\/revisions\/183846"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/183842"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=183839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=183839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=183839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}