H. Res. 109<\/a><\/strong><\/span>) \u201crecognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal (GND)\u201d already has 67 co-sponsors in the House. If the scheme outlined in the resolution expressing the \u201csense of the House\u201d is implemented, it would seek to eliminate air travel, the eating of steaks, the use of hydrocarbons, and more. It would aim to completely end all emissions of CO2 \u2014 an essential gas exhaled by every living person and required by plants \u2014 over the coming decade.<\/span><\/p>\nMoore, who was one of six international directors of Greenpeace, was flabbergasted that something so ludicrous could even be proposed, much less be advanced in the U.S. government. \u201cIt is quite amazing that someone that is in government \u2014 actually elected to the government of the United States of America \u2014 would propose that we eliminate all fossil fuels in 12 years,\u201d he said in an on-camera interview with The New American<\/em> from Canada. \u201cThis would basically result, if we did it on a global level, it would result in the decimation of the human population from 7-odd billion down to who knows how few people.\u201d It would end up killing almost everyone on the planet, he added.<\/span><\/p>\nWorse than mass death would be the way people reacted. \u201cIt would basically begin a process of cannibalization among the human species, because the food could not be delivered to the stores in the middle of the cities anymore,\u201d Moore continued. \u201cThe point that bothers me the most is that if you eliminated fossil fuels, every tree in the world would be cut for fuel. There is no other source for heating and cooking once you eliminate fossil fuels. You could use animal dung, if there were any animals left, but the animals would all die too because they would all get eaten.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nMoore also slammed the \u201csocial aspects\u201d of the Green New Deal proposals such as \u201cpaying people who are unwilling to work,\u201d according to a FAQ released by Ocasio-Cortez’ office. \u201cI can’t believe that anyone would write that in a proposal for law in the United States of America,\u201d he said, calling it \u201cjust unbelievable.\u201d Indeed, that language and other half-baked ideas caused nationwide ridicule of Ocasio-Cortez and others involved in pushing the \u201cNew Deal.\u201d The ridicule got so intense that one of its propoents eventually lied, claiming that mischievous Republicans might have put out a fake Green New Deal document to make Democrats look ridiculous. But then the truth came out, depsite the FAQ being removed from Cortez’s congressional website.<\/span><\/p>\nBut the absurdity of it all may be a boost to Republicans and President Donald Trump. \u201cWe have a situation where something completely preposterous is being backed by a large number of Democratic congressional elected representatives in the United States of America,\u201d Moore said. \u201cThis is actually going to put Trump right over the top. I cannot see how this can possibly be negative for him. It can only be positive, because people recognize when something is preposterous. And I think that is the best word for it.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n\u201cThe best term for it is actually mass-suicidal,\u201d Moore added. \u201cWhy would anyone vote for something that was going to result in the death of nearly all humans on Earth?\u201d As far as what Americans could do who support the environment but not mass suicide, Moore urged people not to vote for anyone who would support the \u201cGreen New Deal.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n
![\"Patrick](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Patrick-Moore.jpg\")
<\/a>The \u201cGreen New Deal\u201d proposed by congressional Democrats is a \u201crecipe for mass suicide\u201d and the \u201cmost ridiculous scenario I ever heard,\u201d Greenpeace Co-Founder Patrick Moore (shown) warned in an exclusive interview with The New American<\/em>. In fact, Dr. Moore warned that if the \u201ccompletely preposterous\u201d prescriptions in the scheme were actually implemented, Americans could be forced to turn to cannibalism to avoid starvation \u2014 and they still would not survive. Other experts such as Craig Rucker, the executive director of the environmental group Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), also sounded the alarm about the \u201cgreen\u201d proposal in Congress, comparing it to Soviet five-year plans and calling it a \u201cprescription for disaster.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n