The legitimacy of a ruler can best be determined by asking the ruled people.<\/span><\/p>\n The independent Venezuelan polling firm Hinterlaces asked<\/a><\/strong><\/span> (in Spanish) 1,580 Venezuelans in direct interviews who they consider to be the legitimate president of Venezuela.<\/span><\/p>\n 57% said that the Nicol\u00e1s Maduro is the legitimated president. 32% said Juan Guaid\u00f3. 11% did not know or did not respond.<\/span><\/p>\n —<\/span><\/p>\n The well-respected scientific research service of the German Bundestag advised<\/a><\/strong><\/span> (in German) that foreign recognition of someone as a president does not confer legitimacy. Legitimacy of a president requires that he has actual enforcing capabilities within the country. As long as that is not established a recognition must be seen as interference in the internal affairs of the foreign country. Such an interference, which the German and other governments committed, is inconsistent with international law.<\/span><\/p>\n —<\/span><\/p>\n Alfred-Maurice de-Zayas, a<\/a> professor for international law and a longtime senior lawyer at the United Nations, confirms that opinion. He writes<\/a><\/strong><\/span>:<\/span><\/p>\n Members of the United Nations are bound by the Charter, articles one and two of which affirm the right of all peoples to determine themselves, the sovereign equality of states, the prohibition of the use of force and of economic or political interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states. Yet these fundamental principles of international order are being grossly violated in the case of Venezuela.<\/span><\/p>\n —<\/span><\/p>\n ignoring the will of the people of Venezuela and the rule of law U.S. media continue to manufacture consent for regime change in Venezuela<\/a><\/strong><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n