{"id":183074,"date":"2019-02-01T07:10:50","date_gmt":"2019-02-01T07:10:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=183074"},"modified":"2019-02-04T07:59:23","modified_gmt":"2019-02-04T07:59:23","slug":"the-trump-administration-begins-to-fracture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=183074","title":{"rendered":"The Trump Administration Begins to Fracture"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction \u2013 Jan 31, 2019<\/h1>\n
\"(L<\/a>

(L to R) Christopher Wray, Gina Haspel and Dan Coats. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

Two factions are emerging in the Trump administration. The first, headed by National Security advisor John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo are busily trying to further the Zionist agenda and foment conflict, particularly with Iran.<\/h5>\n
However, their attempts to portray Iran as posing a threat to U.S. national security have just been flatly contradicted by a second, opposing faction, consisting of three of Trump\u2019s most senior intelligence chiefs.<\/h5>\n
Testifying before Congress<\/a><\/span> on Tuesday, FBI directory Christopher Wray,\u00a0CIA director Gina Haspel, and\u00a0Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats all contradicted the president on a number of key security issues.<\/h5>\n
North Korea was unlikely to dismantle its nuclear arsenal, they said, despite the president and Mike Pompeo\u2019s assurance<\/a><\/span> that it would disarm.<\/h5>\n
Although Trump had declared victory over ISIS<\/a><\/span>, the Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats flatly contradicted this when he said on Tuesday that the terror group remains a threat<\/a><\/span>.<\/h5>\n
While despite having abandoned the landmark nuclear deal with Iran because in Trump\u2019s words it was \u201cdisastrous\u201d, Dan Coats testified that Iran did not appear to be developing nuclear weapons<\/a><\/span>.<\/h5>\n
Actually Trump\u2019s opposition to the Iran deal hasn’t focused on specific details. Instead he’s dismissed it in sweeping terms such his claim that \u201cAt the heart of the deal was a giant fiction<\/a><\/span>.\u201d<\/h5>\n
Trump\u2019s reluctance to cite precise objections suggests that he’s been “instructed”\/”advised” to reject the deal out-of-hand, without getting bogged down with specifics.<\/h5>\n
When he withdrew from the agreement President Trump claimed that Iran was not keeping its part of the agreement, although he provided no evidence to substantiate that. Since then he has offered no further evidence to corroborate it. Instead Trump has simply echoed John Bolton and Mike Pompeo in repeatedly condemning the deal and Iran.<\/h5>\n
Likewise, Trump\u2019s scathing dismissal of the assessments from the heads of three major U.S. intelligence agencies suggests, to this writer, that he’s been “instructed”\/”advised” to dismiss them.<\/h5>\n
All of which leads one to wonder who is really running U.S. foreign policy? U.S. intelligence officials who are kept informed by numerous agents and listening posts on what is happening around the world?<\/h5>\n
Or are Zionist agents inside the Trump administration actually steering U.S. foreign policy and effectively controlling the U.S. president? For Israel\u2019s benefit rather than America\u2019s?<\/h5>\n

Trump delivers astonishing insult to his ‘naive’ top intelligence chiefs as he tells them to ‘go back to SCHOOL’ after they contradicted him on Iran, North Korea and ISIS<\/h2>\n

Emily Goodin \u2013 Daily Mail Jan 31, 2019<\/h2>\n