{"id":176862,"date":"2018-09-27T05:17:12","date_gmt":"2018-09-27T05:17:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=176862"},"modified":"2018-10-01T04:56:48","modified_gmt":"2018-10-01T04:56:48","slug":"forced-into-a-mental-health-facility-for-talking-about-5g-with-her-family-doctor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=176862","title":{"rendered":"Forced into a mental health facility for talking about 5G with her family doctor"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pam Barker — The Liberty Beacon Sept 20, 2018<\/strong><\/h1>\n

\"SusanneSmallDetention1\"<\/a><\/p>\n

An utterly remarkable and disturbing situation has transpired in the UK just in the last 3-4 days. Susanne Small (her Facebook name<\/span>;<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0see her posted FB video<\/a><\/strong><\/span>) was detained under the UK\u2019s Mental Health Act on Monday because, during a recent visit to her GP, the doctor had determined she was a risk either to herself or others. On Tuesday, she appeared in a special segment of the Richie Allen show, which is linked to below (30 minutes). It\u2019s well worth listening to.<\/span><\/p>\n

Activists are familiar with Susanne\u2019s concerns over the health effects of 5G technology and its quiet rollout. We\u2019re also familiar with other topics she raises such as Agenda 21\/2030, the work of Debra Tavares, etc. This is clearly someone who has done relevant research and, as we are fond of saying, \u2018gone down the rabbit hole\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

As you\u2019ll hear in the interview with Allen, done via her smartphone from the actual hospital, she had compiled research on 5G and gone down to her doctor\u2019s office with it, without an appointment at 8 am, presumably when the office had just opened. She believed that certain symptoms she had been getting, such as headaches, might be connected to cell towers, and had noticed a new large one had been installed in the neighbourhood, although she was well aware that it wouldn\u2019t have been operational at the time. The reaction from the doctor and staff was to basically send her on her way but leave the information behind, which she refused to do. During the subsequent consultation with her doctor, Susanne had the feeling that it was wise to leave, that the doctor had absolutely no interest in the research and viewed her as someone who was under a lot of stress.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Susanne<\/a>A day later she experienced phone calls with withheld caller ID and had someone call on her at home. She refused to answer the door, and it was a day later \u2013 probably two days after the visit to the doctor \u2013 that police and mental health professionals arrived to detain her at a mental health facility.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is what the UK government\u2019s site, on the page titled Mental Health Act<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, says about being forcibly \u2018sectioned\u2019 or detained under it: People detained under the Mental Health Act need urgent treatment for a mental health disorder and are at risk of harm to themselves or others. <\/em>Further down, it says:<\/span><\/p>\n

Who decides that someone should be detained?<\/h2>\n

In emergencies<\/h3>\n

An emergency is when someone seems to be at serious risk of harming themselves or others. This can occur:<\/span><\/p>\n