![\"Jeremy](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/Jeremy-Get-on-Your-Knees.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\nIn their\u00a0response to Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn<\/span><\/a>, the Jewish Leadership Council (JLC) and the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BOD) claim to \u2018propose an agenda of actions for discussion\u2019 between the Labour party and those who claim to \u2018represent\u2019 British Jews.<\/h5>\n
In practice the two Zionist institutions have managed to produce one of the most disgusting documents in modern Jewish history. A text that is little more than an ode to the self-defamation of its own authors and to the community they claim to \u2018represent\u2019: it is rude, authoritarian, and disrespectful to a democratically elected leader of Europe\u2019s biggest party.<\/h5>\n
Read the BOD\/JLC’s public address to Corbyn\u00a0here<\/a><\/span><\/h5>\n
When you read some of the extracts below, remember that despite BOD and the JLC claims to ‘represent’ British Jewry, these two organisations managed to pull just 1500 members of their community into their \u2018Enough is Enough\u2019 anti-Corbyn demonstration earlier this week. We are talking about 0.5% of British Jewry. The BOD\/JLC\u2019s authoritarian document outlines a set of humiliating conditions for Corbyn to meet. The text proves how detached these Jewish institutions are from British values, specifically, and the Western ethos, in general. In fact their vision of the political arena is Orwellian in nature and tyrannical in practice.<\/h5>\n
Apparently, if Corbyn expects to meet with the demands of these self-appointed \u2018Jewish leaders\u2019 he must appoint a watchdog who will take care of the so called \u2018antisemites\u2019 in his party and, of course, under the supervision of these two ardent Zionist bodies. He must also meet a strict time-frame defined by Judea.<\/h5>\n
\u201cOutstanding and future cases (of alleged antisemitism) are to be brought to a swift conclusion under a fixed timescale. An independent, mutually agreed upon ombudsman should be appointed to oversee performance, reporting to the Party, as well as to the Board of Deputies and the Jewish Leadership Council.\u201d<\/h5>\n
Consistent with the spirit of Talmudic\u00a0herem<\/em>\u00a0(excommunication) and totally in contradiction to notions of British openness and Western tolerance, these Jewish institutions insist that \u201cMPs, councillors, and other party members should not share platforms with people who have been suspended or expelled for antisemitism and CLPs should not provide them with a platform.\u201d The Jewish institutions also suggest how to penalise the sinners. \u201cAnybody doing so should, themselves, be suspended from membership; in the case of MPs, they should lose the party whip.\u201d Maybe someone should make the effort to explain to the Jewish leaders that the labour party is an established political institution. It is not a ghetto, I mean, not as yet.<\/h5>\n
The Jewish bodies insist on dominating the language as well as boundaries of political discussion. Criticism of Israel should be completely restricted.\u00a0 The words \u2018Zio\u2019 and \u2018Zionist\u2019 as terms of abuse should be eradicated.\u00a0I actually believe that if the BOD\/JLC truly wanted \u2018Zionist\u2019 to not be used as a \u2018term of abuse,\u2019 they should simply stop abusing Corbyn in the name of Zion as their first step forward.<\/h5>\n
The British Jewish \u2018leaders\u2019 clearly know how to distinguish between the \u2018good Jews\u2019 and the bad ones. Corbyn is told to \u201cengage with the Jewish community via its main representative groups, and not through fringe organisations who wish to obstruct the Party\u2019s efforts to tackle antisemitism.\u201d And I wonder, how exactly the BOD or the JLC are \u2018representatives’ of British Jews.\u00a0When were they elected and by whom? And if these two organisations are \u2018representative of British Jews,\u2019 how is it that they so selectively call upon Labour to ignore the voice of Jewish collectives they don\u2019t agree with?<\/h5>\n
The Jewish institutions talk at Corbyn as if he is a schoolboy. \u201cThese changes must be sustained and enduring.\u201d Corbyn better quickly meet the Zionist demands before a meeting with The Lobby can materialise. \u201cWe firmly believe that this must happen urgently, and certainly before we meet.\u201d<\/h5>\n
The BOD and the JLC express hope in starting a process of \u201cconstructive anti-racist\u201d work within the Labour Party. Talking about racism, we better hear from both the BOD and the JLC how many Muslims and Blacks \u00a0are members of their executive boards. I ask because, unlike those \u2018Jews only\u2019 institutions, the Labour party is, actually, a multi-ethnic and multi-racial political body. If Jewish institutions want to counter racism, they are more than welcome to do so. The racist \u2018Jewish State\u2019 is where they should start.<\/h5>\n
If they want to burn it, you want to read it!<\/strong><\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\nBeing in Time – A Post Political Manifesto,\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Amazon.co.uk<\/a><\/span>,\u00a0Amazon.com<\/a><\/span>\u00a0and here<\/a><\/span>\u00a0(gilad.co.uk).\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n