![\"NK](\"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/NK-Grenfell1.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nSo how come the Towers collapsed in nine seconds on 9\/11, falling into their own footprint?<\/h5>\nNO STEEL STRUCTURE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED AS RESULT OF FIRE<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\n\u2018National Institute of Standards and Technology\u2019 NIST have been discredited by Architects and Engineers for 9\/11 Truth (particularly since their investigation stops at the point where collapse of the Twin Towers is supposed to have begun but ignores the rest of the collapse) \u2013 see their report: \u2018Beyond Mis-information\u2019<\/span>.<\/a> Also they have now pointed out that the weight of structure above the point of impact of the planes was only 4.5% of total tower structure (mass of support structure increasing as you would expect the further down you go). This means that if the steel at the top did collapse due to gravity (highly questionable) then it should be supported by the mass below<\/a><\/span>.<\/h5>\n
Telegraph:<\/h5>\n
Grenfell Tower would have collapsed if built four years earlier, says expert<\/h5>\n
\u201cThe Twin Towers collapsed because the aircraft fuel ignited the contents of the building and it was the burning of the contents of the building which caused the steel columns to lose stiffness.\u00a0UK buildings are much more robust, or tolerant of losing structural capacity than the Twin Towers.\u201d \u00a0This article was very soon deleted, from www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/2017\/06\/14\/grenfell-tower-would-have-collapsed-built-four-years-earlier\/:<\/h5>\n
The Twin Towers collapsed because<\/a> <\/span>the aircraft fuel ignited the contents of the building and it was the burning of the contents of the building which caused the steel columns to lose stiffness.\u00a0UK buildings are much more robust, or tolerant of losing structural capacity than the Twin Towers.<\/h5>\n
There\u2019s a discussion on the comparison of Grenfell Tower and the 9\/11 towers, and why Grenfell Tower didn\u2019t collapse, at\u00a0https:\/\/www.quora.com\/Why-is-the-Grenfell-Tower-still-standing-after-burning-for-almost-24-hours-while-the-WTC-Towers-collapsed-after-burning-for-just-a-few-hours<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0See also here.<\/a><\/h5>\n
Grenfell Tower is of \u2018Brutalist\u2019 architectural design, which uses bare concrete. The implication is that reinforced concrete will take longer to conduct heat, and so will be more resilient to collapse that steel-framed structures. This means that steel-framed structures are more vulnerable to collapse through office fires, as in Building 7. What utter tosh!<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nThe purpose of the cladding was to bring it into conformity with newer buildings nearby.<\/h5>\n
See video by Lionel, who regularly contributes with comedy items in RT news broadcasts, comparing Grenfell with WTC 7<\/a><\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nOf course you shouldn\u2019t mention 9\/11; that\u2019s antisemitic. I\u2019ve just been looking at the hype here in the UK. It seems that Grenfell Tower had a structure of reinforced concrete, rather than steel. Steel, it seems, is more susceptible to collapse through fire because it has a much higher thermal conductivity. That\u2019s why our towers don\u2019t collapse, whereas US towers do. We have more stringent building regulations here, of course, because we\u2019re British, and we uphold British values of democracy and free speech. That\u2019s why no-one listened to the residents, who were trying to tell the authorities about the fire hazards following the refurbishing work done on the tower. (Comments by I.F.)<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nHere is Building 6 of the WTC on 9\/11 \u2013 nothing hit that did it???<\/h5>\n
<\/a><\/p>\nHundreds dead<\/h2>\n
The word on the street is that several hundred were killed: there could be easily a couple of hundred charred corpses in that Greville tower. No-one could escape from those top floors. The authorities have come out with an absurdly low figure. The effort of a truthful statement was too much for them.<\/h5>\n
Nobody knows what caused it: an \u2018exploding refrigerator\u2019 at midnight? No-one seems to have heard of an exploding refrigerator, or that it could be inflammable: how could that set light to the outer cladding of he building? Photographs show the fire glowing with strange colours<\/span>\u2026<\/a><\/h5>\n
Scheduled for demolition: 2014<\/h2>\n
Here is the Grenfell Tower demolition order<\/a><\/span>, deposited three years ago:<\/h5>\n