{"id":140237,"date":"2016-09-29T05:26:51","date_gmt":"2016-09-29T05:26:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=140237"},"modified":"2016-10-03T06:26:50","modified_gmt":"2016-10-03T06:26:50","slug":"support-mh17-truth-machine-gun-like-holes-indicate-shelling-from-a-military-aircraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=140237","title":{"rendered":"Support MH17 Truth: Machine Gun-Like Holes Indicate Shelling from a Military Aircraft"},"content":{"rendered":"

No Evidence of a Surface-to-Air Missile Attack.<\/h2>\n

Michel Chussudovsky — Global Research July 31, 2014, Updated Sept 28, 2016<\/h1>\n
\"Su-25SM\"<\/a>

Su-25. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

More lies prevail with regard to MH17. Recent press reports quoting the Dutch Safety Board\u2019s October 2015 final report point to \u201ca surface-to-air missile [which] exploded near the left side of the passenger plane bringing down the aircraft.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Although the\u00a0Dutch report<\/a><\/strong><\/span>\u00a0concluded that the Russian-made BUK surface-to-air missile with a\u00a09N314M warhead brought down the Boeing 777, it did not mention which side was responsible for firing the missile\u2026 \u00a0(International Business Times<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, March 8, 2016<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The evidence\u00a0presented in this Global Research article (below) first published on July 31, 2014 contradicts the report of the Dutch\u00a0Safety\u00a0Board and provides evidence: \u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The evidence amply confirms that Malaysian Airlines MH17 was not brought down by a surface to air missile. It was brought down by military aircraft.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The West continues to accuse Russia and the Donbass separatists of having brought down the plane with a surface to air missile. IT\u2019S A LIE. The Dutch investigation has been twisted.\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

UPDATE, August 7, 2016<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Washington\u2019s agenda in liaison with the Kiev regimes is to blame Russia. In recent developments (August 3, 2016), Ukraine president Poroshenko has visited Malaysia for discussions with Prime Minister Razak Najib:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cPrime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Malaysia will work with Ukraine to bring the perpetrators to justice. \u201cWe will do whatever we can to find the truth for the sake of families who lost their loved ones in this tragic incident. \u201cWe are waiting for the criminal investigation report, which is expected to be tabled by the year-end, followed by a meeting to decide on the next course of action,\u201d said Najib.(New Straights Times<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, August 4, 2016)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The evidence available in September 2014 \u2013including a BBC report which the BBC decided to suppress\u2013 refutes the official story.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

As we recall, the alleged role of Russia in bringing down the plane was used as a justification to implement the economic sanctions regime against Moscow. Although not explicitly mentioned by the Dutch investigators, Moscow remains the \u201cmain suspect\u201d in this twisted and fraudulent investigation, which will no doubt be the object of a new gush of media lies and distortions. Moscow has expressed its disagreement. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c<\/em>They are fundamentally wrong, the lack of logic there is beyond comparison\u2026 I had a feeling that the commission was cherry-picking the evidence to suit a theory they had chosen.\u201d Deputy head of Russia\u2019s federal air transport agency\u00a0Oleg Storchevoi (quoted by the Associated Press<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Meanwhile, the Dutch investigators have decided to temporarily withhold\u00a0their\u00a0final verdict: \u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cit soon should determine the exact launch site of the missile that brought down the plane, killing all 298 people on board.<\/span><\/p>\n

But Fred Westerbeke, the prosecutor leading the international probe, warned Monday that completing the investigation would take much longer. He declined to name a possible finishing date.<\/span><\/p>\n

After briefing relatives of victims on the investigation, Westerbeke pledged to complete the investigation \u201cas quickly as possible, if only because of the frustration among the families.\u201d (AP<\/a>, March 7, 2016)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

Since July 2014, Global Research has compiled evidence and analysis which refutes the official story. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Our message to the families: The Dutch investigators are lying.<\/span><\/p>\n

Numerous authors and specialists have contributed to the MH17 dossier, which is available on the Global Research website.\u00a0Unequivocally this dossier refutes the official story.\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Click Here to access an archive of 100 Global Research articles and reports on the downing of MH17.\u00a0<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

See the detailed study of Peter Haisenko<\/strong>:<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the \u201cShooting Down\u201d of Malaysian MH17. \u201cAircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile\u201d<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0By\u00a0Peter Haisenko<\/a>, July 30, 2014<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Michel Chossudovsky, September 2016<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

* \u00a0 \u00a0 * \u00a0 \u00a0 *<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSupport MH17 Truth\u201d: OSCE Monitors Identify \u201cShrapnel and Machine Gun-Like Holes\u201d indicating Shelling. No Evidence of a Missile Attack. Shot Down by a Military Aircraft<\/strong><\/h2>\n

by Michel Chossudovsky — <\/strong>Global Research July 31, 2014\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n

According to the report of German pilot and airlines expert Peter Haisenko, the MH17 Boeing 777 was not brought down by a missile. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

What he observed from the available photos were perforations of the cockpit:\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>The facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes.<\/strong> The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. <\/strong>(Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the \u201cShooting Down\u201d of Malaysian MH17. \u201cAircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/a> Global Research, <\/em>July 30, 2014)<\/em><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"MH17<\/a>

MH17 wreckage clearly shows signs of shrapnel or machine gun fire. Click to enlarge<\/p><\/div>\n

Based on detailed analysis Peter Haisenko <\/a><\/strong><\/span>reached\u00a0 the conclusion that the MH17 was not downed by a missile attack:
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is constructed of specially reinforced material<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The OSCE Mission<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

It is worth noting that the initial statements by OSCE observers (July 31) broadly confirm the findings of Peter Haisenko:<\/span><\/p>\n

Monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe reported that shrapnel-like holes were found in two separate pieces of the fuselage<\/strong> of the ill-fated Malaysia Airlines<\/a><\/strong><\/span> aircraft that was believed to have been downed by a missile in eastern Ukraine.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Michael Bociurkiw of the OSCE group of monitors at his daily briefing described part of the plane\u2019s fuselage dotted with \u201cshrapnel-like, almost machine gun-like holes.\u201d<\/strong> He said the damage was inspected by Malaysian aviation-security officials. (Wall Street Journal<\/a><\/strong><\/span>, July 31, 2014)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The monitoring OSCE team has not found evidence of a missile fired from the ground as conveyed by official White House statements. As we recall, the US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power stated \u2013pointing a finger at Russia\u2013 that the Malaysian MH17 plane was \u201clikely downed by a surface-to-air missile operated from a separatist-held location\u201d:<\/span><\/p>\n

The team of international investigators with the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are uncertain if the missile used was fired from the ground as US military experts have previously suggested, <\/strong>the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported. (Malay Mail online<\/strong><\/span>, <\/a>emphasis added)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The initial OSCE findings tend to dispel the claim that a BUK missile system brought down the plane.<\/span><\/p>\n

Evidently, inasmuch as the perforations are attributable to shelling, a shelling operation conducted from the ground could not have brought down an aircraft traveling above 30,000 feet.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ukraine Su-25 military aircraft within proximity of MH17<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Peter Haisenko\u2019s study is corroborated by the Russian Ministry of Defense which pointed to a Ukrainian Su-25 jet in the flight corridor of the MH17, within proximity of the plane.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ironically, the presence of a military aircraft is also confirmed by a BBC\u00a0 report conducted at the crash site on July 23.<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

All the eyewitnesses\u00a0 interviewed by the BBC confirmed the presence of a Ukrainian military aircraft flying within proximity of Malaysian Airlines MH17 at the time that it was shot down:\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Eyewitness #1<\/strong>: There were two explosions in the air. And this is how it broke apart. And [the fragments] blew apart like this, to the sides. And when \u2026<\/span><\/p>\n

Eyewitness #2<\/strong>: \u2026 And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.<\/span><\/p>\n

Eyewitness #1<\/strong>: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.<\/span><\/p>\n

Eyewitness #3<\/strong>: There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction [indicating the direction with her hands].<\/span><\/p>\n

BBC Report below<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n