{"id":133810,"date":"2016-05-29T09:51:23","date_gmt":"2016-05-29T09:51:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=133810"},"modified":"2016-06-03T06:22:53","modified_gmt":"2016-06-03T06:22:53","slug":"how-russia-is-preparing-for-wwiii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=133810","title":{"rendered":"How Russia is preparing for WWIII"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Saker — via The Duran May 28, 2016<\/h1>\n
\"Russian<\/a>

Russian missile<\/p><\/div>\n

I have recently posted a piece in which I tried to debunk a few popular myths about modern warfare<\/a><\/strong><\/span>. Judging by many comments which I received in response to this post, I have to say that the myths in question are still alive and well and that I clearly failed to convince many readers. What I propose to do today, is to look at what Russia is really doing in response to the growing threat from the West. But first, I have to set the context or, more accurately, re-set the context in which Russia is operating. Let\u2019s begin by looking at the AngloZionist policies towards Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n

The West\u2019s actions<\/strong>:<\/h3>\n

First on this list is, obviously, the conquest by NATO of all of Eastern Europe. I speak of conquest because that is exactly what it is, but a conquest achieved according to the rules of 21st<\/sup> century warfare which I define as \u201c80% informational, 15% economic and 5% military\u201d. Yes, I know, the good folks of Eastern Europe were just dreaming of being subjugated by the US\/NATO\/EU\/etc \u2013 but so what? Anyone who has read Sun Tzu will immediately recognize that this deep desire to be \u2018incorporated\u2019 into the AngloZionist \u201cBorg\u201d is nothing else but the result of a crushed self-identity, a deep-seated inferiority complex and, thus, a surrender which did not even have to be induced by military means. At the end of the day, it makes no difference what the locals thought they were achieving \u2013 they are now subjects of the Empire and their countries more or less irrelevant colonies in the fringe of the AngloZionist Empire. As always, the local comprador<\/em> elite is now bubbling with pride at being, or so they think, accepted as equals by their new masters (think Poroshenko, Tusk or Grybauskaite) which gives them the courage to bark at Moscow from behind the NATO fence. Good for them.<\/span><\/p>\n

Second is the now total colonization of Western Europe into the Empire. While NATO moved to the East, the US also took much deeper control of Western Europe which is now administered for the Empire by what the former Mayor of London once called the \u201cgreat supine protoplasmic invertebrate jellies<\/a><\/strong><\/span>\u201d \u2013 faceless bureaucrats \u00e0 la<\/em> Fran\u00e7ois Hollande or Angela Merkel.<\/span><\/p>\n

Third, the Empire has given its total support to semi-demonic creatures ranging from al-Khattab to Nadezhda Savchenko. The West\u2019s policy is crystal clear and simple to the extreme: if it is anti-Russian we back it. This policy is best exemplified with a Putin and Russia demonization campaign which is, in my opinion, far worse and much more hysterical than anything during the Cold War.<\/span><\/p>\n

Fourth, the West has made a number of highly disturbing military moves including the deployment of the first elements of an anti-missile system in Eastern Europe, the dispatching of various forms of rapid reaction forces, the deployment of a few armored units, etc. NATO now has forward deployed command posts which can be used to support the engagement of a rapid reaction force.<\/span><\/p>\n

What does all this add up to?<\/span><\/p>\n

Right now, nothing much, really. Yes, the NATO move right up to the Russian borders is highly provocative, but primarily in political terms. In purely military terms, not only is this a very bad idea (see clich\u00e9 #6 here<\/a>), but the size of the actual forces deployed is, in reality, tiny: the ABM system currently deployed can, at best, hope to intercept a few missiles (10-20 depending on your assumptions) as for the conventional forces they are of the battalion size (more or less 600 soldiers plus support). So right now there is categorically no real military threat to Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n

So why are the Russians so clearly upset?<\/span><\/p>\n

Because the current US\/NATO moves might well be just the first steps of a much larger effort which, given enough time, might begin presenting a very real danger for Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n

Furthermore, the kind of rhetoric coming out of the West now is not only militaristic and russophobic, it is often outright messianic. The last time around the West had a flare up of its 1000 year old chronic \u201cmessianic syndrome\u201d condition Russia lost 20 (to 30) million people. So the Russians can be forgiven if they are paying a great deal of attention to what the AngloZionist propaganda actually says about them.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russians are most dismayed at the re-colonization of western Europe. Long gone are the days when people like Charles de Gaulle, Helmut Schmidt or Fran\u00e7ois Mitterrand, were in charge of Europe\u2019s future. For all their very real faults, these men were at least real patriots and not just US colonial administrators. The \u2018loss\u2019 of Western Europe is far more concerning for the Russians than the fact that ex-Soviet colonies in Eastern Europe are now under US colonial administration. Why?<\/span><\/p>\n

Look at this from the Russian point of view.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russians all see that the US power is on the decline and that the dollar will, sooner or later, gradually or suddenly, lose its role as the main reserve and exchange currency on the planet (this process has already begun). Simply put \u2013 unless the US finds a way to dramatically change the current international dynamic the AngloZionist Empire will collapse. The Russians believe that what the Americans are doing is, at best, to use tensions with Russia to revive a dormant Cold War v2 and, at worst, to actually start a real shooting war in Europe.<\/span><\/p>\n

So a declining Empire with a vital need for a major crisis, a spineless Western Europe unable to stand up for its own interest, a subservient Eastern Europe just begging to turn into a massive battlefield between East and West, and a messianic, rabidly russophobic rhetoric as the background for an increase in military deployments on the Russian border. Is anybody really surprised that the Russians are taking all this very, very serious even if right now the military threat is basically non-existent?<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russian reaction<\/strong><\/h2>\n

So let us now examine the Russian reaction to Empire\u2019s stance.<\/span><\/p>\n

First, the Russians want to make darn sure that the Americans do not give in into the illusion that a full-scale war in Europe would be like WWII which saw the US homeland only suffer a few, tiny, almost symbolic, attacks by the enemy. Since a full scale war in Europe would threaten the very existence of the Russian state and nation, the Russians are now taking measures to make darn sure that, should that happen, the US would pay an immense price for such an attack.<\/span><\/p>\n

Second, the Russians are now evidently assuming that a conventional threat from the West might materialize in the foreseeable future. They are therefore taking the measures needed to counter that conventional threat.<\/span><\/p>\n

Third, since the USA appears to be dead set into deploying an anti-ballistic missile system not only in Europe, but also in the Far East, the Russians are taking the measures to both defeat and bypass this system.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russian effort is a vast and a complex one, and it covers almost every aspect of Russian force planing, but there are four examples which, I think, best illustrate the Russian determination not to allow a 22 June 1941 to happen again:<\/span><\/p>\n