{"id":11796,"date":"2009-11-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2012-09-30T22:33:49","modified_gmt":"2012-09-30T22:33:49","slug":"spitting-mad-jews-and-angry-artists-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=11796","title":{"rendered":"Spitting Mad Jews and Angry Artists: Part 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

My article, The Plot Against Art<\/a>, elicited an unprecedented number of emails. These came mostly from angry artists who believed that they had produced works of high quality that had been spurned by the art establishment. The artists who had achieved world fame, on the other hand, had in many cases done so only because they had produced decadent works of trash designed to deprave and corrupt the public: such as pornographic Madonnas, crucifixes offensively placed in urine, cans stuffed with the artist\u2019s own excrement, and unmade beds with condoms and blood-stained panties conveniently scattered around as \u201csignificant\u201d litter.<\/p>\n

These puerile charlatans had set out to destroy traditional values, promote sexual perversion, mock Christianity, and, in general, create ugliness and despair \u2014 a sorry situation promoted by an art establishment that has been dominated since the early 20th century by Jewish art critics, collectors and dealers. This Jewish influence on art is of course in accordance with the openly declared aims of the Frankfurt School<\/a>, a Jewish revolutionary movement dedicated to the destruction of traditional Western values \u2014 and indeed to the very people who live by those cherished values.<\/p>\n

Unbelievable? Absolutely. If it weren\u2019t unbelievable, it wouldn\u2019t be true.<\/p>\n

I ought perhaps to mention my reasons for discussing these emails in public. (With one exception<\/a>, pseudonyms are used, because this was generally insisted on as the condition for publication. I also had to do some editing for style and brevity.)<\/p>\n

First, I appear to have touched on a raw nerve without meaning to do so. While most articles to this site, my own included, seldom attract more than a handful of responses within the first few days, The Plot Against Art<\/em> has given rise to a phenomenal 100 pages of emails, including one from Czech academic Paul Norrland who informs me that the Occidental Observer<\/em> has made an impact among the intelligentsia of Prague. \u201cI was very happy when I discovered TOO,\u201d he confides, \u201cand could read Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique<\/em>. I believe it is one of the most important works of this young century. I am sure its true impact is yet to come.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Much to my delight, he told me<\/em> he had just translated my article into his native Czech. To my dismay, however, I found I was unable to understand a single word of this gobbledegook<\/a>. Talk about being Czechmated!<\/p>\n

MIKE UPTON: Your analysis of modern art \u2014 and by extension, atonal music<\/a> \u2014 is incisive and insightful. Thank you. It should be required reading for every college undergraduate but of course it won’t be, at least for the foreseeable future. How could we, the descendants of those who created the great Western culture, have been so thoroughly overpowered by a tiny, pathological and destructive minority? It defies belief.<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: Many others have written to me expressing their outrage over the art scam. But it’s more than just art, as you know. The evils being practiced upon us extend to all areas of life. It’s a sad and sorry situation, but aren\u2019t we ourselves to blame for letting ourselves be led by the nose over the precipice\u2019s edge?<\/p>\n

HILDA PRETTY: The Plot Against Art<\/em> is one of the most revealing pieces of literature to detail organized Jewry’s implacable hatred of European culture I have seen. The many photo captions of obscene and hideous “art” along with the in-depth information detailing the immense Jewish involvement and influence on the Western art world, shocks and appalls. People will not soon forget it.<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: Thank you for these kind words. They help to compensate for some of the abuse I have received.<\/p>\n

MARQUIS DE FRANCE: Madam, I had the extreme displeasure of reading your vile essay on art yesterday. My valet brought me the printed version in bed, on my own instructions, carefully arranged on the breakfast tray beside the toast and marmalade. He omitted, however, to bring rubber gloves and pincers. You have a doctorate? From what university, pray? I think you are a charlatan, madam. Your essay is factually unsound and tendentious in the extreme. It made me feel quite ill just reading it. I am not Jewish, by the way, but I adore Jewish women \u2014 the most beautiful in the world. Your essay caused great distress to my Jewish girlfriend. She almost tore it up in her rage. She flung it across the room. \u201cF*** this c***!\u201d she screamed. If I knew your address, madam, I would track you down and give you the thrashing of your life. Marquis de France.<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: The Marquis de Sade, I presume?<\/p>\n

DAVID HOXTON: Your article on the prostitution of art to Jews is like a soothing melody. The composer Wagner made the same observation about the Jewish destruction of art by marginalizing true art which inspires to higher motives. Last weekend I presented some of my sculptures at an art show in Sacramento Ca. It was an art show in name only. For the most part, it was a combination of scramble figures on canvas and photographs in frames. I am so lonely here, all isolated as if I am the only artist who knows the truth. Please respond to this email, and give me some hope. I need a pat on the head like a lonely little puppy.<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: I\u2019m afraid an email from me is unlikely to put the world right. It will probably come as no consolation to you to learn that you are not the only person to have been victimized by the Jews of the art world. I have received dozens of emails from artists who feel desperate failures. They have struggled all their lives and their efforts have all been wasted. The beauty they offered the world has been scorned. This is because the arbiters of art \u2014 mostly a Jewish cultural elite \u2014 have decided that henceforth only ugliness shall be beauty<\/em>. A mesmerized public has been brought, like blinkered horses to foul ponds, and forced to drink filthy water.<\/p>\n

BENJAMIN TROTT: Good try, Darkmoon, but it won\u2019t wash. Your essay seriously flawed. Idea that Jews have genetic defect that makes them lousy artists totally absurd. Many good Jewish artists around. Israel Shamir says Modigliani and Chagall, born Jewish, suddenly morph into brilliant artists after becoming Christian. You parrot this absurd view. Never heard such hooey. How can baptism make one more deft with a paintbrush? Back to the drawing board, Darkmoon.<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: If I were to rewrite my essay, it would have to be more nuanced on this point. The idea that all Jewish artists, because of some inherent \u201cvisual deficiency\u201d<\/a>, are fundamentally inferior in artistic talents to non-Jewish artists, is simplistic. It needs to be modified. Apart from Modigliani and Chagall, other Jewish painters of note are Pissarro, Soutine, Max Ernst, Roy Lichtenstein, Tamara de Lempicka, Helen Frankenthaler, Lucien Freud. The top art forger of all time, Elmyr de Hory<\/a>, was a Hungarian Jew. He forged so many Dufys that even the experts were fooled. They actually rejected genuine<\/em> Dufys because they thought de Hory\u2019s Dufys were the real<\/em> thing! An artist needs extraordinary technical skills to perpetrate such consummate forgeries.<\/p>\n

Having said this, however, Israel Shamir\u2019s excellent point that \u201cJews bend art to suit their abilities<\/a>\u201d has more than a grain of truth in it. Abstract painting largely caught on because inferior artists, many of them Jewish, found abstract art a piece of cake. Here are three abstract paintings which a zoologist friend of mine thinks a trained chimpanzee would have no problem painting:<\/p>\n

JORDAN DUBRAY: I was accepted at Yale university grad school for painting in 1968. The school had an unwritten rule. Each student had to paint in their assigned open cubicles. Those who refused to paint in those cubicles were all thrown out of Yale. This rule may have been started by Joseph Albers, right after he came from Germany and took up his position there as chairman of the grad school.<\/p>\n

I believe that the faculty enforced this rule because some of them had been stealing ideas that grad students were in the process of developing in the open cubicles<\/em>. The faculty were all very well known and had galleries representing them in NYC, and the unknown grad students provided a wealth of ideas for them. I know for a fact that some of the students\u2019 work was far more creative than the tired crap most of the faculty was doing. Anyway, I needed privacy to do my work and so I decided to disobey the unwritten rule of painting in an open cubicle.<\/p>\n

During the next two years one individual member of that faculty, a Jew, tried to find some weakness in my work. He was unable to do so. I admired the classical masters, I studied their work, I modeled myself on them, I attended all the classes and completed all the assignments \u2014 so there was nothing this Jew could do to get me expelled from Yale. I received my MFA in 1970, being the only person to graduate from Yale who had refused to abide by the university\u2019s rule of painting in an open cubicle.<\/p>\n

NOTE FROM DARKMOON: Jordan goes on to relate his subsequent adventures as a struggling artist in the Jewish-dominated art world. The slights and humiliations he was to receive at the hands of this Jewish \u201cart mafia\u201d could fill an entire book. Indeed, they did fill an entire book \u2014 for Jordan was to write it himself, taking seven years to do so. Unfortunately, Jordan was unable to find a publisher. In 1971, an exhibition of his paintings was held at the school where he worked. The curator of the Whitney Museum happened to be there. He was sufficiently impressed to offer Jordan the unique opportunity of showing two of his major paintings at the coming Whitney Biannual exhibition. Jordan was delighted. Recognition at last!<\/em> Alas, it was not to be. Jordan\u2019s dreams were soon to turn to dust.<\/p>\n

By sheer chance, a member of the Yale faculty had visited the Whitney Museum and badmouthed Jordan to the curator, Robert Doty. Doty broke off all communication with Jordan. Suddenly, Jordan\u2019s paintings were no longer welcome at the Whitney. No reason was offered for this bizarre U-turn, but it is easy enough to speculate what must have happened. One Jew had poured his venom into the receptive ear of another. \u201cDon\u2019t show this man\u2019s work! He\u2019s a known anti-Semite!\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n

When Jordan attended the Whitney exhibition a bit later, he was to find that the wall space originally assigned to him had been allocated to a Yale art faculty member. Several years later, he was to learn the identity of the man who had been spreading calumnies about him.<\/p>\n

JORDAN DUBRAY: After 23 years, in 1993, I was told the name of the man who had been slandering me to the art galleries. Who had got me blacklisted. It was the Jew I previously referred to \u2014 the man who had been a constant thorn in my flesh at Yale<\/em>. This man had the most power on that faculty and, I believe, the least talent. But it was easy to see that he was a cruel and vicious individual. The students even tried to get rid of him and many of us signed a petition to have him removed from Yale. We all believed he was incompetent and a danger to the students there. But it didn\u2019t work, and he remained there longer than any other member of their faculty.<\/p>\n

I went into a terrible rage soon after I received information that I had been blacklisted. I could not focus on my painting any longer, so I decided to do an investigation of what it was all about and find out who exactly was involved. And so I did an investigation lasting about 7 years, then I also wrote a book about the whole experience. But it has remained unpublished to this day. Yale was later to buy an old Jewish Synagogue and place the Yale graduate art school in that building. A fitting place for that school, don\u2019t you think?<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: I am shocked to hear all this. Truly shocked. There\u2019s nothing I can really say…<\/p>\n

JORDAN DUBRAY: I\u2019ve learned that practically everything in this world is basically upside down. I couldn\u2019t stop these people from sabotaging my career, from doing all they did to injure me, but I guess it gave me an interesting story to tell…<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: That\u2019s why I\u2019m telling it.<\/p>\n

JORDAN DUBRAY: I believe your important essay has helped me to see things in a new light. Have I failed as an artist? Maybe. But not as a man. To refuse to be part of this evil trade is to succeed. To be embraced by them, however, and rewarded with riches after selling one\u2019s soul to the devil \u2014 that is to fail in life. And so I send you my blessings, Lasha Darkmoon.<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: Goodbye, dear Jordan. Words fail me at this point. Let me offer you these ancient words of wisdom as a parting gift: What doth it profit a man if he gain the whole world and suffer the loss of his own soul<\/em>?<\/p>\n

ANTHONY HILTON (retired Professor Of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, and frequent contributor to TOO<\/a>): Here\u2019s a thought I’ve had concerning ethnicity and art. It is that the Jews themselves seem to be genuinely fond of the psychology of Sigmund Fraud [sic] as well as the type of \u201cart\u201d favoured by the Jewish art establishment. To the extent that this is true, it would mean we’re dealing not so much with a deliberate attempt to undermine WAS(P) culture but rather with a cultural incompatibility \u2014 accompanied by a normal human tendency to assert dominance over any domain the Jews happen to like. There could even be an element of \u201caltruism\u201d in it \u2014 a bit like garlic lovers proselytizing their food tastes.<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: I won\u2019t disagree with you. Your garlic metaphor is particularly apt. Pathological liars, sooner or later, come to believe their own lies. I’m sure there was an element of that in Bush and Blair when they plotted the destruction of Iraq and were looking for an excuse for genocide. I\u2019ve just read a comment today on another site, where someone says you have to hand it to the Jews that they’ve managed to take over the world \u2014 mass media, politics, finance, the judiciary, academia et al<\/em> \u2014 on a miniscule 0.2 per cent of the world’s population. His conclusion? Maybe they deserve<\/em> to rule the world, being so smart and superior. Maybe we ought to sit back and let them get on with it. Who knows, he muses, they may be doing all this for our own good \u2014 out of sheer altruism! Point to ponder: is this Animal Farm? Are we like cattle being coddled and cared for by the People Farmers?<\/p>\n

DARKMOON: [unsent email to Anthony Hilton, Nov. 12, 2009]: Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, claimed that Jews had invented ideas like human rights and universal peace. He concluded his speech<\/a> by stating, \u201cwe are a small people but a great people; a people generous enough to pave a path toward a lasting peace; a people brave enough to thwart the dangers that confront us; and a people creative enough to once again help steer humanity towards a better future for all<\/strong>. By a curious coincidence, it bears out what you said earlier about possible Jewish \u201caltruism\u201d \u2014 they are doing things like dispossessing the Palestinians for the good of humanity. It also echoes my own comment about the Jews in their role of \u201cPeople Farmers\u201d: Superior people that they are, they are steering humanity in the proper direction \u2014 over the precipice\u2019s edge.<\/p>\n

I should like to conclude this discussion by suggesting that if Jews continue to behave in a provoking manner, as they have for centuries, anti-Semitism is inevitable. Dismissing the irrelevance of the Protocols as a source<\/em> of anti-Semitism, Israel Shamir says<\/a>: \u201cArabs have no need to import anti-Semitic arguments from old and far-away sources, provided they have a fresh round-the-clock local source: actual behaviour of the Jewish state and its Jewish citizens.<\/em>\u201d<\/strong> (My emphasis).<\/p>\n

DARKMOON (Final email, to an artist friend who is also a cartoonist): Here are two political cartoons \u2014 a potent art form in its own right \u2014 that say more in one smack of the eye than a thousand words can:<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nSteve Bell, acclaimed Guardian cartoonist, won the British Political Cartoon Society 2003 Award with this cartoon depicting Ariel Sharon devouring babies. The usual suspects were incensed and Bell was stigmatized as an anti-Semite<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Finally, here\u2019s one of my favorites: a cartoon with a witty nursery rhyme added as a special bonus.<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nLand-grabbing Izzy built a Great Wall,
\nLand-grabbing Izzy had a Great Fall.
\nAll America\u2019s armies, missiles and men
\nCouldn\u2019t put Izzy together again!
\nUnknown Poet<\/em><\/p>\n

Prophetic? Time will tell.<\/p>\n

Go to Part 2<\/a> of this article.<\/p>\n

<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon is an academic, age 31, with higher degrees in classics. A published poet and translator, she is also a political activist with a special interest in Middle Eastern affairs. \u2018Lasha Darkmoon\u2019 is a pen name.<\/div>\n

Original source: http:\/\/www.theoccidentalobserver.net\/authors\/Darkmoon-SpittingMad.html<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dr Lasha Darkmoon’s earlier article about modern art stirred a hornet’s nest of angry debate. Here she continues her exposition of how modern art is being prostituted for political purposes <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39262,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Israel_Anti-Semitism_Zionism_and_US-UK_allies"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/39262"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11796"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11796\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57518,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11796\/revisions\/57518"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}