{"id":11533,"date":"2009-10-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2009-10-09T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2009-10-09T00:00:00","slug":"Who Is a Jew?","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/?p=11533","title":{"rendered":"Who Is a Jew?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The question of &#8220;who is a Jew?&#8221; has been debated in Israel since it  attained statehood. In the Jewish state  the authorities,  Rabbis and  the media would dig into one\u2019s bloodline with no shame whatsoever. For the Israelis and  orthodox Jews, Jewishness is obviously a blood related concept. However, Jewishness and blood concerns are becoming a subject of a growing debate in the UK. In the last few days The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian are trying to decide whether Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a \u2018self hating Jew\u2019 or just an ordinary antisemite. Like the Israeli Rabbis they both dig into his bloodline.<\/p>\n<p>Ahmadinejad is revealed to have a \u2018Jewish past\u2019 said the Daily Telegraph on Saturday.  According to the paper, a photograph of the Iranian president holding up his identity card during elections in March 2008 \u201cclearly\u201d suggests that his family had Jewish roots. The Telegraph even found the \u2018experts\u2019 who suggested that \u201cMr Ahmadinejad&#8217;s track record for hate-filled attacks on Jews could be an overcompensation to hide his past.\u201d Needless to say that Ahmadinejad has never come on record with a single anti-Jewish \u2018hate- filled\u2019 attack as the Telegraph suggests. He is indeed extremely critical of the Jewish state and its raison d&#8217;etre. He is also highly critical of the crude and manipulative mobilisation of the holocaust at the expense of the Palestinian people.<\/p>\n<p>One may wonder how come a Western media outlet happens to selectively engage with issues to do with the racial or ethnic origin of the Iranian president. At the end of the day, digging into peoples ethnic past and family bloodline is not a common practice you expect from the Western press. It is something you tend to leave for racists, Nazis and Rabbis. For one reason or another, no one in the so called free press tried to dwell on the close ties between multi billion swindler Bernie Maddof and his tribe. The Free Press saved itself also from dealing with Wolfowitz\u2019s ethnicity, in spite of the fact that the Zionist war he brought on us has cost 1.5 million lives by now. If you wonder how it is that the Western free media is reverting to \u2018pathology\u2019 in order to deal with a Muslim president, the answer is simple not to say trivial:<\/p>\n<p>The so called \u2018liberal West\u2019 is yet to find the answers to President Ahmadinejad within the realm of reason. It lacks the argumentative capacity to address Ahmadinejad. Instead, it insists to spin banal racially orientated ideas that cannot hold water, &#8220;By making anti-Israeli statements\u201d says The Daily Telegraph, \u201che is trying to shed any suspicions about his Jewish connections.\u201d The truth of the matter is clear. Ahmadinejad has already managed to re-direct a floodlight of reasoning and skepticism just to enlighten our darkest corner of hypocrisy. He somehow manages to remind us all what thinking is all about.<\/p>\n<p>It is pretty much impossible to deny the fact that Ahmadinejad\u2019s take on the holocaust and Israel is coherent, consistent and valid. He seems to have three main issues with the narrative:<\/p>\n<p>1.    Around sixty Million died in WWII, the vast majority of them were innocent civilians. How is it, asks Ahmadinejad, that we insist to concentrate on the particularity of the suffering of one \u2018very\u2019 specific group of people i.e. the Jews?<\/p>\n<p>2.    The Iranian president rightly maintains that this historical chapter must be historically examined. This would mean as well that every event in the past should be subject to scrutiny, elaboration and revision. \u201cIf we allow ourselves to question God and the Prophets, we may as well allow ourselves to question the holocaust.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>3.    Regardless of the truthfulness of the holocaust, it is not a trivial fact that the suffering of the Jews in Europe had nothing to do with the Palestinian people. Hence, there is no reason for the Palestinians to pay for crimes committed by others. If some Western Leaders feel guilty for crimes committed against the Jews by their ancestors, which they seem to claim, they better allocate some land for the Jews within their territories rather than expect the Palestinians to keep upholding the Zionist murderous burden.<\/p>\n<p>As much as it is obviously clear that the above points raised by Ahmadinejad are totally valid, it is also painfully transparent that the West lacks the means to address those issues. Instead we seem to revert to supremacy and pseudo scientific discourse dwelling on blood, pathology and lame psychoanalysis.<\/p>\n<p>As embarrassing as it may seem, in just three moves Ahmadinejad manages to expose the current deceptive Western mode of discussion. He, in fact identifies the holocaust as the core of our hypocritical stand, a tendency that has managed to shatter our ethical judgment. The holocaust was there to divert the attention from the colossal crimes committed by the allies: Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden are just brief examples of institutionalised genocide at the hands of the English Speaking Empire. The holocaust has successfully matured into a new religion. Yet, it lacks theology. It doesn\u2019t allow any form of criticism or reformism. It is in fact an anti-Western religion inspired by hate and vengeance. It is dark, it is blind and it lacks mercy and compassion. It is a faith that declares an assault on any form of doubt. It is a crude brutal belief system that stands in opposition to the notions of liberty and goodness. As if this is not enough, those who subscribe to this religion are complicit in an ongoing assault against grace and peace.<\/p>\n<p>As things stand at the moment, The British media is yet to decide whether Ahmadinejad is a \u2018Jew rebel\u2019 or just a \u2018Meshugena Goy\u2019. The Guardian was very quick to publish its own take on the subject refuting the Telegraph\u2019s account. However, one thing is clear, neither the Guardian nor the Telegraph or any other so called \u2018free media\u2019 outlets are free enough to address the questions raised by Ahmadinejad. 1. Why only the Jews? 2. Why do you all say NO to scrutinizing the past? 3. Why do the Palestinians have to pay the price? Instead of engaging in these crucial elementary questions. The British main papers succumb to racially orientated bloodline digging.<\/p>\n<p>Rather than following the banal Zionist query \u2018who is a Jew?\u2019  I suggest that we take the discourse one step further and ask a very simple question: What Jewishness stands for?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size:14px\"><i><\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">Gilad Atzmon is the son of two of Israel&#8217;s founders. An award winning Jazz musician and former Israeli Defence Force soldier, he now lives in virtual exile in London.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Digging into people\u2019s ethnic past and family bloodline is not something you expect from the West&#8217;s press. It is something you leave for racists, Nazis and Rabbis. But the British press has had field day recently speculating on Ahmadinejad&#8217;s ethnic origins<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-Israel_Anti-Semitism_Zionism_and_US-UK_allies"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/109"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11533\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thetruthseeker.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}