Covid-19 Testing is Pure Insanity

Kevin Boyle – No One To Vote For July 2, 2020

I tried to post a video talk on YouTube and Brighteon yesterday. Both refused to process the file. I’m guessing that the auto-subtitle facility can scan content in seconds, subject it to a pre-programmed censorship algorithm and make the decision automatically without the need for individual human intervention. 24 hours after uploading the same file to BitChute the video is still “processing”.
We’ll see.
The main point covered in the video was an analysis (using official published data relating to accuracy of the tests) of the usefulness of the PCR test that is used to identify people with COVID-19.
Given that no one has ever demonstrated the existence within a human body of the “virus” that this test claims to detect, or any connection between the detected RNA and the [imaginary] virus, it is hard to fathom how any meaningful “accuracy” can be claimed. The alleged “accuracy” can only be as fictitious as the virus itself.
Nonetheless … official is official and I will work with officialdom’s published numbers; those that I’ve been able to find anyway. The search was tricky, indicating that real scientists had plenty of problems coming up with any kind of meaningful numbers at all.
The SENSITIVITY of the PCR-test is the number of people with COVID the test claims to accurately identify. The claimed sensitivity varies from about 70% to 90%, depending on the source. 70% sensitivity means that 7 out of 10 people who have COVID will be identified as ‘positive’ by the test.
The SPECIFICITY of the test is the percentage of people who DON’T have COVID who are accurately identified. The claimed specificity varies from about 95% to 99% accuracy. The very significant point to recognise here is that between one and five percent of testees who don’t have the virus will test positive for COVID.
Taking a period in the UK (May 11-24th ) when the official estimated percentage of people with COVID was 0.24%, let us see how these figures play out if (this number doesn’t affect % outcomes) 100,000 people were tested at that time.
0.24% of 100,000 people is 240 so at this time 240 people (of the 100,000) actually had COVID-19

HIGH ACCURACY

Taking the highest quoted accuracies (SENSITIVITY 90%, SPECIFICITY 99%)
We see that 0.9 x 240 = 216 would test positive, 24 would be missed (negative result).
Of the 99,760 who do not have COVID, 1% will test positive. That is about 997 people.
So that total number of positive tests is 216 + 997 = 1213 people identified as having COVID
1213/240 = 5.05 …
THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE TEST RESULTS IS 5 TIMES THE NUMBER THAT “HAVE” THE VIRUS.
So, if you take the test and are identified as COVID positive there is, USING THEIR OWN BEST ESTIMATE, only a one-in-five chance that you are really ‘infected’ (AS YOU WILL HAVE JUST BEEN INFORMED).
Worth knowing, don’t you think? Just as well there are all those “asymptomatic” COVID carriers out there to make sense of this pantomime. It is hard not to laugh. Are you starting to get an idea of the absolute bullsh*t we are dealing with here?

LOW ACCURACY

Taking the lowest quoted accuracies (SENSITIVITY 70%, SPECIFICITY 95%)
There are still 240 people with COVID.
0.7 x 240 = 168 would test positive, 72 missed (negative result)
5% of negatives test positive, i.e. 0,05 x 99760 = 4988 positives
So, the total number of positive tests is 168 + 4988 = 5156 people identified as having COVID. 5156/240 = 21.5  !!!
THE NUMBER OF POSITIVE TEST RESULTS IS MORE THAN 20 TIMES THE NUMBER THAT “HAVE” THE VIRUS.

Therefore, if “accuracy” is the minimum quoted, for a person who is told they have tested positive for COVID there is less than one chance in twenty that you are infected with the virus you have JUST BEEN INFORMED is in your body.
Whatever COVID actually is (there is zero proof for causation by virus) it is, given the above, fair to say that there is poor correlation between PCR test results and this world-altering pandemic/illness.
If ABSOLUTE NONSENSE can model an illness better than SCIENCE perhaps the public will begin to realise that this SO-CALLED-SCIENCE is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE. 
Finally I recommend interviews with Ellis Medavoy linked here. He was one of the ‘propaganda masters’ who ran the AIDS scam and what he says is breathtaking. A must-read.
Medavoy was a wicked so-and-so whose contempt for humanity allowed him to make a good living manufacturing lies that have killed untold thousands. He decided to “spill the beans” after a total stranger saved the life of a loved one after a car accident. He saw a goodness in humanity that he had brainwashed himself into believing did not exist. This interview is a man trying to make amends … maybe trying to save his own soul.
Anyway, having read Medavoy, it is easy to see how the Leicester spike/surge and local lockdown, as the next stage of this “live exercise”, could be manufactured. All you need is one person at the top in the lab carrying out the tests. Testing is carried out honestly but samples are coded. No one knows the source except for the boss with the data. He can easily say, regarding the latest batch, “Oh look, nearly all the positives are in Leicester”.
That’s all it would take.
Other Links:

https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/working-for-us/staff/documents/staff-testing-privacy-statement.pdf

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/04/200409144805.htm

https://www.cochrane.org/news/new-cochrane-review-assesses-how-accurate-antibody-tests-are-detecting-covid-19

 

Source

Teacher (physics/maths), would-be Christian, pro-community, anti-hierarchy.

6 responses to “Covid-19 Testing is Pure Insanity”

  1. Speaking as one who, aeons ago, got straight A’s in the moderns but barely scraped by in the sciences; maths is not my strong suit. I was lucky enough to find a tutor who dinned enough into my head to barely pass in maths. Mr. Boyle, you’re a teacher, can you put your calculations in a form that the uninitiated can understand? I believe you and think that what you’re saying is very important but I can’t act on something I don’t understand.

  2. the establishment is going mad. this is the result of the status given to scientists as God.

  3. I believe there is deep logic in this mythical but extremely dangerous COVID-19 disease and coronavirus tests which can save us from new and fake plague.

    Prophet Zephaniah (https://sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/zep001.htm):

    ============
    JUDGEMENT DAY

    1:2 I will utterly consume all things from off the land, saith the LORD.
    1:3 I will consume man and beast; I will consume the fowls of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumbling blocks with the wicked: and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the LORD.
    1:14 The great day of the LORD is near, it is near, and hasteth greatly, even the voice of the day of the LORD: the mighty man shall cry there bitterly.
    1:15 That day is a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness,
    1:16 A day of the trumpet and alarm against the fenced cities, and against the high towers.
    1:17 And I will bring distress upon men, that they shall walk like blind men, because they have sinned against the LORD: and their blood shall be poured out as dust, and their flesh as the dung.
    1:18 Neither their silver nor their gold shall be able to deliver them in the day of the LORD’s wrath; but the whole land shall be devoured by the fire of his jealousy: for he shall make even a speedy riddance of all them that dwell in the land.

    2:9 Therefore as I live, saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Surely Moab shall be as Sodom, and the children of Ammon as Gomorrah, even the breeding of nettles, and saltpits, and a perpetual desolation: the residue of my people shall spoil them, and the remnant of my people shall possess them.
    2:10 This shall they have for their pride, because they have reproached and magnified themselves against the people of the LORD of hosts.

    3:19 Behold, at that time I will undo all that afflict thee: and I will save her that halteth, and gather her that was driven out; and I will get them praise and fame in every land where they have been put to shame.
    3:20 At that time will I bring you again, even in the time that I gather you: for I will make you a name and a praise among all people of the earth, when I turn back your captivity before your eyes, saith the LORD.
    ============

    This book is extremely short. Reading Zephaniah is a good idea. Rabbi Michael Higger was also writting about this stage (Judgement Day) in his book (https://archive.org/details/TheJewUtopia1932).

    They need a test result of which can be interpreted & manipulated in order to select people for evaporation. Plenty of Goyim unwothy living in the Messianic Era.

    Concept of general destruction of peoples is also supported by prophet Isaiah. 60:12: For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.

  4. This sounds good and much of it is believable, as in, one must give some benefit of the doubt but methinks this so-called master manipulator talks too much & Jon didn’t really dig the dirt. Here is a question that I didn’t see: given that there are only a limited number of presstitutes, how many others were doing what you were doing?

    I have many other questions, but my take on how the fake news works, that every organisation has PR people. Some times it’s a team, other times its one person and in small organisations, someone will do this as part of their main role. As in Kevin’s linked interviews, these people are paid to lie. Many people in PR have a prehistory in journalism, so they are already trained or experienced in creating narratives, so they hand over very carefully crafted content to the fake news presstitutes. In an honest world, these presstitutes would be highly skeptical about the narrative they’ve just been given and would investigate further. This almost never happens for a variety of reasons. Time, money, personal prejudices, the media organisations red lines, editor fear, and the fear of damaging the relationship with the source. So the PR spin gets published almost word for word.

    When you hear the BBC say ‘BBC investigation’, they really want you to believe what they are telling them. Usually, the BBC won’t waste time and money investigating. They just parrot what suits their agenda. The BBC seems to like media organisations who seem to have very, very deep pockets and access to selective information that comes from the deep state.

    The linked interviews beautifully describes the Epstein saga and covid. Boris Johnson’s handlers use the slow, fast and slow method in his appearances. He vanished during the election campaine and did the same during covid by faking his illness. Same with deep state protection of the McCann’s. This is why I have no time for Antifa and BLM… state actors and bullshit.

  5. Yep; being tested and receiving your result seem to be over quickly.

    What happens after your test?
    When and how are you notified of the result?
    Media never seem to explain this phenomenon.

    Kevin, hope you manage to get that video up soon. In my notifications it looked like it went up and was then taken down.

  6. https://off-guardian.org/2020/07/02/no-one-has-died-from-the-coronavirus-president-of-the-bulgarian-pathology-association/

    He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

    Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

    Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

    …The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”