By Kjeld Heising
The global war on women has for many years been an extremely hard-to-recognise war. For decades, it has carried a nice face, actually looking like just the opposite of war. But now, it gets another face - an ugly one. Just like the face of the other wars: That of terror and that of man-made global warming. These have long been recognizable as false and staged. Now, the global war on women is becoming visible.
For me, it started as a wondering: How come that more and more vaccination campaigns are targeted on women? Recently in Denmark, the media have been strongly marketing the HPV vaccination against cervical cancer, not as given to women of exactly that age where cervical cancer occurs, no, they are about to be included in the normal children's vaccination scheme, targeting girls at the age of 12 - where it has absolutely no positive effect. How come?
Just before that, the media announced that Bill Gates Foundation has granted 10 million Danish Kroners to a Copenhagen university for further research on a vaccine against Malaria, targeting women in the Third World. Women again ... why?
Before that, we saw so many campaigns in the whole western world on making HIV test mandatory for pregnant women. Since I have made extensive research on AIDS, this became my personal key point. As I shall explain, the existance of HIV virus has never been documented, nor has it's connection with AIDS. "AIDS" itself is a misleading term. The HIV test is not testing presence of any virus but is only indicating the presence of certain antibodies in blood. It is very often responding positivly on pregnancy, despite no particular virus is present.
Then why this obsession of testing pregnant women?
There are many other indications - which I shall explain - all pointing to the fact that something strange is going on in respect to women. I have earlier brought up the suspicion that it has to do with depopulation. We all know that the agenda for it has existed at least since World War II. We definitely know that it is under implementation in the Third World, mostly through economic means - the looting of money and natural resources from Africa and other continents, facilitated by the Debt Trap, IMF Structural Adjustments and World Bank administrations.
We also know that minimizing a population must target women, not men. Only by reducing the number of females can you reduce the amount of offspring. One man can fertilize thousands of women. One woman can not be fertilized by thousands of men.
Then I watched Dr. David Ayoubs video lesson Global Vaccine Agenda
a second time and suddenly the whole picture was clear. In his lesson, Dr. Ayoub uses half the time explaining the connection between the increasing frequency of Autism in the US and the increased consumption of Mercury contained in vaccines. The rest is used to explain that the strange culture of vaccination plays a complete different role than what most of us think.
The Rockefeller shadow
Dr. Ayoub's story starts in the year of 1952 where John D. Rockefeller the Third established the Population Council
and thereby seriously brought the issue of overpopulation forth to the political arena.
In 1972, another commission, The Rockefeller Commission on Population Growth
, completed a two years study on population growth, on request of then President Nixon. The commission concluded:
"After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation's population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation's ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person".
Later, the report states:
"By its very nature, population is a continuing concern and should receive contunuing attention. Later generations, and later commissions, will be able to see the right path into the future. In any case, no generation needs to know the ultimate goal or the final means, only the direction in which they will be found". John D. Rockefeller 1972
Just two years later, in 1974, came the well known Henry Kissinger National Security Study Memorandum 200
about "the consequences of the global population growth for the US security and overseas interests". A document we have known since it's declassification in 1989. What we also know is that the same Mr. Kissinger made his way into top US politics as a protegé of the Rockefellers. There is no doubt that there is a straight line from the Rockefeller report to the Kissinger memo.
The memo states that:
• We have unprecedented growth rates
• Lesser Developed Countries are growing faster
• Required US imports could be threatened
• Risk of global destabilization
• Urgent immediate measures must be taken to reduce fertility.
And the memo recommends these goals:
• Zero rate growth in the developed countries by 1985
• Zero rate growth in Lesser Developed Countries by 2000
It is worth noticing that this agenda shall be first implemented in our own western world and then later be exported to the Third World. Probably because people in the industrialized world are easier to work with, easier to reach by controlled centralized media, easier to experiment with and easier to follow up on when the efficiency of the campaigns shall be measured.
Which corresponds well with the fact that the birth rates in fact declined in the western world before it fell in the Third World.
Concerning the tools, the memo lists:
• Reproductive health (abortion, condoms)
• Sex education
• Improved health
• Women' equality
• Day care
• Government participation
• Improve social security
• Reduce infant mortality
Can we recognize some of these? Ay ... all of it, actually. They are exactly the ingredients characterizing the adult lifetime of my generation - the period from the 1970´ies and ahead. Overall and in every context, they were called "welfare" and there was a strong consensus that they were the result of a superior society model based on democracy. Now, suddenly we remain with the question: Were they just means to make us stop reproducing ourselves?
To answer that requires a deep analysis. Let us here just state that the headlines of our life actually can be regulated. That happens through regulation of the amount of money in circulation: When the central banks let out money in the market, we get "welfare". When they withdraw money from circulation, we get recession. The centralized management of the global media network makes it easy to control the ideas accompanying the money - and thereby channelling both money flow and ideas in the directions wanted.
What is hereafter a fact, is that we got the elements from the Kissinger memo. What likewise stands, is the fact that we got the declining birthrates. Around 1970, the birthrate in Denmark was 2.0. Today it is 1.7 - a good deal less than required to maintain the size of the population. We find a similar development all over the Western World.
Concerning the implementation in the Third World, the memo recommends the following vehicles:
• The World Bank
• Governments from "donor" countries
• Private organizations and groups
This is reveiling a little bit more of how the world functions. An American financial elite demands an American Foreign Secretary to incorporate international organizations in his toolbox. We are not talking about a UN as "united nations" but about a UN as branches of American Foreign Department.
We also notice that the World Bank plays a central role. We are in the 1970´ies and the Third World is about to jump into the debt trap - a mechanism completely reversing the newly obtained "independencies". After a short period of time, it is clear that also these parts of the world are controllable, economically and politically. And the World Bank is, as we have since seen, the number one tool for control, backed up by the twin organization IMF. In their period of governance, the Third World has been steadily impoverished and steadily robbed for the natural richness of their continents.
Apart from that, the agenda of the memo covered by the health sector (WHO), the education sector (UNICEF), support from allied governments is secured and through financing of thousands of NGO´s it all gets a touch of people-to-people-commitment.
So far on the Kissinger memo, which we find important as a background painting making quite a lot of practical events understandable. Let´s then go to our main issue: The medical world and it's remarkable joy of vaccinations.
See Pharmageddon II: From One Scam to Another
Last updated 03/11/2007