They say there are two sides to every story and that is certainly true of the emergent New World Order. At its core are two dominant factions whose heritage stretches back centuries, even millennia. And although both are very different and sometimes even at odds with each other they are nonetheless united by one common drive: an insatiable desire for earthly power.
So on the one hand you have an Anglo-American elite whose roots go back to the Middle Ages, with the Bush family being a prime example. Like his father the current US President is a direct descendent of the Percy family, of whom it was once said: “He’s not a King but a Percy be.” In other words the Percy family was once considered more powerful than the monarchy itself and for a while they were the real power behind the throne in medieval England.
Thus when George Bush senior talks about “our special relationship” he isn’t referring to any kinship between ordinary Britons and Americans, but to a coalition between powerful ruling cliques on both sides of the Atlantic. And despite the passage of time it’s an alliance that is still very much alive and well: in recognition of which the Queen made George Bush senior an Honorary Knight of the Order of Bath, an honour rarely bestowed on anyone outside the Commonwealth. It also explains why Britain is always ready to follow America’s lead: as in the Gulf War, the Balkans and the current War on Terror. Or conversely why America was ready to follow Britain’s lead in the last two world wars. Not because of any particular kinship between the citizens of the two countries but because the Anglo-American ruling elite demanded it.
On the other hand we also have powerful banking interests, largely Jewish and closely allied with this Anglo-American elite. Again the real power is largely concentrated in the hands of a few families whose power is rarely advertised but enormously influential. Working through bodies such as the IMF, the World Bank and the privately owned Bank of England and the US Federal Reserve: they lend out vast sums of money for the development and purchase of weapons, and then sit back and watch as their Anglo-American allies provoke new wars or launch military campaigns, as in the Balkans. Then once the dust has settled the bankers reap even bigger profits as they lend out yet more money for reconstruction and repair. Whilst their Anglo-American counterparts further extend their power and influence, either directly through ‘peace keeping’ operations, or indirectly, through proxy. Whichever way both parties’ profit and this has been going on for literally centuries now.
In fact this royal scam, as it has been called, dates back to 1689, when William of Orange was brought over from Hanover and installed on the British throne – with the help of an army that was two thirds mercenary and largely paid for by Jewish banking dynasties from Holland.
It was an investment that was to pay off, handsomely.
Within a few short years the privately owned Bank of England was in business: printing money and lending it to the government of the day – on the understanding that it would be repaid plus interest. And so it has continued to this day with various other “national” banks being founded on exactly the same principles, including the US Federal Reserve.
So on the one hand we have a powerful Anglo-American ruling clique, who control government and the security services, (which is why Britain’s security services swear allegiance not to the country or its people but to the Royal House of Windsor). While on the other hand we have powerful banking dynasties that profit from this scam.
The two groups work hand in glove: which may also explain why America is ready to supply Israel with state of the art weaponry, and bankroll it to the tune of hundreds of millions every year. Despite Ariel Sharon’s record as a virtual War Criminal the White House seems more than willing to support him: in fact White House spokesman Ari Fliescher recently went so far as to describe him as “a man of peace.”
Such ‘double speak’ is only to be expected from someone like Ari Fliescher though, for he almost literally embodies the spirit of this alliance. Apart from being the chief White House spokesman he also happens to hold a dual Israeli/American citizenship.
So where, you may ask, does Ari Fleischer’s loyalty really reside? Is he speaking on behalf of America? Or Israel?
Or a shadowy ruling clique that stands behind both and whose power is built on greed and hidden behind a veil of half-truths and spin?
Last updated 01/12/2003