A Recipe For Disaster

The following report should sound alarm bells nationwide, but it won’t. This is because the British media has portrayed immigration largely in terms of race and has conditioned the public to see "racism" as wrong. Of course, it is, but this helps obscure the bigger picture.

Namely, that there are far too many people in this one small island and many of its problems are directly attributable to this fact. Overcrowding, housing shortages, an overworked health service, sky rocketing house prices and less obvious social maladies like drug taking and vandalism are all related to this. This has been amply demonstrated by experiments conducted by behavioural scientists. Ten rats in a relatively small cage can coexist quite harmoniously. Put in another ten and the tensions mount, as the rats compete for food or mates. Put another ten in the cage and the rats start to fight each other, or slip into what appears to be catatonic isolation.

This has its parallel in modern Britain, which is the second most densely populated country on the planet. To cram any more into an already overcrowded island would seem sheer madness but that is precisely what is happening.

Nor is it a question of race. Indeed, the spectre of "racism", real or contrived, is used to prevent any further rational inquiry into the issue. In the end analysis there are far too many people in the United Kingdom, and the authorities seem intent on allowing even more in. Meanwhile those who assure us that immigration has made a valuable contribution to Britain's past, ignore the fact that this only happened when the population was a tiny fraction of what it is now. Ultimately it is nothing less than a recipe for disaster, but then that may be the intention.


Immigration could be running at six times higher than official figures, a Home Office official told a court yesterday.

Robert Owen said he could not even "guesstimate" the true number of foreign nationals living in Britain.

He was giving evidence in the trial at Swansea Crown Court of three Chinese accused of people trafficking on behalf of snakehead gangs.
Mr Owen, who is seconded to the National Criminal Intelligence Service to advise on snakeheads, said there were no "serious removal arrangements" to send asylum seekers back to China.

Most of those who were rejected stayed on, he said.

"Accepted figures for people coming in are significantly higher than official figures."

Mr Owen told the court the number of routes into Britain was "unbelievable". Lorry drivers were being paid up to £3,000 to bring groups in.

He described the trafficking as structured and sophisticated.

"Immigration officers take out a few shipments but we are obviously missing an awful lot of people."

Boat owners in France, Holland "and all the way up the North Sea" were approached by snakeheads and asked to drop immigrants "close to the shore of the UK".

Most of his information was "highly classified" but Leighton Davies, QC, prosecuting, asked him to give an overview of immigration from China.

Mr Owen said some people were simply smuggled into the country and disappeared among Chinese communities. Others claimed asylum but vanished before the application process was exhausted.

Many incomers deliberately destroyed any documentation they had immediately prior to setting foot in Britain.

"Any person can arrive without documents and say, 'I want asylum'. As soon as the magic words are said immigration have to consider it."
The prosecution claim staff at the Dragon Palace Chinese takeaway in Aberystwyth acted on behalf of a snakehead gang.

Guo Chen, 34, Xing Cheng, 21, and Nualk Miah, 32, deny money laundering and assisting illegal entry into Britain.

The trial continues.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/06/10/nimmi10.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/06/10/ixhome.html


It may indeed be a recipe for disaster but to appreciate how potentially catastrophic, a couple of points need to be clarified. First sacrifice, particularly human sacrifice, has been the hallmark of societies in terminal decline. In cultures as diverse as the Druids and the Aztecs, it was used to perpetuate the power of ruling elites by offering human sacrifice to much darker deities, who reciprocated by helping to perpetuate the power of their earthly benefactors.

Of course, today human sacrifice would be unacceptable, or it would be if people knew what it really was. But if they thought that it was something else, if they thought it was for the “greater good” or the “good of the nation”, they might accept it. Just think about that for a moment and ponder the millions of lives, cut down in their prime in the last two world wars.

Or consider the lives lost in Iraq through sanctions, where nearly a million children died as a result of restrictions imposed by Britain and America. Now ask yourself: who benefited? Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction have been proven to be a baseless lie, so why were sanctions imposed on everything from baby foods to drip feeds and life saving drugs?

It certainly did not help ordinary Iraqis but it did generate a lot of suffering and … sacrifice.

But what, you may ask, has this to do with immigration into Britain?

Everything.

Just imagine for a moment that you knew of an impending catastrophe, which might half the world’s population overnight. Naturally you would want to warn others too. However, if you were one of the global elite, that small coterie of families who virtually own the planet, you might think otherwise. You might even keep it to yourself. For in reality this coterie of families and their attendants, consider the earth’s growing population as virtual trespassers on their own private property. And if they knew of an impending catastrophe, one that would reduce the world’s population substantially, they might be inclined to keep it secret.

This would not only rid them of hordes of “useless eaters”, as they are known to refer to us ordinary souls, it would also enable them to do a deal with the darker deities on whom their power depends. They could consecrate the millions of lives lost in the catastrophe to these dark deities, by keeping the “useless eaters” in ignorance of the impending upheaval, and thereby maximising the loss of life.

Either way, this coterie of families gain.

Unfortunately, this is not just speculation. In the 1950’s Professor Charles Hapgood stumbled upon a theory that outlined a shift of the Earth’s crust. Hapgood’s theory not only explained many ancient anomalies, Einstein, who called for further urgent research into the idea, enthusiastically endorsed it.

In light of Hapgood’s theory, one of the areas most at risk from inundation would be precisely where most of Britain’s immigrant population are assembling, South East England and London. Of course, it may be no more than a coincidence that hordes of people are being quietly encouraged to congregate there, but it may be that they are being drawn there like lambs to the slaughter, literally.

For more on Hapgood’s theory and the nature of human sacrifice see:

Back to the Future!!! Part 1
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=572

Back to the Future!!! Part 2
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=573

The Power of Sacrifice: Then and Now
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=969

Printer friendly version

Email this article to a friend

Last updated 04/02/2005

Homepage