Russia warns Israel against attack on Iran

Russia warns Israel against attack on Iran

Press TV – June 6, 2012

The secretary of the Russian Security Council has warned against the consequences of an Israeli military strike on Iran, calling for the resumption of talks over Tehran’s nuclear energy program.

Nikolai Patrushev told the Rossiya-24 TV channel on Tuesday that the consequences of a military attack on Iran will be “absolutely negative” for Israel and many neighboring countries.

He urged the international community to continue negotiations with Iran, rejecting claims that diplomacy has been exhausted over the Iranian nuclear issue.

“It is wrong to conclude that all opportunities and all the existing potential have been exhausted. Negotiations should continue,” Patrushev said.

The Russian official also said that Moscow acknowledged Tehran’s right to develop peaceful nuclear energy.

This comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Tuesday blasted Western powers for failing to halt Iran’s nuclear energy program.

Netanyahu said that the demands that the P5+1 placed on Iran during the recent negotiations were inadequate.

“The Iranians were only asked to stop 20 percent enrichment of uranium; that doesn’t stop their nuclear program in any way. It actually allows them to continue their nuclear program,” he said.

Iran and the P5+1 – Britain, China, France, Russia, and the United States plus Germany – wrapped up their latest meeting in Baghdad on May 24 after two days of negotiations.

Both sides agreed to hold another round of talks in Moscow on June 18-19.

A day before the latest round of the talks in Baghdad, Netanyahu had urged the world powers in the P5+1 group to “show determination, not weakness” and take a tougher stance on Iran.

Israel has repeatedly threatened Iran with a military option in a bid to force the Islamic Republic to halt its peaceful nuclear program, which has been closely monitored by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Iran rejects the allegations of pursuing military objectives in its nuclear energy program, arguing that as a committed signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and a member of the IAEA, it has the right to use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.



The Mad Dogs Days Are Numbered

SOURCE: US and Israel clash over attack on Iran
With added commentary by Lasha Darkmoon – June 5, 2012

“Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.”
— Israeli General Moshe Dayan
American-Israeli relations have not been so bright recently…
That’s good. The worse this relationship gets, the better it is for America. Americans do not benefit by good relations with Israel.
Two points can be taken as self-evident and axiomatic:
(1) All wars waged at the behest of American Jewry on Israel’s behalf are wars of disaster that can in no way be regarded as beneficial to America. The shameful fiasco in Iraq and the spectacular defeat of America in Afghanistan (its new Vietnam) are obvious examples. American Jewry is one hundred percent to blame for these disasters. Pay no attention to the ad hominem slur that this self-evident truth is an “anti-Semitic canard.” That won’t wash any longer. 
(2) The more obvious it becomes that American foreign policy is being run by American Jews in Israel’s interests, to the detriment of America, the clearer it will  become that America has fallen under foreign domination, i.e., that it has become a Jewish colony.
The visit of a top Obama administration official was supposed to ease tensions between the countries, but instead it might have only widened the gap regarding attitudes toward the Iranian nuclear problem.
President Obama’s National Security Adviser Tom Donilon arrived in Israel this week and sat with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for two hours to warn Israel against any unilateral attack on Iran. According to the Israeli news outlet Debka, however, this message didn’t sit well with the hawkish leader.
To military sources that have spoken to Debka, Netanyahu is believed to be upset that the US is willing to work with Iran in terms of a possible nuclear program, giving them the go-ahead as long as they promise to avoid enrichment that will lead to them developing nukes. Iran has long insisted that any nuclear related efforts are in the work for energy procurement, although the US and Israel have been called this into question.
Iran is abiding by international law. It is allowed to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. If Israel attacks Iran preemptively and kills Iranians in the process, without a shred of evidence that Iran is building nuclear warheads, this would be a major war crime.
The Obama administration has so far avoided any military action against Iran, hoping instead that international sanctions and strong words will serve as enough of a warning to keep Tehran from working on warheads. Netanyahu, on the other hand, is not convinced. He is not willing to wait for an optimistic outcome and doesn’t rule out a strike on Iran.
Netanyahu’s behavior has all the hallmarks of mental instability. He is acting like a paranoid. He has no rational grounds for attacking Iran. His own nation is already guilty of carrying out numerous covert acts of terrorism within Iran, such as the assassination of Iranian scientists and the creation of the Struxnet virus. Iran has not retaliated to any of these blatant provocations. It has behaved with exemplary restraint. The US loses all credibility if it cuddles up to Israel, a country engaged in international terrorism and hell-bent on starting World War III.
Last month, Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon explicitly called the Obama administration “hesitant” in their unwillingness to attack, which was followed by a warning only a day later by the nation’s Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, in which he urged the US to “move from words to deeds.”
Why should the US be asked to bomb Iran on Israel’s behalf? Is there any reason why American lives should be sacrificed for Israeli ones?  Why the glib assumption that Jews living in apartheid Israel, a major violator of international law, should automatically receive the benefits of American protection? Why does America need to bring on itself the opprobrium of the rest of the world by allowing itself to be the unpaid bodyguard of this international pariah of a nation?
Lately, however, the US is relying less on threats in terms of taking down a weapons program and more on the hope that Iran will keep their word that the nuclear enrichment program there won’t be used for a warhead. According to the latest reports to the media made by American officials close to the matter, a US strike on Iran is currently not on the cards.
That’s as it should be. If the US attacked Iran right now, we would be entitled to ask: “America, have you gone crazy? Why did you attack an innocent country that has started no wars for 300 years?” 
Will your answer be: “Oh, we couldn’t help it! Our Jewish Masters in Tel Aviv told us we had to do it! They call the shots, you know! We’re under AIPAC’s thumb and must do their bidding!”  
Following the recent, nearly unprecedented deployment of Iranian warships into the Mediterranean Sea, Israel appears closer than ever in coming down hard on Iran. US Joint Chiefs of Staff Commander Gen. Martin E. Dempsey warned CNN this week that an attack at anytime soon simply wouldn’t be “prudent.”
“A strike at this time would be destabilizing and wouldn’t achieve their long-term objectives,” Gen. Dempsey cautioned to CNN host Fareed Zakaria. “I wouldn’t suggest…that we’ve persuaded them that our view is the correct view and that they are acting in an ill-advised fashion,” added Dempsey.
The Israelis ARE acting in an ill-advised fashion. It’s good of General Dempsey to point this out — to  state the obvious. It follows: If  the Israelis attack Iran unilaterally and behave in an “ill-advised” fashion, the US is under no obligation to support Israel or come to its rescue in the event of Tel Aviv or the Dimmona  nuclear facility being attacked by Iranian super missiles. 
The US is now hoping that as other countries sign on to deter a nuclear program, Iran will throw in the towel. To Bloomberg Business Week, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak shared similar thoughts, noting, “I think there is consensus in most capitals of the world that Iran should not be allowed to turn into a nuclear military power.”
Rubbish! There is no such consensus. Common sense tells us that if Israel, the most hated nation in the world in all international polls, is allowed to have nuclear weapons, Iran should be allowed to have them too — if only as a means of defense against a bloodthirsty and dangerous enemy that never ceases to threaten it with nuclear devastation.
I go so far as to say: Iran ought to have nuclear weapons. The sooner the better! The useful doctrine of MAD — mutually assured destruction — would then give stability to the region. Israel would think twice of behaving like the bully on the block if it knew it would receive a bloody nose in the process.
Ask yourself a simple question: Which of these two statements would you regard as the true one: (a) The world would be a safer place if Israel had nuclear weapons and Iran had none. (b) The world would be a safer place if Iran had nuclear weapons and Israel had none.
The world would indisputably be a safer place if Iran had the nuclear weapons instead of Israel. It would be an even safer place if the entire Middle East were a nuclear-free zone.
The sad fact is, the people who run the New World Order don’t want a safe world. They want a dangerous world. How can the Military Industrial Complex prosper and enrich Warmongers Inc. if the world is a safe place?
In order for Little Israel to become Greater Israel, there must be huge territorial adjustments. Land must change hands. Such territorial adjustments invariably occur after every major war, as after WW-I and WW-II.
In order for Israel to expand and get itself more Lebensraum, stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates, a major world war is essential. Desperately short of water, Israel has cast its covetous eye on South Lebanon (to start with) and has made plans to occupy this entire region up to the Litani River. This is the next big land grab: South Lebanon. So Israel is hell-bent on precipitating World War III in pursuit of its perennial dream: a great empire in the Middle East, Pax Judaica, under the rulership of the same Ashkenazi Jews who dominate America, Canada, Europe and Australia right now.
Jewish world domination is very much on the cards. It’s been on the cards for two thousand years — ever since Jesus Christ was nailed to the Cross. It’s now getting nearer than ever. 
As I explained in my dialogue/discussion with Israel Shamir earlier this year: “The Jews took over America and turned it into a Jewish colony. As simple as that. If they’re smart enough to take over America, as they have demonstrably done, why shouldn’t they proceed to the next logical step and take over the world — yes, dominate the world through America? No one denies this is America’s aim: full-spectrum dominance. So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world, doesn’t it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic is irrefutable…. You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.” (See here)
Last week, US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess said Iran will not start the war in the Middle East, unless, of course, the US acts first.
“Iran can close the Strait of Hormuz at least temporarily, and may launch missiles against United States forces and our allies in the region if it is attacked,” Burgess explained this week to a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. “Iran could also attempt to employ terrorist surrogates worldwide. However, the agency assesses Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict,” he added.
True. Iran will NOT attack first. It would be suicide for it to do so. But if Iran is attacked first, it has every right to defend itself by closing the Straits of Hormuz and of attacking its aggressors. Self-defense needs no defense.
Israel, it would seem, is not as willing to wait for that outcome and could very well clash with Iran before the US makes up its mind.
Let Israel attack Iran if it wishes to act like the proverbial “mad dog” so beloved of Israeli General Moshe Dayan. And let it, like all mad dogs, take the consequences of its actions. We all know what happens to mad dogs in the end.
If Iran counter-attacks Israel and inflicts heavy damages on it with its inter-continental missiles, Israel may well respond by nuking Tehran, causing the death of hundreds of thousands of people and the mass contamination of the country with radioactive fallout lasting for centuries. This would be a flagrant war crime. Russia would then be within its rights to spring to the defense of its ally Iran and give Israel a taste of its own medicine.
This would inevitably lead to WW-III if America should be foolish enough to come to Israel’s rescue as it suffered the consequences of its own criminality.
Israel is a thorn in the flesh of the Middle East. It is a thorn in the flesh of America. The sooner America realizes that Israel is a grave liability rather than an asset, the better. The day may come when America, or some other great power, may be forced to obliterate Israel in the interests of world peace.
Once it is perceived that Israel is a country of “mad dogs”, suffering from a collective pathology akin to rabies, there may be no other alternative but to destroy it.
Heaven forbid that it should ever come to this! There can be no excuse for genocidal violence — violence that would make Holocaust 1 look like a children’s picnic in comparison. So it is up to Israel to clean up its act and take steps to make itself less hated. Right now it is the most hated nation in the world. It also tops all polls in being regarded as the greatest threat to world peace.

Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin gloats over the prospects of Jewish world domination. Is he guilty of an “anti-Semitic canard”? Or did he gets his “conspiracy theory” ideas from reading  The Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
“Forty percent of the world’s Jews,” we are told in this somewhat dubious article, “now reside in Israel. A well-placed missile or two and you’ve gotten rid of 7,848,800 people — approximately 5,865,300 of them Jews. Hitler will be high-fiving from the seventh circle of Hell.”
The writer goes on to argue, I think unconvincingly, that the state of Israel was deliberaely established with malign and sinister intent by an elite cabal of Jew Haters. Having persuaded as many Jews as possible to relocate to Israel, these implacable anti-Semites would have the bulk of Jewry just where they wanted them: in one convenient and very restricted location. And then they would nuke them. Finish them all off in five minutes. Pfoof! no more Jews. Jewish Problem solved.
(A shorter version of this conspiracy-theory article has just been published here)
Any virulently anti-Semitic world dictator, determined on a total extermination of the Jews, would be unlikely to succeed. This is because Jews live everywhere. In every single nation. The entire population of the world, you could say, are the Jews’ hostages.
Such a dictator, if sufficiently mad, would probably opt to nuke particular areas of the world in which there were exceptionally high concentrations of Jews. Bombing Israel comprehensively would account for the disappearance of almost 6 million Jews. Tel Aviv alone has 2.5 million Jews, followed by Haifa with its 655,000 Jews.
Our Mad Dictator, in order to pursue his extermination policy more effectively, would then have to bomb New York, which contains almost 2 million Jews — the second largest concentration of Jews in the world. Los Angeles would have to be  next on his hit list. This contains almost as many Jews as Haifa: 621,000. (See here)
Is it irresponsible to discuss the possible extermination of the Jews? I guess it would be if that is what we were advocating. On the contrary, we are stating that such a hypothetical scenario involving Jewish extermination must be avoided at all costs. We don’t want this to happen. We therefore need a world in which Israel, in its own interests, must learn to practice the utmost self-restraint. The onus is on Israel to make itself more loved. Or less hated. It must cease its warmongering. It must cease trying to inveigle America into new wars on its behalf. Its bloodthirsty cries for an attack on Iran must cease.
At once.

The Jewish warmongers in America, the dual citizens beating the war drums for an attack on Iran, are guilty of incitement to violence. They are already guilty of major war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. These American Jews, and the Shabbat goy gentiles (like Hillary Clinton) who dance attendance on them like puppets on a string, need to be rounded up and indicted as war criminals.
And if found guilty, they need to be put in front of a firing squad.
The perpetrators of 9/11 are still at large. These killers need to be brought to justice without delay. If they are allowed to walk free, they will strike again — more false flag attacks, more war crimes, more needless misery for mankind.
As for Israel as an apartheid nation, living on stolen land and stealing more land gleefully by the day, it cannot go on like this. The world won’t let it. Sooner or later, the collective patience of the world will snap. Israel’s doom as a colonialist enterprise would then be sealed. Nor should anyone shed a tear for Israel when its funeral is announced.
The Mad Dog’s days are numbered…

TEL  AVIV . . . some time in the future

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles can be read here, her poetry here.


Shepard Ambellas: My Experience at Bilderberg 2012 (Part 1)

Shepard Ambellas – The Intel Hub June 3, 2012

Around 130 or more international bankers, top financiers, Heads-of-State, CEO’s and CFO’s, large controlled press agencies, and more shady figureheads than you can shake a stick at have converged over the past three days at the Westfields Marriott, nestled in the wooded area around Chantilly Virginia.

Sunday concluded the 58th annual meeting of the Bilderberg Group as a massive peaceful protest was a success in most respects.

As press, the preparation for an event like this is intense. We were working solid for the entire week prior, readying our gear for deployment to the biggest globalist gathering of the year — Bilderberg 2012.

We had to make sure we had the best live streaming capabilities possible and that we would obtain the highest tier on location internet speeds possible in order to upload all of the data to and YouTube.

Alex Thomas, Jason Bermas and myself (Shepard Ambellas) traveled to Virginia with reader and sponsor support to document the event as press corps.

Day 1

Our plan was to travel with only what we could carry on our person so that we would avoid any risk from TSA or the airlines to hold, obtain, or delay our gear from reaching our final destination.

As Alex Thomas and myself arrived at our first departing airport, TSA was already eyeballing us. I had already assumed they would strip my bag apart so I packed it well, assuring that all items would fall under all  TSA and airline rules and regulations for carry-on items.

A female voice called out (TSA agent);

“Who’s bag is this?”, as it passed through the scanner.

Of course the set is history as they stripped my bag apart.

Once we got to the Dallas Fort Worth airport Alex Thomas crossed through the TSA security perimeter, upon reentry the TSA held him and claimed that they found an explosive substance on his person.

Eventually he was allowed to pass after a higher-up from TSA released him.

Just about this time, Jason “The Infowarrior” Bermas Tweeted;

I just refused a body scanner and got a full pat-down

Once we finally arrived at Dulles International in Washington (the scene of one of the Die Hard movies) late Tuesday evening, we were shuttled to our rental car and were on our way to Chantilly.

The weather was pretty nice as we arrived at our hotel.

The flight was grilling as we were each lugging around a 40lb backpack loaded to the max with equipment and personal items like clothing and such.

That night we ran equipment tests and planned for counter surveillance of the grounds the following day.

Day 2

The following day we were able to obtain footage from inside the Marriott grounds as secret service and local police along with private security and others patrolled the ground heavy.

Unmarked cars littered the main drive.

We scouted the area with one final sweep. 

Bilderberg Building Security Fence Around Westfield – Police Everywhere video continues

Day 3

Thursday, May 31 our alarms went off rather early in order to get a jump on the event. We arrived at around 7 am on-scene.

Upon arrival we immediately drove into the Westfield Marriot and were able to capture two videos before being escorted out by security as they made preparations for a checkpoint that would stop others from entering whatsoever. 

Protesters were starting to amass as I started a series of radio interviews I was scheduled for throughout the week. I kicked off the long list of interviews I had scheduled worldwide with The Power Hour hosted by Joyce Riley on GCN.

What a pleasant show to be on as Joyce and her crew are some of the top professionals when it comes to syndicated talk radio.

After a few more early morning interviews I was hard at work trying to grab clear shots of the criminal oligarch’s attending the meeting while juggling interviews throughout the day.

View all our EXCLUSIVE photos of actual Bilderberg attendees here.

Around noon we were to run U-Stream test and found we had made a dire mistake, making it impossible for our U-Stream to go live. We decided to ditch the live stream and revert to still photo shots and video.

Bermas had multiple cameras on location filming video as he himself was conducting and being a part of interview after interview.

The scene started to get intense with police presence and barricades as the protestors ramped up the bullhorns.

In the distance was a faint bullhorn with a classic Alex Jones voice in full force announcing his presence on the scene.

Mobs of protestors and photo journalists swarmed Jones, it was an intense moment.

Throughout the day I was getting paparazzi shots as the globalists entered the compound. At times I was only 2 inches from them, and so were my feet.

The cars would speed through the checkpoint using security protocols and evasive driving skills to elude the protestors and my camera.

The police did not like the fact that I was getting the shots and at one point threatened my arrest saying;

“Don’t step near the car like that or you will be arrested”.

Finally one of the officers let me know that some of them are awake. To my surprise the officer took point off where I was and shielded the other officers from me so I could obtain the pictures.

I want to give a special thanks to that officer.

However, I noticed about 85% of the police force on site were minions of the globalists and or afraid to loose their jobs.

The weather was extremely hot at this point as over 300 protestors from across the country were in full force.

Matt and Cody’s crew from Truth Exposed Radio out of Texas hit the globalists hard with heavy bullhorning as the summer heat burned my flesh.

Once we returned to the hotel to dump the footage, Webster Tarpley reporting for a German outfit and Charlie Skelton with the Guardian arrived at our hotel to help us identify some of the Bilderberg attendees that we posted on

After that is was non-stop dumping footage and radio interview that took us well beyond 1 am in the morning.


Part II continues here… 

Cardinal Dolan! Where is My $20K?

By Robert Hoatson – ( June 5, 2012

If Catholics wish to live by the axiom, “once a priest, always a priest,” than I guess I am still a priest despite the fact that I was voluntarily laicized in December, 2011.  So, I write as a priest, ex-priest, inactive priest, renegade priest, or gadfly priest.  I have been called all of these and more.  The verbiage is irrelevant. 
What is relevant is that pedophile priests are not laicized as quickly as I was and most of them will always be priests despite their dastardly deeds which would have gotten them kicked out of most organizations by now.
The archbishop of my diocese wrote to me when I first requested laicization and told me he would highly recommend that my petition to the Vatican be approved.  It was – in record time.

Continues in full at source …

Jeremy Scahill Calls President Obama A Murderer

By Benjamin Hart – Information Clearing House June 5, 2012

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Weighing in on President Obama’s targeted drone strikes in the Middle East, journalist Jeremy Scahill did not mince words.

During his appearance on MSNBC’s “Up With Chris Hayes” Saturday morning, Scahill repeatedly said that such attacks, when they killed innocent civilians, amounted to “murder.”

Asked by Hayes why he would use such a “loaded” word to describe the strikes, Scahill responded at length.

“If someone goes into a shopping mall in pursuit of one of their enemies and opens fire on a crowd of people and guns down a bunch of innocent people in a shopping mall, they’ve murdered those people. When the Obama administration sets a policy where patterns of life are enough of a green light to drop missiles on people or to send in AC130s to spray them down…”

“But that wasn’t the case here,” interrupted retired colonel Jack Jacobs. “You’re talking about a targeted person here.” Scahill continued:

“If you go to the village of Al-Majalah in Yemen, where I was, and you see the unexploded clusterbombs and you have the list and photographic evidence, as I do–the women and children that represented the vast majority of the deaths in this first strike that Obama authorized on Yemen–those people were murdered by President Obama, on his orders, because there was believed to be someone from Al Qaeda in that area. There’s only one person that’s been identified that had any connection to Al Qaeda there. And 21 women and 14 children were killed in that strike and the U.S. tried to cover it up, and say it was a Yemeni strike, and we know from the Wikileaks cables that David Petraeus conspired with the president of Yemen to lie to the world about who did that bombing. It’s murder–it’s mass murder–when you say, ‘We are going to bomb this area’ because we believe a terrorist is there, and you know that women and children are in the area. The United States has an obligation to not bomb that area if they believe that women and children are there. I’m sorry, that’s murder.”

Scahill is the national security correspondent for The Nation, and the author of the book “Blackwater: The World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army.”

He was part of a panel discussion that centered around a lengthy New York Times article published on Tuesday, which disclosed that the Obama administration maintains a “kill list” of wanted terrorists. Obama personally signs off on the killing-by-drone of many suspects, taking into account the circumstances of a possible attack, including possible civilian casualties.

The article says that Obama tries to avoid any loss of innocent life, but that he considers any male in the area a combatant. Civilian deaths in drone attacks have become a flashpoint in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen.

H/T Mediaite.


Archaeologists find Bulgarian ‘vampires’ from Middle Ages with iron rods staked through their chests

Daniel Miller  – Daily Mail June 5, 2012

Two skeletons, believed to be those of suspected vampires, were discovered with iron poles plunged through their hearts. Click to enlarge

If you thought vampires were simply the stuff of myth and legend – and perhaps the odd teen horror film – think again.

Archaeologists in Bulgaria have unearthed two skeletons from the Middle Ages pierced through the chest with iron rods to keep them from turning into the undead.

They are the latest in a succession of finds across western and central Europe which shed new light on just how seriously people took the threat of vampires and how those beliefs transformed into the modern myth.

The two skeletons, believed to be around 800 years old, were discovered during an archaeological dig near a monastery in the Bulgarian Black Sea town of Sozopol.
Bulgaria’s national history museum chief Bozhidar Dimitrov said: ‘These two skeletons stabbed with rods illustrate a practice which was common in some Bulgarian villages up until the first decade of the 20th century.’
According to pagan beliefs, people who were considered bad during their lifetimes might turn into vampires after death unless stabbed in the chest with an iron or wooden rod before being buried.
 People believed the rod would also pin them down in their graves to prevent them from leaving at midnight and terrorising the living, the historian explained.

According to Mr Dimitrov over 100 buried people whose corpses were stabbed to prevent them from becoming vampires have been discovered across Bulgaria over the years.

He added: ‘I do not know why an ordinary discovery like that became so popular. Perhaps because of the mysteriousness of the word “vampire”.

‘These people were believed to be evil while they were alive, and it was believed that they would become vampires once they are dead, continuing to torment people.’

According to Dimitrov, ‘vampires’ were often aristocrats and clerics.

He added: ‘The curious thing is that there are no women among them. They were not afraid of witches.’

However last month Italian researchers discovered what they believed to be the remains of a female ‘vampire’ in Venice – buried with a brick jammed between her jaws to prevent her feeding on victims of a plague which swept the city in the 16th century.


The remains of a female vampire with a brick in her mouth from 16th century Venice. Click to enlarge

Matteo Borrini, an anthropologist from the University of Florence, said the discovery on the small island of Lazzaretto Nuovo in the Venice lagoon supported the medieval belief that vampires were behind the spread of plagues like the Black Death.

The skeleton was unearthed in a mass grave from the Venetian plague of 1576 – in which the artist Titian died – on Lazzaretto Nuovo, which lies around two miles northeast of Venice and was used as a sanitorium for plague sufferers.

Borrini said: ‘This is the first time that archaeology has succeeded in reconstructing the ritual of exorcism of a vampire.

‘This helps … authenticate how the myth of vampires was born.’

The succession of plagues which ravaged Europe between 1300 and 1700 fostered the belief in vampires, mainly because the decomposition of corpses was not well understood, Borrini said.

Gravediggers reopening mass graves would sometimes come across bodies bloated by gas, with hair still growing, and blood seeping from their mouths and believe them to be still alive.

The shrouds used to cover the faces of the dead were often decayed by bacteria in the mouth, revealing the corpse’s teeth, and vampires became known as ‘shroud-eaters.’

According to medieval medical and religious texts, the ‘undead’ were believed to spread pestilence in order to suck the remaining life from corpses until they acquired the strength to return to the streets again.

‘To kill the vampire you had to remove the shroud from its mouth, which was its food like the milk of a child, and put something uneatable in there,’ said Borrini.

‘It’s possible that other corpses have been found with bricks in their mouths, but this is the first time the ritual has been recognised.’

While legends about blood-drinking ghouls date back thousands of years, the modern figure of the vampire was encapsulated in the Irish author Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel ‘Dracula,’ based on 18th century eastern European folktales.


Lebanon, Palestine & Jewishness – Gilad Atzmon on Afshin Rattansi’s Double Standard

Blacks In Israel Under Sustained Violent Attacks

Atlanta Black Star – June 5, 2012

Four African migrants have been hurt in a suspected arson attack on their home in Jerusalem, Israeli police say.

The fire was started at the entrance to the two-story building on Jaffa Street in the city center after 03:00 (00:00 GMT), trapping the 10 Eritreans inside.

Graffiti found at the scene read: “We want the foreigners out.”

There is increasing argument and dissent in Israel over what to do with the 60,000 Africans who have entered the country illegally in recent years.

On Sunday, a new law came into force allowing immigration authorities to detain illegal migrants for up to three years.

‘Targeted specifically’

The four Eritreans injured in Monday’s attack were taken to hospital with burns on their hands and suffering from smoke inhalation.

Israeli police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld told the BBC’s Focus on Africa program: “We believe that those individuals from the African foreign community were targeted specifically.”

He said the building had graffiti sprayed on its walls saying: “We want the foreigners out.”

In recent weeks there have been violent scenes in Israeli towns and cities where many migrants live and work, reports the BBC’s Wyre Davies in Jerusalem.

In south Tel Aviv, in particular, African-run businesses have been attacked and many migrants have been abused in the streets, our correspondent adds.

“This was the first incident which has taken place… on a level of a specific attack,” Mr Rosenfeld said.

The police spokesman said that of the 60,000 illegal immigrants living in Israel, an estimated 35,000 of them lived in the Tel Aviv area and about 5,000 in Jerusalem.


In a newspaper interview on Friday, Interior Minister Eli Yishai referred to African migrants as a demographic threat who could “end the Zionist dream”.

“We don’t need to import more problems from Africa,” Mr Yishai, leader of the religious Shas party, told Maariv.

“Most of those people arriving here are Muslims who think the country doesn’t belong to us, the white man.”

One politician from the governing Likud Party recently compared asylum seekers to “a cancer.”

While such language has been deplored by human rights groups, politicians from right-wing parties in the governing coalition say something has to be done about illegal immigrants who are mainly from Sudan, South Sudan and Eritrea, our correspondent says.

They blame the migrants for a rise in crime and say they could eventually undermine Israel’s Jewish majority.

The Israeli government also dismisses claims that the migrants, who cross the Sinai desert at the rate of 2,000 a month, are fleeing persecution in their own countries.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently described African migrants as “infiltrators” who had come here for economic reasons and who were a problem that had to be “solved”.

The new law will allow immigration authorities to detain illegal migrants for up to three years, without trial or deportation.

An interior ministry spokesman said it would hopefully stem the flow of Africans entering Israel illegally across the vast desert border with Egypt.


‘US, UK behind attacks in Syria’

Press TV – June 4, 2012


Damascus accuses “outlaws, saboteurs, and armed terrorist groups” for the country’s unrest and mass killings, insisting that it is being orchestrated from abroad.

However, the West and the Syrian opposition accuse the Damascus government of killing protesters.

Moreover, the United States says any political solution in Syria should result in the overthrow of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The unrest in Syria began in March 2011, with demonstrations being held both against and in support of the Assad government.

Press TV has conducted an interview with Stephen Lendman, writer and radio host from Chicago, to further discuss the issue. The following is a transcription of the interview.

Press TV: I want to ask you about that line that SAS and MI6 agents are getting ready to help armed gangs if civil war erupts in Syria. Do you think that these agents will really wait for civil war to erupt in Syria or are they just planning for something on their own anyhow?

Lendman: Well, there’s no question that they’re in Syria but this is not new news. It may be new information about this. In February I wrote that the US, UK and other special forces, Western, probably Qatari special forces were on the ground helping these insurgents, these kill gangs, you can use any name you like, but they’re Western recruited mercenaries coming from nearby regional countries, some of them not so nearby, Libya, coming from Iraq, Iraq is nearby, coming from Jordan, coming from the March 14th alliance in Lebanon. These are coming in by the thousands — thousands of them are coming in. They come in at different times and this has been going on for a long time.

The same thing happened in Libya last year. The attacks that are being carried out, like the Houla massacre, these Special Forces are picking the targets, they are planning the attack, they are sending the insurgents out to commit the atrocities and Assad is blamed for them.

Press TV: Mr. Lendman, President Assad himself spoke about this real war coming from outside in his speech to the parliament. Does this news give more evidence to support his claims?

Lendman: Absolutely. What he’s saying is 100 percent true. Of course, the Western media, the ones I call the scoundrel media, they refuse to mention this. They say nothing about it. They point fingers the wrong way.

The evidence is overwhelming. The Houla massacre alone, the most egregious incident so far, single incident, the evidence is overwhelming. There’s no question, no question.

I wrote an article I put out yesterday on a Russian journalist who was an eyewitness to what happened, a man whose last name is Musin. My article was called ‘Russian journalist exposed propaganda lies about Houla massacre’.

He was there. He saw it firsthand with his own eyes. He interviewed survivors, eyewitnesses to what happened.

The people who were targeted in Houla families, their homes were raided. These were pro-Assad loyalists. People who were loyal to the Assad government, they were picked out, they were targeted for assassination. Special forces, the UK, the US, probably Qatari [forces], maybe French [forces], on the ground picking the targets, directing them, that’s the culpability. Assad had absolutely nothing to do with it.

Musin said one other thing too. There was no evidence whatever of artillery fire, of tank fire in Houla. There were no damaged buildings. There were no craters on the ground. There was nothing what-so-ever to indicate artillery shelling or tank shelling going on.

It was a complete fabrication. This was a Western initiated attack using these armed killers to do it.

Press TV: I’m curious to know then why is the West holding back on them, calling out an all out war against the Assad government if they’re already carrying out attacks within Syria?

Lendman: I think it’s coming. I honestly think it’s coming. I’ve followed the rhetoric since last year. I can feel it heating up.

We saw it before. We saw it last year in Libya. We saw it against Iraq, the so-called weapons of mass destruction that didn’t exist. It’s going on against Syria now. The intensity gets greater and greater.

The megaphone comes from the major media, mainly the US major media, everything from television that has the most effect from CNN, from Fox News. But The New York Times does this. The Washington Post does this, to keep the key in print broadcast news operations in America and spreading these furious lies.

I think the scheme is if you can get rid of Assad without a war, terrific, let’s do it that way. But if everything tried fails, and everything tried so far has failed and I really believe it will fail, unless these militants have an air force the way the Libyans…had an air force, they’re not going to get rid of Assad. Assad is too strong militarily.

I think there will be direct Western intervention, there may be bombings and there’s no question that Washington is orchestrating everything. This is a Washington operation.



Humanities African Origins Theory Challenged by New Findings

News Commentary – June 5, 2012

While still largely accepted in some quarters, the idea that humanity’s roots lie solely in Africa is being questioned in the wake of new archaeological finds.
Among these is the discovery of early human fossils in a cave in southern China’s Guangxi province.  
Although academics are still debating whether the jawbone found came from an early human or a Neanderthal, the bone itself was dated to over 100,000 years old.
The “Out of Africa” theory maintains that modern humans evolved from a common homo-erectus ancestor in Africa; who then left Africa and migrated across the world between 150,000 and 100,000 years ago.
However, other discoveries have been made elsewhere in recent years that also challenge this theory about humanities origins. 
The discovery late last year of early stone tools near Dhofar is another that doesn’t quite fit with the “Out of Africa” model. The tools dated to over 100,000 years old point to the emergence of what could be recognised as early humans in the Arabian Peninsula long before it was thought there were any in the region.
Moreover, the theory that stipulates all humans originated in a single migration from Africa is now being challenged by new genetic discoveries
In fact reports of discoveries that dispute the prevailing “Out or Africa” theory are coming in from around the world.
Researchers at Australian National University said they had analysed DNA taken from human remains discovered near Lake Mungo in New South Wales. Dating put the remains at between 56,000 and 65,000 years old.

ANU anthropologist Alan Thorne said that neither “Mungo Man’s” completely modern skeleton nor its DNA had any links with human ancestors from Africa found in other parts of the world.

Neither of them [the skeleton or DNA] show any evidence that they ever were in Africa,” Thorne told Reuters. “There’s modern humans in Australia that have nothing to do with Africa at all.” (ABCNews Jan 9, 2012)

Although as yet unproven, a competing hypothesis is emerging to challenge the prevailing “Out of Africa” theory. The competing hypothesis is called the “multiregional origin” of modern humans and while it’s still inconclusive, don’t let anyone tell you that humanities origins in Africa have been confirmed.
They haven’t. As they say, the juries still out on that one.
But perhaps we shouldn’t get too carried away with the debate between the two theories because after all they are only theories. Nor should we forget that Darwin’s famous theory of evolution itself remains only that, a theory.
Despite being taken as near gospel in some quarters Darwin’s theory has yet to be proven. That’s why they are still looking for a “missing link” that would conclusively connect earlier ape-like hominids with modern man.
In spite of having been discovered on numerous occasions – all of which were ultimately proven wrong or even hoaxed – the “missing link” is still precisely that, missing.
So perhaps we should pause here to remember that while Darwin’s theory has been widely accepted as tenable, it has not been established as an irrefutable scientific fact. Despite what various ‘authorities’ would have you believe Darwin’s theory is only one among a number of explanations for mankind’s origins.
Another prime contender to explain mankind’s origins is, of course, divine creation and here it should be noted that various vested interests would like that particular theory completely erased from the list; if only because it would then allow them to enter their own contender as creator.

Iranian cell-phone carrier obtained banned U.S. tech

Steve Stecklow – Reuters June 4, 2012

A fast-growing Iranian mobile-phone network managed to obtain sophisticated U.S. computer equipment despite sanctions that prohibit sales of American technology to Iran, interviews and documents show.

MTN Irancell, a joint venture between MTN Group Ltd of South Africa and an Iranian government-controlled consortium, sourced equipment from Sun Microsystems Inc, Hewlett Packard Co and Cisco Systems Inc, the documents and interviews show. MTN owns 49% of the joint venture but provided the initial funding.

The procurement – through a network of tech companies in Iran and the Middle East – offers further evidence of the limitations of U.S. economic sanctions.

The sanctions are intended to curb Iran’s nuclear program, which Tehran maintains is peaceful. No U.S. company can sell goods or services to Iran unless it obtains special authorization, such as for humanitarian aid. But U.S. enforcement has focused on containing Iranian banks, terrorism, Iran’s oil industry, and individuals and companies that Western capitals believe are involved in Tehran’s nuclear development program.

Reuters reported in March and April that ZTE Corp, a Chinese telecom-equipment maker, had sold or agreed to ship millions of dollars worth of U.S. hardware and software to Iran since 2010 despite a longtime U.S. sales ban on tech products to Iran. The buyers were Iran’s largest telecom carrier, Telecommunication Co of Iran, and a unit of the consortium that controls it. The U.S. Department of Commerce is investigating.

People involved in Iran’s telecommunications industry say U.S. computer components remain widely available in Iran today.

“There’s nothing you can get in the U.S. or Dubai that you can’t get in Iran,” Chris Kilowan, who was MTN’s top executive in Iran from 2004 to 2007, said in an interview. He said MTN’s parent company, MTN Group, was directly involved in procuring U.S. parts for MTN Irancell, which launched in 2006 and is now Iran’s second-largest mobile-phone operator.

“All the procedures and processes around procurement were established by MTN,” he said. He said the company agreed to allow its Iranian partners and MTN Irancell to set up a local Iranian company with the “basic” purpose of evading sanctions on Iran.

In a statement, Paul Norman, MTN Group’s chief corporate affairs officer, said: “To the best of our knowledge, MTN personnel, directly or indirectly, did not acquire or seek to acquire equipment for use in Irancell’s operations in a manner that was intended to avoid or circumvent U.S. sanctions. MTN is committed to compliance with U.S. sanctions, and is working with the U.S. government and its international legal counsel to remain compliant. MTN owns a non-controlling 49% share in Irancell.”

Reuters provided MTN with the names of four current MTN Group executives believed to have knowledge of the procurement of U.S. parts by MTN Irancell. MTN declined to make any of them available for interviews.

Kilowan is a central figure in a lawsuit, filed in Washington in March, against MTN by a rival telecommunications company, Turkcell. The Turkish telecom carrier has accused MTN of bribing an Iranian official and other alleged wrongdoing “to steal” from it the original license to launch the operation that became MTN Irancell. Kilowan has provided thousands of pages of documents to Turkcell. MTN denies the allegations and has called Kilowan “a disgruntled former employee” who is an unreliable witness.

Kilowan’s claims regarding how MTN Irancell obtained U.S. parts for its network are not a subject of the lawsuit. The claims were supported in documents and numerous interviews conducted by Reuters.

For example, Reuters reviewed an 89-page MTN Irancell document from 2008 that shows the telecom carrier was specifically interested in acquiring embargoed products.

The document spells out the requirements of a managed-services contract it ultimately awarded to Huawei Technologies Co, China’s largest telecom-equipment maker. In a section on managing product-support agreements for third-party equipment, the MTN Irancell document states, “This should include embargo items.”

The document also includes lists of network equipment, including Cisco routers, Sun servers and products from HP.

Ross Gan, a spokesman for Huawei, said the company observes U.S. export laws and did not provide any equipment to MTN Irancell. “Based on our limited understanding, we are unaware of any embargoed components,” he said. He also said Huawei was “unaware” of the contract document that refers to “embargo items.”

In interviews, the U.S. companies said they were not aware MTN Irancell had acquired their equipment. Two companies – Oracle Corp, which owns Sun, and Cisco – said they were investigating the matter.

A spokesman for Cisco said: “Cisco complies with all US export laws and requires our business partners to expressly acknowledge that they too must abide by these laws. We have been unable to find any information suggesting that Cisco employees were aware of any sales of Cisco equipment to Iran. We continue to investigate this matter, as any violation of U.S. export controls is a very serious matter.”

A spokeswoman for HP said its distribution contract terms prohibit sales into Iran. “Compliance with US and international trade law is a high priority for HP,” she said.

Kilowan said MTN Irancell originally obtained Sun servers from an Iranian firm called Patsa Co. He said an official with Patsa approached him and said: “We know you’ll need these servers. We already have them in Iran.” Kilowan said the company delivered at least a half dozen of the servers about two weeks later in early 2006.

The official at Patsa didn’t return a call and emails seeking comment.

Patsa later won a contract to manage MTN Irancell’s data center, which contains customer information. Kilowan said an Iranian official at the telecom carrier said Patsa could only have the contract if it partnered with MTN’s Iranian partners – Sairan, which is believed to be controlled by Iran’s defense ministry, and Bonyad Mostazafan, which is believed to report directly to Iran’s supreme leader.

Kilowan said the three companies then set up an Iranian firm called Arya Hamrah Samaneh Co with MTN’s approval. He said Arya Hamrah was used to “camouflage” purchases of embargoed equipment.

Arya Hamrah’s website recently said the company was founded in 2006 and was “a leading technology services company.” According to, which archives websites, the company in 2007 listed only one customer under “Projects” – MTN Irancell – and stated it was involved in “procurement” for the telecom carrier’s data center.

The section of the 2008 MTN Irancell contract document that refers to “embargo items” also states that the telecom carrier had a support contract with “Arya Hamra Systems” and that “it would be prudent for the selected vendor to use the same supplier.” The spokesman for Huawei, which won the contract, said his company “has never worked with Arya Hamrah Samaneh as part of the management service contract with MTN Irancell.”

An Iranian familiar with Arya Hamrah said it was a “major partner and major supplier” of MTN Irancell and that it was able to procure equipment from Sun and HP without any problems, via Dubai. He declined to discuss Arya Hamrah’s ownership, saying it was “a secret.”

Another person familiar with Arya Hamrah said one of its sources for Sun equipment for MTN Irancell was an Iranian firm called Fakour Co, with which Arya Hamrah sometimes competes.

The home page of Fakour’s website,, features the logo of Oracle, which owns Sun. The website also includes detailed information about Sun products including Sun marketing material. The site states: “For near twenty years, Fakour Co has been recognized for its innovation and leadership in bringing network computing products especially Sun Microsystems products and services to the country’s market.”

A lengthy list of Fakour’s “main customers” for its “Fakour Sun Microsystems services department” includes Irancell, Arya Hamrah and Huawei. The list also includes 10 Iranian banks, Iran’s Ministry of Energy and numerous Iranian oil companies. U.S. trade sanctions specifically target some of the banks and other firms on the list.

A manager at Fakour did not respond to a request for comment.

Mahmoud Tadjallimehr, a former project manager at MTN Irancell, said in an interview he was present when the telecom carrier obtained more than 10 Cisco routers and numerous switches in 2007 to route communications traffic. Tadjallimehr worked at the time for Nokia Siemens Networks, but said Nokia-Siemens refrained from any involvement in obtaining embargoed equipment. He said a subcontractor called Shabakkat “did all the work to source the products.”

Shabakkat is a telecom service provider based in Kuwait. At the time, it had a unit in Iran called Shabakkat Cellular that worked on the MTN Irancell project. Issaad Assoufi, who was country manager in Iran for Shabakkat Cellular, said in an interview that equipment was purchased from a local company in Iran and that his firm was not involved with bringing it into the country. He declined to identify the local company but said it was not Arya Hamrah, which he said his company had declined to do business with.

“I don’t have anything to hide,” Assoufi said. “I didn’t do anything illegal.”

Asked how the local Iranian company obtained Cisco products, he said: “How they got into the country, this is another story. I don’t have any idea and I don’t want to know.”

(Additional reporting by Marcus George in Dubai and Sylvia Westall in Kuwait. Editing by Michael Williams.)


Movie Stars Whore Themselves to the Illuminati

by Aspen – June 4, 2012 (

Hollywood isn’t just a matter of “big names”.

Fame and talent do not, on their own, operate as part of the actor selection process. For example, Al Pacino and Robert deNiro are two of the most sought-after actors in film history… but they have not been, in general, tapped for serious Illuminati projects.


Paul Bettany has participated in outrageously explicitly Illuminati productions

There are other actors whose participation in Illuminati film production is clearly conscious and explicit. Nearly every film these actors show up in is a heavily-invested Illuminati production.

These include Natalie Portman, Angelina Jolie, Nicholas Cage, Johnny Depp, Robert Downey, Jr., Matt Damon, Russell Crowe, Liam Neeson, Denzel Washington, Geoffrey Rush, Shia LeBeouf, Tom Cruise, Dennis Quaid, Will Smith, Chris Evans, Keanu Reeves, Megan Fox, and more recently, Jeremy Renner.

Have you ever wondered how it is that former fringe actors, far past the prime of youth, like Jeremy Renner, left, (or, for that matter, Geoffrey Rush) suddenly enjoy the proverbial “meteoric rise to fame”?

And others, equally talented, don’t? It’s because they were selected, based on incredibly sophisticated logarithms that establish their selective marketability.

Initially they are approached with the promise of a short itinerary of films that they must agree to. This is rote Hollywood procedure. Later, some of them are brought into the inner circle. Only a very few dare to resist.

Do you recall Randy Quaid, the brother of Dennis Quaid, running for the Canadian border and seeking asylum?

Randy Quaid, Wife Seek Asylum in Canada, Saying They Fear for Their Lives

“The increasingly eccentric duo, who are wanted in California for allegedly skipping out on a hefty hotel bill and for vandalizing a house they once owned, fled north of the border earlier this month, and now claim they are the targets of a mysterious clan they believe murdered actors Heath Ledger and David Carradine. (Ledger died of a drug overdose in 2008 and Carradine was found dead, apparently from accidental asphyxiation, last year.)

“Hollywood is murdering its movie stars,” Evi Quaid said in Vancouver last week.” They wouldn’t go with the program.


Continues in full at source…

The English-Celtic Struggle Against The Ridiculously Laughable Serpent Race

Mike James in Germany – June 5, 2012

Among the ascendency and descendant fall of all nations created separately by a Loving Divinity that abhors the Babylonian filth of globalism, the European Union and the Jew-inspired multiculturalism that seeks to place under the bondage of its god, Lucifer, the hearts and minds of all the human races, there is one People, almost completely vanquished by the Prince of this World and his hordes of rapacious bankers and deceitful political minions, that is destined to save not only itself from destruction, but be a Light unto the World.
They are the English.
Mythology has it that Saint George, the Patron Saint of the English nation and, indeed, of all the Celtic-Saxon peoples who live and continue to suffer the indignities of a monstrous internationalism, gave slay to the Serpent Race that sought to poison the well-spring of the Truth. Yet we speak not of mythology, but of a Biblical prophecy yet to be fulfilled. We speak of a nation, a Free-State Republican England, rising free to liberate itself from the hideous unlawfulness of a Soviet European bureaucracy informed by a usurper Crown system of governance and an evil Talmudic discourse so malevolent and so perverse that it chokes upon the consumption of its own fetid entrails.
We speak of a world gone mad, manipulated by satanic international financiers who, for centuries, have turned brethren against brethren and nation against nation in their self-serving pursuit of profit and power by means of demonic financial alchemy. We speak of a psychopathic cunning so wedded to the paranoid fallacies of its own racial origins that it is even prepared to destroy itself to avenge imagined crimes visited upon itself as “proof ”of their having been chosen to play games with the universe, a ploy known within medieval Kabbalistic lore as “Tikkun”. The sanitized (Satanised) definition of Tikkun (Jews divinely empowered to repair the universe) is, of course, all you shall learn from conventional “authoritative” sources, such as Wikipedia.
What you shall almost never discover is that Tikkun represents a Kabbalistic game-plan, incorporated within both Freemasonry and Satanism, and practised by all world leaders, politicians and bankers in hock to Zionism to destroy the Celtic-Saxon peoples of the world by means of war, multiculturalism, social dissonance, miscegenation, poverty, drug addiction, dietary poisoning, feminism, communism, psychiatry and the artificially created boom-bust cycle of economics.
There is a very concrete reason why the Asiatic, jaundice-skinned Luciferian Ashkenazim Jews (completely unrelated to the original Biblical Judeans and Judahites who largely disappeared by assimilating with Palestinians centuries ago), Freemasons, Satanists and psychopaths such as Tony Blair, David Cameron, José Barosso, George Bush, Barrack Obama, Lloyd Blankfein, Herman Van Rompuy, the entire British Royal Family and the Rothschilds have a deeply vested interest in destroying Celtic-Saxon culture, targeting especially the English people, of whom the Jew, Jack Straw (Blair’s Foreign Secretary) once described as “a race not worth saving”.
God explicitly told the Hebrews, who, as we know, being the most loathsome and repulsive of all Mammalian species known to the world at that moment in time, provided him with a sort of lowest-common-denominator test, which they failed spectacularly by constantly moaning, whining, stealing, lying, murdering and, no doubt, creating garbage money out of thin air at extortionately high interest rates, that (to paraphrase various interpretations of Jeremiah 32.38): “”I shall give my name [Christ] to another People and I shall write my laws upon their hearts; and they shall be my People, and I shall be their God.”
In other words, to use the sort of vernacular I am sure the Hebrews and their Jewish spawn must have used on a daily basis when talking to real human beings, God told them to “fuck off, stay away from Israel, from which you are forever denied access, and prepare to bow down to My Real People, who shall one day bear my name [Christ] and have my laws written upon their hearts instead of the kind of dung-stained papyrus upon which your meaningless bureaucratic, legalistic garbage is annotated and over which your penis-slitting Rabbis and politicians haggle before somehow deeming it lawful”. (Sounds rather like the EU Commission, Westminster and the Jewish-owned US Congress to me.)
You do not have to be a Biblical scholar to know that God Almighty was referring to his real Chosen People as the English and their Celtic-Saxon brethren who, largely emanating from the Basques (the original Celts), came to settle on the coastal shores of the British Isles, which includes Ireland. Celtic Christianity, practised among the Basques and the Carthaginian people in the southernmost reaches of France, long pre-dates the heretical intrusions upon British shores of Constantine’s Roman version of Christianity, which spawned the Templar sect as a means of doing shifty money-shaking deals with the wandering Ben Bernankes of the day. Let’s face it. There were a lot of pissed-off Chosenites looking to scam the unwary and the unaware. Funnily enough, we’ve been giving this scum a free welfare ticket for centuries.
My people, the English, now find themselves not only under the yoke of an unlawful, illegal and and undemocratic Soviet EU bureaucracy, but, by an abhorrence of natural human development that allowed a wilfully ungodly nation of Asiatic Satanists, the Ashkenazim “steal-a-shyster-religion” so-called ‘Jews’, to write their laws, sequester all control over their financial resources and wealth-creation systems, and to whisper unto the ears of otherwise good but dumb-witted men of patriotic standing lies that lead to wars from which they, the pre-Hollywood Jews of the Modern Zeitgeist, have turned the blood of Celts and Saxons into large slabs of gold by means of their own mischievous financial alchemy.
By their own designs, these Asiatic Usurper Jews, who are in no way related the Judean-Celts who raised among themselves the Son of God, Jesus Christ, have subjected the English people to decades of mass immigration, a steep decline in living standards, mass unemployment, austerity, poverty on a scale comparable to that of the 1930s, a social dissonance that is destroying the very fabric of communal life, the mass subjugation of public consciousness to pornography and other forms of televisual emotional assault, and the deliberately designed relegation of education to nothing more than an exercise into disabusing young adults of any notion they may hold that advocates intellectual self-improvement.
The Jew is a monster, an anti-human, that not only feeds upon the inherent ingenuity of the Celt, but subverts, distorts and perverts in his own fashion everything that was wholesome and intended to be creative and productive in furthering the good of all mankind. Before I am pilloried for “racism” (I am a racialist, actually) or sectionalism, let us never forget that time in history when we once equated “Russian” with “communist” or “communist” with “Russian”. Was anyone in America or Western Europe ever proscribed for making such an equation? Were we ever allowed to believe that all communists did not owe their allegiance to Moscow, or that anyone who spoke with a Russian accent was not a member of the KGB?
Now you shall understand just how clever these Jewish tricksters (having created both communism and corporate capitalism) can be and are essentially unassailable in their abilities to play both sides against the middle, almost as if they are not members of the same human species: for they themselves have admitted that they are not of our own kind.
The Jews are not human beings. We have this from an official Jewish source.
The former Prime Minister of Israel, Menachem Begin, admitted: “Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.”
So there we have it, folks. Or should I be politically incorrect and address you as “Mein Volk”? The Jews, according to Der Führer Begin, as the Master Race, regard the Celtic-Saxon peoples of this world as mere insects to be trodden upon underfoot, human excrement to be flushed down the bog, cattle if we’re lucky enough to be Kosher enough for slaughter. Sounds kind of cute in a Disneyland sense because the insect will always find a way to seek revenge upon The Man, the turd will always rise to bite your ass and that cow wins the hearts of millions by getting to tell Yiddish jokes just before The Man slits his throat. But Mr Disney is in cold storage and we too appear to be frozen in time.
Time to break the ice and let the party talk flow. Unless we, the Celtic-Saxon peoples of the world, expel from our very midst ever Jew in our neighbourhood, your grandchildren shall be nothing more than figments of your own imagination. I am not advocating violence; only compassionate expatriation of every Jew in this world to a remote and uninhabited island of their choice. I find that that to be the morally correct and compassionate alternative to their forcing our hand into a planetary nuclear war with our Kith and Kin, the Iranians/Aryans.
Back in the 1930s, the British Crown, wankers though they have always been, suggested Tasmania or Rhodesia. Now that we have the alleged technology to send fake astronauts employed by Hollywood to pose with Coca-Cola cans on the moon, I suggest something a little more adventurous.
If, as Herr Ober-Führer Begin argued, the Jews are divine gods and the masters of the universe, why not just shoot the fuckers in cheaply built high-velocity rockets into outer space? Obsessed as they are with imaginary holocausts, perhaps the Sun would make for a suitable land-down. Who knows? Perhaps in ten thousand years or so, their siblings, sobbing with hands out-stretched for as much tax-cash they can grab, will return to tell their very many tragic and deeply moving tales of finding refuge in deep-freeze units or cooling-pipes especially installed by their Venetian sympathizers at the behest of Dr Spock and his suspiciously jug-eared compatriots.
Until we can figure out a way of ejecting these insect-crushing, cattle-prodding, turd-haters from the planet we inhabit, let us decide who these “people” really are.
We are talking about a very large subsection of an international Mafia-style psychosocial grouping that argues that is is both religiously and racially the same in character, and yet they will also claim the opposite. Whatever suits them. Talk about “shape-shifters”.
Have you ever met an atheistic Jamaican Christian? Or a secular Hungarian Muslim? Of course not. Only the Jews can screw you into believing that they are somehow above both race and religion. You believe this crap because you and your kids have been watching Hollywood garbage since the day your grandmother became a brainwashed Zionist Baptist.
But because we gullible Celtic-Saxon cattle buy this heap of crap by the sack-load for ten dollars a pound at a repayable rate of 30-percent a month, these cunning fuckers not only get to destroy us by creating wars of mass destruction but also by regularly bankrupting our economies and allowing our children to starve to death. Then, when you’re truly broke and hungry, to whom do you go to beg for a loan, money created out of thin air and registered as bits and bytes on a hard disk made in Israel? Yeah, you get it?
It is time that my people woke up to the truth and begin to exact upon these anti-humans the most severe punishments allowable in the eyes of God Almighty. Let us stand up and fight for the sovereign rights of all insects, cattle and human excrement.
I have published a number of essays in the past, which have conclusively proven that the “six million holocaust theory” was and remains to this very day a fantastical Hollywood-style fabrication. Those who had survived for over ten years hiding in chimneys in Auschwitz got sort of narky and sued me, not once, but twice. Because I proved them to be guilty of incitement to commit perjury (bearing false witness to alleged crimes that one did not witness, which is an imprisonable crime and a sin) I made and won my case right here in the heart of Zionist-controlled Germany. Not just once, but twice.
Thereafter, a truly honest anti-Zionist Jew called Bernard approached me, gave me a slap on the back, bought me a double Bushmill’s whiskey and said: “Well, Mike, you crazy son of a bitch, you finally told the truth and got away with it!” I drank my whiskey in silence as he played with a broken match-stick while sizing-up the chessboard before us. “But,” he added with a frown, “you’ll never get another job in your life.”
Bernard, who died of cancer three months later, was right. The Serpent strangled me of my income. But not of my hope, my anger and my fighting Celtic spirit. For I know how this story ends.
I leave it up to you, dear reader, to write the final chapter. Have fun, and don’t forget to buy the Celtic warrior, Saint George, a double-malt whiskey before you pen your final paragraph.
It’s on the house. Our house.

Michael James, an English republican patriot, is a blacklisted former freelance journalist resident in Zionist-occupied Germany since 1992 with additional long-haul stays in East Africa, Poland and Switzerland. He advocates a Leaderless Resistance to destroy the Soviet European Union and prays for a free and independent England, shorn of all alliances with the EU, UK, NATO, the UN, WTO, IMF, Israel and any other treacherous international cabal or entity.

Henry Blodget : “Why do People Hate Jews?”

Henry Makow Ph.D. – June 3, 2012

Scene from 1998 movie "Pleasantville" made by Red Diaper baby Gary Ross. Learn the shocking reason David's mom is in color but his dad is in black & white.

Last week, the editor of Business, Henry Blodget stimulated discussion by asking the question, “Why do people hate Jews?”

He noticed that Goldman Sachs’ activity had created anti-Semitism; Blodget wanted to give the subject an airing.

But the largely negative reaction made Blodget amend the question to “some” people and then to “What are the sources of anti-Semitism?”

Finally he issued a retraction:  

“Some people I like and respect told me they felt insulted by and uncomfortable with the post…I am very sorry to anyone I offended. I sincerely apologize.”

In an article, “Does Henry Blodget Hate Jews?” Jewish writer Foster Kamer commented:

“The only possible motivation for writing a headline like that is to attract attention, and page views, and it … will only inflame parties on all sides (be they Jews, Jew Haters, Self-Loathing Jews, and so on). You can rest assured that whatever genuine intellectual curiosity Blodget has about this issue–and compassion towards marginalized and/or persecuted peoples, …was made a moot point by that headline. And as a Jew, I can tell Blodget, this does not necessarily help our cause.”

Stereotypically, Kamer thinks this discussion is about “helping the Jewish cause.” His reply reflects the Jewish delusion that they are “marginalized and/or persecuted” rather than dominant and exclusive. He thinks any Jew who is self-critical must be “self loathing” – indicative of a closed, authoritarian society. 


Continues in full at source…

Hosni Mubarak has fallen. Assad clings on. Yet the fate of their nations is anyone’s guess

Robert Fisk – The Independent June 4, 2012

There is nothing so bad as a journalist in the wrong place at the wrong time. So here I was in Cairo, covering the trial of Hosni Mubarak, arriving from Lebanon – where 15 people have just died – while Bashar al-Assad pops up on my television screen yesterday to say that his army was not responsible for the massacre at Houla a week ago. And there was Assad, talking of the most serious crisis since the end of colonialism. Well, you can say that again.

And I don’t feel a lot happier. Ahmed Shafik, the Mubarak loyalist, has the support of the Christian Copts, and Assad has the support of the Syrian Christians. The Christians support the dictators. Not much of a line, is it?

On Saturday, the dictator of Egypt was sentenced to life. On Sunday, the dictator of Syria fought for his life. And he said – he warned, he threatened – that his war could extend to other countries. And we all know what that means. The future of the Lebanese city of Tripoli is in doubt. Not long ago, a Lebanese friend said to me that she feared for her country if Assad was in danger. Now I know what she means.

These are bad times for the Arab “spring” or awakening. In Yemen, there are bad times – the government helping the US drone attacks on Al Jazeera operatives. In Egypt, there are Americans who want to support Shafik. Yet in the country’s Al Ahram daily, editors are free to say that the first reaction of Shafik’s spokesman to the presidential election is that “the revolution has ended”. And they can write that Shafik’s rule would be “a much more ferocious version of a police state than what was under the second half of Mubarak’s three-decade rule”. The paper spoke of “endless sacrifices of young men and women so that all of Egypt, those who took part in the revolution, those who sympathised with it, and those who opposed it, can have a better life whereby violations will not remain the norm”. Could I have read anything like this under Mubarak?

But could I have read anything like this in Lebanon? Is Lebanon not serious about freedom? Is Yemen? The fact is that the Arabs are waking up – which is why I prefer the Arab “awakening” to the Arab “spring”. And I think Syria is “awakening”. Now, President Assad said yesterday that his country’s “security” is a “red line” and implied – only implied, mind you – that the war in Syria (and he called it a war) could topple over into a neighbouring state (for which, read Lebanon). And so I am worried about Lebanon and the Alawites in Lebanon who support Assad, who deserve better.

But I am also aware that the Shafik warriors, those in Washington who want Shafik to restore Egypt’s old relationship with Israel, those who want, in effect, to restore Mubarak’s dictatorship, to recreate the old paradigm (Mubarak “stability” versus the old fear of Muslim Brotherhood), will want to pump up Christian fears and frighten the West with the awfulness of “Muslim fundamentalism”, will pop up their heads again as surely as Assad. And as the Republicans close in on Obama, will they not show their love for Mubarak’s last Prime Minister?

But maybe we shall have to live, perhaps, with Mohamed Morsi as the next President of Egypt, a Muslim Brother, a man who will have to show that a Muslim government can actually run an economy, can tame corruption (or cannot, as the case may be) as the Muslim government of Algeria should have been allowed to do in 1991. I’m not sure.

But let’s go back to Lebanon. Its press is free. Its people are. It got shot of Syria in 1995 (albeit at the cost of an ex-Prime Minister’s life). It can look over the border to Syria to see how democratic and free its nation is. And – dare one say this? – poor Syria. It doesn’t deserve the pain and massacres it is enduring. Its President is claiming that international conspiracies are destroying his country. Given Saudi Arabia’s and Qatar’s interest in helping the resistance, he may be right. And weapons are certainly entering Syria from Lebanon.

So here’s a bad omen from Cairo. Shafik may win – though Mubarak’s trial may prove otherwise. Assad may fail – though I fear the civil war of which Kofi Annan speaks. And Lebanon will live. Maybe I should fly back tomorrow.


Symbolic Pics of the Month (06/12)

Vigilant Citizen – June 2012

Kristen Stewart appears in the new movie "Snow White & the Huntsman. Promotinal material for the movie prominently features the one-eye sign.

Another ad for the movie.

In this pic, Rihanna is walking around with a t-shirt that has the words "Minds Control". The words are placed in order to form an inverted cross. Looks like she thoroughly adopted the symbolism of her handlers.

Continues with more pics at source …

Drone blitz on Pakistan enters third straight day – June 4, 2012

Armed Reaper drone. Click to enlarge

Rockets fired from a US drone killed between eight and 15 people in north-west

Pakistan on Monday, officials have said in varying accounts. It is the third strike in as many days after attacks on Saturday and Sunday killed a total of 12 people.

The latest strike targeted a militant hideout in the Hesokhel village of the North Waziristan tribal region, officials said.

US drones hit targets in the South Waziristan tribal region on Saturday and Sunday. There have been a total of seven strikes in less than two weeks.

The United States and Pakistan are deadlocked in difficult negotiations for the reopening of overland supply routes to Nato forces in Afghanistan. No breakthrough is in sight.

Islamabad blocked the routes in November 2011 after 24 Pakistani soldiers were killed by cross-border “friendly fire” from Nato aircraft. To reopen the roads Islamabad wants an apology and an end to drone strikes but the US president, Barack Obama, is taking a hardline stand.

The latest attack followed closely on the heels of another drone strike on Sunday that killed 10 suspected militants. Two Pakistani intelligence officials said in that attack, four missiles were fired at targets in the village of Mana Raghzai in South Waziristan near the border with Afghanistan.

At the time of the attack, suspected militants were gathered to offer condolences to the brother of a militant commander killed during another drone strike on Saturday. The brother was one of those who died in the Sunday morning strike.

On Sunday, gunmen killed four Shia minority Muslims, a police officer and a bystander in a busy market of south-western Pakistani city of Quetta, said police officer Abdul Wahid, who added that the killings had a sectarian motive.


These Two Traps Are Absolutely Destroying The Next Generation Of Young Men In America

End of the American Dream – June 1, 2012

Have you ever noticed that our young girls seem to be far ahead of our young boys and that our young women seem to be much more “together” than our young men are? Have you ever noticed how many young American men almost seem like zombies and find even the most basic human interactions extremely awkward? Well, this didn’t happen by accident. Researchers are finding that there are two traps in particular that are absolutely destroying the next generation of young men in America. One is video game addiction and the other is pornography. In the old days, the parks and ball fields of America would be flooded with young boys after school was done for the day, but now our parks and our ball fields are very quiet. So where did all the boys go? Well, they are all sitting at home staring into computer screens. Yes, there are also young girls and young women that are addicted to these things, but the truth is that these addictions are far more prevalent among young men. Unfortunately, it is not going to be easy to reverse the damage that is being done to the next generation of young men in America, and that is very frightening.

These days, most parents don’t consider video game addiction to be a major crisis. Many parents are just glad to have something that will keep their children occupied and out of their hair.

But the truth is that video game addiction is very serious. One study discovered that 88 percent of all Americans between the ages of 8 and 18 play video games, and that approximately four times as many boys are addicted to video games as girls are.

If you are raising boys right now you probably know exactly what I am talking about. Most boys are absolutely obsessed with video games these days.

Trust me, I know.

I was one of them

When I was a young man I would play video games for endless hours.

I would often spend entire days playing games like Starcraft and John Madden football.

Once in a while I would stay up all night playing video games.

I was really, really good at them but the rest of my life suffered.

Not that there is anything fundamentally wrong with video games. They can be a lot of fun, but when it becomes an addiction that can be extremely damaging.

Today, the average boy spends 13 hours every single week playing video games.

That is an astounding number.

Unfortunately, the second trap that we are going to talk about is almost certainly doing even more damage to our young men.

The Internet has improved our lives in a lot of ways, but one of the very negative things that it has done is that it has unleashed a giant flood of filth into our homes.

Our young men have more access to sexual content than ever before, and this is having some horrific consequences.

The following example comes from a recent Daily Mail article….

A boy of 12 who raped a nine-year-old girl after watching hard-core pornography online was spared jail yesterday as his lawyer warned of a generation of children growing up with a ‘skewed view’ on sex.

The schoolboy, who is now 14, told police he had raped the little girl because he wanted to ‘feel grown up’ after watching porn online.

In a disturbing case that has raised fresh concerns about the sexualisation of children, the teenager had unrestricted access to the web and was able to freely look at sexually explicit material.

Continues in full at source…

Cyber Warning From A Computer Security Expert

Andrew E. Kramer – New York Times June 3, 2012

When Eugene Kaspersky, the founder of Europe’s largest antivirus company, discovered the Flame virus that is afflicting computers in Iran and the Middle East, he recognized it as a technologically sophisticated virus that only a government could create.

He also recognized that the virus, which he compares to the Stuxnet virus built by programmers employed by the United States and Israel, adds weight to his warnings of the grave dangers posed by governments that manufacture and release viruses on the Internet.

“Cyberweapons are the most dangerous innovation of this century,” he told a gathering of technology company executives, called the CeBIT conference, last month in Sydney, Australia. While the United States and Israel are using the weapons to slow the nuclear bomb-making abilities of Iran, they could also be used to disrupt power grids and financial systems or even wreak havoc with military defenses.

Computer security companies have for years used their discovery of a new virus or worm to call attention to themselves and win more business from companies seeking computer protection. Mr. Kaspersky, a Russian computer security expert, and his company, Kaspersky Lab, are no different in that regard. But he is also using his company’s integral role in exposing or decrypting three computer viruses apparently intended to slow or halt Iran’s nuclear program to argue for an international treaty banning computer warfare.

A growing array of nations and other entities are using online weapons, he says, because they are “thousands of times cheaper” than conventional armaments.

While antivirus companies might catch some, he says, only an international treaty that would ban militaries and spy agencies from making viruses will truly solve the problem.

The wide disclosure of the details of the Flame virus by Kaspersky Lab also seems intended to promote the Russian call for a ban on cyberweapons like those that blocked poison gas or expanding bullets from the armies of major nations and other entities.

And that puts the Russian company in a difficult position because it already faces suspicions that it is tied to the Russian government, accusations Mr. Kaspersky has constantly denied as he has built his business.

While Russian officials have not commented on the discovery of Flame, the Russian minister of telecommunications gave a speech, also in May, calling for an international cyberweapon ban. Russia has also pushed for a bilateral treaty with the United States.

The United States has agreed to discuss such a disarmament treaty with the Russians, but has also tried to encourage Russia to prosecute online crime, which flourishes in this country.

The United States has long objected to the Russian crusade for an online arms control ban. “There is no broad international support for a cyberweapon ban,” says James A. Lewis, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. “This is a global diplomatic ploy by the Russians to take down a perceived area of U.S. military advantage.”

Russia, many security experts note, has been accused of using cyberwarfare in disputes with Estonia and wars in Georgia.

Mr. Kaspersky said that at no point did he cooperate with the Federal Security Agency, the successor agency to the K.G.B., as the Flame virus was not a threat to Russian citizens.

Kaspersky Lab, he said, felt justified exposing the Flame virus because the company was working under the auspices of a United Nations agency. But the company has been noticeably silent on viruses perpetrated in its own backyard, where Russian-speaking criminal syndicates controlled a third of the estimated $12 billion global cybercrime market last year, according to the Russian security firm Group-IB.

Some say there is good reason. “He’s got family,” said Sean Sullivan, an adviser at F-Secure, a computer security firm in Helsinki. “I wouldn’t expect them to be the most aggressive about publicizing threats in their neighborhood for fear those neighbors would retaliate.”

Last year, Mr. Kaspersky’s 19-year-old son was kidnapped by criminals demanding a ransom. The kidnappers did not appear to have ties to any of Russia’s online criminal syndicates, but Mr. Sullivan says, “It was probably a wake-up call.”

Some computer security firms say Mr. Kaspersky’s researchers have hyped Flame. It is too early, his critics say, to call the virus a “cyberweapon” and to suggest it was sponsored by a state.

Joe Jaroch, a vice president at Webroot, an antivirus maker, says he first encountered a sample of Flame in 2007. He says he did not publicize the discovery because he did not consider the code sophisticated. “There are many more dangerous viruses out there,” he said. “I would be shocked if this was the work of a nation state.”

Mr. Sullivan, from F-Secure, said: “It’s interesting and complex, but not sleek and stealthy. It could be the work of a military contractor — Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and other contractors are developing programs like these for different intelligence services. To call it a cyberweapon says more about Kaspersky’s cold war mentality than anything else. It has to be taken with a grain of salt.”

Whether the skepticism is authentic or professional jealousy, no one doubts the Kaspersky Lab’s skills. Mr. Kaspersky studied cryptography at a high school that was co-sponsored by the K.G.B. and Russia’s ministry of defense, and later took a job with the Russian military. He started tracking computer viruses as a side project in 1989, after his work PC was infected with one. In 1997, he co-founded Kaspersky Lab with his wife at the time, Natalya, in their Moscow apartment.

The headquarters of the team that unraveled Flame is an open-plan office of cubicles overlooking a park on the edge of Moscow. Mr. Kaspersky eschews suits and his researchers wear Converse shoes and tattered jeans, much as their counterparts in the United States do. A Darth Vader mask adorns one desk.

Talent also abounds. The Belarussian virus hunter who first found the Stuxnet virus in 2010, Sergei Ulasen, now works for Kaspersky Lab.

Today, the company is one of Russia’s most recognizable exports. It commands 8 percent of the world’s software security market for businesses, with revenue reaching $612 million last year.

Yet Mr. Kaspersky says he often has to dispute suggested ties to Russia’s security services. Analysts say suspicions about the firm’s Russian roots have hindered its expansion abroad.

“The U.S. government, defense contractors and lots of U.S. companies won’t work with them,” said Peter Firstbrook, director of malware research at Gartner, a research firm. “There’s no evidence that they have any back doors in their software or any ties to the Russian mafia or state. It’s a red herring, but there is still a concern that you can’t operate in Russia without being controlled by the ruling party.”

Mr. Kaspersky said his company tackled Flame upon the request of the International Telecommunications Unit, a branch of the United Nations. He assigned about three dozen engineers to investigate a virus that was erasing files on computers at Iran’s oil ministry. Kaspersky researchers, some of whom had analyzed suspected United States and Israeli viruses that destroyed centrifuges in Iran’s nuclear program two years earlier, were already following up on complaints from Iranian clients that Kaspersky’s antivirus software was not catching a new type of malware on their systems, Kaspersky officials said.

“We saw an unusual structure of the code, compressed and encrypted in several ways,” Vitaly Kamlyuk, a researcher on the team that cracked the virus.

It was the first virus to look for Bluetooth-enabled devices in the vicinity, either to spread to those devices, map a user’s social or professional circle, or steal information from them. The program also contained a command called “microbe” that silently turned on users’ microphones to record their conversations and sent audio files back to the attackers. It was clearly not a virus made by criminals.

“Antivirus companies are in a not easy situation,” Mr. Kaspersky said. “We have to protect our customers everywhere in the world. On the other hand, we understand there are quite serious powers behind these viruses.”

Even though finding viruses first is usually a boon for antivirus companies, cracking Flame, Mr. Kaspersky said, might hurt his business in one regard. “For the next five years, we can forget about government contracts in the United States.”


International Bureau of Double Standards—The CNN/Iran File

Anthony Lawson – My Cat Bird Seat June 3, 2012

This video looks at a CNN documentary (April, 2012 with repeats) about the Iran nuclear issue, and examines the role of the mainstream media in keeping the public uninformed about the real problem-nation in the Middle East:
Nuclear-armed, Apartheid Israel.

The original CNN programme “A Nuclear Iran: The Expert Intel” was downloaded from the location given, below, but I cannot guarantee how long it will remain available:…

Interesting link: Iran finance minister: ‘Rest assured’ record oil prices over nuclear sanctions…