By wmw_admin on April 13, 2011
Brilliant analysis of the media’s presentation and the authorities complicity in the 7/7 attacks. Posted as the documentary maker is out on bail but still faces possible prolonged imprisonment under false charges. If you haven’t already seen it this is a MUST SEE
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on April 13, 2011
For making the momentous 7/7 Ripple Effect, which exposed the lies behind the July 7 atrocity, John Hill now faces spurious charges to silence him. A brief recap on his story with updates and linked interveiw
Posted in Controlling the News, London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on April 11, 2011
A claims investigator for an insurance company and a leading firm of solicitors with experience of “forensic” matters writes: the phrase “You couldn’t make it up seems approprate to 7/7 … Except someone apparently did!”
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on March 24, 2011
The deaths of Jean Charles de Menezes and Ian Tomlinson suggest that we are.
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on March 7, 2011
Is it not bewildering that a convicted criminal can give evidence in a British court, from jail, on the explicit premise that his sentence gets reduced if he says the right thing…..
Posted in Behind The "News", London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on February 27, 2011
Nick Kollerstrom reveals that a special room had been set up to receive the dead of the July 7th bombings, the contract for which arrived on the contractor’s desk on July 6th, the day before the massacres
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on February 24, 2011
Nick Kollerstrom explains why the explosives that wreaked carnage on July 7th couldn’t have been made of peroxide and black pepper, as the government claims
Posted in Behind The "News", London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on February 23, 2011
William Walshe was sitting right next Shehzad Tanweer when the alleged “suicide bomber” detonated his bomb on July 7th. Amazingly, Walshe survived. Stranger still, the 7/7 Inquest never even asked for his testimony
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on February 22, 2011
With the ongoing inquest into the 7/7 terror attacks a correspondent asks: Where and who were Peter Powers’ agents in his mock bombings. Where did they go? Have they been eliminated from the enquiry OR ARE THEY THE ENQUIRY?
Posted in Behind The "News", Essential Reading, London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on February 14, 2011
More than being an informant on al Qaida – which in Arabic literally means “toilet” – Babar may have been a double agent all along. Meaning he was in the pay of covert agencies even as he trained the “terrorists” puportedly behind 7/7
Posted in "The War on Terror", Current Affairs, London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on February 14, 2011
The man who trained the 7/7 bombers has been released after just 5 years. Leading to suspicions that he may have been acting as an informant or, as this website believes, something more
Posted in "The War on Terror", London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on December 20, 2010
Another attempt by the authorities to maintain heightened public anxiety over the prospect of terror?
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on December 19, 2010
Did someone plant the evidence implicating Jermaine Lindsey in the 7/7 bombing? Along with his passport and his driving licence? Nick Kollerstrom on the unanswered questions posed by the 7/7 Inquest
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on December 10, 2010
Nick Kollerstrom presents a convincing case that elements of the British Army’s own Force Reconnaissance Regiment may have been behind the 7/7 attacks
Posted in Behind The "News", Iraq, London Terror Attacks |
By Kevin Boyle on December 8, 2010
It’s an old ploy: set up a campaign group and then use it to discredit opposition to the official narrative. It happened in the aftermath of 9/11 and now seems to be happening with 7/7 and those who dispute the official version of events
Posted in Ersatz Media Activists, London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on December 1, 2010
The Inquest has heard over 70 testify on the Aldgate blast but it does not wish to hear from the man who was sitting right next to the alleged ‘suicide bomber?’ Why? Could what he witnessed be at odds with the official version of events?
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on November 20, 2010
UPDATED: More evidence emerges at the 7/7 Inquest, which is at odds with the official version of events. And yet again it is given virtually zero coverage in the mainstream media
Posted in London Terror Attacks |
By wmw_admin on November 17, 2010
Body Counts at Aldgate and Edgeware Road blasts both short by one –’the bombers’. However the inquest ruling that ‘identification of bodies’ was ‘outside the scope of the proceedings’ leads one to ask: is this an inquest or a cover-up?
Posted in London Terror Attacks |