“No Hate Crime” When Jews Beat Up Gay Black

Rev Ted Pike — Truthtellers April 29, 2014

Victim of Hasidic assault: Taj Patterson

Government officials described the recent alleged murder of three non-Jews in Kansas by former KKK leader Frazier Glenn Cross as a “hate crime”—though no Jews were killed. His intention to kill Jews, said officials, is enough for indictment under the federal Matthew Shephard Hate Crimes Prevention Act. This means he could be punished three times more harshly than if he had killed the same people without anti-Semitic feelings.

Yet last week the justice system had a very different response to a similarly violent hate crime.

In December 2013, black, homosexual student Taj Patterson was violently assaulted in Brooklyn by Jewish “shomrim” (security police) who are Ultra-Orthodox and thus strongly oppose homosexuality. The attackers, who blinded Patterson in one eye, shouted anti-homosexual epithets.

But a New York Grand Jury ruled last week that the five attackers will not be charged with a hate crime, only civil penalties. Jewish watchdog group, “Failed Messiah,” describes the attack:

Members of the patrol detained Patterson while investigating neighbors’ reports that he had damaged cars; however, they did not call the police. Despite the fact that these reports of vandalism proved to be unfounded, the group, which had grown to approximately 15 members, surrounded Patterson, preventing him from continuing his walk home. When Patterson tried to get away from the group, he was held down, and savagely punched and kicked by a number of the males surrounding him, including these defendants. Patterson sustained injuries to his head and body, the most serious of which was a torn retina and a broken eye socket, causing him to lose vision in his right eye. The beating ceased only when passersby arrived and threatened to take pictures of the group assaulting Patterson. All of the assailants fled the scene, leaving Patterson on the ground injured. None of the attackers were present when the police and an ambulance responded to 911 calls.

The District Attorney said that a Kings County grand jury has indicted the following (5) defendants…for acting in concert to commit Gang Assault in the First Degree, and other related charges. If convicted, the defendants each face up to 25 years in prison.

Why are these defendants not charged with a hate crime for a clearly bias-motivated assault against a person who has not one but two identities—black and homosexual—specially protected under the federal hate law? They committed the crime while shouting their bias for all to hear! If these were white attackers, yelling “homophobic” slurs while beating a black homosexual, it would have been front-page news across the nation and resulted in hate crime charges for all attackers. But these assailants face no tripled penalties, no hate crime charges. Why? Because they are Jewish.

In 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder informed the Senate Judiciary Committee that Jews who commit hate crimes, with other ethnic minorities, homosexuals, Muslims, and even women, will not be prosecuted under the Matthew Shepard Act. They will only face civil penalties. White men and Christians, however, face possible triple penalties—even if they fail, as did Cross, to harm members of federally protected groups; all that is necessary to be convicted of a hate crimes charge is a crime and bias against members of a federally protected group.

Indictment of the five Shomrim attackers without hate crimes charges contrasts sharply with the quickness of the government to label, indict, and prosecute 15 Amish Christians in 2012 for the “hate crime” of forcibly shaving the heads of theological rivals. Although no one was hurt, the FBI and US Justice Department were proud to have “served justice” by meting triple penalty prison sentences of up to 15 years for 15 Amish adults, disrupting families and effectively orphaning many children. (See Convicted Amish Are Not “Hate Criminals”)

Conspiracy to Ensnare Christians

Who contrived such twisted, discriminatory laws? The Jewish Anti-Defamation League proudly boasts that “Our legal experts pioneered hate crime laws and work to implement them nationwide.” (“Problems to Solutions: Building a Better World, ADL Annual Report,” adl.org). ADL continues to argue in court against efforts by lawyers for the Amish to overturn their defendants’ convictions. It supports without compromise the fifteen year sentence meted to Sam Mullet, patriarch of the beard cutting Mullet clan, as just and proportional to the offence.

ADL’s goal in more than 60 nations and 45 US states which have adopted its hate laws is sinister. They aim to arrest Christians and members of the political right as often as possible, stacking the legal systems with indictments and convictions of those of a traditionalist, nationalist, or anti-Zionist perspective—while being careful no Jew is ever indicted for a hate crime. This creates a legal record testifying that Christians and conservatives are notoriously inclined toward hate and violence, while Jews are not. Jews are victims of Christian hate. Someday, when ADL’s hate crime gestapos really bite down on the right, innumerable legal precedents will be available to prosecutors against Christians and patriots, but virtually none against Jews. Jesus prophesied that in times of persecution preceding his Second Coming, anti-Christ Jews will judge Christians in their synagogues and deliver them to prison. (Matt. 10:17)

The case of Taj Patterson reveals that of three privileged groups under the federal hate law, Jews are given the highest privilege of all. Hate laws—which were, according to ADL, conceived, written, and implemented by Jews—make members of their tribe the most protected of protected groups. Under ADL hate laws, “equality and justice for all” has been replaced by a new prosecutorial credo: preferential treatment for Jews, no mercy for Christians.

The fact that Taj Patterson, a member of two usually highly protected groups, blacks and homosexuals, cannot obtain hate crimes justice and protection, certainly also puts blacks and homosexuals in the category of second-class citizens. Where does that then put lowly whites, males, Christians, and members of the Christian/conservative and anti-Zionist right? We are now third-class citizens.

This is a reminder that Jewish Supremacists, making use of blacks, homosexuals, even Zionist Christians, have no real love for any of these groups. They are fodder for Zionist world ambitions. They are expendable. The sooner all of these factions realize they are being exploited, and work to roll back a half century of freedom-destroying hate laws, the safer we all will be.

Source

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.