Introduction — Feb 8, 2014
Anyone paying attention will be struck by the inherent contradiction in U.S. State Department claims that Iran is assisting Al-Qaeda in Syria., dutifully reported by the Wall Street Journal below.
First of all Syria is Iran’s foremost ally in the Middle East. So why should Iran assist fighters who are trying to overthrow Syrian President Asaad?
If ever the term “self-defeating” applied, this is it. Quite simply it defies logic.
Moreover, the fact that these allegations are being made by a U.S. State Department official should make us even more suspicious. For the most generous supporter of Al-Qaeda fighters in Syria until now has been Washington’s chief ally in the Gulf, Saudi Arabia.
Is this claim intended to divert attention from Saudi Arabia and Washington’s, indirect, sponsorship of terrorism in Syria?
Equally suspect is Jay Solomon’s inability to name the individual making this claim in his report below? Is this because the claim is really meant confuse rather than clarify?
Is this why the Wall Street Journal doesn’t name the official making this obviously false claim? Are they covering for him or her, literally, and selling us yet more disinformation disguised as journalism?
Treasury’s charge sees Tehran enabling al Qaeda in Syria
Jay Solomon — Wall Street Journal via Iran Focus — Feb 6, 2014
The Obama administration charged that Tehran has allowed senior al Qaeda members operating from Iranian soil to facilitate the movement of Sunni fighters into Syria.
The allegation by the Treasury Department on Thursday would suggest that elements of Iran’s government or military were at least tacitly supporting the opposing sides of Syria’s civil war.
Iranian officials denied the accusations, saying Washington was harming diplomatic efforts aimed at ending the international standoff over Tehran’s nuclear program.
The Iranian government is Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s closest military and diplomatic ally. U.S., European and Arab governments have repeatedly charged Iran’s elite military unit, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or IRGC, of deploying soldiers to Syria to bolster Mr. Assad’s regime, an accusation Iran has denied.
U.S. officials, however, have intermittently accused Tehran and the IRGC of colluding with Sunni militant groups, who historically are enemies of Tehran’s Shiite government, but also are fighting the U.S. and its allies.
On Thursday, the Treasury Department sanctioned three IRGC officers for allegedly providing support for Afghanistan’s Taliban, a hard-line Sunni group.
Iran’s government nearly went to war with the Taliban in 1998, when they governed Afghanistan, after Taliban killed nearly a dozen Iranian diplomats in the city of Mazar-i-Sharif.
The Treasury sanctioned a senior Uzbek member of al Qaeda, Jafar al-Uzbeki, for allegedly using Iran to move fighters into Syria. The U.S. said Mr. Jafar is part of an al Qaeda network operating from Iran that has also moved fighters into Pakistan and Afghanistan “and operates there with the knowledge of Iranian authorities.”
“The network also uses Iran as a transit point for moving funding and foreign fighters through Turkey to support al Qaeda-affiliated elements inside Syria,” including the Nusra Front, the Treasury said.
The Nusra Front has emerged as one of the Sunni militias challenging Mr. Assad’s regime. U.S. officials said they weren’t certain that Iran’s government was aware of the al Qaeda member’s involvement in Syria, even though they believed Tehran was aware that he was operating in Iran.
Iran’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, denied during a talk in Davos, Switzerland, in January that Iran’s government or the IRGC is in any way supporting al Qaeda, the Taliban or other Sunni militant groups. “It would be preposterous to claim Iran, which is a target of al Qaeda, is backing them,” he said.
The Obama administration has increasingly sought to gain Iran’s support in ending Syria’s civil war, which is estimated by the United Nations to have killed at least 130,000 people.
The U.S. hoped at one point that Iran would attend talks in Geneva aimed at ending the war. But Washington pulled its support for Iran’s attendance after Tehran refused to commit to establishing a transitional government to replace Mr. Assad.
U.S. officials have said that cooperation with Tehran on Syria is complicated by what they believe are significant divisions inside the Iranian government. Iranian policy on Syria, they said, is in the hands of the IRGC, not with President Hasan Rouhani or the Foreign Ministry.
Secretary of State John Kerry sought to discuss Syria with Mr. Zarif last week on the sidelines of an international security conference in Munich, a senior U.S. official said, but Mr. Zarif said he didn’t have the authority to discuss the Syrian conflict with his American interlocutor.
U.S. officials said they have been perplexed in recent weeks by the Assad regime’s tactics in fighting its largely Sunni military opponents and al Qaeda.
U.S. officials have said they have picked up intelligence in recent months suggesting the Assad regime was buying oil from the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, one of the most powerful Sunni militias in Syria’s north, and holding back from bombing the group’s offices in Rakka province.
U.S. officials said they didn’t believe Damascus was coordinating with ISIS. But some believe Damascus has been seeking to use the militia to further undermine other rebels. ISIS has been fighting more secular opponents of Mr. Assad for control of Rakka and other parts of Syria.
Syrian officials have denied any ties to ISIS or al Qaeda, and have accused the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Turkey of supporting these groups.