Adolf Hitler is widely regarded as the most evil person that ever walked this planet. This has obviously a lot to do with the fact that – at least as far as the official narrative goes – Hitler was ultimately responsible for the second world war and the industrial scale murder of as many as six million Jews.
Anyone who has genuinely researched the matter though has probably come across two alternative schools of thoughts, one that claims that Hitler was a much maligned formidable enemy of Communism and the Jewish forces behind it, and one that calls Hitler a tool of the very international Jewry that he supposedly fought.
A weakness of the apologist position is that it is too focused on Hitler’s proclaimed intentions and not enough on the outcomes of his actions:
1. the creation of the Jewish state,
2. the massive spread of Communism and Socialism, and
3. decades of military build up (‘cold war’) between East and West.
The Hitler admirers are understandably unimpressed with any suggestion that the object of their affection could have been a traitor. They make the point that Hitler – like no other historic figure before him – was the victim of systematic character assassination. Not enough, they argue, that his enemies had falsely accused him of the murder of six million Jews. Now they are even adding insult to injury by accusing him of being a Rothschild bastard and having conspired against the German people.
That sentiment makes a lot of sense. Hitler has been accused of the weirdest things: Having been madly in love with a Jewish girl as a young man while studying in Gratz, having worked as a gay prostitute in Vienna, having had deformed sexual organs, and a lot more unsavoury accusations. The alleged Rothschild connection has all the trimmings of yet another Zionist libel.
On the other hand, if Hitler had been a tool of the Jewish merchant bankers, he couldn’t have done a better job. He made a large number of military and political mistakes that proved to be disastrous for his country. Letting the beaten British Army escape across the Channel, not sealing Gibraltar, losing the 6th Army in Stalingrad, declaring war to the United States, and many more.
Henry Makow, a leading supporter of the Rothschild puppet theory, also argues:
Hallett’s theory also explains why Hitler, supposedly the arch enemy of Jewish bankers, acted like he didn’t know the Rothschilds controlled England (and America) when this was practically common knowledge. (See, Hilaire Belloc, “The Jews” 1922). If Hitler were for real, he wouldn’t have tried to accommodate these countries. England would have been invaded and conquered before Russia was attacked.
Hallett’s hypothesis explains
1) Why Hitler was able to expand into the Rhineland etc. without fear of retaliation.
2) Why the Nazi war machine was financed and built by the Bank of England and a Who’s Who of Anglo American corporations controlled by the Illuminati.
3) Why Hitler never sealed the Mediterranean at Gibraltar; and why the Spanish dictator Franco remained neutral, despite the huge debt he owed the Nazis from the Civil War.
4) Why I.G. Farben headquarters in Frankfurt was never bombed. This became CIA headquarters.
5) Why the Bank of England rewarded Hitler for taking Prague by giving him the Czech gold reserves held in London.
It would explain why Hitler gave his ridiculous racial policies priority over actually winning the war. He could have enlisted millions of Slavs (and even many Jews) in overcoming Communist Russia. Instead, he made them implacable enemies willing to fight to the death.
Another point that supports the thesis that Hitler was a puppet of the people he claimed to fight is that so many of them escaped the Nazi terror. The mother of the head of the German Warburg dynasty for example remained safely in Hamburg until the end of the war. Other prominent members of the Jewish banking elite were saved from deportation by Hitler’s body guard, the SS, and escorted into freedom. Many more left Germany unhindered, a fact supporting the claim that they weren’t escaping Nazi persecution but the terror of the Allied terror bombing, which destroyed 90% of Germany’s civilian infrastructure and left a million civilians dead.
On the other hand, if Hitler was indeed a tool of the Rothschilds, the uncrowned Kings of the Jews, why would he have killed millions of their tribe? After all, the bankers needed them to populate and defend the to be created Jewish state. It’s one thing to round them up and herd them into concentration camps for future deportation, and another to kill them all in chemical slaughter-houses. Isn’t it far more likely, that those concentration camps were in fact transition camps as part of a forced immigration programme?
According to the post-war Red Cross figures and the official camp authority death books ‘only’ about 300,000 prisoners – 200,000 of them Jews – died in the concentration camps, most of them from typhus and there are tons of evidence collated by Holocaust revisionists that give reason to doubt in the genocide claims made by the Jews.
Even if the alleged Holocaust was the idea of a small clique of certifiably psychopaths within the ruling elite, those Sabbateans or Illuminati wouldn’t have been able to put their plans into action without the support of less crazy members of the ruling elite. Given the strong Jewish element within that ruling elite, it is highly unlikely that they would have allowed millions of Jews to be killed.
As often with competing historic theories, the truth probably lies somewhere in between the two competing revisionist camps. Hitler was a Rothschild tool, yes, but he didn’t engage in genocide against the Jews. The ‘final solution’ was not an extermination, but a forced labour and immigration programme. Hitler’s goal was not to wipe out the Jewish race, but to strengthen Communism, create the conditions for the creation of a Jewish state, and help the bankers make obscene amounts of money.
 Was Hitler an Illuminati Agent?
Original soure: http://www.ziopedia.org/articles/editorial/hitler,_his_bankers_and_the_holocaust/