Introduction — August 18, 2013
The authorities may go through the motions of new investigations but the fact that they have ignored Tomlinson’s affidavit suggests otherwise. As do official French claims that ALL the cameras in the approach to the Pont de l’Alma and in the tunnel itself “were not working” at the time of her fatal crash.
The authorities are indeed doing their utmost to conceal the fact that Princess Diana was assassinated because:
1) She was surplus to requirements having produced two offspring for the throne and having separated from Prince Charles could have proved a source of future embarrassment with further revelations about the royals.
2) Even in death her grave site is still one of the most visited memorial sites in the world. While alive however, Princess Diana was even more popular and officials feared that her appeal could easily have eclipsed that of the Royal House of Windsor. As such she was viewed as a possible threat to their continued dominance.
3) Moreover her championing of various causes, such her heading a campaign against landmines, meant that she had a conscience and couldn’t be controlled.
All told Princess Diana posed a real threat to the British establishment, all the more so as she was one of their own. As such she had to be removed and a far better and less obvious way to do this than outright assassination was an “accident”.
So while new details about Diana’s death may have been recieved — probably originating from a former SAS man, who may indeed have known something as they carry out many of British Intelligence’s bloody operations — don’t expect any new revelations from the corporate media.
Instead expect half-truths and disinformation. For the media in collusion with the powers that be will now do their utmost to conceal or distort any real truth that may emerge about Princess Diana’s death.
Was Princess Diana MURDERED by a British soldier? Metropolitan Police ‘assessing credibility’ of new claim
James Rush and Francesca Infante — Daily Mail August 17, 2013
New information which has been passed to the police relating to the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed is thought to include an allegation that they were murdered by a member of the British military, it emerged tonight.
Scotland Yard said it is ‘scoping’ the information and ‘assessing its relevance and credibility’.
It is understood the allegation was made by the former parents-in-law of a former soldier based on information that the ex-soldier talked about in the past, according to a military source
It is believed the information was passed to the Metropolitan Police through the Royal Military Police.
A statement issued by Scotland Yard said: ‘The Metropolitan Police Service is scoping information that has recently been received in relation to the deaths and assessing its relevance and credibility.
‘The assessment will be carried out by officers from the specialist crime and operations command.
‘This is not a re-investigation and does not come under Operation Paget.’
Police said they are not prepared to discuss the matter further, while a royal spokeswoman said there will be no comment on the matter from Prince William or Prince Harry, or from Clarence House.
Diana, Dodi and chauffeur Henri Paul died after their Mercedes crashed in the tunnel, which left the Ritz Hotel on the morning of August 31 1997.
The hearing into the deaths of Diana and Dodi lasted more than 90 days with evidence from around 250 witnesses.
The inquests concluded on April 7, 2008, with a jury returning a verdict that the ‘People’s Princess’ and her boyfriend were unlawfully killed.
After the hearing, Metropolitan Police said they had spent £8 million on services arising from the inquest and the Operation Paget investigation from 2004 to 2006.
That money includes the cost of the legal team which represented the force’s commissioner at the inquest, police protection for the inquest jury and paying for the Paget inquiry, reported to have cost £3.6 million.
Former Met Police Commissioner Lord Stevens’s Paget investigation was launched in 2004 at the request of Michael Burgess, the Royal Coroner, who was then overseeing the future Diana inquest.
The former top policeman published his report in December 2006, rejecting the murder claims voiced by some, including Dodi’s father Mohamed al Fayed.
Lord Stevens’s investigation found that Diana was not murdered by British spies nor by the Duke of Edinburgh and she was not pregnant nor engaged to boyfriend Dodi.
Operation Paget concluded, just like the French investigation in 1999, that driver Henri Paul was drunk and driving at excessive speed.
The investigation dismissed the endless conspiracy theories sparked by the fatal accident.
Mr Paul had an alcohol level of around 1.74 grams per litre at the time of the crash – about twice the British drink-drive limit.
The black type S280 Mercedes was being driven through the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris at around 61 to 63mph – twice the speed limit for that section of road.
Lord Stevens said allegations that Diana was murdered were ‘unfounded’ and that he found nothing to justify further inquiries with members of the Royal Family.
The Ministry of Defence said tonight it was not commenting on the matter.