Iran’s Rohani Inherits Narrow Window to Avert Nuclear Showdown

Terry Atlas — Bloomberg August 1, 2013

Iranian President elect Hassan Rohani, center, with the grandson of the late Ayatollah Komeini, Hasan, to his right. Click to enlarge

The inauguration of Iran’s President Hassan Rohani in two days restarts the countdown toward a confrontation over the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program as it approaches Israel’s “red line” for military action.

After a decade of fruitless negotiations and tightening economic sanctions, the next 12 months may make or break the international effort to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Such weapons would pose an existential threat to Israel, endanger the U.S. and Europe, and trigger a nuclear arms race in the Persian Gulf region.

Rohani, who takes office Aug. 4 and was considered a relative moderate among the candidates permitted to run by the country’s Guardian Council, has spurred hopes in some quarters that Iran may be willing to curb its nuclear efforts. That view isn’t shared by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who calls Rohani a “wolf in sheep’s clothing,” and Iran’s nuclear advances are narrowing the window of time to avoid a conflict.

“There is a 75 percent to 80 percent chance that issue will have come to a head” by this time next year, said John McLaughlin, a former deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

As negotiations stalled during the wait for the election to choose President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s successor, Iran increased its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium and added centrifuges capable of shortening the “breakout” time to produce enough highly enriched fuel for a nuclear device.

The country could have a nuclear weapon within a year if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei chooses to do so, according to former U.S. Marine General James Mattis, who retired in March as commander of the U.S. Central Command.

Mideast Challenges

Iran joins Syria and Egypt on a mushrooming list of Mideast challenges for President Barack Obama. During a March visit to Israel, he said the U.S. “will do what is necessary” to keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Netanyahu has renewed his warnings of Israeli military action amid Iran’s nuclear advances and talk in the West of Rohani’s moderation.

“I’m convinced that last year Prime Minister Netanyahu wanted to attack Iran and was looking for some kind of green light, or at least a yellow light from Washington — and he didn’t get it,” said Gary Samore, who at the time was White House coordinator for arms control and weapons of mass destruction, proliferation and terrorism.

Obama has said there’s still time for talks and assured Netanyahu — as well as declaring publicly — that “all options are on the table” to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Agreement Sought

By pressuring Iran with sanctions, the U.S. and other world powers are seeking an initial agreement that halts its production of 20 percent enriched uranium — a step short of weapons grade — and removes its stockpile of medium-enriched uranium so it can’t be diverted for weapons.

Iran says its enrichment program is intended solely for electric power generation and medical research. Netanyahu in June said Iran needs to stop all uranium enrichment activities so that the Islamic Republic won’t get nuclear weapons.

The negotiating window will shut if Iran moves to avoid International Atomic Energy Agency monitoring, such as kicking out global inspectors. In that case, “I think it would be impossible to hold back the Israelis,” Samore told a security conference in Aspen, Colorado, last month. “In fact, it would probably be impossible to hold back the United States.”

U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that Khamenei, who has ultimate authority over the nuclear program, hasn’t decided to produce a weapon, though Iran is developing the ability to do so quickly.

Three Paths

The situation is complicated because Iran is advancing along three paths, each with weapons implications.

One is the production of 20 percent enriched uranium, which is the initial focus of Western concerns because it can quickly be purified to weapons grade. Netanyahu’s “red line” for a military strike is tied to the amount of medium-enriched uranium needed for a warhead, about 240 kilograms (529 pounds).

In May, the Vienna-based IAEA reported that Iran’s stockpile totaled 182 kilograms (401 pounds), up from 167 kilograms (368 pounds) three months earlier, after removing some for use in a reactor making medical isotopes. At that rate, Iran by mid-2014 would have enough to make one weapon, an amount the U.S. says is far more than needed to fuel its one existing medical research reactor and four others being planned.

Iran’s second effort involves thousands of new centrifuges at facilities at Natanz, 209 kilometers (130 miles) southeast of Tehran, and Fordow, near the holy city Qom, that cut the time needed to convert power-reactor grade uranium to weapons material. Iran has 5,000 centrifuges ready to join 12,000 in operation, Ahmadinejad said July 28, according to the state-run Mehr news agency.


Comment — August 2, 2013

The writer of the above seems to work on the implicit assumption that Iran actually has a nuclear weapons program. This is NOT an established fact. Like the articles about Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction that appeared before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, it provides apparent grounds to justify military action as a last resort.
Without any hard evidence.
However, as we now know Saddam never had any program to develop WMD. In retrospect it is clear that our “free press” furnished the justification for military action.
The above article seems to perform a similar function regarding Iran and we can expect to see many more in the months ahead.
Regardless of whether Iran has a nuclear weapons program or not, the fact is that Israel views Iran itself as an existential threat. Iran is steadily developing into a regional power of some magnitude — complete with its own indigenous weapons industry — and that worries Tel Aviv.
So Israel wants Iran neutralised but this is beyond its own military capability. Hence the constant harping on “Iran’s nuclear weapons program” — just as we were once heard a refrain similar about “Saddam’s WMD” — in an effort to get the Western powers to fulfil the task.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.