Why is professor Chossudovsky such a LIAR??…

While this website doesn’t agree that professor Chussudovsky is a Zionist agent, a reader highlights some serious inconsistencies in his work. Ed.

Why is professor Chossudovsky such a liar who loves beating the drums of war against Iran without the slightest regard for the Truth, as he openly promotes the lies spouted by the thoroughly discredited DEBKA Website, besides those he manufactures on his own.

– Example #1: QUOTE: “In recent developments, it is reported that two aircraft carrier strike groups (USS Nimitz and USS Truman) are en route to the Persian Gulf to join up with the USS Enterprise, which means that there will be, by late September, three carrier strike groups in the Persian Gulf.”

This comes straight out of Zionist Debka Disinformation Propaganda.

The truth is that there are only 1 Carrier Group and 2 Amphibious Warfare Ships, a very small fraction of what would be required to attack Iran successfully and prevent the closure of the Hormuz Strait with Iranian mines and missiles hidden in mountain caves all along the coast…

Ships Underway as of September 14, 2007


USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) – South China Sea
USS Enterprise (CVN 65) – Persian Gulf
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) – Atlantic Ocean

Amphibious Warfare Ships:

USS Tarawa (LHA 1 ) – Pacific Ocean
USS Nassau (LHA 4) – Atlantic Ocean
USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) – Persian Gulf
USS Bohomme Richard (LHD 6) – Persian Gulf
USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7) – Atlantic Ocean
Source: http://www.navy.mil/navydata/navy_legacy.asp?id=146

Carriers are rotated every 6 months: Nimitz left San Diego in early April and is in the South China Sea and on its way back home…

“However, USS Nimitz, which headed home today after reaching the end of its deployment period, will be missed by the Indian fighters.”

And USS Truman hasn’t left the US yet…

It’s very easy to find the real whereabouts of the Carrier Groups and I have caught SOBdovsky more than once spreading DEBKA’s Disinformation Propaganda on exactly the same subject: the strength of US Navy assets near Iran. The first time, I pointed out that he was wrong by posting a documented rebuttal on a different Website: did he learn from that, once he realised that he was misleading his readers?… Of course NOT, as he continues to systematically spread the very same LIES, hoping nobody checks him out!…

– Example #2: QUOTE: “Admiral Fallon is fully compliant with the Bush administration’s war plans in relation to Iran.”

This, of course is an unadulterated LIE: the TRUTH is that Admiral Fallon is sternly opposed to attacking Iran and beefing up Navy assets in the area…

“Admiral William Fallon, then President George W. Bush’s nominee to head the Central Command (CENTCOM), expressed strong opposition in February to an administration plan to increase the number of carrier strike groups in the Persian Gulf from two to three and vowed privately there would be no war against Iran as long as he was chief of CENTCOM.

Fallon private conveyed around the time of his confirmation hearing that an attack on Iran “will not happen on my watch.” IPS notes, “Fallon’s refusal to support a further naval buildup in the Gulf reflected his firm opposition to an attack on Iran and an apparent readiness to put his career on the line to prevent it.”

In conclusion, it would appear that, if Chossudovsky is not a Zionist agent busy planting disinformation, he’s in my opinion, clearly intellectually DISHONEST, his articles reeking of Debka should NOT be Trusted and his uncritical readers/admirers should realize that they’re being taken for a ride…