Iran Chases U.S. Drone Over Persian Gulf

Thom Shanker – New York Times March 15, 2013

An Iranian jet fighter pursued an American surveillance drone over the Persian Gulf this week but ended the chase after a radio warning from an American escort plane, Pentagon officials said Thursday.

The chase, which occurred Tuesday, followed a more serious encounter in November, when Iranian warplanes fired on, but missed, a Predator drone carrying out a similar classified surveillance mission.

Pentagon officials said that in both instances the drones were in international airspace.

Even so, the episodes illustrate the chance of unintended hostilities arising from encounters between remotely piloted surveillance craft and Iranian warplanes in the heavily militarized Persian Gulf.

The Pentagon press secretary, George Little, said that in the episode on Tuesday, an Iranian F-4 jet fighter approached within 16 miles of the Predator, which was being escorted by a pair of American military aircraft. United States officials did not say what type of American planes were involved.

“The Iranian aircraft departed after a verbal warning,” Mr. Little said. An initial Pentagon statement said one of the American escort planes had fired a flare to warn the Iranian jet away but later retracted that report. Mr. Little said that after the encounter in November, the United States sent a message to Iran that the American military would “continue to conduct surveillance flights over international waters consistent with longstanding practice and our commitment to the security of the region.”

“We also communicated that we reserve the right to protect our military assets as well as our forces and will continue to do so going forward,” Mr. Little said.

Iran deployed two Russian-made Su-25 jets known as Frogfoots in the November episode, which was the first known instance of Iranian warplanes firing on an American surveillance drone. The Predator model involved in both encounters resembles an upside-down flying spoon and is not easily confused with a piloted jet fighter.

In 2011, an RQ-170 surveillance drone operated by the C.I.A. rather than the military crashed in Iran during a mission that was believed to have been intended to map suspected nuclear sites. That episode came to light only after Iran announced that it had electronically attacked the drone and guided it to a landing. American officials said the drone had crashed after a technical malfunction.

Source

Comment – March 15, 2013

Such encounters in the tense stand off with Iran are likely to become more frequent in the months ahead.
It should be noted however, that the RQ-170 seized by Iran in 2011 did not “crash in Iran”. Contrary to U.S. claims, dutifully echoed by the New York Times, Iranian operators appear to have seized control of the surveillance drone from its CIA operators.
That much was apparent in the undamaged U.S. RQ-170 that was displayed on Iran TV shortly after it went missing and in video of the drone landing under Iranian control (see below).
The NY Times also fails to address some vital questions. For example: how near Iranian airspace was the Predator when it was intercepted? Was it about to embark on a surveillance mission inside the country?
The New York Times only quotes a Pentagon official who says the drone was on a “classified surveillance mission” which is another way of saying it was on secret reconnaissance flight.
I know from my time in the Rhodesian Army Special Forces that “reconnaissance missions” invariably mean long-range patrols in neighbouring and hostile territories. From which we can conclude that the Predator was about to embark on reconnaissance flight inside Iran and the two accompanying U.S. jets would have left it to carry on alone once it entered Iranian airspace.
This latest incident occurred as the U.S. military appears to be stepping up its reconnaissance of Iran. On March 12 Iranian air defence units warned off a U.S. U2 spy plane as it approached the country’s airspace.
While late last month Iran seized a U.S. ScanEagle drone.
This intensification of reconnaissance activity has a number of implications. Firstly, the U.S. doesn’t have a complete picture of what is happening in Iran – including its nuclear program – despite what it may say.
More ominously, the intensification of reconnaissance missions is to prepare for the order to launch military strikes on Iran. Of course, that order may never come but the military being what it is will prepare for such an eventuality.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.