1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Mind Control and propaganda
  4.  » Insider: CIA Designed Rap Music to Boost Black Criminality

henrymakow.com – Feb 21, 2019

This shocking information has been online since 2012.
Music is used as brainwashing. In this case, hip-hop was hijacked by the CIA to increase black drug use, misogyny and criminality. The music executives were told it was to boost the private prison industry, but obviously, it had a larger design — to sabotage the black population and in so doing, US society as a whole.

The Secret Meeting that Changed Rap Music

by Anonymous — May 2012

(abridged by henrymakow.com) 

After more than 20 years, I’ve finally decided to tell the world what I witnessed in 1991, which I believe was one of the biggest turning point in popular music and ultimately American society. …
Between the late 80’s and early ’90s, I was what you may call a “decision maker” with one of the more established companies in the music industry. I came from Europe in the early 80’s and quickly established myself in the business. The industry was different back then. Since technology and media weren’t accessible to people like they are today, the industry had more control over the public and had the means to influence them anyway it wanted. This may explain why in early 1991, I was invited to attend a closed-door meeting with a small group of music business insiders to discuss rap music’s new direction. Little did I know that we would be asked to participate in one of the most unethical and destructive business practice I’ve ever seen.
The meeting was held at a private residence on the outskirts of Los Angeles. I remember about 25 to 30 people being there, most of them familiar faces. Speaking to those I knew, we joked about the theme of the meeting as many of us did not care for rap music and failed to see the purpose of being invited to a private gathering to discuss its future. Among the attendees was a small group of unfamiliar faces who stayed to themselves and made no attempt to socialize beyond their circle.
Based on their behavior and formal appearances, they didn’t seem to be in our industry. Our casual chatter was interrupted when we were asked to sign a confidentiality agreement preventing us from publicly discussing the information presented during the meeting. Needless to say, this intrigued and in some cases disturbed many of us. The agreement was only a page long but very clear on the matter and consequences which stated that violating the terms would result in job termination. We asked several people what this meeting was about and the reason for such secrecy but couldn’t find anyone who had answers for us. A few people refused to sign and walked out. No one stopped them. I was tempted to follow but curiosity got the best of me. A man who was part of the “unfamiliar” group collected the agreements from us.

Continues …