Nick Kollerstrom – Terror on the Tube September 9, 2011
Ian gave an excellent talk, lasting nearly three hours. It was gratifying to see a couple of hundred people riveted with interest. Ian had drived straight down from Sheffield, where he had at short notice been representing Tony Farrell for three days on an appeal tribunal.
We gave Londoners a choice – they did not have to listen to Utter Crap Productions on their TV screens: they did have a chance to hear the truth.
Fukashima as fabricated terror
Fukishama – was it nuked?
On today, the 10th anniversary of 9/11, I’d like to try to give Ian Crane’s take on the Fukishama nuclear reactor explosion – which has more or less destroyed Japan as an industrial nation. It surely behoves all of us to try and grapple with this issue. Was it an Israeli false-flag attack?
Was it yet another manifestation of the Mossad motto, ‘By way of deception shall you wage war?’
Let’s recall that in London on July 7th an Israeli security firm Verint Systems had been installed on the London Underground; just as on 9/11 Israeli security firms were operating at the relevant airports in Boston and New York*.
Ian follows the staggering interpretation of the event given by Jim Stone, here.
1. Japan annoys Israel:
a) 11th March 2010 – exactly one year before the event – Japan deplores Israel’s expansive plans to build upon the West Bank: ‘Japan demands that the plans should not be implemented’. ‘Demands’, eh? Did they maybe need to be taught a lesson?
b) 18 Feb 2011 Japan voted against Israel for the first time at UN
c) Feb 2010 Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran.
2. Japan employs an Israeli security firm for its Fukishama nuclear reactor (Arava based firm called Magna BSP. Arava is a district around Dimona) QUOTE: “It is documented that a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom.”
3. The Stuxnet virus arrives in Japan only weeks before the event. This was a Mossad/CIA creation, used to wreck Iran’s nuclear reactors in 2010. It is able to undermine liquid-flow technology, while preserving the control dials so it looks as if the system is functioning normally.
4. Israel places a rather huge ‘camera’ inside reactor number 3, over 1000 lbs in weight, but actually it was a mini-nuke.
5. An earthquake strikes Japan Mark 6.8 on the Richter scale, not 9 (i.e. a hundred times weaker, its a log scale) with an inland epicentre. Synchronously the mini-nuke blows up, demolishing reactors 3 and 4 at Fukishama.
THE EXPLOSION: “The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 foot thick steel reinforced concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick, and were totally blown away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling. Reactor 3 vanished entirely,as seen in the classified photo used to compare the destruction to the diagram and reactor 4 appears to have been blown to pieces as seen in this classified photo The yellow dome which should be sitting on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen on the wrong side of the containment building. This type of destruction is is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. On top of this, there was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART? That’s the dirty question no one is asking – how did that happen?”
6. Two hours later the Tsunami hits Japan, flooding the reactor: this could not possibly have done the damage claimed or destroyed all of the protection-backup equipment. In all the pictures of the Tsunami, no-one was already fleeing or panicking because of the earthquake, its effect was so terrible because it was unexpected. In Jim Stone’s words, ‘the phony 9.0 story [of earthquake magnitude] was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) … It is obvious NOTHING happened along the coast of Japan until the tsunami arrived.’.
Reactor 3 was found to be completely missing.
That Tsunami was caused by a sea-bed nuke at or near the tectonic plate fissure.
This is a WAR AGAINST TERRA: “Compare the containment diagram to the remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the entire floor they were on is completly gone.” Tons of plutonium??
So why are the Japs not stating these rather obvious facts, concerning who has just destroyed them? “The only reason I believe the management at Fukushima is not telling it like it really was is because victim status has been so well asserted by the ethnic group in question that it is career suicide to point the finger at them, even when they try to kill you” No comment!
For some background on ‘Jim Stone’ (Pseudonym) – saying he worked in NASA with ‘above top secret’ clearance specialising in electronic warfare – see here. His website certainly gives the impression he knows what he is talking about.
* See Appendix 2 of my book, ‘Terror on the Tube’ – Israeli Security Firms: mainly comverse Technology, Verint Systems, ICTS Europe and Fortress GB Ltd.
Note the date numerology 11th of March: 3/11 – same as Madrid bombing in 2004, after 9/11 on 2001.