Guardian.co.uk – July 31, 2011
Something is unraveling before our eyes. From bankers to media-barons, private interests have bankrupted and corrupted the public realm. Power, for so long hidden in the pockets of a cosy elite, has been exposed. Those who wield it have been found wanting – in scruples, in morals and in decency.
Things are now in flux, but will not stay so for long.
Without decisive and sustained action, power will fall back into the hands of a small elite who have their own, and not the public’s interest at heart.
They want to prevent public revulsion turning into public action. But, it’s time for real change. Things cannot be allowed to turn back to business as usual.
Britain can no longer be just the plaything of a handful of powerful, remote interest groups treating the wider public with contempt.
The current press and political scandal is not an isolated event.
It’s the third crisis in quick succession.
First, the bankers and their bonuses, then some politicians and their expenses and now there is the press, profiting from peoples’ pain, grief and private lives.
These crises share common origins.
Left to their own devices politicians, bankers and media moguls could not regulate themselves.
They share a common culture in which greed is good, everyone takes their turn at the trough, and private interest takes precedence over the public good. They have protected each other and left the British people with a financial and political crisis.
They do what they can get away with, not seeming to care for the common life of our country. And, they are scared of only one thing. Us. The public. If public organisations and citizens are vigilant, that elite won’t be able to get away with it again. With the right checks and balances we can put the public interest back into the heart of the system.
Only we, the public, can hold power truly to account by testing whether what happens is in the public interest.
To work out how to do it we call for a new Public Jury for the British public interest to propose reforms of banking, politics, media and the police.
The Jury would be made up of 1,000 citizens drawn as a random sample of the electorate. It will be a jury of our peers. We do not need yet another inquiry in which one elite asks another elite to tell them what cannot be done.
The Jury will be funded out of the public purse, with a paid secretariat with the resources to commission research and call witnesses.
It will have the power to require attendance where persons will be asked by the public to explain themselves.
Reporting within a year of its launch the convention will study and report on:
• Media ownership and the public interest
• The role of the financial sector in the crash
• MP selections and accountability
• Policing and public interest
• How to apply a ‘public interest first’ test more generally to British political and corporate life
Lord Stewart Wood
Lord Smith of Clifton
Baroness Helena Kennedy QC
John Kampfner, Index on Censorship
Philip Pullman, author
Caroline Lucas MP, leader of the Green Party
Professor Zygmunt Bauman, Leeds University
Professor Francesca Klug OBE
Professor David Marquand, Mansfield College, Oxford University
Professor Kate Pickett, University of York
Professor Richard Grayson, University of London
Ann Pettifor, Prime Economics
Peter Facey, Unlock Democracy
Deborah Doane, World Development Movement
John Christenson, Tax Justice Network
Richard Murphy, Tax Research LLP
Charlie McConnell, Schumacher College
Professor Tim Jackson, University of Surrey
Guy Shrubsole, Public Interest Research Centre
Richard Hawkins, Public Interest Research Centre
Alan Mac Dougall, PIRC
Neal Lawson, Compass
Martin McIvor, Renewal
Gavin Hayes, Compass
Andrew Simms, nef fellow
Will Straw, founder of Left Foot Forward
Clifford Singer, Other Taxpayers Alliance
Dave Prentis, General Secretary, Unison
Heather Wakefield, Unison
Polly Toynbee, The Guardian
Madeleine Bunting, The Guardian
Laurie Penny, journalist
Heather Savigny, UEA
Professor Judith Marquand, Wolfson College, Oxford University
Professor Alan Finlayson, University of Swansea
Professor Jonathan Rutherford, Middlesex University
Professor Danny Dorling, University of Sheffield
Professor George Irvin, University of London, SOAS
Professor Prem Sikka, University of Essex
Professor Richard Wilkinson, Emeritus Professor of Social Epidemiology
Professor Stefano Harney, QMUL
Professor Peter Case, Bristol Business School
Owen Jones, author of Chavs
Howard Reed, Landman Economics
Stewart Lansley, research fellow, University of Bristol
Professor John Weeks, SOAS
Jenny Jones AM, Green Party
Jeremy Leggett, founder and CEO, Solar Century
Tamasin Cave, Spinwatch
Professor Victoria Chick, UCL
Ruth Potts, The Great Transition, New Economics Foundation
Stewart Wallis, executive director, New Economics Foundation
Rajesh Makwana, director, Share The World’s Resources
To support the call for a People’s Jury for the British Public Interest go to www.compassonline.org.uk
Footnote – August 1, 2011
Without hesitation and almost instinctively one wants to endorse the above. Or at least one should. Until you see the first name on the list of signatures, and if you didn’t notice it belongs to one Greg Dyke.
Former head of the BBC from 2000 to 2004, Dyke dutifully supported Tony Blair throughout that time. Indeed, even before his appointment as BBC Director General, Tony Blair was courting Greg Dyke at dinners at Chequers, the prime minister’s country retreat.
One might even say they were “as thick as thieves”.
Thereafter Dyke effectively acted as Blair’s propaganda minister in the run-up to the Iraq invasion; when just about every other BBC current affairs and news broadcast featured references to “Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction”.
As it turned out there were none, of course. But under Dyke the BBC prepared the way on the need to invade Iraq, as did the rest of the corporate media: with groundless speculation, half-truths and in some cases outright lies.
In the aftermath of the invasion this quickly became apparent, which may explain why Dyke was so eager to try and distance himself from Blair once it was obvious.
Of course I cannot speak for the others on the list, many of who may be quite sincere. However, in Dyke’s case I would suggest that rather than taking a moral stand he is merely repositioning himself, for his own benefit.
As in a rat deserting a sinking ship.
All confirmation of the longstanding rumour that Dyke was a frequent dinner guest of the Rothschilds has long since been removed from the web. In effect, Dyke’s patrons are covering their tracks. While Dyke himself is trying to infiltrate and no doubt undermine mounting awareness of and opposition to the elite. Ed.