Except for a few hard military types, I don’t know anyone that wants to go to war. Historically war is the most ruinous and uncivilized thing people can do. So why have there been so many wars? Why is the United States at war when so many citizens are absolutely opposed to the idea? There was no valid reason for our invasion of Iraq, though reasons were created and propagandized?
There is one explanation for today’s insanity, and only one—powerful interests have an agenda that includes wars and rumors of wars, and these power brokers have the means to keep populations emotionally and economically unstable so that common sense is uncommon. The people are presently in a confused state and beneath their noses ongoing violence has numbed the senses. Some elitists, and many “conspiracy nuts” are calling this “the new world order?”
The following is a simple and very generalized history of world events leading up today’s apparently insane policies and war actions. You are invited to read into it what you wish.
The “modern” world of our so-called Western Civilization began at the end of the 17th century with the blossoming of the British Empire. The underpinnings of that empire actually began several hundred years earlier with the establishment of the City of London, which is now an 800-year old corporation that controls finance and philosophy for an entity called the Crown. This entity is the creator and controller of “central banks.”
The Crown has never been the King or Queen of England since the establishment of this corporate body. The Crown is the directorate of the corporation. An outline of this cabal is presented at tomvalentine.com.
Western colonization of the Americas, India and Africa is widely taught in school history courses, so it need not be repeated here. One key aspect of the colonial period is generally omitted or skimmed over from the more basic history courses. This is the fact that all the Crown colonies were established on a corporate model with financial ties to the City of London—not the nation of England or Britain. The Dutch used a similar corporate model with their colonies, but France, Spain and Portugal colonized in the name of their monarchs and the church.
The directorate of the Crown, whoever they were, had no loyalty to any nation—they were, and are, devoted entirely to their philosophy which seeks absolute power over an Earthly realm. For more than 250 years, the denizens of the Crown brought untold wealth back from the colonies to the British Isles—for themselves—note: the population of the United Kingdom (British, English, Scottish, Irish, Welsh peoples) received very little wealth even though they provided the tax base and cannon fodder.
The people were invaluable assets of the Crown, but they knew not what they served—and still don’t. No people are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely think they are free (Goethe).
A unifying philosophy from Masonry allowed these banking and merchant princes to cobble together a world cabal of finance—severing themselves from all national loyalties long ago.
If, for example, one reads the history of the Rothschilds one can readily see how the game of high finance works on a worldwide basis. Incidentally, the Rothschilds kept control within their family while dominating Europe. They were never part of the Crown though they served the high cabal very well. The Rothschilds were allowed to amass immense wealth, without ever becoming insiders.
Another well-known family name that was set-up by the Crown without being given a place among the directorate was Rockefeller. But this is incidental information, and we get ahead of the story. Suffice it to say that the Crown may carefully cultivate those whom they make rich and powerful so long as it serves to conceal their identity and promote the cabal’s goals.
If one wants to know the genuine motives for particular actions in history they are told to “follow the money.” But that is only half of it—one must also follow the philosophy—the religious beliefs of those in control.
For purposes of clarity, let the Crown always refer to a stealthy circle of power brokers who all believe in the Masonic philosophy—the brotherhood of man ruled by philosopher kings (or adepts) in league with Lucifer, the God of Masonry. One need only wade through the cumbersome histories of Masonry and also read Albert Pike’s Morals and Dogma to see precisely that this anti-Christian power-philosophy encompasses virtually all the other religious notions ever conjured up by man.
Ordinary members of Masonic lodges, your relatives and mine, are to these adepts and their goals what the people of the United Kingdom and United States are to the directors of the Crown—useful fools; masses of asses! A dissertation on Masonry and history will be forthcoming in another work, but my purpose here is to outline the imperialism that brought us this insanity of present day geopolitics.
There have been many key turning points of history, and historians love to dwell on the personalities of leading people when outlining what happened. The people are important, surely, but events would have reached our level of insanity even if different people were in the roles played by the likes of Napoleon, Bismarck, Marx, Lenin, Lincoln, Washington, Wilson, FDR, et al. Since human nature is unchanging, the key turning points of history are always technical in nature.
Thus, the key to modern history, virtually everyone must agree, was the “industrial revolution” and all the technology of energy production that so changed the structure of man’s life on earth—without changing him.
Therefore the key to our present geopolitical dilemmas lies in the most profitable and prolific basic sources of energy—oil and natural gas and nuclear power. When the emotional anti-war demonstrators shout that today’s savage war in the Middle East is all about “oil.” He or she tells part of the truth without really uncovering the awful truth that is devouring us all.
On the other hand, when the informed sophisticate argues that the real reason for today’s mess in the Middle East is obviously Israel—this person, too, is touching part of the truth, yet is missing the boat.
Interestingly in the United States today very few pundits dare to suggest Israel is at the crux of the war issues though it is quite obvious. Israel is untouchable in the US and UK—why? The ultimate and bitter truth is that Israel is a Crown colony whose purpose is twofold—to prepare the way for the adept’s philosophy of One World, One Bank, One False God, and to serve as the Crown’s wedge in the oil rich Middle East.
The third underlying reason for the Crown’s projected world war against Islam is simply “usury.” Islam abhors usury and Central Banks exist for it—this basic conflict is seldom mentioned by media pundits today.
Suffice it to say now that the Crown’s philosophy is anti-Christ, and it certainly shows up in the way Christianity is treated in the mainstream media. Incidentally, the major media are controlled by the Crown through interlocking directorates, thus the media always serves their purposes rather than the truth.
It is impossible for me to name individuals from within the directorate of the Crown with any certainty because they strive for anonymity, but their names are not important since we can easily analyze their deeds from the events of known history. It is by their fruits that we judge them.
Any conspiracy nut worth his salt will tell you that “they” financed Lenin and Trotsky and Hitler in our modern era. This, of course, refers to the “immaculate they” which is the all-encompassing pronoun used to describe some high cabal—such as our very real Crown from the City of London.
In another paper I summarize the philosophical side of this massive conspiracy so that the events we use to illustrate it here make even more perfect sense. At this point we stay with economic manipulation, the companion of religious manipulation.
Today’s confused geopolitical mess began in the 1880’s and picked up steam after the turn of the 20th century.
The Crown had worn out the taxpaying base of the British Isles in maintaining the Empire, especially after costly wars in the “Raj” which is how they referred to India, and in South Africa at the turn of the century, so they simply adopted or usurped the masses of the United States by manipulating the US to take over the forefront of their imperialism.
World War One marked the apparent transition from London to New York, so to speak. Incidentally, the actual home base for Crown operations isn’t really important in such a worldly scheme. Philosophically, Jerusalem is the most important location of these long-range planners.
Let’s cover this particular road to One World Empire, step by step.
Brittania ruled the waves for more than 200 years, and established the Crown as the premier world power (and lending institution). Then it became apparent to the Crown very early in the oil-patch game that “black gold” was going to rule the world’s economy—they correctly deduced that nothing else would be as dominant in the mechanical world as fuel for the machines. Energy had become the most important facet of international economy. Up until oil became king, control of the oceans was the key. While the rest of the world thought in terms of coal fired steam engines that dominated the first half of the 19th century, the Crown with its tremendous resources and control over academic and technical institutions knew that petroleum oozing out of the ground would very soon dominate the endeavors of mankind.
Until nuclear energy came along, oil was the cheapest, most abundant source of energy with a favorable energy-in/energy-out ratio.
Oh, so quietly, the Crown went to work behind the scenes to carefully manipulate control over the world’s use of oil. It did not matter which personalities were discovering and drilling for oil; nor did it matter which individuals or companies would come along to distribute and market the oil—the Crown would be the power behind the financing. This neat trick of sitting behind the scenes and merely supplying the life-blood of credit for every new development had become second nature to these mercantilists from the dawn of shipping, trade and insurance.
The early merchant kings had honed their skills going back to the days of trade routes across Asia, so they easily controlled steamships and railroads at the dawning of the industrial revolution. Besides, the Crown also had a long-time controlling hand in all the stock exchanges worldwide. They automatically controlled anything and everything that could be called “capital intensive” because they ruled the capital.
For example, John D. Rockefeller had to get a lot of financing to establish his early “capital intensive” Standard Oil monopoly; The Nobel family of Sweden developed the world’s first major oil field at Baku in Azerbaijan on the Caspian Sea but the Crown soon took over control.
Just as petroleum blossomed into black gold with the advent of Henry Ford’s auto manufacturing assembly line after 1903, the Crown realized the British Empire was on the wane. Competition from Germany was serious, Russia had always been seen as a threat, and the United States had survived the civil war, which the Crown had helped to instigate.
The Ottoman Empire was also on the wane, while it appeared that huge amounts of oil lie buried beneath Muslim dominated Middle Eastern sands.
(One little aside here: history remarks on how Henry Ford saw the danger of financial cabal and battled against the Crown his entire life. In bitterness, Ford blamed the “Jews” which illustrates how clever the Crown really is at establishing false flags and scapegoats. Yes there have always been Jews on the Directorate, and Masonry is very much a Talmudic philosophy, but those ordinary folk who call themselves ethnic Jews are also unwitting cannon fodder. The phenomenon of “anti-Semitism” or hating a Jew simply because he is a Jew serves the Crown’s manipulations well. For example, note how the “holocaust” was used to forge modern Israel.)
You can only imagine how difficult it is to manipulate an entire world population of stubborn and irrepressible human beings to bring about total dominance of all trade, all war, all commerce, and all money. It wasn’t easy, but they have done it—their New World Order (not ours) is virtually here, and one of these days expect the announcement.
In the early decade of the 1900s, if the Crown were to maintain its worldwide power in the face of seething nationalistic populations, all with strong desires of their own, it had to act boldly.
So, at the turn of the century, not only did they cleverly enlist the United States in aggressive steps toward Imperialism by fostering the Spanish-American war, they also took South Africa away from the Boers, and arranged for the Japanese to have a very strong modern navy in order to keep Russia out of the Pacific. After all, the Crown had long prevented Russia from getting a seaport in any warm waters to the south and west, and there was no need to acquiesce to the Pacific. The Japanese naval defeat of the Russians in 1902 did the trick neatly, and the Crown directors smiled silently as the Russian bear remained landlocked.
There is nothing in the above recitation of history that is not well known—except, perhaps, the central role of the Crown. Historians insist upon calling it the “British” Empire, but the people of Britain had absolutely nothing to do with it.
The “Commonwealth” is an interesting term for nations who are tied directly to the Crown. All the millions of subjects (not citizens) in the Commonwealth have no say, nor anything to do with the Empire, except to play the same pretend politics we play in the US today and provide able bodies for the military and some tax dollars.
World War One was one of the Crown’s finest hours, so to speak. Think about some of these facts:
1. Nobody can explain how the war came about, especially at that particular time in Europe. The famous assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was truly insignificant, but thanks to many “treaties” serving silent manipulations of the Crown a number of nations declared war against Germany while Germany declared against none.
2. The fighting in Europe was utterly insane, to the point of the French army going on strike as millions of men died for no reason in trench warfare. The US population wanted nothing to do with Europe’s war, but dirty trick politics manipulated Americans into the fray. The sinking of the Lusitania comes to mind. American forces engaged in actual fighting for only a few months.
3. The trench warfare ended in stalemate with no clear winner, but at the Treaty of Versailles, the Crown used American president Woodrow Wilson and manipulated the terms as if Britain had won—thereby setting the stage for Adolf Hitler and WWII.
4. Egypt, and the vital waterway called Suez, was essentially a Crown colony at the outset of WWI, and when the shooting stopped in the Middle East, Britain and France were directed to parcel out the entire region by the Crown. Two of the parcels became nations of keen interest to us today—Iraq and Israel.
5. Lord Balfour instigated the establishment of modern Israel with a mere “declaration.” This gave a green light to the “Zionist” movement that had grown more prominent after 1897 when Theodore Herzl wrote The Jewish State. Who directed Lord Balfour? Despite all the terrorism and posturing that made it appear the British were dragging their feet in helping Israel get established, it turns out that Israel is a de facto Crown colony to this day—attached at the hip with the Crown’s main mercenary, the United States. That was the best trick of all.
6. Iraq was cobbled together from various tribal groups in Mesopotamia after the British occupied Baghdad in 1917. In 1921, after considerable strife, the Crown manipulated the selection of an Arab Hashemite (Faisal) as Iraq’s first “elected” ruler. Then the <>Crown<> was ostensibly kicked out of Mesopotamia when the Baath Party came to power much later. The socialist Baathists were formed in 1947 after the tumultuous Damascus conference, which was a gathering of Arab groups ostensibly attempting to decide religious archeology directions as well as what should be done in the wake of the fall of the Ottoman Turks. The hidden hand of the <>Crown<> tried to pull all the strings of this fiasco, but many Arab leaders had become aware of the high cabal behind the political powers of the west. The Muslim leaders saw Israel as a colony establishing a foothold in the Levant. The Crown knew that Islam would vow to resist Israel for more than religious reasons alone. This historic “tension” could be used to great advantage by the manipulative Crown.
Establishing control of the blossoming world of oil export was only half of the goal of the Crown in these machinations following both WWI and WWII. These two world wars were actually all one manipulated global-changing activity. To fully understand where we are going, we need to delve into a little modern history of Institutional Churchianity because it is the combination of Jewish Zionist and Churchist Zionist belief systems that provided the political base for America’s unfettered support of modern Israel.
I distinguish between Churchists and Christians for obvious reasons—no Christian thinks modern Israel has any scriptural connection whatsoever.
In a nutshell, Christ, on the cross and resurrected, fulfilled the Old Testament and accredited the New. The Roman destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, where God had chosen to relate to humans in the old order, marked the dawning of the Kingdom promised by Christ—a spiritual kingdom sustained entirely by individual belief, conviction and obedience.
Christianity is for individuals, and has nothing to do with nations since the ultimate goal is the spiritual, rather than an earthly, kingdom.
However, institutional churches want to stay in business so they must cater to the whims of the people, therefore changes in doctrine and additions of pagan ritual were worked into the mix early on. This led to some very unchristian behavior resulting in wars between churches over centuries of time back when man lived without electricity and technological wonders. Regardless, Christians believed Jesus Christ completed his father’s work. The Jews have always vehemently denied it, generating an implacable wall.
Along came the millennial revolution.
This was a revolution that changed Christianity as thoroughly as the industrial revolution had changed man’s ways of life—ironically, the two unrelated revolutions grew together in the 1800’s. Secular history taught in schools deliberately ignores the millennial revolution for what it really is, but one need only read an excellent book: Death of the Church Victorious, by Ovid Need Jr. to get the entire well-documented story.
The so-called Brethren movement actually caught on more in the United States than it did in its native UK. The US fervor for evangelism was made to order for the Crown, and they took full advantage of it. An itinerant American lawyer named Cyrus Scofield obtained backing for the Scofield Teaching Bible from some very interesting sources. In the US it was Arno C. Gaebelin, a Zionist who published a periodical Our Hope, in 1894. Gaebelin, a “converted” Jew proclaimed the imminent but non-scriptural “Second Coming” of Christ and alerted gentiles to the remarkable Zionist awakening among the Jews of Europe.
Curiously, the Scofield Teaching Bible was first published by Oxford in England thanks to a financial angel named Untermeyer (with known connections to the Crown). Oxford is hardly a religious publisher, so it was out of character for this highly connected institution to publish a “Bible.”
Though few among believers know what the words mean, Millenialism and dispensationalism are very popular today, but they are Anti-Christ while pretending to be Christian. These non-scriptural doctrines actually make the advent of Jesus Christ of non-effect, and virtually “Judaize” Christianity—and hardly any churchist today sees this.
So, as Christianity came into the radio, and eventually the television age, the predominant point of view was and is anti-Christ Scofieldism, carefully cultivated by powerful forces behind the scenes. Helen Peters, a Christian woman investigator and writer called it “spiritual communism” and her One World is an important read. You can find it at tomvalentine.com.
You can also find an important booklet by Charlie Samples on my website: The Greatest Hoax; A Study of the Inconsistent Theology of Modern Bible Prophecy. By reading Helen Peters and Charlie Samples you will get a clear picture of the diabolical plot to use churchists against Christianity and truth.
Now we fast forward to 2004/2005. The most powerful nation on earth, the United States, is embroiled in an expensive, brutal war in Iraq. Our propaganda says that “we” are determined to “free” the Iraqi people from dictatorship and Muslim extremism. The administration of George W. Bush has claimed our motives are defensive and on behalf of the world. George Bush, by his own words, is a repentant sinner and devout follower of Christ. He has not stated a belief in millennialism, but his actions are 100% Christian-Zionist (an oxymoron, but the term used today). His major ally in the recent war against terrorism has been the Prime Minister of Great Britain. Neither of them likely knows that they are both representatives of the Crown, even more than they are representatives or leaders of the people who elected them.
Were either of these two national leaders to be told outright that their actions were nothing more than a furtherance of the <>Crown’s<> goals to control world oil and to establish a center in Jerusalem to be the throne for the Kingdom of God on Earth, they would demand the teller of such a tale be locked away in a straight jacket. They would adamantly deny any such thing, and chances are they would be sincere because they are useful idiots and not part of the directorate—which they don’t believe exists.
Is the Crown is a figment of my imagination? Was World War Two not manipulated and used as one gigantic urban renewal project to solidify the Crown’s earthly control? Was the cold war not a game designed to make the Crown’s military industrial complex ever stronger on a worldwide basis. Am I a fool to think that Russia and the Soviet could not have been a genuine threat without media hype because they had no capital and no civilian infrastructure?
In order to maintain power over the always restless natives of the earth, the Crown must make sure that all their manipulated governments have an enemy to face or a crisis to manage—else the people don’t need governments that steal their money lawfully via taxes.
The two political parties are used to keep independent thinking away from a Constitutional government. The Crown generally finances the opposition to its own puppet regimes. International Communism is a Crown device. How do I know? Because I have followed the real money!