Digital IDs Will Place All Humans on the Surveillance Grid
Jesse Smith – Global Research Jan 19, 2021
With the pandemic, the “digital transformation” that so many analysts have been referring to for years, without being exactly sure what it meant, has found its catalyst. One major effect of confinement will be the expansion and progression of the digital world in a decisive and often permanent manner. – Klaus Schwab, COVID-19: The Great Reset (p. 153)
No matter the origin or true lethality of SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus pandemic has been utilized to implement broader agendas that have been planned well in advance. One of the motivations for declaring a global pandemic was to make possible the widespread usage of new technology such as facial recognition, digital IDs and payment systems, mRNA vaccines and vaccine certificates. This is openly stated in books such as COVID-19: The Great Reset and The Fourth Industrial Revolution.
The engineers of the “plandemic” recognized that new technology is often resisted by the masses, but could be adopted quickly due to a public health crisis. What better way to coerce people into using technology that has long been planned to enslave humanity than by holding them hostage to a “deadly” virus causing people to fear for their lives? From the outset of the COVID-19 crisis, humanity was told the world could not return to normal without global vaccination against the coronavirus. We were even told that some things would never return to normal.
In fact, the people and organizations behind exercises such as Crimson Contagion and Event 201 secretly planned to reshape the world in their technocratic image using the guise of the pandemic to implement their schemes.
For decades Hollywood, a major partner in advancing globalist agendas, has been conditioning people to accept all-pervasive surveillance through films such as Enemy of the State, Eagle Eye, and Minority Report. The societies depicted in those dystopian films is now a reality. Welcome to Dystopia Now!
Vaccine Certificates Will Change the Future of Work and Travel
On January 14 the Vaccination Credential Initiative (VCI), a broad coalition of health and technology corporations, was announced. The VCI combines the efforts of companies such as Microsoft, Oracle, and Mayo Clinic for the purpose of standardizing digital access to vaccination records. The VCI also garners support from the World Economic Forum (i.e., Klaus Schwab and his Great Reset) through The Commons Project Foundation and its Common Pass project.
Common Pass is a “globally-interoperable platform for people to document their COVID-19 status (health declarations/PCR tests/vaccinations) to satisfy country entry requirements, while protecting their health data privacy.” In other words, it’s a digital tracking system designed to keep people from traveling unless current with vaccines and other future health requirements. Common Pass requires a smartphone and works on Apple (through the Apple Health app) and Android (through the CommonHealth app) devices. Authorities will be able to scan a QR code embedded in the app that will verify whether an individual is cleared for travel. It is expected to launch in the first half of 2022.
In the new world being erected right before our eyes, the Global Syndicate does not want the average citizen to have the right to travel freely without being closely monitored for compliance with new societal rules. They claim reducing travel will help the environment and solve the problem of climate change, but this is just a ruse to destroy individual freedom and rights. In reality, they want humanity locked into a surveillance grid that can track every movement and eventually, every thought!
As I warned in part four of the Beware the Vaccine series, employers will eventually make it difficult to work without proof of vaccination. Additionally, stores, concert and sports venues, restaurants, museums, and parks may also soon require a tool like Common Pass to shop for necessities and access entertainment and leisure. But it doesn’t stop here.
Facial Recognition, Thermal Cameras, and Biometric Wearables
Surveillance including the use of facial recognition technology was increasingly used by governments worldwide under the guise of fighting the spread of COVID-19. As early as last April, Amazon began using thermal cameras to scan workers for fever and other symptoms of coronavirus. Companies such as Thermal Guardian and Flir have been supplying thermal cameras to airports, healthcare centers, businesses, casinos and even grocery stores throughout the plandemic.
Contact tracing plans largely failed because people were uncooperative, and the technology was not well developed. Companies such as TraceSafe and Estimote have created the next wave of contact tracing tools in the form of biometric wearable devices. Wearables from Flywallet and Digital DNA will hold your vaccine certificates. For now, these new surveillance devices are meant to be worn outside the body, but the ultimate goal is for widespread adoption of bodily implants as documented in my Internet of Bodies article.
Though there have been some rumblings about the privacy violations these technologies could create, it hasn’t stopped their development or implementation by governments and companies worldwide. This does not bode well for the future as the digital transformation of society races on.
Digital IDs Will Place All Humans on the Surveillance Grid
Globalists have a funny way of posing as saviors while secretly planning humanity’s total subjugation. A global technocracy cannot be imposed without robust surveillance systems, widespread deployment of artificial intelligence, and the digitization of everything.
The push for digital identification is increasing at a pace faster than Usain Bolt’s 100-meter dash. As I wrote in part 5 of the Beware the Vaccine series:
“…the plan is to roll out a full-fledged digital ID (ID2020) which would contain driver’s licenses, passports, work badges, building access cards, debit and credit cards, transit passes, and more.”
Under the guise of aiding the marginalized and protecting their civil liberties, despotic technocrats will be able to use digital IDs to control access to government, finance, health, travel, and any service where an ID would be required for access or benefits. The road to the ID2020 initiative leads to the Bill & Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations. You may recall that both were co-sponsors of Event 201, the pandemic planning exercise that became reality just a few months later. Is it a mere coincidence that these two foundations are the driving forces behind global pandemic planning, vaccination, and the creation and enforcement of digital IDs?
Digital Payment Systems, Global Digital Currencies, and the Cashless Society
The next domino to fall, coinciding with a planned and coordinated global economic reset, will be universal adoption of digital payments and the outlawing of cash.
The plandemic has served to rapidly change the way people think about money, especially cash. Last March, the World Health Organization vilified cash as a coronavirus spreader, and its use was restricted around the world. Coin shortages also soon followed, resulting in a dramatic shift toward digital payments. Talks and moves to implement digital currencies ramped up, all according to schedule.
Prior to the plandemic, cash usage was still prominent in the U.S., but was already on the decline in China and many Asian countries. The COVID-19 crisis provided the perfect cover to accelerate adoption of digital payments throughout Western nations.
Many are excited about digital money and the blockchain technology behind it, believing it will be the key to decentralization and less oversight by central banks. However, history has proven that elites tend to establish greater control of economies as societies move away from physical currency.
This push for digitalization is placing the world at a crossroads. I believe the transition to a global digital economy will happen similar to the way Napster revolutionized digital file sharing (mainly music) in the late 90s. As millions of songs were uploaded, downloaded, and shared across Napster’s networks, consumers relished the ability to obtain “free” music. However, the music industry and many of its artists were not happy and launched an all-out assault against Napster and the many services it spawned, such as Limewire and BitTorrent. After years of legal proceedings, the music industry was able to smash Napster and other file-sharing platforms to pieces. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) even sued individual citizens for illegal downloading and file-sharing. Through the creation of platforms like iTunes, Spotify and Apple Music, the music industry regained iron-clad control of its copyrighted material. Sadly, artist revenue never rebounded to pre digital piracy heights.
I see a similar situation with blockchain and digital currency. Though blockchain technology and cryptocurrency may initially provide financial freedom and anonymity through products like BitCoin, eventually the banking elites and their technocratic partners will find a way to regain control. The Federal Reserve has already proposed a new FedCoin that threatens to centralize digital currency with the ability to track and/or prohibit transactions. Attacks on cryptocurrency are on the rise as governments, credit card companies, and mega-corporations have banned their use. Big tech giants like Facebook and Google joined together to ban cryptocurrency ads. However, Facebook (which owns data from billions of people) has announced it will launch its new rebranded cryptocurrency called Diem later this year.
To top it off, several countries and banks have issued Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) which threaten to destroy the independent and anonymous financial system brokered through blockchain technology. Once these efforts by governments, central banks, and mega-corporations gain steam, it won’t be long before BitCoin and other cryptocurrencies will be targeted for extinction. Those who possess them may be sued, criminalized, and excluded from financial systems much like those who pirated music in the earlier part of the century.
The War on Terror Set the Stage for Global Surveillance
A significant outcome of the war on terror was the emergence of the surveillance state. Initially sold as a way to track terrorists, governments soon turned these tactics on their citizens, as revealed by whistleblowers Edward Snowden and Julian Assange and through legislation like the Patriot Act (which President-Elect Joe Biden bragged about writing) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). It even spawned the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), an entirely new government agency conceived to monitor known and “potential” terrorists and prevent future terror attacks. With time and the advancement of technology, the fledgling surveillance state of the early 2000s has grown exponentially into the monstrous biosecurity police state now emerging.
What began as eagle eye tools for militaries to track and monitor “terrorists” abroad have now been adapted for use in everyday consumer products like nanny cams, smartphones, smart watches, and vehicles. Use of traffic and surveillance cameras have exploded in the years since 9/11 to the point where the U.S. and China combined possess one surveillance camera for every four people. It is expected that 2021 will see the global deployment of over one billion cameras.
DHS expects to have biometric data including DNA and face, fingerprint, and iris scans of at least 259 million people by 2022. DHS is using cloud-based software called Homeland Advanced Recognition Technology (HART), hosted by Amazon Web Services to “make it possible to confirm the identity of travelers at any point in their travel,” according to former secretary Kevin McAleenan. The possibilities of using this software to curb individual rights and freedom are staggering. According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation:
“The records DHS plans to include in HART will chill and deter people from exercising their First Amendment protected rights to speak, assemble, and associate. Data like face recognition makes it possible to identify and track people in real time, including at lawful political protests and other gatherings. Other data DHS is planning to collect—including information about people’s “relationship patterns” and from officer “encounters” with the public—can be used to identify political affiliations, religious activities, and familial and friendly relationships. These data points are also frequently colored by conjecture and bias.”
Northrop Grumman, a preeminent U.S. defense contractor, received a $95 million contract to develop the first two phases of the HART system under DHS’s Office of Biometric Identity Management (OBIM). But this is just one of many ongoing government surveillance projects designed to spy on and incorporate all of humanity in biometric databases.
Technology Isn’t the Problem, It’s the People Behind It
For the record, I am not advocating against the use of new technology. Technology is simply a tool used to achieve a task or goal. It’s mostly neither good nor bad. How it’s used, who’s using it, and for what purpose typically determines benefit or harm. However, it has been proven time and again that digital systems are fragile, ripe for hacking, and contain back doors that can be used to spy on users. Though the technologies discussed in this article promise privacy and individual control, trusting those overseeing their development or deployment is foolish. Most involved in the creation, implementation, distribution, and use of these technologies have ties to governments, global entities, spy agencies, and billion-dollar tech companies.
All these new inventions are being used to create a global panopticon, making it easy for technocrats to control humanity through technological innovation. So pardon me if I don’t get all excited about artificial intelligence, augmented reality, body implants, and other rapidly developing technologies. In fact, these unprecedented modern times make me nostalgic for corded telephones and fax machines.
*
Jesse Smith is an independent journalist who operates the Truth Unmuted website. Truth Unmuted is dedicated to exposing the lies, motives, and methods of the global cabal trying to force humanity into a new world order. The website covers issues such as technocracy, globalism, transhumanism, politics, health, and other relevant topics that tie into global agendas.
https://greatgameindia.com/indian-dies-vaccine-covishield/
Indian Hospital Worker Dies Just 24 Hours After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine
January 19, 2021
An Indian hospital worker from Uttar Pradesh has died just 24 hours after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine Covishield from Serum Institute of India.
A 46-year-old government hospital employee in Uttar Pradesh’s Moradabad died on Sunday evening, 24 hours after receiving a Covid vaccine shot. The district’s Chief Medical Officer has said the death is unrelated to vaccination.
Ward Boy Mahipal Singh died after complaining of chest congestion and breathlessness.
“He was vaccinated on Saturday around noon. On Sunday he felt breathless and complained of chest congestion. We are inquiring into the reasons of the death….”
The death has occurred just days after Norway launched an investigation after 23 (now 29) people died after receiving COVID-19 vaccine shots.
Several points here.
1) The end of physical currency means no more gardeners, window cleaners, boot sales, street collections, any kind of private transaction, and nothing to give to buskers or the ever-growing numbers of people made homeless as a direct result of malicious government policies.
2) I don’t personally care that I won’t be able to travel abroad when (not if) I refuse the deadly “vaccine”, though I sympathise with those who will no longer be able to visit relatives abroad. It’s not prohibition on air travel that bothers me, but the near certainty that the travel ban will be extended to ALL forms of transport, making it impossible for me to visit widely-scattered friends and family members in THIS country (England in my case).
3) I neither have nor want a (not very) “smart” phone, so it seems I wouldn’t be able to participate in the scheme even if I wanted to (which I don’t).
4) If we can’t have government “of the people, by the people and for the people”, something we’ve never had anyway, why have “government” at all? They’re nothing but a bunch of criminals, parasites stealing from those of us who create the real wealth and then, in their insanity, imagining that they own us.
5) It’s a weird kind of lunacy that makes someone want to live (=control) the lives of others rather than being content with their own lives, and those that want power over others are exactly those that should never have it. They should instead be incarcerated in mental institutions where they can hope to be cured of their irrational obsessions and delusions.
6) Unfortunately (and that must be the understatement of the century) large numbers of people are going to be killed (murdered) by the vaccines and by government policies in general. This has long been predicted as “the great die off”. It seems there’s nothing that can be done to stop this terrible tragedy, which is already underway, though most aren’t yet aware of it, but those who survive intact must treat it as an opportunity to re-take our Humanity. No more large towns where people are crammed in together like livestock, and NO MORE GOVERNMENT. We’re perfectly capable of governing our own local communities, and Humans are generally happier living close to Nature (God) in a more rural setting where our needs are met and our voices can be heard. In such a setting, our lives will start to mean something, as they did before the lunatics seized control a long time ago.
We do need a “great reset”, but it’s not the one currently being planned for us under cover of a fake “plague”.
YOUR LEGAL RIGHT TO MASK EXEMPTIONS
When you do not need to wear a face covering
In settings where face coverings are required in England there are some circumstances where people may not be able to wear a face covering.
Please be mindful and respectful of such circumstances. Some people are less able to wear face coverings, and the reasons for this may not be visible to others.
This includes (but is not limited to):
· children under the age of 11 (Public Health England does not recommend face coverings for children under the age of 3 for health and safety reasons)
· people who cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering because of a physical or mental illness or impairment, or disability
· where putting on, wearing or removing a face covering will cause you severe distress
· if you are speaking to or providing assistance to someone who relies on lip reading, clear sound or facial expressions to communicate
· to avoid harm or injury, or the risk of harm or injury, to yourself or others ‒ including if it would negatively impact on your ability to exercise or participate in a strenuous activity
· police officers and other emergency workers, given that this may interfere with their ability to serve the public
There are also scenarios when you are permitted to remove a face covering:
· if asked to do so in a bank, building society, or post office for identification
· if asked to do so by shop staff or relevant employees for identification, for assessing health recommendations (for example by a pharmacist) or for age identification purposes, including when buying age restricted products such as alcohol
· if required in order to receive treatment or services, for example when getting a facial
· in order to take medication
· if you are delivering a sermon or prayer in a place of worship
· if you are the persons getting married in a relevant place
· if you are aged 11 to 18 attending a faith school and having lessons in a place of worship as part of your core curriculum
· if you are undertaking exercise or an activity and it would negatively impact your ability to do so
· if you are an elite sports person, professional dancer or referee acting in the course of your employment
· when seated to eat or drink in a hospitality premise such as a pub, bar, restaurant or cafe. You must put a face covering back on once you finish eating or drinking The government’s guidance for keeping workers and customers safe during COVID-19 in restaurants, pubs, bars and takeaway services clearly advises that designated indoor seating areas for customers to eat or drink should at this time only be open for table service, where possible, alongside additional infection control measures.
Exemption cards
If you have an age, health or disability reason for not wearing a face covering:
· you do not routinely need to show any written evidence of this
· you do not need show an exemption card
This means that you do not need to seek advice or request a letter from a medical professional about your reason for not wearing a face covering.
However, some people may feel more comfortable showing something that says they do not have to wear a face covering. This could be in the form of an exemption card, badge or even a home-made sign.
Carrying an exemption card or badge is a personal choice and is not required by law. If you wish to use an exemption card or badge, you can download exemption card templates. You can then print these yourself or show them on a mobile device. Please note that the government is not able to provide physical exemption cards or badges.
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/your-rights-under-equality-act-2010
Who is protected by the Equality Act?
Everyone in Britain is protected. This is because the Equality Act protects people against discrimination because of the protected characteristics that we all have. Under the Equality Act, there are nine protected characteristics: · age · disability · gender reassignment · marriage and civil partnership · pregnancy and maternity · race · religion or belief · sex · sexual orientation
There are some important differences depending on which protected characteristic you have.
Situations in which you are protected from discrimination
Under the Equality Act you are protected from discrimination:
· when you are in the workplace
· when you use public services like healthcare (for example, visiting your doctor or local hospital) or education (for example, at your school or college)
· when you use businesses and other organisations that provide services and goods (like shops, restaurants, and cinemas)
· when you use transport
· when you join a club or association (for example, your local tennis club)
· when you have contact with public bodies like your local council or government departments
How can you be discriminated against?
There are four main types of discrimination. Direct discrimination
This means treating one person worse than another person because of a protected characteristic. For example, a promotion comes up at work. The employer believes that people’s memories get worse as they get older so doesn’t tell one of his older employees about it, because he thinks the employee wouldn’t be able to do the job. Indirect discrimination
This can happen when an organisation puts a rule or a policy or a way of doing things in place which has a worse impact on someone with a protected characteristic than someone without one. For example a local authority is planning to redevelop some of its housing. It decides to hold consultation events in the evening. Many of the female residents complain that they cannot attend these meetings because of childcare responsibilities. Harassment
This means people cannot treat you in a way that violates your dignity, or creates a hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. For example a man with Down’s syndrome is visiting a pub with friends. The bar staff make derogatory and offensive comments about him, which upset and offend him. Victimisation
This means people cannot treat you unfairly if you are taking action under the Equality Act (like making a complaint of discrimination), or if you are supporting someone else who is doing so. For example, an employee makes a complaint of sexual harassment at work and is dismissed as a consequence.
What else does the Equality Act do?
Public Sector Equality Duty
The Equality Act also requires public bodies (like local councils, hospitals, and publicly-funded service providers) to consider how their decisions and policies affect people with different protected characteristics. The public body also should have evidence to show how it has done this.
For example, a local authority wants to improve its local bus service. It carries out a survey of people who use public transport and finds that very few women use buses at night because they are worried about sexual harassment. The local authority decides to work with the police and the transport provider, as well as local residents, to find ways to address this problem and make the bus service more inclusive.
Where else can I find information? You can visit the Citizens Advice website for general information. If you are concerned about your treatment at work, you can visit ACAS for more information.
If you are in a union, your union representative should also be able to help you with discrimination advice.
Last updated: 19 Feb 2020
Nuremberg Code
In August 1947, in response to the criminal behaviour of the Nazis during and leading up to WW2, a code of conduct called the Nuremberg Code was adopted:
The ten points of the code are given in the section of the verdict entitled “Permissible Medical Experiments”:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
In addition, any involuntary or enforced medical treatment is also a breach of: · the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights, · the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, · the European Council’s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, · the European Charter of Patients’ Rights, · the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
The UK has signed all of these documents.
In detail:
· The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states clearly: ‘Everyone has the right to respect for his or
her physical and mental integrity’. It also states: ‘Free and informed consent must be respected in the fields of medicine and biology’ and lastly: ‘The prohibition of eugenic practices and of making the human body and its parts as such a source of financial gain must be respected’. The European Council’s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine states clearly: ‘The interests and welfare of the human being shall prevail over the sole interest of society or science’. It also states: ‘An intervention in the health field may only be carried out after the person concerned has given free and informed consent to it. This person shall beforehand be given appropriate information as to the purpose and nature of the intervention as well as on its consequences and risks. The person concerned may freely withdraw consent at any time.’
· The European Charter of Patients’ Rights states clearly: ‘Every individual has the right of access to all information that might enable him or her to actively participate in the decisions regarding his or her health; this information is a prerequisite for any procedure and treatment, including the participation in scientific research (article 4 – Right to Consent)’. It also states: ‘Each individual has the right to freely choose from among different treatment procedures and providers on the basis of adequate information (article 5 – Right to Free Choice)’ and also ‘Each individual has the right to be free from harm caused by the poor functioning of health services, medical malpractice and errors, and the right of access to health services and treatments that meet high safety standards (article 9
Tyranny happens on different scales, right down to a small family. The mysterious thing is how it jumps from a small scale to a big one, even global, as they would like. I use the word “monopolist” because it covers greed for power as well as money or property, but the psychology is still unexplained. Theoretically, the monopolist could be cured and not need to be killed.
CRIMES OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
child abuse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jW-S9Ddws4w
“Rare but narrow” shows that Schwab does not know the meaning of the word “rare”. He thinks it means “good”. Illuminists will need to learn to talk like a human before I listen. You cannot be a spaz alcoholic.
Biden utilises Trump’s initial work:
https://kfor.com/news/coronavirus/heres-what-trumps-coronavirus-emergency-declaration-does/
President Donald Trump issued a federal emergency declaration Friday afternoon over the coronavirus outbreak following a week of cancellations, suspensions and growing case numbers that unsettled Americans nationwide. An emergency or disaster declaration from the President frees up additional money and sets the Federal Emergency Management Agency in motion.
A declaration puts FEMA, which is supporting the Health and Human Services Department and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for coronavirus response, in a position to be the coordinator.
More federal funds will become available, as will supplies, personnel and any other support. FEMA Administrator Peter Gaynor told lawmakers Wednesday that the agency’s warehouses are stocked with commodities across the country.
When activated, FEMA can help with logistics, like the transport of residents if needed, and put up temporary medical facilities. Those resources could come from across federal agencies, from stocked warehouses and through contracts. States will likely communicate what they need and where they need it.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/15/biden-to-deploy-fema-national-guard-to-set-up-covid-vaccine-clinics-across-the-us.html
Biden to deploy FEMA, National Guard to set up Covid vaccine clinics across the U.S.
PUBLISHED FRI, JAN 15 2021
President-elect Joe Biden plans to use FEMA and the National Guard to build coronavirus vaccine clinics across the United States, according to new details of his Covid-19 vaccination plan.
“Here’s the deal: The more people we vaccinate, the faster we do it, the sooner we can save lives and put this pandemic behind us and get back to our lives and loved ones,” Biden said at a speech in Wilmington, Delaware, Thursday night. “We won’t get out of it overnight, and we can’t do it as a separated nation.”
The Biden administration has said current vaccination efforts are not sufficient to quickly and equitably vaccinate the vast majority of the U.S. population, adding, “We must ensure that those on the ground have what they need to get vaccinations into people’s arms.”
By the end of Biden’s first month in office, the administration plans to have 100 federally supported centers across the nation that will ultimately vaccinate millions of people. “And as governors of both parties have asked, our administration will reimburse states 100 percent when their National Guard is deployed in the fight against COVID-19,” the transition team wrote.
Biden said the administration also plans to launch a public information campaign to “rebuild that trust,” as some polls suggest Americans are skeptical about getting a Covid-19 vaccine.
It looks they are working in duo, the former helps the latter, and vice versa
Trump initialises FEMA legistlation, Biden continues right from there
Useful information there, Hamish, but in my opinion it would have been better to have posted a summary, plus a link to the more detailed article rather than copy and paste the entire thing here.
Just my opinion, so don’t take it personally.
So the UK regime wants to give everyone who tests positive for Covid, £500 sqid! This to encourage the sheeple to get tested. This is expected to cost… £500 million per week!
Now, I wonder what is on the swabs? Are they collecting DNA? As a recent video on here stated, clean swab returned, got a positive test result… easy money. I’m sure the sheeple will be flocking to this one.
Hamish,
All that you’ve mentioned is the very instrument that the Jews and their shabbos goy use to enslave the population – legality/Roman law/law of admiralty/law of the sea.
What you’ve essentially just written about is also known as contract law.
The bottom line? There is no law that can force you to do anything, as long as you haven’t committed a crime. Not wearing a facemask is NOT a crime. They can create legislation to make it an offense, but offenses are NOT crimes.
So the bottom line is really quite simple – don’t go into any premises that require you to wear a mask, or should I say make it mandatory.
If people united and boycotted those businesses (as they used to do in the past, when people had a spine) would be left with a choice – allow people in who do not wish to wear a mask or bankruptcy.
If approached by the police:
1. Ask them if you are a living man. They must answer and will confirm you are a living man.
2. Then ask them what authority they are trying enforce upon you. You will be given an answer such as Public/Terrorism act, subsection etc etc.
3. Ask them that seeing as they’ve ascertained you’re a living man, why are they trying to enforce regulations upon you, that only have authority over the legal person and not the living man/woman?
4. Take their names and badge numbers. Let them know that should any of them put their hands upon you, that’s common law assault. Tell them that you do not wish to speak to them anymore and that if they persist, they will be guilty in committing common law breach of the peace. Let them also know that should they arrest or detain you, they’d be committing common law unlawful arrest/kidnap and should they lock you in a police cell, that would be common law unlawful imprisonment. Tell them they WON’T have a leg to stand on in a court of law under common law, being tried by a jury of 12.
Forgive me but F*CK the Equality Act and any other legislation, solely created to control the people like sheep. It only has authority over the legal person/those who consent to being under its authority.
Who is ultimately to blame for the current insanity? The psychopathic ruling class or the people themselves for believing in the state. The state needs your compliance, it is a parasite that must be fed with your consent.
Government is a religion and a world wide death cult, everywhere government goes, death follows. Democracy is mob rule. If voting mattered, they wouldn’t let us do it. Government is slavery. Taxation is theft. Time to wake up – no one should be a master and no one should be a slave.
If you ever wake up and realize you are a slave regardless if a Democrat or Republican wins, then quit participating, stop watching television which glorifies the ruling class, stop voting and pretending your vote matters.
The government is a parasite and you are it’s host. The government is a group of thieves who agree to prey on you and anyone else they can feed on, they stage false flags so they can go to war and rob the public treasury. The government is so god damned corrupt they can’t even count votes properly, they can’t keep the potholes filled on the roads, they can’t balance the budget, nor do they keep the value of money constant.
Yet so many view them as saviors when in fact they are devils.