3 Comments

1. Nixon Scraypes on November 10, 2020 at 12:05 pm

   Ever since I saw the Stalin quote about his being only interested in who COUNTS the votes, my eyes were opened. Physically counting hands is the only thing I trust, but that is vulnerable to intimidation. Now with electronic fraud the concept of voting seems delusional. Quigley’s statement in Tragedy and Hope that prime ministers and presidents are pre chosen is increasingly probable. Ken Clarke’s addressing the youthful David Cameron when he visited his father- “Good morning, prime minister” becomes a very sinister joke.

2. Neo on November 10, 2020 at 4:49 pm

   Welcome to the Jewocracy. When you control everything, you can do anything.

3. Basic BS on November 11, 2020 at 7:44 pm

   First of all, an actual computer program for voting can be learned
   and programmed by an elementary school kid in one lesson.
   It is literally not more than a simple IF, THEN statement
   program with variables assigned for the candidates. Simple stuff.

   That being said, it either works or it doesn’t. Like all programs.
   It’s so small for voting that a “glitch” is DEFINITELY not
   happening. You can write it, beta test it in a single day it is
   “good to go.”

   So how would it be faked. Easy. You can remotely access it
   through a back door and flip every thing from one candidate to
   another in an instant. Voila!

   This is apparently what happened. Also, it could be done with
   local code, but that would be hard, if not impossible to completely
   wash, scrub, delete, even with multiple low-level formats, which
   would render the machine blank with no OS.

   So why can’t you get a printout of your vote like at an ATM or
   when you buy any item like the law requires for IRS, federal
   tax reasons when you vote?

   Because they want or need the loophole. They need plausible
   deniability in case of an emergencey like oh say…….Trump
   wins and not beholden Hillary.