John Scheerhout and Abigail O’Leary – The Mirror Nov 8, 2020
—
Hundreds of anti-lockdown protesters have taken to the streets against the national lockdown.
Huge crowds marched through Manchester city centre, accusing MPs who voted for the lockdown of treason.
Many held placards of anti-lockdown slogans, with one reading “Fear is the currency of control” while some chanted “take off your masks”, witnesses claimed.
Video circulating on social media showed a man on a megaphone addressing the crowd with chants of “freedom, freedom, freedom” ringing through the streets.
He said: “Those 300-plus politicians that voted for the lockdown are treasonous.”
The comment prompted cheering from those in the crowd
“Witnesses claimed” is very odd. If they send reporters, the accounts are supposed to be first-hand. It is one of their lame techniques for distancing themselves from the facts. “Something may have happened but we do not know. Don’t ask me, I am just a newspaper making a report, how should I know?”
I read about this demo in the daily on-line rag The Mirror and the only comments they’ve published so far are anti-demo comments. “Can’t go to the pub, eh?” That kind of guff. These comments could easily be from the army’s propaganda wing the 77th Brigade, and it’s quite possible more people than not support these protests but they’ll never tell us that.
This is why I say to those who insist the majority are asleep and have been fooled; don’t be so sure the majority aren’t awake, but only the idiotic few are allowed to speak to give the impression they’re the majority – meaning you’re the ones who may have been fooled.
If Adolf Hitler could give his people freedom prosperity and full employment
why cant we ?
Hundreds? There were thousands there! So was I.
How about another joke, Murray?
What do you get when millions of British Christian morons obey their Jewish Overlords & obliterate anti-Communist Germany in WWII, so a cabal of Communist Jews can rule the world, invent a hoax virus & impose a lockdown upon the white goyim?
I’ll tell you what you get. You get what you f****ng deserve.
Lewis Jones – “Something may have happened but we do not know.”
Standard technique, Lewis. They use it a lot in their traffic reports too. “The High Street is closed DUE TO AN INCIDENT”. That phrase, “due to an incident” means exactly the same as “because something happened”, but we already know that. If the High Street is closed, something MUST have happened or nothing would have changed, rendering “due to an incident” nothing but meaningless sounds, words for the sake of words.
If they’re not prepared to say WHAT happened, why add this meaningless phrase?
Not really on-topic, I admit, but this kind of idiocy from those who want us to believe their lies really irritates me, like my local BBC radio station continually telling me I “love” the horrible anti-music they play or that I “trust” their unreliable traffic reports.
One example of a traffic report they tell me I “trust” concerned a recent hold-up (probably “because of an incident”) on the A270 Sevenoaks by-pass.
For those who don’t know, the A270 consists of a few miles in the Brighton area, while Sevenoaks isn’t even in the same county!
Travel I TRUST? I don’t think so!
Michael McNulty,
“The Mirror and the only comments they’ve published so far are anti-demo comments……These comments could easily be from the army’s propaganda wing the 77th Brigade.”
…..or from Jews, paid to scour the internet and post on forums to disrupt them.
Back in 2008 or so, internet newspaper columns began the heavy censoring of their comment sections. Don’t get me wrong, they always deleted the usual stuff like bad language, calling out Jews, racism etc etc, but what I mean is they started to just mass delete any comments that were critical of the articles. I think it was the Telegraph online, can’t remember, but they posted one article and there were so many replies, utterly tearing into the lie the article was, they deleted all the comments, there and then. Yup, the whole forum with well over 300 comments had its plug pulled.
After that comment sections started disappearing as this was effectively when the heavy censoring began.
If you look on any msm forum, especially a tabloid mush, guaranteed, for every comment there is that’s praising the propaganda article, there will have been dozens that disagreed. And those comments would have instantly been deleted.
You are right. I think there are far more people awake than they let on. If we can go by voting figures, well, it would mean that at least 40% are awake. This lockdown is really beginning to do the unthinkable – bring skepticism back to the brain dead Joe public. Then again, it could also be a plan to bring about martial law.
How do the media whores get away with it. Watching the 10pm news about the enormous amounts of COVID? patients in hospitals in the UK at this time . Showing one hospital in which there were crises actors galore some gowned up with mask and hoods on standing saying how tired they are and overwhelmed they are in full make up as in the eyebrows and thick mascara then pan onto one or two COVID patients who have supposedly been struck down with COVID with oxygen mask over there faces but speaking very clearly and not at all breathless saying how awful it has been and how they were taken down with “COVID” so quickly but looking very well lots of color in their faces no signs of real illness . It was so phony you couldn’t make it up in fact it was embarrassing and yet someone sitting near me exclaimed how awful poor things. They believed it all.
There is a simple metric that the governments have been using for decades to gauge the depth of their opposition: for everyone at a demo or protest rally, there are ten others who didn’t show up but who sympathize. Add to that all the demonstrations going on in other cities, and I’d say that they are losing control of the narrative – and fast. This is when they will call in the Army and it will be naked brute force. Hopefully then the rest of the public will wake up.
“All we have to do now
Is take these lies
And make them true somehow;
All we have to see
Is that I don’t belong to you
And you don’t belong to me.”
– George Michael: Freedom ’90 (1991)
White Elephant
I have read your posts re the common law courts with much interest, but unfortunately their site doesn’t contain any FAQ’s or go into any detail as to how in practice and reality this would work. I hope you can help.
As a UK Law grad, I was always told that common law is essentially the law of judge made law; not so much a judgement of peers. However I was also always taught that legislation is supreme. I have asked the following on the common law courts site but to date have not received a response:
1) Where in the UK are there designated common law courts?
2) If a police officer tried to arrest an individual for an offence which is not mentioned in common law, for example harassment alarm and distress, or more topically a covid related offence, can I clarify how you suggest we respond? The gist seems to be that we would say the following:
1) Officer, the offence you say I am committing, ie breach of covid regs, is not recognised at common law. As a result I do not come under your jurisdiction. I do not therefore contract with you. You have no power to arrest me as I am entitled to walk to a friends house / peacefully protest under my rights at common law. Is this the crux?
If so, I am curious: have you witnessed anyone actually using a common law ID card and making these statements to an officer about any topic? If so, please let me know.
Does this common law protection extend further? For example, if an officer arrested an individual for harassment alarm and distress, what do you suggest we do?
Judging by the common law forum section, it suggests 1) not to give your name 2) state from the outset that you do not consent to their questions or recognise their authority as the offence in question is not a common law offence; and 3) when in court, again refuse to answer questions or give your name.
This sounds great, except would it work in reality or would the court and police just make sure you received a guilty verdict regardless and then send you to prison anyway?
The thing is, as much as I commend the common law site, it needs more detail and needs to be giving people crystal clear guidance on how this works and ‘do’s and don’ts’ in certain situations.
I see it more likely that a copper is going to nick you regardless of whether you tell him that your common law ID card makes you immune to being arrested for non-common law offences.
Or, does it mean that the police can arrest you but you can engage your right to be tried in a common law court? Can I also ask: in a common law court, are you literally tried by a jury of your peers and no judge? or is it an officially recognised judge in attendance?
So many questions!
The site also doesn’t explain how our ‘normal’ courts (magistrates / crown) are essentially state owned (although some forums say there are actually private companies), which actually (as you have previously mentioned) enforce a law of the sea not the land. This needs more explaining to laypeople who want to understand. The site needs to break it down and give us more guidance. Simply saying this or that is unlawful and you don’t have to under common law is not enough.
Also, I have had a look at a few of the cases on the common law site. One in particular from sept ’19 was interesting – it was essentially a common law ruling against that wretch Matt Hancock and his immoral involvement in pushing vaccines. The court ruled against him and fined him – yet in reality he is still health sec and i’m sure he hasn’t paid a penny of the fine that the common law court passed down.
So what gives here? Did the common law judge and court pursue this judgement? Are these judgments actually valid in reality?
Again, I have emailed the site about this and they don’t respond unfortunately. If they are genuinely too busy that’s absolutely fine, but they need to be putting these answers in an FAQ. That way, more and more people can educate themselves and arm themselves, as at the moment people are still unconvinced that flashing a common law card at a police officer will make them retreat into the shadows. Any advice appreciated, cheers