Brother Nathanael – Real Jew News Oct 20, 2020
—
+Brother Nathanael’s Amazing Videos!
The Enemies Of Free Speech Here
+BN Classics On BitChute!
What If Jews Ran America? Here
America’s Two Minutes Of Hate Here
Who’s Applauding Internet Censorship? Here
+BN Vids FULL Archive! HERE!
(Upload ALL My Vids On The Jew Internet!)
___________________________________
Support The Brother Nathanael Foundation!
Br Nathanael Fnd Is Tax Exempt/EIN 27-2983459
Or Send Your Contribution To:
The Brother Nathanael Foundation, POB 547, Priest River, ID 83856
E-mail: brothernathanaelfoundation([at])yahoo[dot]com
Good analysis, but I would shut them (social media) down as Trump has suggested. Even if Trump was just shooting his mouth off, I think his sentiment was sound. The reason why social media bosses are protected is that their businesses are hardwired into the deep state intelligence systems. The idea that the NSA or GCHQ needs to request data on xyz is a myth. This is why UK court cases where illegally accessed information is used as evidence are held in secret. They don’t want the methods exposed. I was blessed when Twitter banned me. So much time saved fighting the algorithm.
Brother Nathael is wrong on this one.
Moderating websites is not cencorship. Zuckenberg has the right to promote his political views and moderate away his opponents, as he is the legal administrator of Facebook. If facebook shareholders want to have a commie site, they can have it. He can even put a big red communist flag on his website, and that is his right .
True cencorship is disrimination that is based on law, is embedded in the law, such as hatespeech laws. In EU censorship is openly in the law.
Facebook moderating websites is annoyance, not cencorship
“They can’t have it both ways.”
They can and they do.
“Zuckerberg Won’t Go to Jail”
No indeed ! Now that bankster jews control the governments of the world, jails and prisons are being turned into penal systems for punishing those who oppose bankster evil.
Zuckerberg is a jew in good standing with the banksters doing what the banksters want him to do. The banksters made JZ into a billionaire and head honcho at Farcebook because JZ follows bankster orders.
The banksters control the jewdicial system, so there is no chance of JZ going to jail as long he stays loyal to the banksters.
rick @ 8.13.
I think you’re missing the point.
Moderation is censorship. It’s a step between the person who wants to publish and publishing. The moderator may have good reasons to censor but censorship it is.
B.N. makes a point of law. Facebook claims to be a platform. A platform publishes anything without moderation or interference and is not liable for what is published.
A publisher moderates and censors content. Facebook is trying to be both.
Zuckerburg can do whatever he pleases with the site. He cannot claim to be a platform and a publisher as these are contrary to each other. The choice is black or white not both.
Any media outlet that restricts the freedom of speech of Americans, is breaking the American 1st amendment.
Hate Speech legislation (not laws) break the 1st amendment.
The government should have immediately shut down Facebook and all other social media outlets that restrict the freedom of speech. Therefore ALL sites that have moderation, therefore restrict freedom of speech, thus do not honor the 1st amendment should, by law, not be allowed any platform.
The fact that people are incapable of understanding this simple premise beggars belief. And it is their ignorance that is leading them straight into the gulag. Just as in Russia, with the Jew’s being those behind the hell, they are now in charge of the west, about to inflict the same hell upon the westerners.
A crime, is only a crime when there is an injured party (theft, assault, murder) and that’s it. Hurting someone’s feelings is not a crime. Telling the truth in calling a homosexual a homosexual, or a shit stabber, or a fudge packer, a chutney ferret, a degenerate, a depraved individual and/or a pervert is not a crime, never was and never will be. In fact, it is very much a sin against God.
If people do not wake up asap and fight against that which is wrong – PHYSICALLY as we’ve past the point of dialogue, then they will end up waiting in line to be ‘processed’ in the slaughter markets, that are coming to a city/village near you very soon.
If you accept a society that promotes wrong, then you too will be wronged. It’s common sense, something that’s severely lacking in the population of this world, today.
Rick:
George: is right and to be honest, it is no ones business but the job of the courts to punish those who overstep legal sensibilities. Just because the 99% don’t have access to the courts, this does not mean that massive publishing tech giants should censor.
The other day I called creepy Biden a —- (not a swear word) and my comment was censored or more specifically, blocked. It shouldn’t be the business of websites to censor. If Biden doesn’t like what people accuse him of, then he can go to court. The fact is, people like Biden get protection. Like Blair arrested and cautioned for cottaging. You couldn’t say this 15 years ago & now it has got so bad that social media will just censor everything they don’t like. How about George Bush,Tony Blair and Jeff Gannon (not his real name) having a sex party in the Oval Office one night? Gannon was the guy that Bush gave a press pass to so that he could ask his sex buddy easy leading questions at White House briefings. It is also believed that Gannon had a big role in establishing military sex torture during the Afghanistan/Iraq war period.
How about Cherie and Tony Blair being neglectful parents & that Kathryn Blair tried at least twice to top herself. Other parents would have had their children taken into care. This was total censorship apart from a so say friend of the family called Melvyn Bragg… apparently he likes little children. He blurted out the truth.lol
Why should the sheeple be kept in the dark over Prince William’s bit of fluff on the side? The real reason for Harry and Wills bust up. The sheeple pay for these parasites, why should they be protected? I know this is true, because it comes from a very widely read columnist for a selection of top fake news publications. Dinner table chat. All the establishment knows, all the prime fake news presstitutes know, but the sheeple who pays the money are kept in the dark…. oh, that’s just a conspiracy theory.
All Fackf–k and Tw-tter are is deep state gatekeepers.
@George
You strain a gnat, while simultaneously you swallow a camel
I didnt hear you say anything about true censorship laws (hatespeech, holocaust denial etc), and americas support for such dictators, or anything about julian assange
All i heard is you whining about zuckenberg not publishing what you wish him to publish
Someone should inform this rabbi, that Epstein is still alive.
Remember, you can’t have ‘free speech’ when Jews own/control all the mass/social media outlets.
rick,
“True cencorship is disrimination that is based on law, is embedded in the law, such as hatespeech laws. In EU censorship is openly in the law.”
There are no hatespeech laws. There’s hatespeech legislation and DO NOT confuse the two. The freedom to speak and hold opinions contrary to others is enshrined within the American constitution’s first amendment. You cannot arrest someone for speech. It’s that simple and if people ARE arrested for speech, in the USA, those doing the arresting are committing common law assault, common law false imprisonment and common law kidnap and any policeman, who knows his constitutional rights, knows very well that he wouldn’t even contemplate doing so.
As for the rest of Europe, take the UK for example, there are no hate speech laws either. Again, common law. You cannot arrest ANYONE for what they say, but you can CONTRACT them by making them given their name and later signing that contract to make it legally binding. For example, if I called a black man a nigger or a homosexual a filthy, degenerate, sodomite, the police would arrest me. I would not give my name, because I would not submit to being under the law of admiralty, which this act (legislation) is under. I would inform the police that they are, in fact, breaking the law, in unlawful assault upon arrest, kidnap under common law and false imprisonment. I would take their badge numbers and their names and take them to court under common law, which they have infact breached and not fulfilled their oaths as common law, peace constables. They know this, they this very well. They know that after two days they have to either charge me, or release me. And if they do not have my name, they cannot charge me and more so, by not signing my name I do not allow myself to be under their jurisdiction and the court’s. If they did imprison me for two days, upon release they’d be taken to court and prosecuted for above crimes.
The most basic God given right to all people is freedom of speech. There is no law against freedom of speech. Your name is very powerful. Do not give its power away willy nilly.
In about 1992 I told a Left-wing group that there are no rights, only powers and inclinations, and something a bit similar has to be said for freedoms. Who speaks of freedom without being furious? Serving God is anything but freedom, whereas the West is a ghost-train of sprites and imps in a grotesque pursuit of all freedoms, thanks partly to the bent rhetoric of Jefferson, who, in a single sentence, professed to be interested in serving both God and “the mind of Man” as if you could do both.
This guy takes better angle:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/there-solution-big-tech-censorship-no-politician-will-touch-it
This fact completely debunks today’s notion of what constitutes free markets. Corporations ARE NOT free market structures. They are, in fact, government chartered and government protected monopolies. They are SOCIALIST creations, not free market creations, and therefore they should not exist in a free market society at all.