CCTV that blocks people from entering a shop if they are not wearing a mask being set up across UK

  • CCTV cameras installed in stores in bid to help staff tackle ‘difficult’ customers
  • Screen outside shop will display green or red message to grant access to person
  • Whiteley’s Garden Centre in West Yorkshire already has system up and running
  • It follows revelation that AI scanners in UK are supplying social distancing data

 Katie Weston – Daily Mail.com Oct 16, 2020

CCTV that blocks people from entering a shop if they are not wearing a face covering is being set up across the UK.

The cameras use artificial intelligence to determine whether a person walking towards the shop doors is wearing a mask in a bid to help staff tackle ‘difficult’ customers.

A screen fitted outside the shop’s doors will display a green or red message to automatically allow or deny access to the person.

Customers who aren’t wearing a mask will be refused entry automatically and the doors will remain shut.


Continues …

Comment – Oct 17, 2020

From hereon the next step will be to set up CCTV cameras to identify if shoppers have been vaccinated against Covid-19 or not. Then shop owners – and here we are talking about major supermarket chains, as most small family stores will be out of business soon – will be able to bar those who have not been “immunized” with a Bill Gates approved vaccine.
As in “that none may buy or sell unless he bears the mark of the Beast

38 responses to “CCTV that blocks people from entering a shop if they are not wearing a mask being set up across UK”

  1. This is expecting other people and institutions to enforce bad laws. Orwell said they will get the people to police the people and how right he was.

    My grandfather and so many like him fought and died for nothing in WWII. They bought us some time but that was all, and the only reason they made gains at home like free healthcare and pensions was because the establishment was wary of returning forces. They were young and fit, many battle-hardened, they had weapons and ammo as war souvenirs, and they had contacts allover the country. They were organised and the establishment feared being overthrown.

    In the early-80s when these veterans started getting old and colleagues were passing away, Thatcher and Reagan began taking back those gains. Now that most of them have died and the survivors too old to rebel we have very few of those gains left.

  2. Perhaps things now under fascism resemble ancient Rome?
    Back then they had a Republic and people had their rights then after his victories and murders and thefts in Gaul, Ceaser returned to Rome and became Dictator!
    We used to have law and order and decent Courts and decent Police etc,but now we are all going to get done by the Gates injection, and maybe 12 super rich dictators.
    Take the Gates jab or stay in isolation for life.Plus wealth confiscation will happen on a massive scale, so buckle up for the worst nightmare of all time.

  3. This is fake news. It is not the responsiblity of shop staff or security to enforce the wearing of face masks. I have never worn a face mask in a UK shop/supermarket. The closing of doors by remote means has staggering H&S repercussions. My experience is that medium and large supermarkets really don’t care I I suspect staff have been told that its not their job to enforce mask wearing. What happens to people with medical exemptions, do they now have to carry medical ID & divulge personal medical information to the local shelf stacker?

    My last shop at Lidl and half the staff didn’t have masks on & I talking about staff on the shop floor, but even so, some of those on the tills didn’t have a face mask and those that did only had their mouth covered.lol

  4. Thanks for your insights. It sure seems to me that by banning (potentially large) numbers of customers from stores that a financial catastrophe for those companies would be inevitable, yes? Oops, pardon me–the financial catastrophe, the retail apocalypse has already happened……Maybe this means ” Last customer out the door, please turn off the lights?”

  5. If you are banned from the over-priced-tat Jew shop that is another bad habit crossed off the list.

  6. Welcome to your Jewtopia.

  7. Peter Gar,
    Just how many times do I have to correct people in the “truth movement” that we are not living in a Fascist state but a communist/bolshevik/marxist state.

    Fascism was formed to fight against communism and unfortunately lost.

    A real Fascist government (not the hollywood misrepresentation) would be far more preferable.
    The vast majority have fallen for the jew lies about Fascism and use the word as a pejorative epithet. The truth is not so hard to find.

    Here is an excellent book that lays out the real tenets of Fascism, well worth a read:

    https://archive.org/details/100QuestionsAboutFascism

  8. Im reading 1984 at present! This is the New reality. I 100% Believe this Covid19 scam is an agenda to put in 24/7 monitoring of the citizens in respective countries.
    A Program on China about a few years ago about Chinas Social credit system that watches citizens actions through CCTV. From travel to purchsses to punishment. This is what the UN want for the west a compliant Populace. This is truly a nightmare for all.

    Is it any wonder that Chinas President is Loved and held up to be a Hero by the UN.

    The new world will be free of Love, life and happiness.
    The Big Tech really are creating their own Nightmare.
    Lets face some hard truths.
    All these Culutre Wars, regime change and War on terror has set society up for an all mighty fall.
    A tribe of people have been hell bent on destroying the West.
    With Joe Biden most certainly to become President those FEMA camps will be filled up with God fearing patriots.

    A full on Global Civil War is not wanted ITS NEEDED.

    I look forward to seeing this.

  9. Ross,

    Believe it or not, we’re actually living in a very messed up mix of a communist and fascist state. Peter Gar is partly correct, although he’s ignorant as to what fascism is. He merely bleats out fascism, as all fools do, in the left, at any society that restricts freedom and imposes draconian legislation into society. That stated, fascism is a left wing ideology. It just happens to be right of communism, as is national socialism (the hint is the socialism that for some reason, lefties automatically attribute it to right, because it’s got ‘nationalist’ in front of it, failing to see that nationalism, pre WW2, before the left accepted identity politics as its main tenet, was in fact left, centrist and right wing).

    The doctrine of fascism by Mussolini is there for all to read, as you know. Many people do not realise that fascism is a state controlled society, run by the nation for the nation. Communism, on the other hand, is a state controlled society, over all societies, by an elite, not of that nation. People like to quote Marx and state that his ideals of communism have never been implemented properly. Not only are these people ignorant on whom Marx was, whom he worked for and that many people don’t believe he even wrote the works attributed to him, but more so that Marx was a Jew, who fooled people into accepting Marxism, to ultimately be ruled over, by the Jew, as we clearly saw happen in Russia, post 1917 Jewish takeover.

    The reason I said we live in a mix is because the definition of fascism, by Mussolini, is the merger of corporation and the state – corporatism is what fascism is. According to Mussolini, the individual is not important. The group is. The group works for the state and the state is there to keep the people safe. Fascism was essentially, Mussolini’s attempt to recreate the Roman Empire. In Mussolini’s Italy, there would only be indigenous Italians although one seriously has to question Mussolini’s fascism, because what he and Hitler fell out over was Mussolini’s disagreeing with Hitler in the removal of Jews, from Europe. There’s more to Mussolini that we’re not being told.

    So the bottom line is, we live under fascism, BUT ONLY in the context of merger of the state and corporation (and the corporations are owned by you know who). No other parts of a fascist society can be attributable to what we live in today. Yes, we are living under a Marxist/Bolshevick/Communist state today. We live under the complete control of Jews, as they enforce their Talmudic laws upon us all, turning the indigenous into 3rd class citizens in their own lands, with the immigrants as 2nd class, behind them being the 1st class.
    I hope I’ve explained why we ‘partly’ live in a fascist state.

  10. i tried to email in this hot news and could not, its hilarious
    https://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2020/10/trying-to-make-sense-of-hunter-biden.html

  11. This as Rothschild predicted is communism
    As Gen Patton said in w w 2 we slaughtered the wrong pig
    Hitler gave his people freedom from the bankers tyranny
    and we fought for rothschild to destroy him
    i worked with many w w 2 veterans in the 50s nd 60s they all regretted this to a man
    the only country left who can help us is iran who refuse a rothschild banking system

  12. When the campaign began to boycott jewish shops and businesses it was boom time for farmers markets
    food was locally grown fresh with little in the way of toxic strays and jews profitted nothing from it
    it hit tesco hard
    we all need to join together to stop jews at thir tricks
    buy from farmers markets every time

  13. Ross: they are all the same things and can be applied in different ways. Since the 70s, maybe earlier, the West has been run on communist lines. Most people earn similar wages, they live in similar homes, they drive similar leased cars, they watch the same crap on TV. Strictly Come Prancing started last night… I was on JewTube… not much choice, but that is communisum, very few choices. At the same time, it is highly fascist when the regime, banks and corporates are having a three some every night.

    Going back to the 70s when things started going wrong for the so say capitalist free market economy, in the Soviet Union, everyone had jobs and homes and the sheeple in Western Europe were actually envious of socialist Russia. This is why the deep state (operation Gladio) created nut job (left-wing) terror groups in Europe and the US in order to change public preception. Neither Russia or China became full on communist states, they are really socialist models. Even the EU is more like China. Shell democracies like the US & UK are really run by banks and corporations. This is why they are both dysfunctional failed states. No other country in the world seeks to emulate the US & the UK is a half baked virsion of the US & again, no one looks at the UK & thinks, yep, we’ll do it like the UK

  14. Ross,
    you like your creature comforts, don’t you? Not having to fight everywhere for world supremacy, being deported to a concentration camp if you say or even think something the rulers do not like? Well, then think twice about the “true fascism” they want to build on your back.
    Communism was developed in opposition to rising fascist tendencies in the Prussian militaristic state of the 19th century. It holds out a promise of liberty if we get rid of all the exploiters world-wide and can have a decentralised system where people at the village or quarter level take their own decisions, and all positions are filled by a rotational principle. Every household would have their own house, contribute to society to the measure of their abilities and in return receive what they need. All medicine would be natural. This has NOTHING to do with the Covid Fascism they are building now.
    Given a choice between this new fascism based on lockdowns, social distancing, masking up, concentration camps, DNA changes by vaccine, compulsory chip implants, being burnt alive by 5G and denial of health care, education, travel, work, constitutional rights and true Communism I’d support communism any day. Peter Gar

  15. At present the mass of the people have no freedom. Under Fascism for the first time they will have freedom. What is the use of a vote if the people never get what they vote for ? How can they get what they vote for when only two big Bills can be carried through Parliament in a whole year on account of obstruction ? The beginning of freedom for the people is that the programme for which they vote shall be carried out. It cannot be carried out until the Government has powerto act. By giving” Government the power to act, Fascism brings not the end of freedom but the beginning of freedom. Real freedom is economic freedom. Economic freedom cannot come until economic chaos ends ; and it cannot end until a Government has power to act.
    Real freedom means good wages, short hours, security in employment, good houses, opportunity for leisure and recreation with family and friends. Modern Science enables us to build such a civilisation. It is not built, because Democracy prefers talk to action. We have to choose between the freedom of a few professional politicians to talk and the freedom of the people to live. In choosing the latter, Fascism makes freedom possible and releases the people from the economic slavery rivetted upon them by the Democracy of talk.

  16. It is the deliberate aim of Fascism to bring to an end the Party game which we believe to be the ruin of the Nation. We substitute a new system of action suited to the modern age for the system of talk which belongs to the past. For instance, a Parliament elected under Fascism will be a technical and not a political Parliament. The franchise will be occupational and not geographical. Men and women will vote according to their industry or profession, and not according to their locality. They will vote for people versed in the problems of their industries, and not for professional politicians. In such a system there is no place for parties and for politicians. We shall ask the people for a mandate to bring to an end the Party system and the Parties. We invite them to enter a new civilisation. Parties and the Party game belong to the old civilisation, which has failed.

  17. The Fascist Movement represents Leadership, not Tyranny. It offers to the people a Leadership in national revival which they will accept of their own free will. The Dictatorship is a Dictatorship of the will of the people expressed through a Leadership and Government of their own choice. The only way in which the will of the people can be carried out is through a Leadership which they choose for the purpose and give the power to act.
    Fascism offers that Leadership through which the will of the people can be effective. Thus a Dictatorship of the people themselves replaces the present Dictatorship of Vested Interests. Parliament and Government are paralysed by universal talk. Programmes for which the people have voted are never implemented. As a result real Government under Democracy rests in the hands of the great interests, such as International Finance. Fascism restores to power the people. That power can only be expressed through Leadership voluntarily accepted and chosen, but armed by the people with power to do what they want done.

  18. The present system ignores the fact that majorities also have their rights. In the name of free debate a minority now has the power to prevent a Government carrying out the programme for which the majority of the people have voted. The first necessity is to secure the right of the majority to the action which they demand by their vote. This is impossible so long as an obstructive opposition has the power by endless talk to prevent action by Government. The will of the people is greater than the right of the minority. That first principle is denied by the practices of present Democracy.

  19. 23. When the first Fascist Government introduces a Bill to confer power of action by order on the Government, what will you do if the House of Lords throws it out ?
    The people will have voted for a Government returned with a constitutional majority to pass this measure as its first Act. If the House of Lords throw out the Bill under these circumstances it will violate not only the spirit but also the practice of the British Constitution in modern times. The Peers will be rebels against Crown and People and will be treated as such. Fascism, therefore, would grasp the nettle and would suppress the House of Lords. It would immediately be replaced by a Second Chamber truly representative of Modern Britain.

  20. What will be the position of the House of Lords ?
    The House of Lords will be replaced by a Second Chamber representing the industry, culture and ability of the Nation. This Second Chamber will also contain representatives whose technical knowledge of science and industry shall be specific and detailed beyond the needs of the House of Commons, and will also contain representatives of Education, Religion, the Services, Science, Art, and every aspect of the people’s spiritual life. From this national pool of culture and ability, Government will derive a real assistance.
    The present House of Lords is an anachronism. It was originally intended that the House of Lords should broadly represent industry and culture. In early days the Peers owned the land, which was the only industry, and enjoyed exceptional opportunities of education. To-day, Agriculture is not the only industry and many Peers are not even connected with land or industry. Further, none would claim they enjoy a monopoly of culture. Therefore, by abolishing the present House of Lords in favour of an Assembly genuinely representing the industry and culture of the Nation, we restore the original conception of the British Constitution.

  21. In brief definition, Capitalism is the system by which capital uses the Nation for its own purposes. Fascism is the system by which the Nation uses capital for its own purposes. Private enterprise is permitted and encouraged so long as it coincides with the national interests. Private enterprise is not permitted when it conflicts with national interests. Under Fascism private enterprise may serve but not exploit. This is secured by the Corporative System, which lays
    down the limits within which industry may operate, and those limits are the welfare of the Nation.

  22. In brief, we believe in a managed currency so that the consumption of goods can be equated to the production of wealth. The supply of money in all forms must be adequate to the needs of production and consumption. The supply must be again the prerogative of the Crown, representing the State, and not the monopoly of private exploiters.

  23. If industries are to be self-governing under their own Corporations, how will you prevent the financiers and bankers from continuing their present policy ?
    A Corporation would be established for the control of Banking and Finance as for all other industries. In this case, as in all others, the Corporation would work within the limits of national welfare as laid down by Government. The governing principle of finance will be that British credit shall be used for British purposes alone. The export of credit or capital will be absolutely prohibited. A banking code applying the principle in detail will be devised, having the force of law. Not only the Bank of England and the Joint Stock Banks will be subject to the Corporation, but also the Finance Houses. It is noteworthy that the Socialist Party do not include in their scheme the Finance Houses, which are responsible for most foreign banking. The reason is not only that they are largely Jewish, but also that they can break any Government pursuing an international economic policy by breaking the exchange. Free movement of capital and credit from one country to another is implicit in an international trading system. Therefore, under internationalism it always rests in the power of the Finance Houses to break a Government by sudden and excessive movements which break the exchange and create panic. A national economic system alone is independent of the necessity for such movements in its normal trade and, therefore, is independent of international finance.

  24. 48. How will you enforce your banking code ?
    The banking code will have the force of law with heavy penalties attaching to it. Any banker who breaks the law will go where the poor go to-day when they break the Law. As most bankers prefer the luxury of their present apartments to a sojourn in gaol, very few will break the law. FURTHERMORE, THE WORST OFFENDERS WILL ALREADY HAVE BEEN DEPORTED AS FALLING WITHIN THE CATEGORY OF JEWS WHO HAVE GROSSLY ABUSED THE HOSPITALITY OF BRITAIN.

  25. 59. What is your attitude to the private ownership of land, and hereditary tenure ?
    We believe that the private tenure of land should be as widely diffused as possible in many different hands. Our policy will aim at the maximum number of owner-occupier Farmers, and will encourage in every way the handing down of such land from father to son. This will create a hereditary interest and pride in the land, which will revive the spirit of the countryside. Big landowners will be treated as all other owners of hereditary wealth. Land ownership will be regarded as a Trusteeship on the principle of no reward without service. A landlord who abuses that trusteeship will lose his land without compensation, and it will be split up into owner- occupier farms. On the other hand, a landlord will be encouraged if he exercises a real local leadership and gives back in service to the countryside the equivalent of his reward derived from the land. Such men have been singled out for attack by the Social-Democratic system, which has permitted gross abuses of hereditary wealth.
    A Jewish financier, stock-exchange speculator, or bucket-shop keeper may amass a large fortune and leave it to his son. That son’s interest in the country may not extend beyond a night club and a liberal supply of champagne. Yet under the present system, such an owner of hereditary wealth is treated as altogether admirable, while an object of scorn and attack is the man devoting his whole life to the countryside, where the roots of his family have extended for centuries in the hereditary tenure of land. This is one of the many examples of the false values of present financial Democracy. Under Fascism, the land of the absentee landlord and waster will be expropriated. The local leader and servant of the countryside, where he was born and bred, will be encouraged.

  26. 69. What is the attitude of Fascism towards Chain Stores ?
    Chain Stores owned by Jewish and foreign capital will be eliminated. Their staffs will be absorbed in the extended co-operative system to which reference is made in the previous question. Chain Stores, which are British owned, will be permitted only under licence, and to an extent which does not interfere with the Fascist system of small shopkeeper and co-operative society. Fascism will not tolerate the growing monopoly of the people’s vital supplies in alien hands.

  27. 95. What is the Fascist attitude towards the Jews ?

    Jews must put the interests of Britain before those of Jewry, or be deported from Britain. This is not a principle of racial or religious persecution. Any well-governed nation must insist that its citizens owe allegiance to the nation, and not to co-racialists and co-religionists resident outside its borders or organised as a state within the State. The Jews, as a whole, have chosen to organise themselves as a nation within the Nation and to set their interests before those of Great Britain. They must, like everyone else, put “Britain First” or leave Britain.

  28. 97. Will the Jews then be persecuted or ill-treated ?

    It is untrue to suggest that Jews will be persecuted under Fascism in Britain. Bullying or persecution of any kind is foreign to the British character. We shall not keep Jews here to bully them. Those who have been guilty of anti-British conduct will be deported. Those against whom no such charge rests will be treated as foreigners, but in accordance with the traditional British treatment of foreigners within these shores, will not be ill-treated or molested. On the other hand, foreigners who have not proved themselves worthy citizens of Britain will be deported.

    98. Will they be allowed the right of citizenship or permitted to be officials or M.P.’s in the Fascist State ?

    As stated above, the Jews have deliberately maintained themselves as a foreign community in Britain, setting their racial interests above the national interest. As such, therefore, they will be treated, and none can complain of treatment which accords with their own actions. We do not permit foreigners to be M.P.’s or officials, or afforded the full rights of British citizenship, and Jews will not be afforded these privileges. Anyone in the service of the State under Fascism must be entirely British.

  29. I apologise about the text, I set it all out in paragraphs etc but, it downloaded as one continuous text.

    Anyway; Fascism is what we need to defeat the jew “new world order”!

  30. Any shop owner who would install that kind of absurd mechanism to enforce an even more absurd and insulting edict doesn’t deserve to stay in business.

    In the Jewnited States, we are now seeing more people take advantage of the face diaper, er mask, requirement and steal everything that isn’t nailed down in shops. It would be a real shame if that happened to the stores with those sensors and automatic doors keeping out the free-thinkers. Yup, a real shame if they got robbed into bankruptcy…. You enforce an illegal, immoral, idiotic order, then don’t be surprised if you eventually get what you deserve.

  31. Communism is a lot older than Fascism. In the latter, people intelligently reacted against the Jews’ trick of “fraternity, liberty, equality” with the healthy approach–hierarchy, duty, discipline, service, eugenics. The other three destroy a people.

  32. But you do not get freedom under Fascism. Like sugar, freedom might feel good but is poison, and when people spurt the word “freedom” out of their mouths they are just being parrots.

  33. Lewis Jones,
    Explain your idea of freedom.

    Did you not just read what I posted, straight from the book ‘Fascism:100 questions asked and answered’ by Oswald Mosley.

    Again, for xxxxx sake:

    At present the mass of the people have no freedom. Under Fascism for the first time they will have freedom. What is the use of a vote if the people never get what they vote for ? How can they get what they vote for when only two big Bills can be carried through Parliament in a whole year on account of obstruction ? The beginning of freedom for the people is that the programme for which they vote shall be carried out. It cannot be carried out until the Government has powerto act. By giving” Government the power to act, Fascism brings not the end of freedom but the beginning of freedom. Real freedom is economic freedom. Economic freedom cannot come until economic chaos ends ; and it cannot end until a Government has power to act.
    Real freedom means good wages, short hours, security in employment, good houses, opportunity for leisure and recreation with family and friends. Modern Science enables us to build such a civilisation. It is not built, because Democracy prefers talk to action. We have to choose between the freedom of a few professional politicians to talk and the freedom of the people to live. In choosing the latter, Fascism makes freedom possible and releases the people from the economic slavery rivetted upon them by the Democracy of talk.

  34. Amazing how the corporations are there to help governments enforce tyranny. Yes, and all those citizens working there helping as well. Assisting treason is treason as well.

  35. Lewis Jones,
    And what is your idea of freedom?

  36. The beginning of freedom for the people is that the programme for which they vote shall be carried out. It cannot be carried out until the Government has power to act. By giving” Government the power to act, Fascism brings not the end of freedom but the beginning of freedom. Real freedom is economic freedom. Economic freedom cannot come until economic chaos ends ; and it cannot end until a Government has power to act.

    Real freedom means good wages, short hours, security in employment, good houses, opportunity for leisure and recreation with family and friends. Modern Science enables us to build such a civilisation. It is not built, because Democracy prefers talk to action. We have to choose between the freedom of a few professional politicians to talk and the freedom of the people to live. In choosing the latter, Fascism makes freedom possible and releases the people from the economic slavery rivetted upon them by the Democracy of talk.

  37. Come on it’s the Hegelian Dialectic in action. Seen the Fasciae (bundle of sticks ) in Congress? Double headed eagle everywhere? Fascism/ Communism the same. WW2 financed by big money…….all sides. We have now reached end game. But Albert Pike suggested WW3, so that looks to be imminent. Then the complete global dictatorship can begin.
    Trouble is the Satanists who are orchestrating things, must surely know that God will blow his last fuse, and they won’t get away with it. Sorry folks, but Jesus said it would be the greatest tribulation the world had ever seen before he returned. So button up, say your prayers and get your life right and back to God. You’ll find it’s well worth it, both now and in the future.

  38. When comparing communism and facism in terms of level of oppression and tyranny, it seems obvious to me that facism is preferable – the number dead under communist regimes absolutely dwarfs the number dead under facism. This is surely indisputable. Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pot et al.
    I don’t recall any alleged facist dictator mass murdering their own people like the above. How many millions have died under Red regimes? If you study the major world revolutions, you ALWAYS see the illuminati using atheistic communism as its tool to overthrow the Catholic rule (King Louis, then Nicholas the Czar – both Catholic).
    Communism is satanic in spirit. Communism is Jewish. Enough said.