Even if Amy Barrett is confirmed to SCOTUS, she still promotes forced vaccinations and indefinite lockdowns

Lance D. Johnson – Natural News Sept 24, 2020

Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a potential successor to Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

Conservatives are clamoring online, hoping that President Trump nominates Judge Amy Coney Barrett to be the next Supreme Court Justice of the United States. As conservatives rush to nominate a Supreme Court Justice before the 2020 election, they may get the opposite of what they really want. Republicans are on the verge of electing one of the most egregious authoritarians, a woman who has a track record of defending the power of the state over the freedom of the individual.

Conservative darling Amy Barrett is for indefinite lock downs, forced vaccination

In order to get approval from conservatives, a Supreme Court candidate merely has to espouse disdain for one case, Roe vs Wade. This was the infamous ruling that led to modern day infanticide – unchecked, taxpayer funded abortions that conscript medical professionals to terminate human life from the womb.

While this case is important, what about all the other court opinions that have led to human abuses? In 2020, Judge Barret sided on behalf of J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois — giving him supreme authority to lock down the state for as long as he pleases. Judge Barrett gave in to the authoritarian left by hiding behind a 1905 ruling in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts. This ruling gave local Massachusetts authorities free reign to vaccinate and re-vaccinate every adult in their jurisdiction and fine those who did not comply.

Jacobsen v. Massachusetts (1905): “The board of health of a city or town if, in its opinion, it is necessary for the public health or safety shall require and enforce the vaccination and re-vaccination of all the inhabitants thereof and shall provide them with the means of free vaccination. Whoever, being over twenty-one years of age and not under guardianship, refuses or neglects to comply with such requirement shall forfeit five dollars.”

Barrett is prone to side with the state in all matters of public health hysteria, disregarding individual liberty, medical privacy, informed consent and human rights. She concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois and agreed to hold down the people of Illinois through indefinite, illegal lockdowns and economic restrictions. If nominated, Barret would continue to allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety and protecting the “greater good.” If nominated, Barrett would ultimately rule in favor of compulsory vaccination, giving government the power to force experimental covid-19 injections, faulty flu vaccines, and all other pharmaceutical products that are promoted as one-size-fits-all “public health” solutions.

Judge Barrett would allow governors to restrict religious freedom

Furthermore, it seems that Barrett would restrict religious liberty. In Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois, she concurred that the governor “was not compelled to make a special dispensation for religious activities.” She agreed that the First Amendment Free Speech Clause did not prevent him from controlling religious exercise. “As in the cases reconciling the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses, all that the Governor did was to limit to a certain degree the burden on religious exercise that [the governor’s executive order] imposed.”

Pennsylvania District Judge William S. Stickman refuses to hide behind the fragile precedent that continues to mock the original intent of the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution. Judge Stickman stood against the human rights abuses that followed the 1905 Jacobsen v. Massachusetts compulsory vaccination ruling. He ruled against Pennsylvania’s illegal lock down in 2020 and wrote, “Jacobson was decided over a century ago. Since that time, there has been substantial development of federal constitutional law in the area of civil liberties… That century of development has seen the creation of tiered levels of scrutiny for constitutional claims. They did not exist when Jacobson was decided. […]”

Just because Barrett worked as clerk for former Justice Antonin Scalia, does not automatically make her an honorable originalist who can interpret the law by following the Constitution. Her track record, especially during 2020, proves the opposite to be true.

Watch Robert F. Kennedy Jr. debate Alan Dershowitz on  Jacobsen v. Massachusetts (1905), in regard to vaccine safety, informed consent and human rights.




Sources include:





13 responses to “Even if Amy Barrett is confirmed to SCOTUS, she still promotes forced vaccinations and indefinite lockdowns”

  1. Notice all these Supreme Court Justices are Jews or Roman Catholics. The next possible nominee ‘Amy Barrett’ is another Roman Catholic creep. The Jewish Overlords who created the Roman Catholic Church & control the Vatican to this day, understand that white gentile Catholic scumballs are the best Judeophilic toadies.

  2. “Federal appeals court Judge Barbara Lagoa is high on President Trump’s list of potential nominees for the Supreme Court seat left open by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.” – Let’s hope that lagoa is the choice because, if Barrett is appointed, then Trump is just another Deep State operative, in my opinion.

    “She’s excellent,” Trump said on Fox News on Monday. “She’s Hispanic. She’s a terrific woman from everything I know … [but] I don’t know her. Florida — we love Florida.”

  3. While this video is starting. Im thinking wtf am i wanting to watch this?

    Its going to be fake as fuk…yep stagged bs!! 5 minutes in…lol..kennedy is half parkinsonized already…They steralized people back then with diseases. Kennedy family has bad genes. Why r they able to breed?? Jewster cant even keep a straight fave while rfk jr is talking…lol…wtf is this crap?

  4. Quote: Amy Barrett is confirmed to SCOTUS, she still promotes forced vaccinations and indefinite lockdowns
    I think that she did raped me about 10 years ago ?

  5. She’s a Catholic? I know quite a few people with the name Barrett – and they are ALL Jewish.

  6. Not one ” protestant ” Supreme Court Judge? So much for protestant USA. It may well have been once. The Jesuits must have worked hard to get it back.

  7. @Robert Newton…Barrett is a common Irish surname…do the research.

  8. From the time when Pilgrims built America, through its best days when millions of people were eagerly trying to migrate there, America was a non-Catholic Christian nation.

    The Christian Pilgrims who founded America were fleeing from persecution led by largely Catholic authorities as documented in books such as ‘Foxe’s Book of Martyrs.’

    Christians fled to America to escape being burned at the stake, drawn and quartered, and other atrocities used to force them into the Catholic religion. The jews media hides this instead of exposing it.

    The first Catholic Justice on the US Supreme Court was Roger Taney in 1836. The first Jew on the SCOTUS was Louis Brandeis in 1916.

    Today the SCOTUS consists exclusively of Jews and Catholics. Since 2010 with the retirement of Justice John Stevens there has not been any non-Catholic Christians on the SCOTUS.

    Trump and his puppet masters are keeping the Supreme Court exclusively Catholic and Jewish by nominating another Catholic, Amy Barret.

    The replacement of non-Catholic Christians on the Supreme Court with Jews and Catholics since 1916 directly correlates with the demoralization, decay, and ruin of the USA, ie WW1, Federal Reserve, IRS, WW2, drugs, hippies, fags, pornography, wars for Israel, Covid, riots, etc.

    This replacement of non-Catholic Christians with Jews and Catholics is another piece of the puzzle showing that Jews use the Catholic Church as a front organization to subvert and control Christianity.

  9. Well,,, for minds of mush, if Trump appoints the woman then she has got to be great. That’s as far as their minds are capable of.
    Both idiots will require the shot. Both will allow shutdowns and the Supremo’s will rubber stamp it all just as they have been doing for the past 70 years.

  10. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/everything-you-need-to-know-about-what-it-would-take-for-the-fda-to-approve-a-covid-19-vaccine-11600809562

    Will Emergency Use Authorization fast-track vaccine?

    The standard approval process for vaccines can require more than one year of observation after vaccination. If the short-term safety is good and the vaccine works to prevent COVID-19, then the vaccine should be approved for use under an Emergency Use Authorization while it is still being studied.

    What should we expect in terms of approvals?

    I expect that the FDA will approve several vaccines by the end of 2020 under its Emergency Use Authorization authority so that vaccination can begin immediately, starting with high-risk groups including first responders, health-care personnel, and the elderly and those with pre-existing medical conditions.

    This will be followed rapidly with rollout of vaccination to the population at large, while all of the time the FDA and vaccine manufacturers will continue to monitor for side effects and work to improve upon these first vaccines. This process is expected to take months.

  11. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-predicts-coronavirus-vaccine-will-be-available-to-all-americans-by-april-2020-09-18

    President Donald Trump predicted Friday that the U.S. would make available to all Americans a coronavirus vaccine “by April.” … Speaking at a White House news conference, Trump said distribution would begin within 24 hours of approval.

  12. Barrett sounds like a nightmare if this piece is true. The hag has ruled in favor of unconstitutional and grossly immoral lock-downs and forced toxic vaccinations? The hag has a record of ruling in favor of authoritarianism and tyranny.

  13. Lockdowns have some good aspects. The corrupt, useless institutions close. When Cambridge University did, for the plague, physics took great strides with Newton, working alone, not stopped by the status quo. Cars ten times too powerful are off the roads; the economy is shattered–remember who got you worshipping that? when 95 per cent of it serves futile addictions, all unhealthy? The return to normality in May felt horrible to me. People will have to be weaned off their vices. We do need a new normality.