Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And Natural Gas, Researchers Find

The traditional view that oil and natural gas were produced by decaying plant and vegetable matter from the ancient past is being challenged by Swedish researchers. Click to enlarge

What would happen if it were proven that “fossil fuels” weren’t the result of decaying plant and animal matter, were actually created within the Earth due to simple chemistry and you could not be scared into believing that we were “running out” of oil and natural gas?

Estimates of how much crude oil we have extracted from the planet vary wildly. As late as May of 2009 a report published in the International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology suggested that we may have used more than we think.

The idea that we are running out of oil is not a new one. Scientists have told us that oil is a limited resource which was formed millions of years ago by the decaying vegetation and biomass of extinct species of plants and animals. With an estimated 1- trillion barrels of oil already extracted from deep wells since commercial drilling began around 1870, many predict that we are nearing the mid-point of remaining oil on the planet.

But there have always been those who claim that oil is a natural substance that forms automatically in the Earth’s mantle. They say that it is virtually everywhere, if you can drill deep enough to tap it.

Proponents of so-called “abiotic oil” claim that the proof is found in the fact that many capped wells, which were formerly dry of oil, are found to be plentiful again after many years, They claim that the replenished oil is manufactured by natural forces in the Earth’s mantle.

Critics of the abiotic theory disagree. They claim that capped wells may appear to refill after a few years, but they are not regenerating. It is simply an effect of oil slowly migrating through pore spaces from areas of high pressure to the low-pressure area of the drill hole. If this oil is drawn out, it will take even longer for the hole to refill again. They hold that oil is a non-renewable resource generated and deposited under special biological and geological conditions.

Until now these believers in “abiotic oil” have been dismissed as professing “bad science” but — alas — a new study has proven them correct!

Reported in ScienceDaily, researchers at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm have managed to prove that fossils from animals and plants are not necessary for crude oil and natural gas to be generated. The findings are revolutionary since this means, on the one hand, that it will be much easier to find these sources of energy and, on the other hand, that they can be found all over the globe.

“Using our research we can even say where oil could be found in Sweden,” says Vladimir Kutcherov, a professor at the Division of Energy Technology at KTH.

Together with two research colleagues, Vladimir Kutcherov has simulated the process involving pressure and heat that occurs naturally in the inner layers of the earth, the process that generates hydrocarbon, the primary component in oil and natural gas.

According to Vladimir Kutcherov, the findings are a clear indication that the oil supply is not about to end, which researchers and experts in the field have long feared.

Vladimir Kutcherov adds that there is no way that fossil oil, with the help of gravity or other forces, could have seeped down to a depth of 10.5 kilometers in the state of Texas, for example, which is rich in oil deposits. As Vladimir Kutcherov sees it, this is further proof, alongside his own research findings, of the genesis of these energy sources — that they can be created in other ways than via fossils. This has long been a matter of lively discussion among scientists.

“There is no doubt that our research proves that crude oil and natural gas are generated without the involvement of fossils. All types of bedrock can serve as reservoirs of oil,” says Vladimir Kutcherov, who adds that this is true of land areas that have not yet been prospected for these energy sources.

But the discovery has more benefits. The degree of accuracy in finding oil is enhanced dramatically — from 20 to 70 percent. Since drilling for oil and natural gas is a very expensive process, the cost picture will be radically altered for petroleum companies, and in the end probably for consumers as well.

“The savings will be in the many billions,” says Vladimir Kutcherov.

To identify where it is worthwhile to drill for natural gas and oil, Vladimir Kutcherov has used his research to arrive at a new method. It involves dividing the globe into a finely meshed grid. The grid corresponds to fissures, so-called ‘migration channels,’ through underlying layers under the surface of the earth. Wherever these fissures meet, it is suitable to drill.

According to Vladimir Kutcherov, these research findings are extremely important, not least as 61 percent of the world’s energy consumption derives from crude oil and natural gas.

The next step in this research work will involve more experiments, but above all refining the method will make it easier to find places where it is suitable to drill for oil and natural gas.

Vladimir Kutcherov, Anton Kolesnikov, and Alexander Goncharov’s research work was recently published in the scientific journal Nature Geoscience.

Continues …

8 responses to “Fossils From Animals And Plants Are Not Necessary For Crude Oil And Natural Gas, Researchers Find”

  1. When you take the red pill, you realise that much of what you’ve been told in life is a lie. But what does taking the red pill really do? Sure it awakens you and you essentially see through Roddy Piper’s dark glasses, but more importantly, it awakens you to critical thinking capabilities.

    Problem: How do we (oil companies) pull the wool over the public’s eyes and fool them into believing oil is a finite resource?

    Solution: Tell them it’s the result of decomposed dinosaurs and vegetation,from millions of years ago. Pay off science to go along, by threatening to blacklist people who know the truth and stop finding for these institutions.

    Reaction: the price of oil continues to rise and people are none the wiser.

    It just beggars belief that people choose to be so incredibly stupid. They aren’t born stupid. They become stupid through not educating themselves. And as a result, socioeconomic is rope for the picking, by evil.

  2. “And as a result, socioeconomic is rope for the picking, by evil.”
    Should read:
    “And as a result, society is ripe for the picking, by evil.”

  3. This is old hat, really. This “new” theory on the origin of petroleum was originally developed in the Soviet Union. That is why they have started drilling for oil in the coastal waters off older geological formations, such as Australia and Brazil. According to the traditional “Western” view on the origins of petroleum, there ought to be no oil there at all. But lo and behold, oil was indeed found and in copious quantities. The scientists working in Sweden are obviously Russians.

  4. I am the dumbest guy in the room most of the time, and when I was taught this in school, I had to laugh and question this. Now I still always tell myself I am the dumbest guy in the room since then and am now 77 years of age, so laugh not when I have always said and still believe there are nor ever were any dinosaurs, Those things you find or see in the museums are fake.

  5. Agreed, Harbinger, and the same kind of trickery applied when hemp was demonised to protect the profits and viability of the oil industry.

    This annual crop could even now put (((them))) out of business, and unlike mineral oil, hemp products are non-polluting and fully biodegradable.

  6. In a related article a humongous deception that will stretch your mind.
    ( watch the video that hasn’t been taken down ) Common sense technical questions and physical facts
    Jet Fuel Hoax – Planes Run on Air not Fuel!
    Airplanes Don’t Fly, They Levitate, No Jet Fuel On Planes, Free Energy

  7. Another argument.

    Study largest oil fields in the world:

    This is just an estimation and there is plenty of disinformation in the list.

    But 100 billion barrels = 16 cubic kilometers. Ghawar, largest oil field capacity was then ~15km3. How many dinosaurs were needed to create one cubic kilometer of oil? They were allegedly heavily compressed. How many dinosaurs were used just in Ghawar? Why we have oil fields worldwide, in Malaysia, Siberia and Greenland?

  8. This 80 year old Rockefeller lie, is contested by “swedes”.. -since when did they start thinking..?