Introduction – Sept 20, 2019
The following Associated Press report is disinformation dressed as journalism. First of all it claims that the attack on Saudi oil facilities was carried out by Iran. It asserts this without question, in the process completely ignoring Houthi claims of responsibility.
While we concede that Iran may have provided assistance — with target intelligence, electronic components etc — what’s amazing is Houthi claims of responsibility are NOT MENTIONED ONCE.
The Associated Press also completely ignores the fact that the Houthi have a history of launching drone strikes on Saudi Arabia and its allies. In fact the Houthis have shown themselves adept at using drones against the Saudi-led coalition.
In January 2019, a Houthi drone strike killed six Yemeni soldiers – who were aligned with Saudi Arabia – at a military parade in Yemen’s Lahaja province.
In August 2019, Houthi’ drones struck an oilfield in eastern Saudi Arabia. A total of ten drones were used in that attack and although they started fires at a gas plant oil production was unaffected.
The Houthi rebels have also unveiled their own indigenously developed drones, which in the words of the authoritative Janes Defence, look “substantially different” from Iranian drones of similar capability.
None of this crucial background is mentioned in the following Associated Press report. The omission together with the failure to mention Houthi claims of responsibility acts to frame Iran as being responsible for the attack. Thereby providing justification for a U.S. led strike on Iran.
Whether that happens remains to be seen. We know that elements in the U.S. military are not enthusiastic about striking Iran. However, the final decision rests with Trump and he may not share their sense of caution and restraint. Ed.
U.S. military to present several options to Trump on Iran
Associated Press – Sept 20, 2019
The Pentagon will present a broad range of military options to President Trump on Friday as he considers how to respond to what administration officials say was an unprecedented Iranian attack on Saudi Arabia’s oil industry.
In a White House meeting, the president will be presented with a list of potential airstrike targets inside Iran, among other possible responses, and he also will be warned that military action against the Islamic Republic could escalate into war, according to U.S. officials familiar with the discussions who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The national security meeting will likely be the first opportunity for a decision on how the U.S. should respond to the attack on a key Middle East ally. Any decision may depend on what kind of evidence the U.S. and Saudi investigators are able to provide proving that the cruise missile and drone strike was launched by Iran, as a number of officials, including Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo, have asserted.
Iran has denied involvement and warned the U.S. that any attack will spark an “all-out war” with immediate retaliation from Tehran.
Both Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence have condemned the attack on Saudi oil facilities as “an act of war.” Pence said Trump will “review the facts, and he’ll make a decision about next steps. But the American people can be confident that the United States of America is going to defend our interest in the region, and we’re going to stand with our allies.”
The U.S. response could involve military, political and economic actions, and the military options could range from no action at all to airstrikes or less visible moves such as cyberattacks. One likely move would be for the U.S. to provide additional military support to help Saudi Arabia defend itself from attacks from the north, since most of its defenses have focused on threats from Houthis in Yemen to the south.
Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, emphasized to a small number of journalists traveling with him Monday that the question of whether the U.S. responds is a “political judgment” and not for the military.
“It is my job to provide military options to the president should he decide to respond with military force,” Dunford said.
Trump will want “a full range of options,” he said. “In the Middle East, of course, we have military forces there and we do a lot of planning and we have a lot of options.”
U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) said in an interview Thursday that if Trump “chooses an option that involves a significant military strike on Iran that, given the current climate between the U.S. and Iran, there is a possibility that it could escalate into a medium- to large-scale war, I believe the president should come to Congress.”
Slotkin, a former top Middle East policy advisor for the Pentagon, said she hopes Trump considers a broad range of options, including the most basic choice, which would be to place more forces and defensive military equipment in and around Saudi Arabia to help increase security.
A forensic team from U.S. Central Command is poring over evidence from cruise missile and drone debris, but the Pentagon said the assessment is not finished. Officials are trying to determine if they can get navigational information from the debris that could provide hard evidence that the strikes came from Iran.
Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said Thursday that the U.S. has a high level of confidence that officials will be able to accurately determine exactly who launched the attacks last weekend.
U.S. officials were unwilling to predict what kind of response Trump will choose. In June, after Iran shot down an American surveillance drone, Trump initially endorsed a retaliatory military strike then abruptly called it off because he said it would have killed dozens of Iranians. The decision underscores the president’s long-held reluctance to embroil the country in another war in the Middle East.
Instead, Trump opted to have U.S. military cyber forces carry out a strike against military computer systems used by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard to control rocket and missile launchers, according to U.S. officials.
The Pentagon said the U.S. military is working with Saudi Arabia to find ways to provide more protection for the northern part of the country.
Air Force Col. Pat Ryder, spokesman for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Pentagon reporters Wednesday that U.S. Central Command is talking with the Saudis about ways to mitigate future attacks. He would not speculate on what types of support could be provided.
Other U.S. officials have said adding Patriot missile batteries and enhanced radar systems could be options, but no decisions have been made.