US defense failure… Why Washington has to blame Iran over Saudi attacks

Finian Cunningham – RT Sept 16, 2019

Abqaiq processing facility ablaze. Click to enlarge

The devastating blitz on Saudi Arabia’s oil industry has led to a flurry of accusations from US officials blaming Iran. The reason for the finger-pointing is simple: Washington’s spectacular failure to protect its Saudi ally.

The Trump administration needs to scapegoat Iran for the latest military assault on Saudi Arabia because to acknowledge that the Houthi rebels mounted such an audacious assault on the oil kingdom’s heartland would be an admission of American inadequacy.

Saudi Arabia has spent billions of dollars in recent years purchasing US Patriot missile defense systems and supposedly cutting-edge radar technology from the Pentagon. If the Yemeni rebels can fly combat drones up to 1,000 kilometers into Saudi territory and knock out the linchpin production sites in the kingdom’s oil industry, then that should be a matter of huge embarrassment for US “protectors.”

American defense of Saudi Arabia is germane to their historical relationship. Saudi oil exports nominated in dollars for trade – the biggest on the planet – are vital for maintaining the petrodollar global market, which is in turn crucial for American economic power. In return, the US is obligated to be a protector of the Saudi monarchy, which comes with the lucrative added benefit of selling the kingdom weapons worth billions of dollars every year.

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Saudi Arabia has the world’s third biggest military budget, behind the US and China. With an annual spend of around $68 billion, it is the world’s number one in terms of percentage of gross domestic product (8.8 per cent). Most of the Saudi arms are sourced from the US, with Patriot missile systems in particular being a recent big-ticket item.

Yet for all that financial largesse and the finest American military technology, the oil kingdom just witnessed a potentially crippling wave of air assaults on its vital oil industry. Saudi oil production at its mammoth refinery complex at Abqaiq, 205 miles (330 kms) east of the capital Riyadh, was down 50 per cent after it was engulfed by flames following air strikes. One of the Saudi’s biggest oilfields, at Khurais, also in the Eastern Province, was also partially closed.

There are credible reports that the damage is much more serious than the Saudi officials are conceding. These key industrial sites may take weeks to repair.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo got it half right when he claimed, “Iran launched an unprecedented attack on the world’s energy supply”.

Yes, it is unprecedented. But Pompeo and other US officials have most likely got it wrong about blaming Iran.

Some Trump administration officials told US media that “cruise missiles” were responsible for the giant fireballs seen over the Saudi oil facilities. One was quoted anonymously as saying: “There’s no doubt that Iran is responsible for this… there’s no escaping it. There is no other candidate.”

In a hurried effort to substantiate accusations against Iran, satellite images were released which show what appears to be the aftermath of the air strike on the Abqaiq refinery complex. US officials claim the location of the explosions indicate the weapons originated not from Yemen to the south, but from either Iran or Iraq.

Even the normally dutiful New York Times expressed doubt about that claim, commenting in its report: “The satellite photographs released on Sunday did not appear as clear cut as officials suggested, with some appearing to show damage on the western side of facilities, not from the direction of Iran or Iraq.”

The accusations made by Pompeo and others are assertions in place of substantiated claims.

It is noteworthy that President Donald Trump refrained from openly blaming Iran by name, merely hinting at the possibility. If Pompeo is so adamant in fingering Iran, why didn’t Trump? Also, the president made a telling remark when he said he was “waiting for verification” from Saudi Arabia “as to who they believe was the cause of the attack.” Again, if US officials are explicitly accusing Iran then why is Trump saying he wants “verification” from the Saudis?

For its part, Iran has flatly dismissed the allegations that it had any involvement, saying that statements by Pompeo were “blind” and tantamount to setting up a conflict.

Iraq’s Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi also rejected claims that his country’s territory might have been used by pro-Iranian Shia militants to launch the air strikes.

The Houthi rebels in Yemen have issued unambiguous statements claiming responsibility for the air raids on the Saudi oil installations. They were specific that the weapons were drones, not missiles, adding with details that 10 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) were deployed.

Notably too, most US media reported initially that the attacks were by drones flown from Yemen. Associated Press reported a level of sophistication in the attacks whereby drones were used first to disable the US Patriot radar systems before other UAVs proceeded to execute the air strikes.

It therefore seems that US officials are attempting to switch the story by blaming Iran. It is reckless scapegoating because the logical consequence could elicit a military attack against Iran, in which event Tehran has warned it is ready for war.

The rationale for blaming Iran is that the Yemeni rebels (which Iran supports politically) are just not capable of using drones with such dramatic success against the Saudi oil industry. The culprit must be Iran, so the rationale goes. This is a follow-on from alleged sabotage by Iran against oil tankers in the Persian Gulf earlier this summer.

However, a timeline shows that the Houthis are more than capable of launching ever-more powerful ballistic missiles and deeper penetrating drones into Saudi territory. The rebels have been using drones from the beginning of the war which the US-backed Saudi-UAE coalition launched on the southern Arabian country in March 2015.

Over the past four years, the Houthi aerial firepower has gradually improved. Earlier, the Saudis, with American defense systems, were able to intercept drones and missiles from Yemen. But over the last year, the rebels have increased their success rate for hitting targets in the Saudi interior, including the capital Riyadh.

In May this year, Houthi drones hit Saudi Arabia’s crucial east-west pipeline. Then in August, drones and ballistic missiles were reported to have struck the Shaybah oil field near the border with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as well as the Dammam exporting complex in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province.


9 responses to “US defense failure… Why Washington has to blame Iran over Saudi attacks”

  1. Look just bomb israel and sort all this in one go
    BTW i knew a girl who married into the Saudi Royal family
    she said they are not Muslims at all but jews.
    over the years i thought a lot about this and i believe it now 100%

  2. This whole thing is BS there were no drones, or cruise missiles . This waas another inside job/ Each oil tank had a hole in exactly the same spot and the fires were put out quickly. If a missile hit them they would be GONE! See for photos and mor.

  3. There is about a 100% probability that bankster Jews and Israel were behind the drone attacks on the Saudi Oil facilities.

    The word Israel doesn’t appear anywhere in the RT article written by Finian Cunningham. Finian is part of controlled opposition media or else he isn’t jew-wise.

    Bankster Jews are obsessed with overthrowing the government of Iran. Zionists have been trying to incite wars against Iran since at least as far back as the ‘Iranian Hostage Crisis’ when Jimmy Carter was president


  5. Looking more like another inside job from uncle Sam and his buddies.

  6. RT has been taken over by Zionists, don’t expect truth from them anymore. They are pretend opposition.

    Jim Stone Freelance website (

    “Look in the lower right hand corner of the photo. There is a car or pickup truck there. That shows how large the tanks are. Iran’s smallest cruise missile has approximately a 290 pound warhead. If an Iranian cruise missile hit those tanks (as some have claimed) the hole would be approximately as far across as 5 of those cars if the tank was robustly built, and more if it was not. AND IF there was no additional explosive effects provided by the fuel in the tank. The entire story line for the refinery attack is an obvious hoax. There’s no way a 290 pound warhead hit that tank.”

  7. Funny how the US claim is that it was cruise missiles, only Iran posses them.
    No mention of the Jewish Dolphin subs and the vast stocks of US cruise missiles, gifted to them over the years.
    Not to mention the alleged direction, would be the only viable flight path if the missiles were launched from the southern desserts of Israel. That is if they wanted to frame anyone else.

    But my money is on Dolphin launched missiles. That way if it is ever revealed a sub launched them, they can claim Iran is the only one with subs in the region also.

  8. Who knows what the truth is anymore.. I just wish the barbaric and cowardly attacks on Yemen would stop..

  9. Chuck Stillman above is right. Just look at the precision holes in the photos of the 4 oil domes at . This is once again total US-UK bullshit, a false flag in order to strike at Iran of behalf of Israel and the Western oil giants. Also, in Yemen Saudi jets continue to kill Houthi’s in droves for wanting to take back control of their nation, and do doubt US jets are right in there helping with the dirty work.

    Whatever SA does it is at the direction of the same cabal which controls the US, the UK and Israel. The $68 billion on military expenditures is just one way the SA puppet monarchy is forced to spend the oil royalties they receive in US dollars. For all their money, military power, control of the media and of our politicians, the cabal has to deceive, bribe, bully, cheat, and kill to get what they want, and so we witness one false-flag operation after another. With the rest of the world waking up more and more to their ways, they know that unless they can manufacture another major war and create more chaos, their time is over.