Tobias Langdon — The Unz Review Aug 28, 2019
The mark of a true prophet isn’t perfect accuracy, but powerful ideas. It’s impossible to foresee the future in every detail, but a true prophet should give us the ideas that explain what he doesn’t foresee. For example, in one way George Orwell got the future completely wrong in Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). In his totalitarian surveillance state, the Party harshly punishes “sexcrime,” which includes “all sexual misdeeds whatever [including] homosexuality and other perversions.”
Raising the rainbow
So homosexuality is a perversion and a serious crime on Airstrip One, the name Orwell gave to the British Isles. But what do the real British find in their own surveillance state in the 21st century? They find that homosexuality is actively celebrated by the thought-police. The cyber-snoopers at GCHQ (Government Communication Head-Quarters) are “the most extremist and invasive in the West,” according to Glenn Greenwald. In 2014, the cyber-snoopers “raised the rainbow flag on the GCHQ flagpole in Cheltenham for the first time to show all our staff that we value our Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) colleagues and are a modern organisation that does not tolerate discrimination in any form.” That last claim is true in one way: GCHQ doesn’t discriminate in its invasion of privacy. It siphons up everything it can on everyone it can, collaborating with the American National Security Agency (NSA) and Israeli cyber-snoopers like Unit 8200. The NSA too actively celebrates homosexuality: in June 2019, which is Gay Pride Month “in much of the US,” it “posted a photo on Twitter of its secretive Maryland headquarters in rainbow colors,” boasting that: “At NSA, talented individuals of all backgrounds, contribute to something bigger than themselves: national security. #PrideMonth.”
Orwell didn’t foresee the celebration of homosexuality by totalitarians, but he did explain it. Totalitarian ideologies live by lies and contradiction. For example, the slave-state of North Korea, ruled by a hereditary dictatorship, proclaims itself a Democratic People’s Republic when it is neither democratic, popular, nor a republic. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell wrote of how “the names of the four Ministries by which [the oppressed population is] governed exhibit a sort of impudence in their deliberate reversal of the facts. The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy; they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.”
Defending the death-machine
You could, then, call GCHQ and the NSA part of the Ministry of Morality. While breaking laws against surveillance and trying to destroy freedom of expression and enquiry, they pretend that they’re caring, ethical organizations who defend the oppressed and want to build a better world. In fact, of course, GCHQ and the NSA are defending the death-machine of the military-industrial complex, which has been wrecking nations and slaughtering civilians in the Middle East (and elsewhere) for decades. They’re also defending the traitorous Western governments that first import millions of Third-Worlders, then use the resultant crime, terrorism and racial conflict to justify mass surveillance and harsh laws against free speech
This totalitarian system has a name: Globohomo, the alliance between globalist capitalism and minority-worshipping leftism. Globohomo is part of the Jewish Culture of Critique and is intensely hostile to Whites and White traditions like Christianity. That’s why it promotes everything that stops Whites having children (or, conversely, enables non-Whites to have more children). And so Globohomo is very enthusiastic about abortion, feminism and homosexuality. Abortion literally kills White children; feminism works to destroy good relations between White men and White women; and homosexuals are the vanguard for the hedonistic, self-centred and self-destroying behaviour that Globohomo wants to encourage among all Whites. However, although homosexuality and Jewish ideology are at the heart of Globohomo, it doesn’t have the support of all Jews or all homosexuals. For example, the homosexual Jewish libertarian Glenn Greenwald wasn’t fooled in the slightest by GCHQ’s attempt to embrace the rainbow:
This is so very moving. Gay Brits are now just as free as everyone else to spy on people, covertly disseminate state propaganda, and destroy online privacy. Whatever your views on all this nasty surveillance business might be, how can you not feel good about GCHQ when it drapes itself in the colors of LGBT equality?
This is all a stark illustration of what has become a deeply cynical but highly effective tactic. Support for institutions of militarism and policies of imperialism is now manufactured by parading them under the emotionally manipulative banners of progressive social causes. (GCHQ’s Rainbow Lights: Exploiting Social Issues for Militarism and Imperialism, The Intercept, 18th May 2015)
GCHQ and the NSA feed the diseases that they pretend to be trying to cure. Indeed, GCHQ and the NSA are diseased organizations, symptoms of the deeply pathological ideologies that now dominate the West. When a government is spying on its own people, it’s because the government is committing crimes against its own people and fears rebellion against its crimes.
“Very, very good relations with the Jewish community”
The criminal government might be, as in North Korea and China, a native gang of criminals (but it would be very interesting to compare the genetics of the North Korean and Chinese elites with those of the general population). Or the criminal government might be, as in Britain and other Western nations, a criminal gang acting on behalf of outsiders and partly composed of outsiders. Those outsiders are Jews: for example, Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair’s thuggish and Machiavellian press secretary, told the Jewish Chronicle that Blair “was conscious of the need to have very, very good relations” with “the Jewish community,” which wields enormous financial and media power despite its tiny size.
But Blair may not have been controlled simply by the money and favourable media coverage that the “Jewish community” could supply. He may also have been frightened of what spy-agencies like Mossad could reveal about his private life and secret homosexual activity. Indeed, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has led the blogger Anonymous Conservative to argue that ambitious politicians and businessmen “happily supplied the material to blackmail themselves” as part of a bargain for success with the Deep State and organizations like Mossad. That’s speculation, but what isn’t speculation is the direct role of Jews in creating the system of Globohomo. In 2007, Britain’s Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks lamented that “Britain’s politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment.” He described how a “culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation is greater than that of others.” And he made a shockingly anti-Semitic claim: “The process … began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays.”
Harvey Milk and other rainbow warriors
But in fact Rabbi Sacks wasn’t anti-Semitic enough. He was right to say that “the process began with Jews,” but he should have added that “blacks, women and gays” (and now Muslims too) “took it up” with direct Jewish encouragement and assistance. Kevin MacDonald and others have described the central Jewish role in civil rights and feminism. For example, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) was not merely funded but actually run by Jews for many years. Jewish women have always been hugely over-represented as leaders and propagandists in feminism.
And what about “gays”? Their contribution to the “poison” of identity politics has also been heavily Jewish. In June 2019, on “the anniversary of the Stonewall riots,” the Jewish Chronicle was proud to celebrate “Rainbow warriors: the Jews who fought for LGBT+ rights”:
Frank Kameny – “our Rosa Parks”, according to one gay rights activist – was an early pioneer. Fired from his job with the Army Map Service in 1957 under the terms of President Eisenhower’s executive order making “sexual perversion” grounds for dismissal for federal government employees, Mr Kameny refused to slip away quietly. Instead he attempted to sue the government. … The government’s discrimination against gays, he argued in his brief, represented “an anachronistic relic of the Stone Age carried over into the Space Age”. The Constitution demanded equal treatment for all. …
[I]t was Stonewall that turned “a small movement … into a mass movement”. Few have greater claim to have helped foster that mass movement than Brenda Howard, the so-called “Mother of Pride”. A bisexual Jewish nurse who was involved in both the burgeoning feminist movement and the fight against the Vietnam war, Ms Howard became a leading light in the Gay Liberation Front and the Gay Activists Alliance which were formed in the aftermath of the riots. … Ms Howard was the brains behind the notion that the march should be accompanied by a week-long series of events and, together with two other LGBT activists, is credited with naming the events “Pride”.
One of the early participants in the New York City Gay Pride march was a Jewish teacher from Queens, Jeanne Manford. … Walking alongside her son at the Pride march, she carried a sign “Parents of Gays Unite in Support for Our Children”. The enthusiastic reception she received led Ms Manford and her husband to found PFLAG, Parents Friends and Families of Lesbians and Gays, which today has more than 200,000 members and 400 branches across the US.
Another early straight Jewish ally of the LGBT cause was the popular newspaper columnist and radio host Pauline Phillips. Under the pen name Abigail van Buren, her “Dear Abby” advice column was syndicated to 1400 newspapers and had millions of readers. One of the few celebrities openly sympathetic to them, she became a hero to many gay Americans. …
But it is the name of Harvey Milk – America’s first openly gay elected politician, who was assassinated in 1978 – which is perhaps most synonymous with the cause of gay rights. Although from a secular home, Mr Milk learned from his mother the Jewish obligation of “tikkun olam”; helping to repair the world. As the historian Lilliam Faderman suggests in her recent biography of him, the memory of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising – which occurred days before his bar mitzvah – shaped Mr Milk’s lifelong belief that evil should be resisted even when the odds seem hopeless. …
Other gay Jewish politicians have followed the trail which Mr Milk blazed. In 1986, Barney Frank became the first member of Congress to come out. … Last November, Jared Polis became the first openly gay man to be elected as a governor (also becoming Colorado’s first Jewish governor).
… a young Harvard Law student, Evan Wolfson, wrote his thesis on the legal basis for gay marriage. As the height of the Reagan years, it cannot have seemed much more than an academic exercise. But Wolfson didn’t give up the cause. Twenty years later, he formed Freedom To Marry at the very moment that George W Bush was using opposition to same-sex marriage to bolster his support among evangelicals as he ran for re-election. Wolfson’s message – “Marriage is not defined by who is excluded by it” – helped to reshape the debate.
On 26 June 2013, the Supreme Court struck down the federal bar on same-sex marriage. At the centre of the landmark case were a Jewish couple – Edie Windsor and Thea Spyer – and their suit was pursued by a Jewish lawyer, Robbie Kaplan. Two years later, and two days before the 46th anniversary of the Stonewall riots, the Supreme Court legalised gay marriage throughout the United States. In both cases, the three Jewish justices – Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Elena Kagan – were critical in delivering the 5-4 rulings. (Rainbow warriors: the Jews who fought for LGBT+ rights, The Jewish Chronicle, 27th June 2019 / 24th Sivan 5779)
These Jewish activists were not seeking equality for homosexuals and lesbians: they were seeking worship. Jews want worship for all minorities because they see themselves as the supreme minority, the most oppressed and victimized of all. And so you could also call Globohomo the Ministry of Minority-Worship.
The sacralization of homosexuality is a particularly attractive cause for Jews precisely because homosexuality is unnatural, unhealthy, and historically condemned by Christianity. If the Jewish propaganda machine can successfully turn homosexuals into saintly exemplars of health, decency and style, Jews are reassured about their own vulnerability to the irrational bigotry and prejudice of the gentile majority. Like Muslims, the LGBTQ+ community form a buffer-zone between Jews and that majority, which has a long and lamentable history of unprovoked and inexplicable anti-Semitism.
This explains why “The website Pink News, run by Benjamin Cohen, aggressively promotes the transgender cause.” It also explains something that once puzzled me: the enthusiastic support of the Jewish MP Edwina Currie (née Cohen in 1946) for the lowering of the homosexual age of consent and the equally enthusiastic support of the Jewish actress Maureen Lipman (born 1946) for the pioneering “queer comedy” of Julian and Sandy, as played by the actors Kenneth Williams and Hugh Paddick on BBC Radio in the late 1960s. When I watched Currie and Lipman at work in the 1990s, I sensed that there was a hidden motive in the way two heterosexual Jewish women were so eager to support homosexual gentile men. But I didn’t understand what the hidden motive was until I read the work of Kevin MacDonald. Then I understood what was going on: Currie and Lipman were part of the Culture of Critique, condemning White Christian society for its mistreatment of saintly homosexuals and celebrating homosexuals for their wit and style.
I also understood why the scripts for Julian and Sandy were written by the Jewish comedian Marty Feldman (1934-82) (in collaboration with the gentile but possibly homosexual or bisexual Barry Took). And indeed, Julian and Sandy were witty and stylish. Kenneth Williams and Hugh Paddick were excellent comic actors who relished playing the parts of two chorus-boys whose promiscuous adventures were conveyed indirectly through the doubles entendres and innuendo of the gay slang Polari. The scripts had to be indirect because homosexual acts were still illegal in Britain at the time the shows were first broadcast. Julian and Sandy were ineffectual, unthreatening, and highly entertaining, and Maureen Lipman credited them with helping to change public opinion and assist decriminalization, which was strongly supported by the Jewish MP Leo Abse (1958-83), who was accused of child abuse after his death and whom the Times of Israel hails as “The Jewish MP who pried open Britain’s closet door.”
Camping up Christianity
But Julian and Sandy helped kill what fuelled their comedy. By popularizing the gay slang Polari, they rendered it useless as a secret code between homosexuals. They also vulgarized it: snobbish and snooty queers were no longer interested in using verbal pearls that had been cast before millions of straight swine (see the Gospel of Matthew 7:6). And after decriminalization, in the era of queer militancy and “Gay Liberation,” Polari seemed old-fashioned and outdated, hopelessly redolent of the closeted 1940s and ’50s. But what once seemed closeted now seems camp, and “in recent years there has been a resurgence in interest in the language.”
So says the introduction to the Polari Bible, a translation of the King James Bible into the “High Polari” used by the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, “an international order of gay and lesbian nuns and monks.” Only it isn’t a “translation”: Polari isn’t a full language, rather a mixture of borrowings from Italian, Romani, rhyming slang, and so on that are used to replace words and phrases of standard English. For example, where the real Bible has “God” and “Jesus Christ,” the Polari Bible has “Gloria” and “Josie Crystal.” The Polari Bible refers to all men by female names and with female pronouns. Similarly, the Lord is “the Duchess”; angels are “fairies”; people don’t walk but “mince,” don’t speak but “screech”; and so on. The effects are cheaply amusing at times, but camp Christianity reminds me of Satanism: it’s wholly dependant on what it perverts and corrupts, without any originality or vitality of its own. In short, it’s parasitic, rather in the way that homosexuality itself is parasitic on heterosexuality. Here are some extracts from the Polari Bible:
Book of Genesis 1:1 In the beginning Gloria created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth was nanti form, and void; and munge was upon the eke of the deep. And the Fairy of Gloria trolled upon the eke of the aquas. 3 And Gloria cackled, Let there be sparkle: and there was sparkle. 4 And Gloria vardad the sparkle, that it was bona: and Gloria medzered the sparkle from the munge. 5 And Gloria screeched the sparkle journo, and the munge she screeched nochy. And the bijou nochy and the morning were the first journo.
Gospel of Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Josie Crystal was on this wise: When as her mother Mary was espoused to Josephine, before they trolled together, she was found up the duff of the Fantabulosa Fairy.
Gospel of Mark 1:14 … Josie trolled into Galilee, cackling the gossip of the kingdom of Gloria, 15 And cackling, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of Gloria is at famble: repent ye, and believe the gossip. 16 Now as she minced by the sea of Galilee, she vardad Simone and Andrea her sister chucking a net into the sea: for they were fishers. 17 And Josie cackled unto them, troll ye after me, and I will make you to become fishers of homies.
The King James Bible is sublime literature, one of the landmarks of English-speaking culture, and the Polari Bible therefore consists of a long series of descents from the sublime to the ridiculous. You could call it blasphemy as banality, and the cheapness of the enterprise is summed up for me by one repeated grammatical error. The Perl script used to “translate” the sublime original into the camp corruption wasn’t sophisticated enough to adjust indefinite articles, so that “an angel” always became “an fairy” (similarly, “an offering” becomes “an parkering,” “an ark” becomes “an bijou arkette,” and so on).
Peaks and troughs of White male achievement
You can contrast that carelessness with the loving detail of the old Biblical engravings added to the Polari Bible (which is now in its seventh edition). One of these engravings shows the Good Samaritan helping the stripped and wounded traveller who has “fallen among thieves” (see the Gospel of Luke 10:30). The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence have added a would-be funny commentary on the engraving:
The commentary runs: “The small flask of Rohypnol [a rape-drug] which that Good Samaritan always carried on his belt had once again come into its own.” Again, it’s blasphemy as banality, a cheap snigger at a powerful story, like a teenager spray-painting a penis on Caravaggio’s sublime painting The Taking of Christ (c. 1602). Caravaggio was homosexual, but unlike the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence he was also an adult. And an artistic genius, of course. There are no cheap sniggers in Caravaggio’s portrayal of stories from the Bible. Instead, there’s profundity, beauty, horror, and humility. When Caravaggio placed his own image in his art, he cast himself as the villain: it’s Caravaggio himself who holds up the lantern in The Taking of Christ, and in another painting it’s Caravaggio’s own head that the boy David holds aloft after the slaying and decapitation of Goliath.
Caravaggio took Christianity seriously, while the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence snigger at it. That’s why Caravaggio’s art represents one of the peaks of White male achievement, while the Polari Bible represents one of the troughs. And if you know anything about modern Christianity, you won’t be surprised to learn that a “trainee priests at a church of England theological college” have used the Polari Bible in a service held to “commemorate LGBT history month.”
But there’s something else in the Polari Bible that’s highly significant. The preface to the seventh edition asked its readers to “look out for the forthcoming Polari Koran.” On the website for the Polari Bible, an anonymous Sister of Indulgence made a promise way back in 2015 that has never been kept: “The initial translation of the PK [Polari Koran] was done some time ago. … Once the translation is adequately funny (and I have laid a suitable false trail of domain registrations etc.) then I will publish it.”
Four years later, we’re still waiting. The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence know that if they try sniggering at Islam, they will experience the difference between a decadent religion and a religion that still has its teeth. Christianity is decadent; Islam is not. That’s why adolescent blasphemers aren’t scared of Christianity, but are definitely scared of Islam. The Sisters have promised us a Polari Koran, but we can be confident that they won’t deliver. They’re working on behalf of Globohomo, consciously or otherwise, as they try to corrupt and degrade Christianity. But Globohomo hates Whites much more than it loves homosexuals, which is why it imports homophobic Muslims in their millions and then subsidizes their large families.
In other words, the Ministry of Minority-Worship is really the Ministry of Majority-Hate. It doesn’t want to benefit minorities: it wants to harm and dispossess the White majority. Globohomo hates Christianity, which is an excellent sign that Christianity has been good for Whites and the West.
(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)