‘Time for reconciliation over’: South Africa votes to confiscate white-farmland

Introduction — Feb 28, 2018

Prior to the arrival of white settlers the indigenous people of southern Africa were largely hunter-gatherers; inter-tribal conflict was ongoing before the settlers arrived. What little land was cultivated was limited to subsistence level farming. As in Zimbabwe, large-scale commercial farming only began after the arrival of White-settlers.
Perhaps that’s why the takeover of white farms in Zimbabwe was such an unmitigated disaster. Without any historical roots in agriculture, under Black supervision what had once been Africa’s breadbasket became a famine stricken dust bowl.
Julius Malema. Click to enlarge

Julius Malema. Click to enlarge

A video of Julius Malema (below), who tabled the motion to allow the takeover of white farms, is reminiscent of a younger Robert Mugabe. He has same arrogant, vaguely threatening air. Despite advocating hard left policies Malema also happens to be a multi-millionaire.
In South Africa’s Black townships they have a name for the likes of Malema. To locals he’s a Tsotsi, a gangster, a township thug. Is he about to take South Africa down the same disastrous path where Mugabe took Zimbabwe? Ed.

‘Time for reconciliation over’: South Africa votes to confiscate white-owned land

Russia Today — Feb 28, 2018

The South African parliament voted on Tuesday in favor of a motion seeking to change the constitution to allow white-owned land expropriation without compensation.

The motion, which was brought by Julius Malema – the leader of the radical Marxist opposition party, the Economic Freedom Fighters – passed by a wide margin of 241 votes to 83 against.

Several parties – the Democratic Alliance, Freedom Front Plus, Cope and the African Christian Democratic Party – did not support the motion. The matter has been referred to the parliament’s Constitutional Review Committee, which must report back by August 30.

“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice,” Malema told the parliament. “We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.”

South Africa has a population of over 50 million people. According to a 2017 government audit, white people own 72 percent of farmland.

Last week, South Africa’s new president, Cyril Ramaphosa, pledged to return the lands owned by white farmers since the 1600s to the black citizens of the country. He added that food production and security must be preserved.

The official opposition Democratic Alliance party (DA) has criticized the motion, saying it will undermine property rights and scare off potential investors.

The DA’s Thandeka Mbabama told the parliament that expropriation without compensation was a way to divert attention from the failure by successive ANC-led (African National Congress) governments.

“It is shocking that at the current rate it will take 35 years to finalize (land) restitution claims lodged before 1998,” said Mbabama, who is deputy shadow minister for rural development and land reform.

It’s been more than two decades since the end of apartheid in the 1990s, and the ruling ANC party is still trying to tackle racial disparities in land ownership in South Africa.

The president of farmers’ group the Transvaal Agricultural Union, Louis Meintjes, warned the country risks going down the same route as Zimbabwe, which plunged into famine after a government-sanctioned purge of white farmers in the 2000s.

“Where in the world has expropriation without compensation coupled to the waste of agricultural land, resulted in foreign confidence, economic growth and increased food production?” Meintjes said, as cited by Australia’s news.com.au.

“If Mr Ramaphosa is set on creating an untenable situation, he should actively create circumstances which will promote famine. His promise to expropriate land without compensation sows the seed for revolution. Expropriation without compensation is theft.”


Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.