henrymakow.com — Aug 15, 2017
Is Trump surrounded by Security Adviser H.R. McMaster & Other Deep State Traitors who are determined to subvert the will of the American people?
H.R. McMaster fired Rich Higgins, a Michael Flynn hire, from the National Security Council last month for writing the brilliant 7-page memo below which correctly identified the “deep state” threat Donald Trump faces as Communist both in method and substance.
National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster is clearly one of the deep state traitors to whom Hawkins refers. This makes us ask, why does Trump appoint enemies to his WH staff and betray his defenders?
“Complicating the current situation, many close to the president have pushed him off his message …thus alienating him from his base thereby isolating him in the process. When President Trump is not candidate Trump, he becomes dangerously exposed. While the base that elected candidate Trump identified with his vision, they are only Trump’s insofar as he holds to the vision that made him president…” –Rich Higgins
Memo– POTUS & POLITICAL WARFARE (May 2017)
Abridged by henrymakow.com
The Trump administration is suffering under withering information campaigns designed to first undermine, then de legitimize and ultimately remove the President. Possibly confusing these attacks with an elevated interplay of otherwise normal D.C. partisan infighting and adversarial media relations, the White House response to these campaigns reflects a political advocacy mindset that it is intensely reactive, severely under-inclusive and dangerously inadequate to the threat. If action is not taken to re-scope and respond to these hostile campaigns very soon, the administration risks implosion and subsequent early departure from the White House.
This is not politics as usual but rather political warfare at an unprecedented level that is openly engaged in the direct targeting of a seated president through manipulation of the news cycle. It must be recognized on its own terms so that immediate action can be taken. At its core, these campaigns run on multiple lines of effort, serve as the non-violent line of effort of a wider movement, and execute political warfare agendas that reflect cultural Marxist outcomes. The campaigns operate through narratives.
Because the hard left is aligned with lslamist organizations at local (ANTI FA working with Muslim Brotherhood doing business as MSA and CAIR), national (ACLU and BLM working with CAIR and MPAC) and international levels (OIC working with OSCE and the UN), recognition must given to the fact that they seamlessly interoperate at the narrative level as well. In candidate Trump, the opposition saw a threat to the “politically correct” enforcement narratives they’ve meticulously laid in over the past few decades. In President Trump, they see a latent threat to continue that effort to ruinous effect and their retaliatory response reflects this fear.