David Irving: Churchill Warmonger vs. Hitler Peacemaker

henrymakow.com — Oct 11, 2015

Churchill was an alcoholic because he had sold out his country to Illuminati Jewish bankers. The Victory Sign is really an occult symbol for their love of Satan. -

Churchill was an alcoholic because he had sold out his country to Illuminati Jewish bankers. The Victory Sign is really an occult symbol for their love of Satan (see link for more on the hand sign’s significance)

British historian David Irving criticizes Winston Churchill for getting England into a needless war with Nazi Germany which cost England its empire. For Irving, Hitler was a hero who could have defeated Stalin with our cooperation.
He ignores that Churchill, Hitler and Stalin all served the same cabal of Masons and Cabalist Jews (Illuminati) who use war to wage war against humanity.

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

“History is propaganda about the past,” someone said.
Most historians are paid liars. David Irving is an exception because, as he points out in a compelling speech, The Real Winston Churchill, from the mid 1980’s, he is not an academic historian. As such he actually does original research and doesn’t have to parrot the Masonic (Illuminati) Jewish line. As result, he comes up with embarrassing information.
For example, in a 1937 letter, ex-German Chancellor (1930-1932) Heinrich Brüning revealed to Churchill just who backed his successor, Adolph Hitler:
‘I didn’t, and do not even today for understandable reasons, wish to reveal from October 1928, the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of Jewish faith and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany.”
Irvinjhr-19-2-weber1-l.jpgg makes this shocking revelation at roughly the 14-minute mark of his 90 minute speech. It means Hitler and the Nazis were the creation of the Illuminati Jews, i.e Zionists. Then he ignores the mind boggling implications and focuses entirely on what a fraud and buffoon Winston Churchill was. I am using this remarkable speech as a template for Irving’s overall position since I have not studied his every utterance.
For the reasons given above, David Irving is likely the only man resembling a real historian of World War Two. He is an eloquent and inspiring speaker with a photographic memory. However there is something troubling about a man of his intelligence who doesn’t mention Freemasonry and acts like he doesn’t know that Soviet Russia was a product of British Freemasonry. He doesn’t mention that Churchill was a Freemason like Stalin and Hitler, and that the war was a charade designed by the Masonic Jewish bankers to destroy Western civilization and force Jews to create Israel as future capital of the satanic NWO. He doesn’t mention Hitler’s shortcomings, only Churchill’s, which include:

Continues …

2 responses to “David Irving: Churchill Warmonger vs. Hitler Peacemaker”

  1. […] David Irving: Churchill Warmonger vs. Hitler Peacemaker […]

  2. […] David Irving: Churchill Warmonger vs. Hitler Peacemaker […]