Boston Bombing Hoax Continues With Trial

henrymakow.com — March 18, 2015

Does this boy look like a terrorist or a patsy? Click to enlarge

Does this boy look like a terrorist or a patsy? Click to enlarge

The current trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev features a mass of fabricated evidence including video purporting to show Dzhokhar killing a policeman. Even more disturbing, it involves the complicity of dozens of false witnesses, including “friends,” the mass media, his lawyers, police and the “justice” system in general.
After reviewing the facts, Jim Fetzer, Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota, concludes: “I find myself in a state of nausea. This is not a nation that deserves respect. It is a sham, a fraud and a disgrace to all who perceive the truth.”
Makow – None of this should be a surprise. The media is also complicit in the 9-11 false flag. Society resembles a satanic cult: Truth and falsehood are inverted to advance evil. Society is divided between the conspirators (i.e. the initiated, traitors) and the great mass of dupes.

by Jim Fetzer — The NYT- All the Lies They can Fit in Print (Abridged by henrymakow.com)

How many lies of enormous magnitude are the American people expected to accept from their government and the mass media?
The evidence for concluding that this was a drill using amputee actors and special effects filming is overwhelming, where neither Tamerlan nor Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were responsible for the explosions or events thereafter. The mass media insults our intelligence. How, for example, could Dzhokhar have run over his brother after Tamerlan had been arrested by the police?
As I have explained in recent articles, including “The Boston Show Trial: The ‘bloody confession’ of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev” (12 March 2015), “Boston Show Trial: Attorney declares patsy “Guilty!” (8 March 2015), and (most thematically!) “Media complicity and indispensable to ‘false flag’ success” (14 January 2015), the proofs that Dzhokhar did not do it are so blatant and numerous that they should be intelligible even to reporters for The New York Times. That The Times should be ignoring the evidence and promoting a fantasy defies belief-unless, of course, it remains under the control of the CIA. Here are a dozen proofs that make the case:
1)

Continues …

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.