We Are All Anti-Semites Now

Anti-Semitism used to refer to a racial prejudice against Jews. Now “hate” is a codeword for something else: Opposition to Zionism, a political program that many Jews find repugnant.

By equating “hate” with opposition to Zionism, organized Jewry has given everyone permission to be an anti-Semite.

In Soviet Russia, anti-Semitism was considered “counter revolutionary” and severely punished. Similarly, anti-Semitism is now a political crime in the West because it runs counter to the New World Order.

For example, a Winnipeg journalist, Leslie Hughes, was dropped as a Liberal candidate in the 2008 election for remarking on Israeli foreknowledge of the 9-11 attack in an 2003 article. She taught courses on tolerance and had no feelings of hostility against Jews whatever. Her crime was political. (She is suing the Jewish groups.)

My writing warns Jews they have been used to advance the central banker’s plan for world government dictatorship. I emphasize that every nation, religion and organization is being used in the same way. Nonetheless, the Canadian Jewish Congress accuses me of “hatred against Jews” and wants to prevent me from writing on this subject. The absurdity of accusing the son of holocaust survivors of anti-Semitism only highlights the true political nature of my crime.


Rev. Ted Pike extrapolates from the 2004 US “Global Anti-Semitism Review Act” to define the kind of political activity that is being criminalized. (“The Real Motive Behind ‘Dept Of Global Anti-Semitism'”)

1. Any assertion “that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world” is anti-Semitic.

2. “Strong anti-Israel sentiment” is anti-Semitic.

3. “Virulent criticism” of Israel’s leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic.

4. Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.

5. Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.

6. Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the “New World Order”) is anti-Semitic.

7. Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.

8. Diminishing the “six million” figure of holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.

9. Calling Israel a “racist” state is anti-Semitic.

10. Asserting that a “Zionist Conspiracy” exists is anti-Semitic.

11. Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.

12. Making “derogatory statements about Jewish persons” is anti-Semitic.

13. Denying the right of mostly atheist Jews to re-occupy Palestine is anti-Semitic.

14. Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.

Essentially if you believe in truth and justice, you’re an anti-Semite. If you believe in free speech, free inquiry and the democratic process, you’re an anti-Semite. If you oppose tyranny, corruption and murder, you’re an anti-Semite.

The New World Order will turn 90% of the world’s population and at least 50% of Jews into anti-Semites. Is this the real agenda? To divert blame onto ordinary Jews and away from the central banksters and their non-Jewish Masonic minions?


Andrew Hitchcock’s “The Synagogue of Satan” is a compelling chronological history of the Jewish role in the central banker’s Satanic conspiracy a.k.a The New World Order. Together with my Illuminati, it serves as an excellent popular introduction to the subject.

The only knock against the book is that Carrington does not provide sufficient references. For example, he lifts the above list from the Internet without giving proper credit to Rev. Pike. Nevertheless Hitchcock’s sources mostly can be quickly verified online.

I was impressed at the amount of new information and insight I found. Hitchcock explains how the “nationalization” of the Bank of England in 1946 was a sleight-of-hand. He provides new insight into the art of money creation. He lucidly explains the significance of the Noahide Laws.

You read this book with a growing fury at the chicanery and crimes committed by Jews and their chutzpah. You are rationally convinced that Jews are not God’s but Satan’s Chosen people, a matter that should be of real concern to most Jews who are guilty only of naivety, complacence and conformity at best, and opportunism at worst.

Hitchcock quotes Werner Sombart who says that from 1820 onward, there was “only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild.” He says modern capitalism and Americanism is nothing else but “the Jewish spirit distilled.” Certainly we must analyze the positive and negative aspects of this spirit, weighing prosperity for many against a crude materialism.


Does the New World Order represent the culmination of a Jewish agenda, a more general satanic agenda or a central banker need to consolidate power? I would suggest that these agendas are complementary and overlapping.

The bottom line is that we cannot understand our world unless we see it in terms of this long term conspiracy to overthrow civilization and institute a Satanic dictatorship using the mass media, education and sophisticated technology.

In 1984 George Orwell predicted that reality would be turned upside down, black would become white based on what Big Brother says. When free speech is a political crime, Orwell’s prophesy has come true.

We must resist these moral cripples. liars and traitors with all our power. If we aren’t prepared to fight for freedom, we don’t deserve to be free.

Henry Makow, Ph.D. is the inventor of the board game Scruples and the author of “A Long Way to go for a Date.” His past articles on Feminism and the New World Order can be found on his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments at henry@savethemales.ca

This article can be found permanently archived at: