Dutch report into MH17 finds crash caused by ‘high-energy objects’ from outside plane

Nick Miller — SMH Sept 9, 2014

A preliminary report into the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 includes a chilling transcript of communication between flight controllers as they realised MH17 had vanished from their instruments.

MH17 wreckage clearly shows signs of shrapnel or machinegun fire. Click to enlarge

MH17 wreckage clearly shows signs of shrapnel or machinegun fire. Click to enlarge

After the final communication from the plane (a simple acknowledgement of “Romeo November Delta, Malaysian one seven”), a few minutes later flight controllers in Dnipro and Rostov talk on the phone trying to locate the flight.

“Do you observe the Malaysian,” Dnipro asks.

“No, it seems that its target started falling apart,” Rostov responds.

“It’s not responding for our calls too,” Dnipro says. “It’s disappeared.”

Moments earlier, the report finds, a large number of high-energy objects smashed through flight MH17, causing it to break up in mid-air and crash in eastern Ukraine.

There was no distress message and no sign of any technical fault or pilot error, according to the Dutch Safety Board.

This impact caused the plane to break up in mid-air, according to the Dutch Safety Board.

All 298 people on board MH17 died in the crash, including 27 Australian citizens.

“Multiple holes and indentations” were found in wreckage from the cockpit and forward section of the plane.

A part of the cockpit roof also showed holes indicating the plane was penetrated from the outside.

“Material around the holes was deformed in a manner consistent with being punctured by high-energy objects [which] originated from outside the fuselage.

“The pattern of damage observed in the forward fuselage and cockpit section of the aircraft was consistent with the damage that would be expected from a large number of high-energy objects that penetrated the aircraft from outside.”

The aircraft broke up in the air, with some parts continuing down and forward before breaking up further.

The black box recording from the cockpit ended abruptly with no sign of alarm, the report found.

“No aural warnings or alerts of aircraft system malfunctions were heard on the cockpit voice recording, which ended at 13.20:03 hrs,” the report said. “Crew communication gave no indication that there was anything abnormal with the flight.”

The engines were running normally at cruise power until the data recording stopped.

According to the report, MH17’s flight plan was approved by all the usual air-traffic control centres.

The plane changed course over Ukraine to avoid thunderstorms.

The Dutch Safety Board is taking the lead in the investigation, assisted by experts from Australia, Britain, Germany, Malaysia, the US, Ukraine and Russia.

The investigation covers the cause of the crash, the decision-making around flight routes and the availability of passenger lists.

Experts looked at photographs from the crash site, satellite images and the data recorders (black boxes). The flight recorder was slightly damaged in the crash but the memory module was intact, all 30 minutes of data were recovered and there was no evidence it had been tampered with.

The investigation was hampered because the flight came down in separatists’ territory in eastern Ukraine, close to areas of heavy fighting.

Investigators were only able to make a few short visits to the crash site in late July, to take photographs of the wreckage.

The safety board’s investigation into MH17 will continue “unabated” after the preliminary report, the Dutch Safety Board said.

MH17 flight transcripts. Click to enlarge

MH17 flight transcripts. Click to enlarge

The investigation may also include a return to the crash site.

On Monday Malaysia’s Defence Minister Hishamuddin Hussein said he had agreed “in principle” with Ukraine that an international team of personnel from Australia, the Netherlands and Malaysia “should gain early safe access into the MH17 crash site”.

However Mr Hussein said he had received a briefing from the chief of Ukraine’s army that the crash side is “currently volatile and inaccessible”.

The Dutch Safety Board said the information in the preliminary report was “tentative” and could change with further evidence.

The board’s final report is expected within a year.

Crash investigators are unlikely to identify the source of the “high-energy objects” that downed the plane.

Continues …

Comment — Sept 9, 2014

Right up until this point the above article is fairly straightforward. However, it then cites the BBC’s Panorama that quoted eyewitnesses saying they saw Russians operating a BUK missile launcher near where MH17 was shot down.
Of course these so-called “eyewitnesses” could easily be crisis actors used by Western intelligence to substantiate claims that the Russians shot down Flight MH17.
The SMH report goes on to relate that the BBC spoke to one “eyewitness” who claims to have seen the missile-launcher being deployed from a truck close to the crash site, just hours before MH17 came down.
The eyewitness told the BBC that the crew were “well-disciplined, unlike the rebels, and not wearing the standard Ukrainian camouflage uniform sported by government and rebel troops alike”.
Note that these claims are not part of the official investigation and the BBC’s Panorama report was broadcast the NIGHT BEFORE THE RELEASE OF THE INVESTIGATIONS PRELIMINARY FINDINGS.
Almost as if the Panorama broadcast had been timed to pre-empt the publication of the investigations preliminary findings; part of a BBC attempt to frame Russia for the downing of MH17.
This linked BBC Online report echoes those false allegations.
However, BBC must know that the “eyewitnesses” it interviewed were lying because it had earlier spoken to residents near the crash site who told a completely different tale.
Speaking to a Ukrainian BBC reporter the inhabitants of nearby villages told of how they saw fighter jets appear and fire on the plane before it went down.
No mention of that was made in the BBC’s Panorama on Monday night or in the BBC Online report. In fact those videos have since BEEN REMOVED from the BBC’s website.
In other words THE BBC IS DELIBERATELY COLLUDING in attempts to frame Russia for the downing of MH17. Here’s the proof, from an earlier report that the BBC has subsequently deleted.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.