Pussy Fury: A Plea for an Explanation

henrymakow.com — Dec 18, 2018

pussy-roar(Hear my pussy roar! WTF?)
What’s behind women protesting by dressing up as vaginas and wearing “pussy hats”? I am asking my knowledgeable  readers to explain this bizarre behaviour. Is it a renunciation of their feminine modesty and femininity itself? Do these mutants think their vagina is the source of their power?  Do they suffer from Personality Deficit  Disorder? Below is my explanation but  I am not satisfied.  Please help!
Are Womyn’s Protests a Plea for Male Love?
Could it be sexual frustration? Experienced men know women make themselves most unattractive when they are feeling most unloved. Self described “nasty women” are crying out for male love.
In The Vagina Monologues, Jewish author Eve Ensler laments this lack of male attention to her genitals. “My vagina wants to go deeper. It’s hungry for depth. It’s hungry for kisses, kindness. It wants to stop being angry. It wants everything. It wants to want. It wants.”
Women need satisfying sex as much as men or even more. They are not getting it from feminized boyfriends or anonymous hookups. Why would a stranger care about her satisfaction? Having sex is not making love. Women are narcissistic-masochistic. A man’s love-making is their narcissistic reward for their masochistic sacrifice. Men love women for putting up with them.
Sexual intercourse symbolizes a a husband’s possession of his wife and her surrender to him. Her sexual satisfaction depends on this self-effacement. Women instinctively want to belong to the man she loves and bear his children. This is why promiscuity is dehumanizing and does not work. A woman can only belong to one man. Our parent’s generation had it right when they insisted on sex within wedlock. (This is also the key to a satisfying sex life.)
Women universally want to be put to use. They are instrumental by nature. Apart from procreation, they help make things happen. That’s why they were secretaries and nurses in the past. They are hypergamous and want to serve a man, their husband.
The movie “The Business of Strangers” (2001) illustrates what happens to  women when they reject this universal role and adopt feminist shibbolethsVictims of a diabolical  plot, they have mutated, and need a man’s love in order to be themselves again.
This decidedly Un-PC movie could not be made today because we live in a de facto Communist (Masonic Jewish-controlled) society which has killed freedom of expression. Without freedom, they can be no genuine culture. The career of brilliant writer and director Patrick Stettner has gone nowhere. Western culture is controlled agitprop. Thanks to the Internet, you can watch this fine movie here.    We’ll never forgive CIA stooges like Gloria Steinem and Communist Party hacks like Betty Friedan  and the mass media for destroying the lives of millions.
Ashley-Judd-Womens-March-on-Washington(left. Self described “Nasty Women” Ashley Judd. See Judd’s psychotic speech.) 

The Effect of Sexual Deprivation on Women Updated from Jan 2010 and March 2017

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

An excellent independent movie, “The Business of Strangers” (2001) explores the effect feminism has had on modern women. Writer/director Patrick Stettner illustrates how American women have traded the honored social role of wife and mother for the sterility, and banality of corporate culture.
This is what movies should do: Reflect modern life. Yet this brilliant movie bombed (or was torpedoed) at the box office, making less than $500,000. Fortunately, critics liked it and it is widely available on DVD.
Stockard Channing and Julia Stiles in "The Business of Strangers - See more at: http://henrymakow.com/the_effect_of_sexual_deprivati.html#sthash.TukcSiBD.dpuf

Stockard Channing and Julia Stiles in “The Business of Strangers. Click to enlarge

Two women are stranded overnight at an airport hotel while on a sales trip. Stockard Channing, left, plays “Julie Styron,” successful divorced 45-ish VP Sales whose best friend is her secretary.
Julia Stiles plays Paula Murphy, a tough 25-ish “writer” who works the overhead projector.
The movie shows how career has supplanted family for women like Styron. Feminism promised that women could have both, but this did not happen.
Forty seven per cent of 40-something women with professional degrees have no children. Only 14% of these women said they didn’t want children.  (“Creating a Life: Professional Life and the Quest for Children” by Sylvia Ann Hewitt)
Styron is fired without warning. But when she immediately lands an even better job as a CEO, she is strangely indifferent.



Continues …