<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Truthseeker &#187; Conversations with the Crow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;cat=68" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk</link>
	<description>Behind the headlines - conspiracies, cover-ups, ancient mysteries and more. Real news and perspectives that you won&#039;t find in the mainstream media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow: Part 71</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=10768</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=10768#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wmw_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insights into recent history from a former CIA insider]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>TBR News.org</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;">Editor’s note: When this series was prepared, a number of conversations were deliberately redacted because they were either very personal in nature or, more important, contained specific material which we felt might have considerable impact and present potential danger in publication. Now that all of the conversations are being readied for publication, along with illustrative specific notes, we are publishing many of the hitherto off-limits examples. Enjoy them! </span></p>
<p>On October 8th, 2000, Robert Trumbull Crowley, once a leader of the CIA&#8217;s Clandestine Operations Division, died in a Washington hospital of heart failure and the end effects of Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease. Before the late Assistant Director Crowley was cold, Joseph Trento, a writer of light-weight books on the CIA, descended on Crowley&#8217;s widow at her town house on Cathedral Hill Drive in Washington and hauled away over fifty boxes of Crowley&#8217;s CIA files.</p>
<p>Once Trento had his new find secure in his house in Front Royal, Virginia, he called a well-known Washington fix lawyer with the news of his success in securing what the CIA had always considered to be a potential major embarrassment. Three months before, July 20th of that year, retired Marine Corps colonel William R. Corson, and an associate of Crowley, died of emphysema and lung cancer at a hospital in Bethesda, Md.</p>
<p>After Corson&#8217;s death, Trento and a well-known Washington fix-lawyer went to Corson&#8217;s bank, got into his safe deposit box and removed a manuscript entitled &#8216;Zipper.&#8217; This manuscript, which dealt with Crowley&#8217;s involvement in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, vanished into a CIA burn-bag and the matter was considered to be closed forever.</p>
<p>The small group of CIA officials gathered at Trento&#8217;s house to search through the Crowley papers, looking for documents that must not become public. A few were found but, to their consternation, a significant number of files Crowley was known to have had in his possession had simply vanished.</p>
<p>When published material concerning the CIA&#8217;s actions against Kennedy became public in 2002, it was discovered to the CIA&#8217;s horror, that the missing documents had been sent by an increasingly erratic Crowley to another person and these missing papers included devastating material on the CIA&#8217;s activities in South East Asia to include drug running, money laundering and the maintenance of the notorious &#8216;Regional Interrogation Centers&#8217; in Viet Nam and, worse still, the Zipper files proving the CIA’s active organization of the assassination of President John Kennedy..</p>
<p>A massive, preemptive disinformation campaign was readied, using government-friendly bloggers, CIA-paid &#8220;historians&#8221; and others, in the event that anything from this file ever surfaced. The best-laid plans often go astray and in this case, one of the compliant historians, a former government librarian who fancied himself a serious writer, began to tell his friends about the CIA plan to kill Kennedy and eventually, word of this began to leak out into the outside world.</p>
<p>The originals had vanished and an extensive search was conducted by the FBI and CIA operatives but without success. Crowley&#8217;s survivors, his aged wife and son, were interviewed extensively by the FBI and instructed to minimize any discussion of highly damaging CIA files that Crowley had, illegally, removed from Langley when he retired. Crowley had been a close friend of James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s notorious head of Counterintelligence. When Angleton was sacked by DCI William Colby in December of 1974, Crowley and Angleton conspired to secretly remove Angleton’s most sensitive secret files our of the agency. Crowley did the same thing right before his own retirement , secretly removing thousands of pages of classified information that covered his entire agency career.</p>
<p>Known as “The Crow” within the agency, Robert T. Crowley joined the CIA at its inception and spent his entire career in the Directorate of Plans, also know as the “Department of Dirty Tricks,”: Crowley was one of the tallest man ever to work at the CIA. Born in 1924 and raised in Chicago, Crowley grew to six and a half feet when he entered the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in N.Y. as a cadet in 1943 in the class of 1946. He never graduated, having enlisted in the Army, serving in the Pacific during World War II. He retired from the Army Reserve in 1986 as a lieutenant colonel. According to a book he authored with his friend and colleague, William Corson, Crowley’s career included service in military intelligence and Naval Intelligence, before joining the CIA at inception in 1947. His entire career at the agency was spent within the Directorate of Plans in covert operations. Before his retirement, Bob Crowley became assistant deputy director for operations, the second-in-command in the Clandestine Directorate of Operations.</p>
<p>One of Crowley’s first major assignments within the agency was to assist in the recruitment and management of prominent World War II Nazis, especially those with advanced intelligence experience. One of the CIA’s major recruitment coups was Heinrich Mueller, once head of Hitler’s Gestapo who had fled to Switzerland after the collapse of the Third Reich and worked as an anti-Communist expert for Masson of Swiss counterintelligence. Mueller was initially hired by Colonel James Critchfield of the CIA, who was running the Gehlen Organization out of Pullach in southern Germany. Crowley eventually came to despise Critchfield but the colonel was totally unaware of this, to his later dismay.</p>
<p>Crowley’s real expertise within the agency was the Soviet KGB. One of his main jobs throughout his career was acting as the agency liaison with corporations like ITT, which the CIA often used as fronts for moving large amounts of cash off their books. He was deeply involved in the efforts by the U.S. to overthrow the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in Chile, which eventually got him into legal problems with regard to investigations of the U.S. government’s grand jury where he has perjured himself in an agency cover-up</p>
<p>After his retirement, Crowley began to search for someone who might be able to write a competent history of his career. His first choice fell on British author John Costello (author of <em>Ten Days to Destiny, The Pacific War</em> and other works) but, discovering that Costello was a very aggressive homosexual, he dropped him and tentatively turned to Joseph Trento who had assisted Crowley and William Corson in writing a book on the KGB. When Crowley discovered that Trento had an ambiguous and probably cooperative relationship with the CIA, he began to distrust him and continued his search for an author.</p>
<p>Bob Crowley first contacted Gregory Douglas in 1993 when he found out from John Costello that Douglas was about to publish his first book on Heinrich Mueller, the former head of the Gestapo who had become a secret, long-time asset to the CIA. Crowley contacted Douglas and they began a series of long and often very informative telephone conversations that lasted for four years. . In 1996, Crowley , Crowley told Douglas that he believed him to be the person that should ultimately tell Crowley’s story but only after Crowley’s death. Douglas, for his part, became so entranced with some of the material that Crowley began to share with him that he secretly began to record their conversations, later transcribing them word for word, planning to incorporate some, or all, of the material in later publications.</p>
<p>In 1998, when Crowley was slated to go into the hospital for exploratory surgery, he had his son, Greg, ship two large foot lockers of documents to Douglas with the caveat that they were not to be opened until after Crowley’s death. These documents, totaled an astonishing 15,000 pages of CIA classified files involving many covert operations, both foreign and domestic, during the Cold War.</p>
<p>After Crowley’s death and Trento’s raid on the Crowley files, huge gaps were subsequently discovered by horrified CIA officials and when Crowley’s friends mentioned Gregory Douglas, it was discovered that Crowley’s son had shipped two large boxes to Douglas. No one knew their contents but because Douglas was viewed as an uncontrollable loose cannon who had done considerable damage to the CIA’s reputation by his on-going publication of the history of Gestapo-Mueller, they bent every effort both to identify the missing files and make some effort to retrieve them before Douglas made any use of them.</p>
<p>All of this furor eventually came to the attention of Dr. Peter Janney, a Massachusetts clinical psychologist and son of Wistar Janney, another career senior CIA official, colleague of not only Bob Crowley but Cord Meyer, Richard Helms, Jim Angleton and others. Janney was working on a book concerning the murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer, former wife of Cord Meyer, a high-level CIA official, and later the mistress of President John F. Kennedy. Douglas had authored a book, ‘Regicide’ which dealt with Crowley’s part in the Kennedy assassination and he obviously had access to at least some of Crowley’s papers. Janney was very well connected inside the CIA’s higher levels and when he discovered that Douglas had indeed known, and had often spoken with, Crowley and that after Crowley’s death, the FBI had descended on Crowley’s widow and son, warning them to never speak with Douglas about anything, he contacted Douglas and finally obtained from him a number of original documents, including the originals of the transcribed conversations with Robert Crowley.</p>
<p>In spite of the burn bags, the top secret safes and the vigilance of the CIA to keep its own secrets, the truth has an embarrassing and often very fatal habit of emerging, albeit decades later.</p>
<p>While CIA drug running , money-launderings and brutal assassinations are very often strongly rumored and suspected, it has so far not been possible to actually pin them down but it is more than possible that the publication of the transcribed and detailed Crowley-Douglas conversations will do a great deal towards accomplishing this.</p>
<p>These many transcribed conversations are relatively short because Crowley was a man who tired easily but they make excellent reading. There is an interesting admixture of shocking revelations on the part of the retired CIA official and often rampant anti-social (and very entertaining) activities on the part of Douglas but readers of this new and on-going series are gently reminded to always look for the truth in the jest!</p>
<p><em>Conversation 71 </em></p>
<p>http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2941.htm#006</p>
<p>Date: Tuesday, March 4, 1997<br />
Commenced: 2:30 PM CST<br />
Concluded: 3:10 PM CST</p>
<p>GD: It’s a little late in the day., Robert. Am I OK on my timing?</p>
<p>RTC: Not a problem, Gregory. Lunch is over long ago. I did hear from Bill last night about that material on Hillary.</p>
<p>GD: What about it?</p>
<p>RTC: Oh, it’s all true but it will never get into the papers. Those things never do.</p>
<p>GD: Some of it, the stuff about Bob Treuhaft in Oakland, did. In the Chronicle.</p>
<p>RTC: A fluke. What was your source?</p>
<p>GD: Military collector who was also in the California State Police office in Sacramento. He copied the file and sent it to me.</p>
<p>RTC: Well, they aren’t up for reelection so there’s no point in beating a dead horse. But not a surprise.</p>
<p>GD: I suppose with her background, when they get out of office, the pair of them, she can become the mayor of Skokie or if we have another Democrat president, the ambassador to Israel.</p>
<p>RTC: Sad to say but they’re everywhere you look these days. Back in the reign of Franklin I, they filled the ranks of State and stood right next to the Oval Office. Of course, they pilfered all our secrets and sent them off to Russia. That was their new homeland, after all, and Stalin loved them. Or so they thought. When Bill and I were working on our KGB book, I discovered that Joe hated them and when they managed to kill him with rat poison, was planning a super pogrom in Moscow. No, the regular Russians loathe and fear them and now that Putin is coming up, they are fleeing to Israel like fleas leaving a dead dog. The problem with this, as we know, is that the ranks of Israeli intelligence are now full of fresh blood what with the refusedniks pouring into the country and believe me, Gregory, any scrap of secret information, every secret code, that we mistakenly give to the Israeli government will end up in Moscow about ten seconds after they get it. Multiply Pollard about a hundred times and you’ll see the real picture. I told Jim dozens of times to keep away from the Hebrews but Jim never listened. He was hip deep with the mob but they weren’t trying to sell the dreaded white man down the river like the Jews do. My God, I wouldn’t let them into my department because I know what they’re like but they’ve gotten in the door elsewhere. Polland was only the tip of a huge iceberg.</p>
<p>GD: None of that comes as a great surprise. They managed to start the Second World War and I agree that they pumped Stalin full of state secrets and you know my connection with the Pollard business. In any other country, they would have taken the little shit out for a very long walk on a very short pier. Well, maybe some patriotic con will get an early parole by sticking a file into his liver.</p>
<p>RTC: One hopes, one hopes. But in a way, I feel sorry for Russia. That was quite a game after Yeltsin got in, let me tell you. Old Boris the drunk was ours, bought and paid for. The drill was for Boris to privatize the Russian natural resources and let our people…our oil people really…get their hands on everything. How did we do it? We located a bunch of street thugs. Drug dealers, whoremongers, porn merchants and especially extortionists, set them up as businessmen, get them funded, let them buy up all the oil, steel and aluminum former Soviet corporations and then sell the stock off to our companies. The thing is, all of these thugs and murderers, because that’s what they are, are Jewish street bandits, all of them. And they got their co-religionists in the IMF and the World Bank to help them with capital both from us and from Israel. And they did buy up everything at rigged auctions and they did make deals with the big US oil people. You fancy yourself a newspaperman , Gregory? I’ll give you an inside story but I beg you not to use me as a source….</p>
<p>GD: Never…</p>
<p>RTC: An Israeli owns the Bank of New York and they are using it to launder billions in stolen Jewish Mafia money. I mean money from Russia. Billions. And our people have been helping the Hebes set up Swiss bank accounts. Before that, they used to keep the money under the bed in bags but now they can buy expensive suits, that the tasteless shits wear with tennis shoes, and strut their stuff in international society. I can give you some inside information on this and you could expose some of it. It needs to be done but you’ll never see a word of it in the New York Times or the Post. Why not? Because these organs of truth and light are owned by Jews and Jews never go after their own kind.</p>
<p>GD: I could go to Carto. He would love this.</p>
<p>RTC: Any old port in a story, Gregory. I have names. One of my friends down there gave them to me.</p>
<p>GD: I have good connections with the Swiss. If I could get the names, perhaps I could get the account information. The Bank of New York?</p>
<p>RTC: Yes. One of the oldest banks in this country. Hamilton founded it. The Jews have it now and more money goes in and out of it than the US Treasury. Kimmel knows about this so do not ever tell him about this conversation or that you are working on this. I can send you my entire file on all of this and you can take it from there. And if you have friends in Switzerland, be sure to look for the black accounts, not the white ones. These greaseballs always have a white account with a few thousand in it and a black one with billions. That way, if an official request is made, say be us, the Swiss can put up a show of resistance and then break down and give us the smaller one. The black accounts.</p>
<p>GD: Sounds good.</p>
<p>RTC: And I can give you the name of at least two Russian intelligence people here who are disguised as newspaper men and you can contact either or both and pass on the information. They would love you, Gregory, and it might lead you to make more friends. You certainly wouldn’t have any in the Jewish camp.</p>
<p>That moron Bronfman, the booze king, has delusions of grandeur, and thinks he is going to push the Swiss around so you can kick him in his flabby ass for me. My God, I hate to deal with these swine, believe me. The biggest pack of thieves, murderers and back stabbers I have ever run into and believe me, I have seen them all. And there’re a lot more bits and pieces I can pull together for you but again, mention none of this to Kimmel and if he ever starts to talk about this, say nothing. Understood?</p>
<p>GD: Is the FBI involved?</p>
<p>RTC: Not that I know but they all suck on the same tit so be careful.</p>
<p>GD: What do you see as the end result of outing them?</p>
<p>RTC: Hopefully, enough publicity to slow them down in this country. They own the press and the banks and dig in like maggots in a side of beef so if the public gets wind of the enormity of their thefts, they can watch them. Ah, but in Russia, the Putin people will love you. Putin, as I understand it, wants to stop this drain on Russian oil and kick the Jews out of power. And, of course, like a good KGB officer that he is, kick the US in the nuts. But, I think uprooting the Hebrews and outing them outweighs a boot in the testes.</p>
<p>GD: Collateral damage.</p>
<p>RTC: How astute, Gregory. Let me tell you, my boy, the whole world would be far better off if some rag head set off an atomic bomb in downtown Tel Aviv during Passover. I know that sounds terrible but from my years of experience, that game would well be worth the candle. I tell you, if we don’t put a stop to their burrowing, treachery and high treason, those filthy Yids will drag us into a nasty war with the Arabs. I mean it. None of them care a fig about this country. Everything for that miserable habitat of warped trolls and nothing for anyone else. No wonder they have been hated and persecuted for thousands of years. The Romans had a wonderful chance to advance civilization by killing them all off but they missed their opportunity.</p>
<p>GD: The tsars should have chased them all into Siberia and we would have been spared Bolshevism.</p>
<p>RTC: Oh, absolutely, absolutely. And now they want to kill off all the Arabs in the Near East and move into their homes. And they would expect us to help them. I tell you that if we don’t get our nose out of Israel’s hairy ass, the Arabs will come after us as well. America has no business over there and Israel is not our friend. America is full of white Christians and Jews hate all Christians and do their best to rape, loot and pillage us, all in the name of greater Israel. Well, not in my lifetime but maybe in yours, Gregory, in yours.</p>
<p>GD: If you send me the papers, I will do my best.</p>
<p>RTC: Expose and derail. They have already looted England and Poland and now they’re raping Russia and we’re next on the menu. And their creepy Mossad agents are crawling all over this country as well. The FBI knows about this so that’s one of the reasons to keep quiet around Kimmel. You tell him anything hot and juicy and Tom will burn the line to the headquarters. Once they have it, the Jews will have their hands on it in seconds and they can either put a few pounds of cocaine in your car or shoot your crippled mother as a warning. Say nothing and publish.</p>
<p>GD: Good advice. I recall an conversation I once had with a Pole. He said they Poles hated the Germans but one good thing was that Hitler cleaned the Jews out of Poland. Did you know that after the war when the Jewish refugees went back to Poland, the locals used to chase them into barns, lock them in and barbecue them? Last major pogrom in Europe was in Poland in ’46. In fact, Stalin…I mean in ’39 when Hitler went into Poland, about three hundred thousand Polish Jews fled eastwards to find security in the friendly bosom of Mother Russia. Stalin did not want any more Jews so he ordered the border guards, the NKVD, to shoot anyone trying to cross the border. They wiped out the lot of them. And now, of course, the Germans get the blame.</p>
<p>RTC: The older ones still love Stalin. Well, isn’t truth relative, Gregory?</p>
<p>GD: Depends on who wins, doesn’t it?</p>
<p>RTC: :Well, I’ll dig out some of the papers on this business and send them off to you. Probably after the next weekend. I can’t get to the post office but I can get my son to do it. I hate to drag him into this but I have no choice here.</p>
<p>GD: Well, if it’s too much trouble to…</p>
<p>RTC: No, not a problem. The is not a damned thing I can do about these assholes but perhaps you can.</p>
<p>GD: I might get it in Carto’s paper but I doubt if anyone else will touch it.</p>
<p>RTC: You will shake up the FBI if you publish but does this bother you?</p>
<p>GD: Why should it?</p>
<p>RTC: DC is so incestuous, Gregory, so involved. Everyone is so self-important.</p>
<p>GD: My impression has been that they want to be important but never will be anything but pointy headed hacks and wannabees. I am sure there are smart people in DC but I have yet to encounter one.</p>
<p>RTC: I know a few but you have a point. Here, we have spent this entire conversation trashing the Jews. God help both of us if someone is tapping our phones.</p>
<p>RTC: You’re retired and I am no on so I don’t worry about myself. I suppose what with the collapse of the Soviet Union, all your people are happy.</p>
<p>RTC: Well, James Joyce said that: In moments of happiness, don’t despair, tragedy lurks around the next corner.</p>
<p>GD: Always. Tragedy would be the Jews tricking or forcing us into a war somewhere to help them out. A lot of dead young men, slaughtered Arabs and Tel Aviv rubbing its hands in glee. Or they can do it on their own and invade some place without soldiers around to shoot back and kill fifty children in a Syrian school. Of course these dead toddlers would be proclaimed in the New York Times as a training camp for Arab militants. Of course, out public wouldn’t really care about this. I wonder what would happen if the Arabs blew up one of our day care centers? My God, what a howl that would bring out. Of course we both know that they did it to teach us a lesson for our support of a rogue state. Ah, the Skokie crowd cheers us onwards, over the edge. If that happens they will all run to Toronto which a friend tells me is crawling with them. They even have special lamp posts there.</p>
<p>RTC: The better to hang them on, Gregory.</p>
<p>GD: It might come to that yet, Robert. But enough amusing talk. When you were talking about the take-over of Russian gas and oil and so on, were they successful? I mean your people?</p>
<p>RTC: Oh, yes, they achieved their initial goal. But then the Jews got too greedy and too public with their wealth and I think now, Putin will pull them all down, one by one. And I also think there will eventually be serious problems with America’s banking system. It’s totally corrupt, Gregory, and, like the oil barons of Russia, getting too arrogant. If we were to try to restructure America, we would have to start by reforming the banks and then reestablish the press as independent entities. But to accomplish this, we have to take into consideration that the banks, the media and, to a lesser degree, our intelligence agencies, are firmly in the hands of Jewish interests. These people are not operating for the good of the public but for their own little cliques and more seriously, solely for the interests of Israel. Mark you, Gregory, that miserable dwarf country will drag this powerful country into ruin unless someone puts a stop to it. But, I suppose, it’s the old question of who will bell the cat.</p>
<p>GD: Why not let nature, or time, take its course, Robert? None of what you talk about is new, at least not from a historical point of view. Happened before and will happen again. Watch and wait is what I say.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12px;">(Concluded at 3:10 CST)</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=10768</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Crowley Papers: The Vietnam War- 1945-1978</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9716</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9716#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wmw_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overview of Robert Trumbull Crowley’s career and why the former head of CIA Clandestine Operations, otherwise known as the Crow, was such an embarrassment to the agency  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>TBR News.org</strong></p>
<p>On October 8th, 2000, Robert Trumbull Crowley, once a leader of the CIA&#8217;s Clandestine Operations Division, died in a Washington hospital of heart failure and the end effects of Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease. Before the late Assistant Director Crowley was cold, Joseph Trento, a writer of light-weight books on the CIA, descended on Crowley&#8217;s widow at her town house on Cathedral Hill Drive in Washington and hauled away over fifty boxes of Crowley&#8217;s CIA files.</p>
<p>Once Trento had his new find secure in his house in Front Royal, Virginia, he called a well-known Washington fix lawyer with the news of his success in securing what the CIA had always considered to be a potential major embarrassment. Three months before, July 20th of that year, retired Marine Corps colonel William R. Corson, and an associate of Crowley, died of emphysema and lung cancer at a hospital in Bethesda, Md.</p>
<p>After Corson&#8217;s death, Trento and a well-known Washington fix-lawyer went to Corson&#8217;s bank, got into his safe deposit box and removed a manuscript entitled &#8216;Zipper.&#8217; This manuscript, which dealt with Crowley&#8217;s involvement in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, vanished into a CIA burn-bag and the matter was considered to be closed forever.</p>
<p>The small group of CIA officials gathered at Trento&#8217;s house to search through the Crowley papers, looking for documents that must not become public. A few were found but, to their consternation, a significant number of files Crowley was known to have had in his possession had simply vanished.</p>
<p>When published material concerning the CIA&#8217;s actions against Kennedy became public in 2002, it was discovered to the CIA&#8217;s horror, that the missing documents had been sent by an increasingly erratic Crowley to another person and these missing papers included devastating material on the CIA&#8217;s activities in South East Asia to include drug running, money laundering and the maintenance of the notorious &#8216;Regional Interrogation Centers&#8217; in Viet Nam and, worse still, the Zipper files proving the CIA’s active organization of the assassination of President John Kennedy..</p>
<p>A massive, preemptive disinformation campaign was readied, using government-friendly bloggers, CIA-paid &#8220;historians&#8221; and others, in the event that anything from this file ever surfaced. The best-laid plans often go astray and in this case, one of the compliant historians, a former government librarian who fancied himself a serious writer, began to tell his friends about the CIA plan to kill Kennedy and eventually, word of this began to leak out into the outside world.<br />
The originals had vanished and an extensive search was conducted by the FBI and CIA operatives but without success. Crowley&#8217;s survivors, his aged wife and son, were interviewed extensively by the FBI and instructed to minimize any discussion of highly damaging CIA files that Crowley had, illegally, removed from Langley when he retired. Crowley had been a close friend of James Jesus Angleton, the CIA’s notorious head of Counterintelligence. When Angleton was sacked by DCI William Colby in December of 1974, Crowley and Angleton conspired to secretly remove Angleton’s most sensitive secret files our of the agency. Crowley did the same thing right before his own retirement , secretly removing thousands of pages of classified information that covered his entire agency career.</p>
<p>Known as “The Crow” within the agency, Robert T. Crowley joined the CIA at its inception and spent his entire career in the Directorate of Plans, also know as the “Department of Dirty Tricks,”: Crowley was one of the tallest man ever to work at the CIA. Born in 1924 and raised in Chicago, Crowley grew to six and a half feet when he entered the U.S. Military Academy at West Point in N.Y. as a cadet in 1943 in the class of 1946. He never graduated, having enlisted in the Army, serving in the Pacific during World War II. He retired from the Army Reserve in 1986 as a lieutenant colonel. According to a book he authored with his friend and colleague, William Corson, Crowley’s career included service in military intelligence and Naval Intelligence, before joining the CIA at inception in 1947. His entire career at the agency was spent within the Directorate of Plans in covert operations. Before his retirement, Bob Crowley became assistant deputy director for operations, the second-in-command in the Clandestine Directorate of Operations.</p>
<p>One of Crowley’s first major assignments within the agency was to assist in the recruitment and management of prominent World War II Nazis, especially those with advanced intelligence experience. One of the CIA’s major recruitment coups was Heinrich Mueller, once head of Hitler’s Gestapo who had fled to Switzerland after the collapse of the Third Reich and worked as an anti-Communist expert for Masson of Swiss counterintelligence. Mueller was initially hired by Colonel James Critchfield of the CIA, who was running the Gehlen Organization out of Pullach in southern Germany. Crowley eventually came to despise Critchfield but the colonel was totally unaware of this, to his later dismay.</p>
<p>Crowley’s real expertise within the agency was the Soviet KGB. One of his main jobs throughout his career was acting as the agency liaison with corporations like ITT, which the CIA often used as fronts for moving large amounts of cash off their books. He was deeply involved in the efforts by the U.S. to overthrow the democratically elected government of Salvador Allende in Chile, which eventually got him into legal problems with regard to investigations of the U.S. government’s grand jury where he has perjured himself in an agency cover-up</p>
<p>After his retirement, Crowley began to search for someone who might be able to write a competent history of his career. His first choice fell on British author John Costello (author of <em>Ten Days to Destiny, The Pacific War</em> and other works) but, discovering that Costello was a very aggressive homosexual, he dropped him and tentatively turned to Joseph Trento who had assisted Crowley and William Corson in writing a book on the KGB. When Crowley discovered that Trento had an ambiguous and probably cooperative relationship with the CIA, he began to distrust him and continued his search for an author.</p>
<p>Bob Crowley first contacted Gregory Douglas in 1993 when he found out from John Costello that Douglas was about to publish his first book on Heinrich Mueller, the former head of the Gestapo who had become a secret, long-time asset to the CIA. Crowley contacted Douglas and they began a series of long and often very informative telephone conversations that lasted for four years. . In 1996, Crowley , Crowley told Douglas that he believed him to be the person that should ultimately tell Crowley’s story but only after Crowley’s death. Douglas, for his part, became so entranced with some of the material that Crowley began to share with him that he secretly began to record their conversations, later transcribing them word for word, planning to incorporate some, or all, of the material in later publications.</p>
<p>In 1998, when Crowley was slated to go into the hospital for exploratory surgery, he had his son, Greg, ship two large foot lockers of documents to Douglas with the caveat that they were not to be opened until after Crowley’s death. These documents, totaled an astonishing 15,000 pages of CIA classified files involving many covert operations, both foreign and domestic, during the Cold War.</p>
<p>After Crowley’s death and Trento’s raid on the Crowley files, huge gaps were subsequently discovered by horrified CIA officials and when Crowley’s friends mentioned Gregory Douglas, it was discovered that Crowley’s son had shipped two large boxes to Douglas. No one knew their contents but because Douglas was viewed as an uncontrollable loose cannon who had done considerable damage to the CIA’s reputation by his on-going publication of the history of Gestapo-Mueller, they bent every effort both to identify the missing files and make some effort to retrieve them before Douglas made any use of them.</p>
<p>All of this furor eventually came to the attention of Dr. Peter Janney, a Massachusetts clinical psychologist and son of Wistar Janney, another career senior CIA official, colleague of not only Bob Crowley but Cord Meyer, Richard Helms, Jim Angleton and others. Janney was working on a book concerning the murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer, former wife of Cord Meyer, a high-level CIA official, and later the mistress of President John F. Kennedy. Douglas had authored a book, <em>‘Regicide’</em> which dealt with Crowley’s part in the Kennedy assassination and he obviously had access to at least some of Crowley’s papers. Janney was very well connected inside the CIA’s higher levels and when he discovered that Douglas had indeed known, and had often spoken with, Crowley and that after Crowley’s death, the FBI had descended on Crowley’s widow and son, warning them to never speak with Douglas about anything, he contacted Douglas and finally obtained from him a number of original documents, including the originals of the transcribed conversations with Robert Crowley. (See our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?id=68">‘Conversations with the Crow’</a> archive)</p>
<p>In spite of the burn bags, the top secret safes and the vigilance of the CIA to keep its own secrets, the truth has an embarrassing and often very fatal habit of emerging, albeit decades later.</p>
<p>Among Robert Crowley’s papers was a complete manuscript he prepared for in-house circulation dealing with the political, <a href="http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2888.htm#003">military and intelligence backgrounds of the long war in Vietnam</a>. As a CIA employee, Crowley had signed an agreement that he would never publish anything based on his CIA service without first submitting the complete manuscript to the Agency for its vetting. In this case, Crowley never submitted the manuscript and is now dead. His only son is also dead and his wife is in a nursing facility so this fascinating view of a troubled period in America is now seeing the light of day for the first time.<br />
<span style="font-size: 12px;">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2888.htm#002</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9716</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 39</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9692</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9692#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wmw_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final part of transcribed conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations exposes more hidden history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>TBR News.org</strong></p>
<p>Date: Wednesday, February 19, 1997<br />
Commenced: 8:46 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 9:30 AM CST</p>
<p>GD: You called me Robert. Role reversal here. Is something up back there?</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, in a way. I’ve been keeping my eye on a growing negative situation here that directly affects you and indirectly affects me. This is going to be a little prolix so I was wondering if you had a tape recorder handy and might hook it up so you can make some sense of all this later. You ought to listen to it, make notes at your convenience and then we can talk about things after you do this. Is this possible? The recorder?</p>
<p>GD: Yes, I have one over on the shelf. I’ll just go and get it.</p>
<p>RTC: Well, I’m not going anywhere.</p>
<p>(Pause)</p>
<p>GD: I got it and put a tape in it. Let me hook the mike up to the phone here….OK now fire away.</p>
<p>RTC: Very well, let’s get started. I begin by telling you something we both know and this is that you are most unpopular back here, at least in certain circles. For example, Wolfe hates you and keeps telling me I ought not to talk to you. How odd that Kimmel tells me the same thing and so does Joe Trento. Do you have any dealings with him, by the way?</p>
<p>GD: No. I’ve heard the name. He wrote a book with you once if I recall.</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, Joe and his wife.</p>
<p>GD: Not very deep writers, are they?</p>
<p>RTC: No, Trento is like Bill. So eager to be part of a larger picture, so desperate to be noticed, so unimportant. Wolfe is only a government librarian but he, too, had delusions of grandeur. And Tom…Poor Tom was once the golden boy and now he is getting older and he is going to have to retire.</p>
<p>GD: I talk to him quite often, Robert, and I’ve been of help to him and his family over the Pearl Harbor business.</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, I know that but you are not on his good side for several reasons. In the first place, he views you as subhuman and only puts up with you for the same reason the others do…They want something from you. What they want is to get any papers Mueller might have given you and in the end, they want you to be quiet about him. Now Jim Critchfield wants you dead.</p>
<p>GD: Why so?</p>
<p>RTC: It’s all about Mueller. Now let me go on for a time here. I know and you know that Mueller worked for the CIA. Critchfield’s SS boys recruited him in ’48 and he came here. We hired him, in spite of the fact he ran the evil Gestapo, because he was a genuine expert on Soviet intelligence and very effective. Russia, officially, is our convenient enemy. Convenient because everyone makes money because they threaten to invade us or atom bomb New York. Of course they were going to do no such thing but a frightened public is generous with funds to its protectors. So we hired Mueller. That, in and of itself, is a major scandal. The left wing, the Jews and anyone the Gestapo arrested would howl the house down if they ever found out about this. The other little problem is that no one alive, aside from myself and you, knows the name Mueller was given when he came over to us. This was a large secret and only a few knew. Harry Truman knew, Beatle Smith knew and so did Jim Critchfield and myself. And, of course Mueller and his wife, who worked for us too. So we have a situation that could prove to be very, very embarrassing for many people. Mueller is dead and his wife will say nothing but then we have you in the equation. You met him in California and his wife knows you. Apparently, you two hit it off. His wife, who doesn’t approve of you because she is afraid of you, tells us you two were thick as thieves. So much for that. You used your entrée to write a book on him. My dear sweet Jesus, what a stink you made. Mueller was dead and forgotten and along came you, a loose cannon, and tore off the scabs of time. It takes bureaucracies a long time to react. But to save their collective asses, they do react. Initially, Bill was all gung ho about you because your book supported his ‘Widows’ book and he clearly identified Mueller’s Swiss-based CIA interrogator,.</p>
<p>GD: Kronthal.</p>
<p>RTC: Absolutely, and when Bill talked with you about this after reading the book, you gave him some inside information on Kronthal you got from Mueller. This was private information and you could never have made it up. Bill was sold and got me involved in this. Of course I didn’t tell them that we had known each other previously, albeit rather casually. You know, the Costello business.</p>
<p>GD: I recall.</p>
<p>RTC: And suddenly it began to dawn on certain elevated people in our organization that you might know far more than you should. And your book, which was interesting but not too revealing about our methods and activities, got out, you became a person of real interest. A question here, Gregory. Did Mueller ever mention the Kennedy business to you?</p>
<p>GD: Yes. I was having lunch with him when it happened. As I recall, we were having a late lunch at Stickney’s Hickory House in Palo Alto when Mueller started staring at the restaurant television set which was behind and above me. He said, ‘I see they shot your President in Dallas.’ I turned around and watched the uproar for a minute and then the food came. At one point, a little later, Mueller called me and asked me if I had been watching television and I said I had. He asked me if I had noticed Oswald being walked through crowded corridors in the Dallas police station and I said I had. He said that Oswald was not guilty and those who did it were trying to get him killed by exposing him to strangers. And he did get shot in the same surroundings the next day. Mueller said that the business was now over and that Ruby would also either hang himself in his cell or be knifed in jail by an inmate wanting fame and fortune. When I told him much later that Ruby died of cancer, Mueller only laughed and said that he preferred the heart attack and that cancer took too long to work.</p>
<p>RTC: Astute. Anything else?</p>
<p>GD: Nothing that I remember.</p>
<p>RTC: You see, Gregory, Mueller was involved in the business.</p>
<p>GD: I was having lunch with him when it happened and I had known him for some time before, Robert. Was he?</p>
<p>RTC: Mueller was hired by us as probably the best expert on Soviet intelligence alive. When Jim Angleton learned that the most important secrets, the President’s Daily Briefing material was all over Moscow, he went over the edge. Only a very few people ever saw that paper. I suggested that he have these salted with different information prior to distribution. This bit of fiction in one report and that in another. That way, Jim found out that the leaks came from the White House. That’s when we dragged Mueller out of retirement and he pinpointed Bolshakov, the top KGB operative in this country, as the conduit. And a little bit of snooping discovered that Bobby Kennedy was in regular touch with Bolshakov. Obviously, the material went from JFK to RFK to Bolshakov to Nikita in Moscow. That’s when it was decided to remove Kennedy, in fact both Kennedys. We got the President and Hoover got Bobby. The latter was more in the line of revenge but the President had to be stopped. And of course, he was. Mueller knew this and we, or rather they, are terrified as to what else he might have told you.</p>
<p>GD: He never told me any of this.</p>
<p>RTC: But of course we don’t know that, do we? So the plan has been to gain your confidence, promise you much, get even closer to you and then find out if you have any papers or tapes on any of this but especially the Kennedy business.</p>
<p>GD: And then they’ll shoot me.</p>
<p>RTC: Oh no, not that. With Critchfield in play, I told him that if any harm came to you, he would suffer terribly so I doubt if anyone would shoot you. They would lie to you, con you, trick you and maybe break into your house and steal anything that might make trouble. Did you get anything from Mueller?</p>
<p>GD: Oh yes, much.</p>
<p>RTC: And safe? And by safe, I don’t mean cunningly hidden in the attic or cellar or, worse, in a local storage facility under your name. You know what I mean.</p>
<p>GD: Oh I do indeed. I did not fall off the turnip truck yesterday, Robert. Very safe.<br />
RTC: After Mueller died, we talked to his widow and went through all his papers but they were very thin and there were a lot of things missing that she had remembered seeing. Most important were documents with Mueller’s new name. I told you, they don’t know that name…</p>
<p>GD: But they know his wife so they must know the name.</p>
<p>RTC: Good chap here but he had a number of names and his married name was not the same as our cover. Anyway, old papers were missing and then after we found out about you and your friend Laegel, we became very concerned. Laegel died in ’66 and you had vanished into thin air.</p>
<p>GD: I went to Europe under a false identity. I have dozens of them.</p>
<p>RTC: Vanished and so on. And then the book. That got everyone’s bowels in a ferment, Gregory and that’s why Bill got ahold of you.</p>
<p>GD: But you got me earlier.</p>
<p>RTC: That was on another matter entirely but fortunate for both of us in the end.</p>
<p>GD: All this over Kennedy?</p>
<p>RTC: Kennedy’s demise and our employment of the Gestapo head and some very sensitive things he knew and had been involved in. And what he might have told you and, most important, what he might have given to you such as papers, files or the like. You can understand why you began to hear from Tom Kimmel of the FBI and others, can’t you? And weren’t they so pleasant and jovial with you?</p>
<p>GD: Certainly.</p>
<p>RTC: Of course they were. And invitations to come to Washington to talk at historical conferences where you met all kinds of interesting people. And how many of these nice, attentive people have asked you about what Mueller might have given to you, or told you about really interesting historical happenings?</p>
<p>GD: Kimmel and Andrew Grey…</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, one of ours. You obviously didn’t oblige them but then they got Bob Wolfe into the act. A fellow historian with, very important for your future researches because he had access to government files.</p>
<p>GD: I always wondered why a professional Jew with strong ties to the Holocaust industry would be so smarmy with me. It figures.</p>
<p>RTC: And were you overwhelmed by the attention? By the free hotel rooms? By the dinners for you?</p>
<p>GD: I take what I can get, Robert.</p>
<p>RTC: And give?</p>
<p>GD: I give nothing, Robert, that I don’t want to give. Oh yes, many little questions about Mueller and who he might have been and did I have his address in California and so on. But they knew where he was living after all.</p>
<p>RTC: They wanted to know what you knew. Kimmel told me, and Bill confirmed it and I learned myself first hand, that you can get on the phone and talk for three hours. Very interesting, very much in the know but you never, ever let anything slip. This drives them all crazy, Gregory.</p>
<p>GD: Oh yes, I am aware. For example, someone, whose name is not your business, would give me the name of a very sensitive government operation, and I mean very sensitive. But just the name and nothing else. I would casually drop it into a conversation with Wolfe, Andrew or Tom but just a drop, not a discussion. No response of course. It was too new and too important for them to know about it. They I would wait a few weeks and guess what? I would get a smarmy call from Wolfe, Andrew or Tom, or sometimes all three, with a query. Say, one or all of them would say, last week you mentioned Operation Bunghole. That’s really interesting because just yesterday someone was talking about it to me. What more do you know about it? I mean just between the two of us?</p>
<p>RTC: How did you get out from under that one?</p>
<p>GD: I would say, Oh yes, Operation Bunghole! Yes, well, it’s…oh, excuse me Robert, Andrew or Tom, but the UPS man is at the door with some packages and I have to get off. Let me get back to you on this. And of course I don’t and the next time they call on this, I say, Oh that thing. Such cold coffee. Let me tell you about the giant eagles we have around here. They just grabbed some small kid out of the parking lot and flew off with him! Is that what I should have done, Robert?</p>
<p>RTC: You are a very evil person, Gregory, causing so much trouble. I love it.</p>
<p>GD: But they obviously didn’t, did they?</p>
<p>RTC: No, you drove them crazy. Your natural arrogance coupled with the confusion you sowed among them has not made you a popular person.</p>
<p>GD: Good. Mueller would have loved it as much as we both do.</p>
<p>RTC: Well, that’s some background. You are beginning to get some of these people very annoyed.</p>
<p>GD: The Wolfe and Kimmel people?</p>
<p>RTC: No, the people they work for. There will, I think, be some intense efforts to get their hands on you. Someone said getting anything from you was like trying to pick up some mercury from a table top. You slide this way and that and nothing can be done. They know you have something but just what is a mystery. Keep it that way, Gregory. It’s insurance. And on that subject, I have been going through all of my files and I am going to ship you some really interesting material. Some of it, as I promised, has to do with the Kennedy business but the rest covers sundry other matters. I’m going to have my son ship these to you because I am long past dragging heavy boxes to the post office. Now when you get these papers, be very sure to put them in a very safe place and tell no one about them. And here is more information for you. Do not trust your son in any way.</p>
<p>GD: Are you serious? My son?</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, because of the name. They can use his name at one point. I have to tell you this and I realize it may have an adverse effect on you but it’s important. Bill told me that he has approached your son and offered him a job with the CIA.</p>
<p>GD: You really must be joking. He has no academic background and would never pass a security clearance.</p>
<p>RTC: It doesn’t matter. He has been offered a consultant job at forty thousand a year and has more or less accepted. Bill said he was more than willing to work with him, and through him, the Company. They want cooperation in the event you start to push them or they even suspect you are about to pull off their covers. He is not too friendly to you and, of course, the money matters. Once he served his purpose, naturally, the job would disconnect. Tell him nothing and never let him know that you got anything from me. If he quizzes you about your relationship with me or gets interested in specifics, be on your guard and do not trust him. I don’t say you should walk away from him but just watch yourself.</p>
<p>GD: Not surprising. He’s clever but a coward and would never come at me from the front. But he has had so much trouble with the law such as having fake driver’s licenses, huge bills and the like that I doubt if any government agency would hire him if he used standard employment techniques. He never mentioned Bill or his offer and I did not know he had talked with Corson. He talked with Kimmel and Wolfe but not Bill. Well, it’s a disappointment, considering what it cost me to raise him and pay his bills but not a surprise. His favorite game is to knock up his girl friends, walk off and then expect me to pay for the abortion. Or the bill I knew nothing about. Or the car he ran into the week before. That sort of thing. He’s very clever but totally amoral and I don’t trust him to the corner, Robert, but I thank you for the input. Now, I can stuff him with disinformation which, as it comes from the inside, just has to be right. I should be able to squeeze a few dollars out of the swine if I play it right and I can always find ways to get them after people I don’t like. I mean I can tell my kid that so and so has the papers and plans to blackmail Langley with them. Then we can read the paper about a terrible gas explosion or a car wreck somewhere and another enemy is crisped.</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, well, you know the game.</p>
<p>GD: Of course I do. What did they say during our Glorious Revolution? Trust in God but keep your powder dry? Trust in no one, not even God, and keep your knife sharp. I don’t suppose you’d like to fill me in on your surprise?</p>
<p>RTC: Not on the phone, Gregory.</p>
<p>GD: They might be listening, but I doubt it. I’m using a special phone. But they might be listening to you. If they are, Wolfe, Andrew or Tom, kiss my royal ass.</p>
<p>RTC: Don’t do that, Gregory. They might.</p>
<p>(Concluded at 9:30 AM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size: 12px;">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2887.htm#006</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9692</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 38</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9678</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9678#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wmw_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations reveal more hidden history, and this week some investment advice too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>TBR News.org</strong></p>
<p>Date: Sunday, February 16, 1997<br />
Commenced: 10:45 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 11:15 AM CST</p>
<p>GD: I got your packet today, Robert, and thank you for it. I have a problem with the classification stamps on them. Would I have any problem putting these into a book with the stamps showing?</p>
<p>RTC: I would suggest that you use them for reference, Gregory, and would appreciate it if you did not photo copy them. As you say, there could be serious trouble for both of us if you did. What did you think of them?</p>
<p>GD: Amazing. I had no idea the blessed Republicans were so underhanded and vicious.</p>
<p>RTC: The Democrats, and my father was an active one, are more interested in social issues but the GOP wants unfettered economic power and to get, and keep it, they have no scruples. Clinton may be left of center but he’s economically pretty sound. The Republicans, and I used to be the man for connections with really big business don’t forget, have two goals and two only. They want to establish an ideological police state that is anti-black, anti-Mexican, anti-intellectual and in this category, anti-Jew. Once they have this, their next goal would be to allow unfettered capitalism to rage unchecked throughout the land so that they and their friends can get rich quick on crooked businesses like the huge fraud now going on in the electronics stock. It goes up, Gregory, because it’s rigged and I just know it will go higher and higher.</p>
<p>GD: Yes, and what goes up, must come down. And if it goes up too fast, when it crashes, it takes legitimate businesses with it. My grandfather got out of the market in September of ’29 because it was going up too fast and businesses were heavily overcapitalized. This electronic business is not genuine?</p>
<p>RTC: No, it’s rigged. How it works is this way: The stock fraud people grab some engineering student from MIT, set him up in an nice office in San Francisco and then incorporate him with some fancy, arty name. Next step is to get the stock listed on the New York board. After that, a ring of very reputable stock brokers call up their friends with an offering. They tell them they are going to buy a certain stock at ten dollars for them and then sell it when it gets to, let’s say, twenty. The client goes along with this and when this is repeated across the country, the stock shoots up. The original investors get double their money back, minus brokerage fees, and then the brokers do it again, and again. This forces almost all technology stock up into the heavens. Maybe some of the initial investors gripe when they see stock they bought at ten and sold at twenty up at two hundred but when all of will come crashing down, they are satisfied that they have a safe return.</p>
<p>GD: Well, gravity works on the market as well as fat woman’s tits.</p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) There you go again, Gregory, illuminating a serious economic lecture with lewd remarks.</p>
<p>GD: A little levity to offset crude capitalism.</p>
<p>RTC: Oh, if the Republicans have their way, all the restrictions on Wall Street would be lifted and everything would shoot up. Some of it rigged and the rest just being copycats.</p>
<p>GD: You’re not a Republican?</p>
<p>RTC: No, a relatively modest Democrat but not a poor one.</p>
<p>GD: It’s none of my business, Robert, but what do you have your money in?</p>
<p>RTC: Not communications stock, I can tell you that. Very conservative investments. And you?</p>
<p>GD: I’m almost broke, Robert. I don’t make that much money on the books and now that the rodent brigades from the CIA are starting to squeal that I am a really terrible liar, the sales are slowing down some. But, I have an idea that might pay off. I told you about the gold Jimmy Atwood and I dug up in ’90. Well, I have some old gasbag down in Florida who wants me to go over with him to Austria in the future and dig up more. Only this one doesn’t want to dig up gold. He wants to put a party together and get the money from them and come back with me later to get the money which we can split up.</p>
<p>RTC: The concentration camp money?</p>
<p>GD: Oh, yes and lots of it. We had to quit in ’90 because one was sick and the other a total asshole. And Atwood, being one of your people, tried all kinds of transparent tricks to cheat me. Didn’t work. But this Florida phony wants to work with me. I could always go back with him, or stay there after his rich friends went home, and dig up more money. Of course this time he could have a boating accident and fall into the lake. It’s very deep and very cold. What goes down into it Robert, does not come up.</p>
<p>RTC: And how would you get the loot back?</p>
<p>GD: I would keep it in Europe and invest it.</p>
<p>RTC: Probably not a bad idea. How much did you get last time?</p>
<p>GD: About five million and there must be five times that still left. Yes, I think a boating accident. Sort of like Colby’s assisted departure. If he has any family, I can tell them he ran off to Sofia with a Bulgarian whore instead of being refrigerated at the bottom of a deep lake in Austria. Well, we will see. I have a friend in the electronics business. How long before the stock boom busts?</p>
<p>RTC: I have no idea but eventually. Two years, three years…who knows? You don’t have any electronics stock, do you?</p>
<p>GD: God no. If I did have money, I would stay as far away as I can from the trendy stocks that the press loves to shill for. No, if I had a lot of money, I would put it in gold and property.</p>
<p>RTC: Anything left from your late jaunt?</p>
<p>GD: I invested it in long-term property and kept some of the gold. Of course I got the wedding rings and had to melt them all down and put them into bullet moulds I bought in Klagenfurt. Poor Aunt Minnie’s ring is gone forever.</p>
<p>RTC: I wouldn’t let the Jews find out about that, Gregory. They would be very angry with you.</p>
<p>GD: Well, who is to prove that this ring or that gold coin came from such and such a person? The people who owned these are long dead and mostly forgotten. So what?</p>
<p>RTC: For God’s sake, Gregory, don’t even hint at this in your books. Hell hath no fury like a Jew deprived of money.</p>
<p>GD: Well, his own or someone else’s? Jimmy and I got all kinds of gold crucifixes, wedding rings, coins and other material and I melted most of it down. Used a portable acetylene torch and bullet moulds working in an Italian hotel room. Cheap hotel and no one complained about the smell of melting metal. Took two weeks to melt it all down. Just think, so many precious memories, gone forever and all mine, Robert, all mine.</p>
<p>RTC: Well, just be discreet.</p>
<p>GD: I don’t mind the concept of screeching and imploring Hebrews so I invest elsewhere because I would mind the screeching and other problems of the IRS.</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, that would be different, wouldn’t it?</p>
<p>GD: Oh, yes. Now Atwood could get away with it because he belongs to your agency but I have no such cover. Jimmy got bagged for all kinds of thefts but your people got him off the hook…I think it was in ’62. Anyway, we make our own way in life, don’t we? And remember, we have a pool on how long it will be before the Company ices poor Jimmy for his loud mouth.</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, I remember.</p>
<p>GD: Ah, well, I am going to leave you, Robert, and go to church and see what sort of really awful pornography I can slip into the hymnals.</p>
<p>RTC: Now that’s not Christian, is it?</p>
<p>GD: Disagree, Robert. Quintessentially Christian, absolutely.</p>
<p>(Concluded at 11:15 CST)<br />
<span style="font-size: 12px;">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2886.htm#004</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9678</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 37</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9656</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9656#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wmw_admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transcriptions of conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations reveal more hidden history. This week touching upon Italian Masons, the pope and Stalin    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>TBR News.org</strong></p>
<p>Date: Wednesday, February 12, 1997<br />
Commenced: 11:15 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 11:45 AM CST</p>
<p>RTC: That has to be you, Gregory. Such timing. Corson was speaking with me a few minutes ago about you. Are your ears still ringing?</p>
<p>GD: No.</p>
<p>RTC: Ah, you are so popular. Bill was warning me that we had both best cut you loose because the wrath of God might descend. Bill has a paper asshole.</p>
<p>GD: Who is it this time? The Pope?</p>
<p>RTC: No the Kimmel people. He regularly turns his Justice people loose on both of us. I think they need a new record. The current one gets stuck. Is it true you killed Abraham Lincoln, Gregory? I mean it’s pretty well set that you are the illegitimate son of Adolf Hitler, or is it Josef Stalin? I can’t seem to remember, its all so mixed up. Anyway, you are pure evil and have to be kept away from. And do let’s keep the Pope out of this. I had enough trouble with that one.</p>
<p>GD: Which Pope?</p>
<p>RTC: John Paul I. We also went after John Paul II but that one didn’t work and we didn’t want to try it again.</p>
<p>GD: Why, in God’s name, did you want to kill the Pope? And out of curiosity, how did you pull it off?</p>
<p>RFC: The first one was going to put a terrible crimp in our drug business out of Italy and we tried to do the second one to blame the Russians. It was a sort of a game with us. Always try to do a bad bit and make it look like the Russians did it.</p>
<p>GD: The drug business? What did the Pope have to do with drugs?</p>
<p>RTC: He didn’t. It was the bank there that did. He had nothing to do with it but it was the Vatican bank.</p>
<p>GD: The Vatican bank was involved with drugs?</p>
<p>RTC: No, we used it to launder money. Who, I ask you, who would ever question the Vatican bank? It was the Mafia who had the inside bank contacts and believe me, there was a lot of money moving around. Let’s see, the Pope was elected in, I think, August of ’79. He replaced Montini. Former Vatican Secretary of State….he was Paul VI. Anyway, we had a fine working arrangement with the Italian Mafia about the movement of money as I said.</p>
<p>GD: I met Montini once, I think in ’51.</p>
<p>RTC: The new one had been in Venice….Luciani….</p>
<p>GD: There was another one from Venice….</p>
<p>RTC: I know but not the same one. That was back in the ‘60s. But the new Pope posed quite a problem. He had been told that there were certain irregularities in the IOR…that’s the Vatican bank. And the new Pope was inclined to be honest and was demanding a full review of the books and so on. If this had happened, a good deal would have been uncovered so the Pope had to go. It was that simple, Gregory. Politics had nothing to do with it, nothing at all.</p>
<p>GD: Couldn’t someone have cooked the books? Was murder necessary?</p>
<p>RTC: You don’t understand the whole picture, Gregory. The Mafia was involved in this up to their eyebrows and if any of it had come out, someone would have talked and pointed to us. We couldn’t have that. We had to get rid of Dag Hammarskjold because he was interfering with the uranium people in the Congo. It was nothing personal at all.</p>
<p>GD: How did you do it?</p>
<p>RTC: Our Station Chief in Rome ran the show. Contacts in the Vatican and especially with Buzonetti, the Pope’s doctor. My God, old Renata cost us plenty. On our payroll since God knows when. And our Political Psychological Division worked on this to put the blame on the KGB. And the P-2 Lodge was also involved and they were ours.</p>
<p>GD: The what?</p>
<p>RTC: The P-2 Lodge was an Italian Masonic group and early in 1970, we got our hands on it. It was designed to attract right wing Italian bankers and businessmen to combat the very active Italian Communist party. No, if the Pope had started something, it would have wrecked years of hard work on our part and ruined some of our more important assets. In the end, it was money, not Renaissance-style politics that did Luciani in.</p>
<p>GD: Does the Vatican know now?</p>
<p>RTC: Suspects but would rather not know anything. After the Pope assumed room temperature, we consolidated and revamped the system. There was quite a bit of mopping-up to do. We had to kill off a number of Italian players who had been pushed out of the picture and were longing to get back into the money. One hanged himself from a bridge in England. Obviously killed himself out of remorse.</p>
<p>GD: Stalin said once that it was not difficult to execute a murder but much more difficult to arrange a suicide.</p>
<p>RTC: Josef was a clever man.</p>
<p>GD: And, he said, No man, no problem.</p>
<p>RTC: That one I know. A friend and co-worker had that up over his desk. I am not joking.</p>
<p>GD: Oh, I believe it, Robert. It is lawful to be taught by your enemies.</p>
<p>RTC: I detect a critical attitude here, Gregory. You have to realize that the amount of money we were, and are, making from our drug partnerships is nothing to walk away from. Vast sums of money, Gregory, and enormous political power therefrom.</p>
<p>GD: I can see that but one day they will go too far.</p>
<p>RTC: The Kennedy business is a classic example why nothing will ever come of this sort of thing. If you publish the ZIPPER material you already have and what I am going to give you, you will only excite the conspiracy buffs, all of whom will gather together and hiss at you and heap coals of fire on your head. Let us say that you write a newspaper article on what I just told you. It would never get published and within minutes of your submitting it to an editor, we would be notified.</p>
<p>GD: And then you’d shoot me?</p>
<p>RTC: No, trash you. Laugh at you. Get our little broken down academics to piss on you. The press would ignore you completely and eventually, you would find something else to do. Now, on the other hand, if you had been one of us and had inside knowledge and worse, proof, you would perish very quickly. The faulty brakes while driving on dangerous mountain roads, an overdose of some kind of popular drug and dead in an overheated apartment. Things like that. But as an outsider, just laughter and silence. Of course, there are those who would believe you and if you wrote about this business with the Pope and mentioned some Italian names, you might get different treatment. The bomb under the front seat of your car or something crude like that. But we wouldn’t have done it and I would recommend against stirring those people up. We would look into your tax records and turn the IRS loose on you or let your wife know you were boffing a nice waitress at a cheap local motel. Or one of your nice children would be introduced to dangerous drugs. That’s more effective than a bomb in the car or someone shooting you dead in a parking garage. The Italians tend to be very emotional and we do not.</p>
<p>GD: The Italians once said that he who went softly went safely and he who went safely went far.</p>
<p>RTC: It would be less messy if they actually practiced that sentiment.</p>
<p>GD: By the way, Robert, why did you go after the other Pope? I assume that’s the one that got shot by the Arab in front of the Vatican.</p>
<p>RTC: Yes, but not an Arab, a Turk. They do not like to be equated with Arabs. That one? Actually, we thought that if we had him done in right in front of everybody, it would draw a lot of attention and we could really blame it on the KGB. It was a perfect set up. He was a Polack who was agitating the Solidarity people against Russia so who would be the most logical suspect? And we had been financing the Turkish Grey Wolves for some time. They got the hit man for us. Of course he didn’t know anything so no one shot him in the courtroom.</p>
<p>GD: Que bono! But for no other reason?</p>
<p>RTC: Isn’t that enough? Turn all the world’s Catholics against the Russians in a hurry.</p>
<p>GD: Let’s see here. One Pope for sure, another shot at, a dead UN chief, a dead American president, assorted deceased South American leaders, a Pakistani or two, at least one high level Indian and so on. I would hope not all for such trivial motives.</p>
<p>RTC: Turning huge number of people against Russia is not a trivial motive at all.</p>
<p>GD: The wheel does turn, Robert, it does. And what is now at the bottom comes to the top. Out of curiosity, have you killed any Israelis?</p>
<p>RTC: No, they know just how far to go and we work very closely with them. They do a lot of our dirty work for us. They blew up the Marine barracks in Lebanon and of course we blamed it on the Arabs. It goes on, Gregory, and if you had sat in my chair and walked in my shoes, you would be a bit more understanding.</p>
<p>GD: This is not aimed at you, of course.</p>
<p>RTC: If it were, I wouldn’t be defending you to the monkeys when they jabber about you. They aren’t worth much. I think your problem is that you never were in a position of command and at a high level. If you had been, you would be less judgmental.</p>
<p>GD: I am just an amateur, Robert, just a dilettante. Thank God.</p>
<p>(Concluded at 11:45 CST)<br />
<span style="font-size: 12px;">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2885.htm#005</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9656</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 36</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9644</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9644#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More recollections from the former head of CIA Covert Operations ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Tuesday, February 11, 1997<br />
Commenced: 9:05 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 9:42 AM CST </p>
<p>RTC: Why, Gregory, so soon after our last conversation? We’ll have to be careful or Emily might get jealous. Do you have something new for me to chew on? </p>
<p>GD: No, I’ve been working on the latest Mueller book and I’m about worked out for the rest of the day. Writing is not hard, Robert, but the research is a killer. Still, if you don’t want the rat-faced gits in your old agency or Wolfe’s decaying Hebrews braying at you like a barn full of donkeys in a fire, you have to dot every I and cross every T. Not that these chinless wonders are capable of finding errors but eventually someone might and then the jackass chorus begins. No, Corson told me my strong suit was my research and my stronger one was taking the results of it and making it readable without being a pompous, opinionated university pedant. When I worked for Army Intelligence years ago, I was well-known for my research. Of course, the whole office hated me. </p>
<p>RTC: And why so? </p>
<p>GD: Actually, because I worked on my material until I had finished, even if I had to spend the night in the office. I was known to have slept on my desk and subsisted on coffee. But the work got done and, most important, it got done right. And I never tried to shove my own views down anyone’s throat. I liked then, as I like now, to present both sides of an issue, clearly and without passion, letting the reader make up their own mind. </p>
<p>RTC: Very, very rare, talent, Gregory. Bill commented on this once and I would have to agree. Well, who do you work for now? This seems to be in your blood. </p>
<p>GD: Myself. I am a wonderful boss, Robert, really inspired and so kind to myself. </p>
<p>RTC: Do you treat yourself well at Christmas? </p>
<p>GD: Oh yes, Christmas. I haven’t had a Christmas card for years and not a present from anyone. It’s just another day for me and quieter than most. </p>
<p>RTC: I would invite you to have Christmas with us but my son would be unhappy. </p>
<p>GD: Well, thank you for the thought. </p>
<p>RTC: And how is the Mueller book coming? </p>
<p>GD: Fine, and the blow-flies from your former agency are starting to buzz around again. Let’s see how much I can clip them for this time. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, I suppose if they can’t be more creative, they have to pay the price. </p>
<p>GD: No, they would never come right out and try to communicate with me. Why, the Gods do not deign to descend to earth to speak with mere mortals. And they pay the price, too. After all, they don’t care how much of the taxpayer’s money ends up in my pocket. What about the fool returning to his own folly? Or the dog to his own vomit? At least they don’t descend to the petty and sadistic harassments that we find in the local police. </p>
<p>RTC: I would hope not. </p>
<p>GD: That puts me in mind of a sordid but highly entertaining incident in my earlier life. Most people remember Thanksgivings’ with the grandparents or their first experience in the cramped backseat of the family car but I recall more entertaining things. </p>
<p>RTC: Are you planning to enlighten me? This has nothing to do with the Company, has it? You’re rather negative today, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: I’m negative all the time. No, nothing to do with your people. Just an example of how to deal with illegally intrusive agencies. I was living in a rural area once and in a nearby town was a friend of mine. He was a gun collector. He actually collected Swiss Lugers. </p>
<p>RTC: German? </p>
<p>GD: No, Swiss. Beautifully made pieces. </p>
<p>RTC: I can well imagine. Go on. </p>
<p>GD: Anyway, he collected these and people knew about this. I want to stress that they were quite legal. The local sheriff’s people somehow got wind of this and began to harass him. I think they just wanted to frighten him and steal his collection. The police love to do things like that. When I was younger, I knew one cop who liked to take war relics like Japanese swords away from kids because he said they were illegal, which they were not. I fixed his wagon good but this is not the forum for that one. So he had vague and sinister threats like, ‘You could to prison for years…’ and so on. He told me about this harassment. He had no money and it was a rural area where there are no real lawyers to intervene so I gave the matter a lot of thought and finally hit on a plan to rid himself of the swine. Not nice but it worked. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes. What did you do? Shoot someone? </p>
<p>GD: Oh God no. Someone else did. </p>
<p>RTC: This is beginning to sound rather ugly. </p>
<p>GD: It does get that way. First off, I told him to hide the guns, the Lugers, away from his home and I gave him some suggestions. He did but he hated to lose physical control of them. Now you know, in the rural area in his county was a junk yard that was run by an old nut. He was convinced that the Communists were taking over the local schools and kept getting up at local governmental meetings and bitching about this. And, of course, sent long misspelled letters to the local paper. I didn’t know him personally but I knew, or found out, a lot about him. He shot the neighborhood dogs and cats and was, in my estimation at least, a perfect foil. My friend now had no weapons, legal or otherwise, in his physical possession. So I got the name of the chief of detectives that was hoping to add some nice pieces to his personal gun collection and I called him at home. They wouldn’t have a trace on his line then. I told him a good deal of really accurate information to establish my bonifides and then said that he also had two German machine pistols, which I went into some detail on and that he had hidden them with the owner of the junkyard who, I knew, was also a gun collector. This one was not very smart and he bought the whole cake. I waited a few days and then called the junk dealer. I told him I was on the local sheriff’s staff and we knew a gang of armed Communists were going to come out to his place and kill him. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh sweet Jesus, you didn’t? No, you did. Go on but I know the ending. </p>
<p>GD: Naturally. One dark night, two cars full of deputies, all heavily armed with guns and shovels, drove down his lane, lights out. The junkyard dogs started barking and the old man was ready. The one I talked to, kicked down his door and the old man let fly with a 12 gauge shotgun, full choke, pointblank range, both barrels, right in the face. Down went the greedy one with no head left. Reload and the one behind got both barrels in the tum-tum. Another one got it in the leg and they later had to cut if off above the knee. Screaming, shouting, guns going off all over the place, screams from the junkyard as the vicious dogs munched on deputies. My God, Robert, the neighbors said it sounded like the battle of Cold Harbor. Some deputy had a Truflight 37 millimeter flare gun and he got winged and let fly up in the air. That’s the sort of tear gas gun that is really designed to set fire to buildings. A little tear gas for effect and a lot of incendiary material. The Feds used that in LA to nail the SLA. ‘Oh, gosh,’ they say after they burned down a house with fifteen people in it,’ someone must have knocked over a candle in there.’ So one of these shells went up and came down on a neighbor’s house. Set it on fire and by the time the rural fire boys managed to get out there, it had burnt to the ground with a wheel-chair bound granny inside. Of course they finally killed the old man and all of his dogs and his place burnt down with two of the law roasted along with the old man. You could see the flames for miles. The next day, the remaining law-breakers were out there, picking through the smoking rubble and digging in the junkyard in a frantic search for the guns. Of course there weren’t any guns. And as a precaution, I had told my friend to absent himself from the area and visit friends. Of course they came after him but he was 500 miles away and had been there before, during and after the carnage. And now the really nice part. The old man’s son was a prominent lawyer in another state and I called him up, telling him I was a horrified local policeman. He had no idea what had happened so I said they had killed his father and burned his house down because he was making trouble for them. That lawyer went ballistic, as they say, and believed every word I said. And when he descended on the town, along with the FBI, I would like to have been in the civic offices. Of course I wasn’t because I am not stupid but there were copious newspaper accounts and local gossip. I know there were several closed coffins at various funerals in the weeks to come. And huge lawsuits, Federal charges and so on followed. The local law could give no reason why they raided the place other than to claim some informant had phoned in a tip. Who was this informant? No idea. The lawyer got big money in the end, people were arrested and many new faces were seen in the much subdued sheriff’s office. And I had my friend contact the son and tell him a story and tell him he was terrified for his life. The lawyer used his testimony and, good for him, paid for my friend’s exit from the area and his comfortable establishment under a new name elsewhere. </p>
<p>RTC: Probably got him under Witness Protection. That’s quite a story, Gregory, but I believe it. Your friend kept his guns? </p>
<p>GD: That was the drill, Robert, he kept his guns. There never were any machine guns of course. I moved away out of prudence about this time so I can’t tell you any more. </p>
<p>RTC: Take care of your friends, Gregory, don’t you? </p>
<p>GD: Always, Robert. And I take care of the bad people as well. Does this turn you off?</p>
<p>RTC: Not really. I see a typical abuse of power there, Gregory and I’m really so happy we seem to get on with each other. </p>
<p>GD: Now he could just have moved away but why should he have to do that? They were wrong and that’s the end of the matter. </p>
<p>RTC: I told Bill once that you should have worked for us. </p>
<p>GD: No, I would not have. I am happy when I work by myself and I would not do well in a bureaucracy. They aren’t overly bright and they love to tell you why you can’t do this or that. The point is, Robert, that you win the real battle, not the paper one. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 9:42 AM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2884.htm#002</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9644</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow: Part 35 (ii)</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9624</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9624#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former cheif of CIA Covert Operations recounts how America’s real leaders control the media, telling them what to publicise and what to ignore. And how the media obliged with President Nixon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Monday, February 10, 1997<br />
Commenced: 11:02 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 11:35 AM CST </p>
<p>GD: Good morning, Robert. What’s going on back there on a nice cold Monday? </p>
<p>RTC: Not very much, Gregory, and after a lifetime of excitement, I rather like it that way. </p>
<p>GD: Are you still in touch over there? </p>
<p>RTC: Sometimes, Gregory, sometimes. A casual conversation here, a visit there. You know how it is. Gone and soon forgotten. </p>
<p>GD: And no memoirs, either. </p>
<p>RTC: No, the code of omerta is with all of us retirees. </p>
<p>GD: But never having worked for your people, I have no such caveat, do I? </p>
<p>RTC: No, you do not. </p>
<p>GD: But Corson never worked for you, did he?</p>
<p>RTC: No, not actually. He wanted to but he never did. He has been involved in various things but only on the periphery. </p>
<p>GD: People love to dream and eventually, they begin to fantasize and after those take hold, begin to lie in public and later, in print. </p>
<p>RTC: Cruel, Gregory, but close to the truth. </p>
<p>GD: Do you know what really disturbs me, Robert? I mean the CIA people who do not like me, writing that the head of the Gestapo worked for them. What I find bad is their utter stupidity. I can appreciate intelligence, even if it is directed towards or against me, but when your people drag up dismal failures like Wolfe who calls himself Doctor when he isn’t and Landreth who calls himself a television producer when he isn’t. And all the pathetic and utterly predictable kindergarten games they play, trying to lure me into some kind of a trap or to find out what documents I have from a man they claim did not exist….pathetic, Robert, really pathetic. Wolfe is a second-level librarian with delusions of literary grandeur and Landreth claims to run a television company and actually runs a wino soup kitchen in Los Angeles. Can’t Langley find someone with an IQ higher than their belt size? </p>
<p>RTC: Now, Gregory, you are getting loquacious again. I don’t think it’s because these people are stupid but that you are too intelligent for your own good. Certainly for theirs. You annoy Kimmel whose middle-class morality is offended by your callous treatment of his station in life and Bill is terrified of you. I don’t mean he thinks you are going to lure him outside on garbage can night and split his skull with an axe but Bill is like so many other creative liars; he’s afraid someone like you will come on the scene and expose him. </p>
<p>GD” I don’t do this on purpose, you know. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh, I think there is some malice in what you do, Gregory. I don’t find you either stupid or unkind but you have a very active streak of destruction in your nature. Why, Gregory, bother to shoot butterflies with a rifle? </p>
<p>GD: Point, but then I don’t put up with these morons gladly. Now, an intelligent and creative approach might get some positive reaction from me but all of this transparent bleating just annoys me. And after I have dispatched one with withering words or, better, making a fool out of them, why here comes another one down the path, wearing the top half of a clown suit and waving a fan. Jesus wept. You know, their reaction time is marvelous, Robert. I did the first Mueller book in ’95 and just now they are starting to leak negative stories about me. Do they sleep in refrigerators at night? Slow on the draw, Robert. In the Old West of blessed fiction, they would be full of holes. I wonder what sort of attack they will try next? There never was a Heinrich Mueller? I am really a practicing vampire? I misspelled a name once so I can’t be right about anything? Do you think some broken-down academic who teaches animal husbandry at an Arkansas community college will come forward and produce a book showing that Mueller was eaten by Stalin? They did a story like that once about Mueller living in Panama but it turned out to be a huge joke. Then some senile Czech intelligence person’s son claimed his father said Mueller was shot in Moscow. Of course, when the press tried to talk to the father, he was too far gone to do anything but wet himself. </p>
<p>RTC: I don’t think a book, Gregory. And after what you did to that Hungarian Jewess in London, I doubt if any reporter will dare to attack you again. </p>
<p>GD: Fear is a wonderful deterrent, Robert. Pick the loudest of the pack, stick a knife in them and gut them in front of everybody and the rest of the piebald apes run back to the security of the deep forest. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, you don’t fit the mold, Gregory. You were supposed to turn all of Mueller’s highly incriminating material over to that jerk from Time magazine and then they would be done with you. I don’t think the boobery understands that hiring General Mueller, bringing him over here and putting him to work was a very, very sensitive business. After all, FDR’s propaganda machine depicted Mueller’s Gestapo as pure evil… </p>
<p>GD: Which they were not… </p>
<p>RTC: No, just professionals. But necessary targets. And in light of the propaganda, how could we dare to hire the man who personally shoved millions of Jews into the enormous gas chambers that could have been seen from the moon? No, a very private matter indeed. That’s why Jim Critchfield is terrified of you and wants to kill you. If it ever got into the Jewish and far left community….. </p>
<p>GD: The same thing… </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, and if it did, Jim would be toast. Therefore, you lie like a rug and no one should ever listen to you. Of course, given your volatile and creative personality, such jabber only gets you angrier and that results in more very ugly mischief. Not to be impudent, Gregory, but how much money have you skinned these people out of? </p>
<p>GD: About a hundred and ten thousand, give or take a few cents. Book advance fees, television rights, outright bribes and so on. </p>
<p>RTC: And what did they ever get for all the taxpayer’s money? </p>
<p>GD: A number ten shoe in their scrotum, Robert. </p>
<p>RTC: It seems that way. Well, I don’t know what their next move will be but I have seen this all before. The usual method of dealing with people like you, aside from the convenient heart attack or car accident, is to hire worthless but hungry scribblers to submit articles to obedient newspapers, marginalizing you, misspelling your name and in general, treating you like someone on ticket of leave from a nut house. And then on to other, more important, matters. You know, we have an entire department that invents news stories to feed to our toadies in the press in order to disguise something very bad we just pulled off. We kill the head of the UN and then start a story going about the Yeti being seen in downtown Detroit. </p>
<p>GD: That’s a familiar pattern. How controlled is it? </p>
<p>RTC: Gregory, the US government owns the press, the newspapers, the magazines and the television. They print what we tell them to and they ignore that which we wish them to ignore. We wanted to get rid of Nixon, who was becoming a loose cannon, so the press obliged by daily attacks. We kill Kennedy and suddenly, legions of conspiracy nuts emerge from under their damp rocks with tens of thousands of books filled with more shit than a Christmas turkey. </p>
<p>GD: Are they on the payrolls? 	</p>
<p>RTC: God no, Gregory. Most of these slime merchants are on their own and we would never dare to pay them…at least not directly. But what we do accomplish is to get their cloaking nuttiness published and distributed through our friends in the media. You know, big New York publishing house does a book that Kennedy was only shot by Oswald, number one on the New York Times book list even though they only sold three copies, talk show babbling on friendly TV networks and on and on. And the more the literary nut fringe sees and hears others braying like donkeys in public and, very important here, getting attention, they go at it again by proving some Secret Service agent was hiding in the trunk of Kennedy’s car and shot him through the trunk lid. </p>
<p>GD” (Laughter) </p>
<p>RTC: No, don’t laugh. There armies of the ignorant out there who believe such crap. You know that. </p>
<p>GD: Yes, I do. And since we’re on the topic, how much of all this insanity is planned?</p>
<p>RTC: Oh, we start it, that’s for certain, but there are many who carry on the good work quite for free. Actually for free. Most of them are pathetic losers and they lust after attention…for recognition…for something other than their bleak and unrewarding existence. They become keepers of great secrets, Gregory, and smug in their inner knowledge. </p>
<p>GD: They delude themselves. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, but they also delude the public which is often very important. </p>
<p>GD: Why must the CIA, or the Pentagon, or the White House, use such garbage to advance their evil ends? </p>
<p>RTC: I never said we didn’t need rubber gloves and Lysol, dealing with our sources, Gregory. But these twits have produced so much silly garbage about the Kennedy business that our worries are over. </p>
<p>GD: I recall a cartoon in Playboy. A bunch of ancient Hebrews were standing around at the base of a mountain and down the path came a man with a long beard and a little bottle in his hand. One of those below had his head turned to his neighbor and the caption said, as I recall it, ‘Our headaches are over. Here comes Moses with the tablets!’ It said Aspirin on the little bottle. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) Naughty boy, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: Here, I never did the cartoon. I’m just commenting on it. All of this reminds me of a scenario. A small child sees a stallion mounting a mare in a pasture and points to it. ‘Mommy, what’s the big horsy doing to the little one?’ ‘Oh,’ said the shocked mother, ‘just look over there, Jimmy! See the nice donkey?’ ‘Why,’ said the entranced child, ‘what’s the donkey doing to cousin Muriel?’ Ah well, Robert, in seeking to avoid Scylla, we fall upon Charybdis. </p>
<p>RTC: Pardon? </p>
<p>GD: A classical Greek nautical problem, Robert. </p>
<p>Concluded at 11:35 AM CST<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2883.htm#003</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9624</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 35</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9605</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9605#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More transcribed conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations. This week revealing how the CIA is one of the most powerful businesses on the planet, reaping huge profits while controlling much of the media and the drugs trade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Friday, February 7, 1997<br />
Commenced: 11:55 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 12:35 PM CST	</p>
<p>RTC: Hello there, Gregory. I hope you’re feeling better than I am. </p>
<p>GD: You have a cold? </p>
<p>RTC: No, getting old. Some advise Gregory. Don’t get old. The worst part isn’t forgetting things, it’s remembering. And knowing you are helpless to correct the present. But there still is correcting the past. </p>
<p>GD: Historians do that all the time. Hitler lost so Hitler was always wrong. Roosevelt won so Roosevelt was always right. Saints and sinner. It depends entirely on who wins. </p>
<p>RTC: True. I told you I once met Roosevelt, didn’t I? My father got me in to see him. Old and shaky but still clever. Phony old bastard, one thing to the face and another to the back but very shrewd in political circles. He set up a powerful movement but as soon as he hit the floor, they started to dismantle it. </p>
<p>GD: Müller was filling me in on the anti-Communist activities he was involved in. McCarthy and all of that. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, Franklin put them all in and Truman threw them all out. Most of them were Jewish so we were all accused of anti-Semitism but we held all the cards then and they knew it so criticism was muted. It wouldn’t be that way now, but times change. </p>
<p>GD: They always do and a smart man changes with them. </p>
<p>RTC: Sometimes, the older forms are better. </p>
<p>GD: Yes but people grow tired of old forms and want new ones. A revolution might mean more money and power for some and death or disgrace for others. The wheel does turn. </p>
<p>RTC: So it does. I wanted to give you a little background here, Gregory, about you. You see, at one time, these others wanted to set up a sort of private think tank. They wanted to call it after the oracle of Delphi. Tom Kimmel, Bill Corson, the Trento ménage, Critchfield and others. But they wanted me to be the honcho. </p>
<p>GD: And why you? </p>
<p>RTC: I have the connections with the business community. I could get big money people behind the idea. It was a sort of miniature Company if you will. Money and power. We always called it the Company because it was a huge business conglomerate. But anyway, this think tank would bring all of us lots of money. Unfortunately, I didn’t feel too happy with the makeup of it. Kimmel is pompous and entirely too much obsessed with his late Grandfather, the Trentos’ are very lightweight but aren’t really aware of it and poor Bill is a perpetual wannabe, running around trying to sound like a great keeper of various unknown secrets. We tried Costello. Tom liked him because of his Pearl Harbor writings but I never liked him. There was a screw loose in his brain somewhere. And of course being a fairy didn’t improve his objectivity. I gave up on John after his trip to Reno. He hated you, you know. </p>
<p>GD: My heart is breaking. I should have given him some of my old shorts to chew on. </p>
<p>RTC: Now do let’s be serious, Gregory. John was a spiteful person but I got the impression he thought you were much worse than he was and since he was hiding his perversions, he probably thought you could see through him. I think people get that impression. That you watch and see too much. Of course, it doesn’t help that you run your mouth and say terrible things about self-made saints. Anyway, I didn’t want John involved and then I began to have some interest in you. Of course I couldn’t put you forward for the group because Kimmel detested you and Bill didn’t know where to turn. He liked you but always listened to others in making up his mind. When I ditched Costello and Bill knew you and I were talking, Kimmel went through the roof. He didn’t like me talking to you and spent much time getting his oafs at Justice to ring me up and tell me how terrible you were. Tom likes to get others to do his dirty work, I noticed long ago. The Trento family didn’t know you and Bill is actually afraid of you. So the private study group for profit more or less died a natural death. I wanted to include you but they did not so there it ended. </p>
<p>GD: I would have had no problem working with you but not with the others. Bill is a lightweight, Kimmel a gasbag and the one Trento book I tried to read was hopeless. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes. </p>
<p>GD: ‘And slime had they for mortar’ Genesis 11:3. </p>
<p>RTC: Citing Scripture, Gregory? I thought the Devil did that. </p>
<p>GD: He does. Daily. Now we call him Pat Robertson. </p>
<p>RTC: Where’s your Christian charity? </p>
<p>GD: I sold it to buy a gun. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes. Well, to get back to the subject here, which is the fact that these gentlemen do not like you but I do. They have stopped yapping about you because I told them to shut up but no doubt they still run around behind my back and try to stab you in the back. Never to the face but in the back. </p>
<p>GD: Not to change the subject, Robert, but why do you really call it the Company?</p>
<p>RTC: Because it’s a huge business. We are one of the most powerful businesses on the planet, Gregory. We make enormous sums of money, have established a tight and very complete control over the media, have the White House doing as we tell them to, overturn foreign governments if they dare to thwart our business ventures and so on. </p>
<p>GD: Business ventures? </p>
<p>RTC: A generalized case in point. A left-wing nigger gets into power in the Congo. The Congo has huge uranium deposits. Will Moscow get the uranium? The Belgian businessmen come to us for help. We agree to help them and we get into a civil war and murder Lummumba. One of our men drove around with his rotting corpse in his trunk. The head of the UN starts to interfere in matters so we have an aircraft accident that kills him very dead and stops the interference. We tell the President about the uppity nigger but not about poor dead Dag. We tell them what we want them to hear and nothing more. </p>
<p>GD: And the business aspect? </p>
<p>RTC: The drugs, of course, bring in astronomical amounts of loose money. And if some rival group cuts into the business, we get them removed. Ever read about huge heroin busts somewhere? Our rivals going down for the third time. All of this is part and parcel of the Plan. </p>
<p>GD: Sounds like the Templar’s Plan. </p>
<p>RTC: Ah, you know about this, do you? Which one of the seven dwarves enlightened you? Not Kimmel but probably Bill. </p>
<p>GD: Actually no. I was speaking of the Plan of the Templars… </p>
<p>RTC: Ah, you see, you do know that. You knew Alan was an initiate, didn’t you? </p>
<p>GD: Well, not in so many words. Didn’t the Templars get disbanded for having too much money? I think they killed DeMolay… </p>
<p>RTC: Now don’t change the subject here. They were never really disbanded but they went underground. Do you know how much money they had? The French only got a little bit of it. Now let me know who told you? </p>
<p>GD: You did, actually. Just now. I was thinking of Umberto Eco’s excellent ‘Foucault’s Pendulum’ and his discussion of the survival of the Templars. </p>
<p>RTC: I missed that one. Is that an old book? </p>
<p>GD: No. Late ‘80s if I remember. Brilliant historical pastiche. Eco’s an Italian scholar and the book is wonderful although I doubt very few people in America would understand a word of it. They don’t teach history in our public schools, only political correctness. You can no longer look for the chink in someone’s armor anymore because Asians are terribly offended and you dare not call a spade a spade. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, yes, I know all that. Stunts the mind. </p>
<p>GD: It’s my impression, based on my visits to your town, that they don’t have any minds to stunt. </p>
<p>RTC: Don’t forget, Gregory, that I was in government service as well. </p>
<p>GD: There are always exceptions, Robert. </p>
<p>RTC: Many thanks for your kindness, Gregory. The Templars have always had money but they have been an underground power for so long, they are set in their ways. We are public and they are not so there is a sort of joint partnership here. As I said, Dulles was taken in when he was in Switzerland. One of the Jung people as I remember. They can open doors, Gregory, don’t ever think they can’t, but they are always out of the sunlight. </p>
<p>GD: Like the mythic vampires. </p>
<p>RTC: Custom and usage as they say. We have common interests, believe me. </p>
<p>GD: Catholic group? </p>
<p>RTC: Not anymore. </p>
<p>GD: Well, I had an ancestor in the Teutonic Knights and they really never went away. And the Knight’s of Malta still have some influence in Papal matters. Interesting about the Templars, though. I thought Eco was just a good story teller. Could be. Secret societies have always intrigued parts of the public. The dread Masons, for example. Of course before the French Revolution, they had a great deal of clandestine power in France but now I think they’re just a high class fraternal organization. Müller told me that the Nazis were obsessed with the Masons but when the Gestapo got around to really investigating them, they found nothing sinister at all. Just a social organization and nothing more. </p>
<p>RTC: You know quite a bit about so many interesting things. I can see why you got on with the kraut and why the rat pack here hates you. I must ask you please not to discuss this business with anyone. I would also ask you not to put it into anything you write concerning me. The Kennedy business is bad enough but no one would believe a word of the other business. </p>
<p>GD: I agree, Robert. But if I have to give up a really interesting story, can I get more information on Kennedy/ </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, I can send you more. I did give Bill a copy of the Russian report but nothing more. He started bragging about this so I basically shut him down. Of course it doesn’t really say anything but once is enough when someone starts to leak out material they have sworn to keep silent about. </p>
<p>GD: And have you tested me? </p>
<p>RTC: I don’t need to. You aren’t trying to make points with the bosses like they are. I hate to say it because I am friendly with all of them but they are just a bunch of useless asskissers. You certainly are not. </p>
<p>GD: No, I am not. I don’t trust anyone in the establishment. My God, you ought to listen to what the Landreth people were telling me, I want to wet myself, that they can put me on the cover of Time magazine. Of course I really believe them and I would like nothing better than to have my picture on the cover of Time magazine. It used to be a good news magazine but now it worse than People Magazine which sells very well in the supermarket check out lines. And right next to the National Enquirer which is probably written by the same people. </p>
<p>RTC: I think the day of the printed paper or magazine is dying. We still have our hand in on that game. We moved to television but that is also losing out so we are moving into the internet. But don’t ask me about that because I know nothing about it. We view the internet as very dangerous because we can’t begin to control it. Set up a few people with money and push them. Hope for the best you know but doubtful. </p>
<p>GD: The Templars story is interesting, mainly because I read Eco and know something about their early days. </p>
<p>RTC: When the conspiracy idiots babble on about secret societies, they don’t have any idea what they’re talking about. They go on about the CFR and the Masons but they don’t know the half of it. </p>
<p>GD: Did you ever read Mills’ The Power Elite? Came out in ’55 and is a little out of date but very good. </p>
<p>RTC: Can’t say as I have. Didn’t you mention this once? No matter. I might have but years ago. Speculative? </p>
<p>GD: Concrete, realistic and so on. The reason why the American public is so wrapped up in conspiracy theories is because they have lost all faith in their government and most of our major institutions such as banks, the press, mainline religion and so on.  I remember the so-called OPEC panic when the price of gas at the pump went up every ten minutes. There was no OPEC crisis but just the oil companies creating a panic so they could make huge profits. Ever notice, Robert, how the price of gas at the pump soars just at the beginning of summer when everyone drives on trips and then comes down in winter when no one drives? And how the price of fuel oil drops off in summer when no one needs it but then shoots up every winter when everyone does? Tell me, are these accidents? </p>
<p>RTC: Of course not, Gregory, of course not. </p>
<p>GD: I’m surprised that people don’t pick up on this. </p>
<p>RTC: They won’t pick up on anything at all and what if they did? A little talk here and there and they pay the bills. </p>
<p>GD: And the sheep get shorn again. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, if you want to put it that way. That’s why they’re there, isn’t it? </p>
<p>(Conclusion at 12:35 PM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2882.htm#006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9605</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 34  (ii)</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9586</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9586#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transciptions of conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations reveal more hidden history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Tuesday, February 4, 1997<br />
Commenced: 8:45 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 9:30 AM CST </p>
<p>GD: Feeling a little better, Robert? </p>
<p>RTC: Much, thank you. By the way, Gregory, I dug up the information on this Landreth person you asked me about. He used to work for CBS news and his father ran our offices in Havana. Edward Landreth. Used Sterling Chemical Company as a front. I wouldn’t trust this one, if I were you. </p>
<p>GD: No, I didn’t like him at first sight. And he got some hack named Willwirth at Time magazine to promise to put me on the cover of their trashy rag if I cooperated. </p>
<p>RTC: What do they want? </p>
<p>GD: Anything and everything relating to Mueller’s CIA employment. Anything with his new name, that is. I have an old Virginia driver’s license, a pilot’s license, an old CIA ID card and things like that. </p>
<p>RTC: Don’t even show them to them and keep the new name to yourself. The first thing they will do, and the Army as well, will be to get out the burn bags and totally obliterate any trace of him. You see, Mueller came in at such a high level and so early that his name is not known. Once your book came out, there were frantic searches of the files but they ran up against the dismal fact that they could not identify his new personality. Beetle Smith knew it but he’s dead. Critchfield is foaming at the mouth over all of this but he doesn’t have the name either. Wonderful. But take my advice and don’t give out the name. They would obliterate any trace of it and then piously deny they knew anything about it. Why not try the Army records in Missouri? List five or six names plus the Mueller pseudonym and get a researcher to get the copies of the files. Don’t use your name because you are on the no-no list now. Then, you can take the real Mueller out and toss the rest. </p>
<p>GD: Robert, how brilliant of you. I did this a year ago but I’m glad to see you’re right up on things. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, I know the name, you know the name but Tom Kimmel and Bill Corson do not know the name. I assume both of them have asked you? </p>
<p>GD: Of course they have. </p>
<p>RTC: Not surprising. I like Bill but he had gone over to the other side, lock, stock and barrel so use discretion with him. And you can be polite to Kimmel but shut up around him. Anything either one of them get would go straight to Langley. </p>
<p>GD: And the burning would commence. </p>
<p>RTC: Clouds of smoke would blanket the eastern seaboard, Gregory. Help keep America pollution free and keep your mouth closed. No, that’s not what I meant. Your mouth is not a source of pollution. The smoke from the burning CIA records is what I had in mind. What kind of approaches do they use? </p>
<p>GD: Kindergarten level. ‘We are going to make you famous’ is the main one followed by such stupidity as ‘you can tell me because I’m your friend.’ With friends like that, who needs any enemies? I wouldn’t let any of them into my house. My grandfather would have had them use the tradesman’s entrance. They don’t do that anymore. One great homogenous melting pot of proletariat idiots, ill-educated twits, liars and chronic violators of deceased prostitutes. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) Such an accurate portrayal, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: It’s been quite an unwanted education, Robert, listening to all the foolishness coming out of these creeps.  But, good humored banter aside, I wanted to discuss the Kennedy thing with you. </p>
<p>RTC: Go ahead. </p>
<p>GD: I have been reading through all the major books on the subject and here and there I find something interesting. Mostly, only personal opinion without facts. But in looking through my notes, I am positive that your collective motives were based on what you thought was good for the country and the CIA, in opposite order. </p>
<p>RTC: Passing secrets to the enemy is very serious, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: Yes, but Kennedy sacked your top people and was going to break the agency up. Self-preservation is a powerful motive for action. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, it is. We had a similar problem with Nixon as I recall. </p>
<p>GD: You weren’t planning to off him, were you?</p>
<p>RTC: No, but we did get him out of the Oval Office. </p>
<p>GD: I met Nixon once and I rather liked him. You? What about Watergate? </p>
<p>RTC: Watergate was our method of getting him out. It wasn’t as final as the Zipper business but he played right into it. </p>
<p>GD: What did Nixon do to you? </p>
<p>RTC: Now that’s a long and involved story, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: Well, since you didn’t have him killed, can you tell me? </p>
<p>RTC: I suppose so. Nixon was no specific threat to us, understand. We worked with him rather well. But he was getting squirrelly the second time around. And the China business was no good. China was our enemy and we had the best relations with Taipei….Formosa. The very best relations and very profitable. Nixon threw the entire thing out of balance and then the war in Vietnam was another factor. Very complex. </p>
<p>GD: I have plenty of time. </p>
<p>RTC: It was the drug business in the final analysis. </p>
<p>GD: There have been stories around about that. </p>
<p>RTC: Can’t be proven. We get curious reporters fired for even hinting at that. Anyway, it started in ’44-’45 with Jim’s Italian connections in Naples and Palermo. </p>
<p>GD: Angleton? </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, of course. Jim had lived in Italy as a child and spoke the language fluently. He knew the Mafia people in Sicily and the gangs in Naples, not to mention the Union Corse people in Corsica. I mean it was to get their assistance in intelligence matters. First against the Germans and then against the local Communists. Jim was very effective but I don’t think he realized that by asking for favors, he put himself in the position of having to give favors back again. That’s how they are, you know. </p>
<p>GD: I’ve known one or two. Yes, very much that way. Didn’t he realize he was making a bargain with the Devil? </p>
<p>RTC: No, Jim did not. The Italians he grew up with were not that way. I knew a few of those people through my father. He was involved in politics in Chicago in the old days and that means a guaranteed association with the Mob. </p>
<p>GD: And they called in their markers?</p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes, they did. And that’s how the drug connections got started. The Italian gangsters helped Angleton when he was there with the OSS and then later, they called their markers in with him. Not much at first but much more later. Opium makes morphine and refined morphine makes heroin. You must know that. Turkey has opium fields and so do a number of places in SEA. Burma for example. Once you get into that sort of thing, Gregory, you can’t get out again. And we comforted ourselves that the actual movers and shakers were doing the dirty work and, at the same time, assisting us with intelligence matters. Killing off enemies, securing sensitive areas and that sort of thing. Naples and Palermo to begin with and later Corsica. And then in Asia, Burma first. We were big supporters of Chaing and when the Commies forced him out of mainland China, he went to Taiwan and one of his top generals, Li Mi went south with his military command and got into former French Indo China and then into Burma. He had a large contingent of troops, thousands, and both us and the French supplied him with weapons and he, in turn, set up opium farms and we, but not the French, flew out the raw products to be refined in the Mediterranean. The weapons were often surplus World War Two pieces out of Sea Supply in Florida. As a note for your interest, we shipped tons of former Nazi weapons from Poland to Guatemala when we kicked out Guzman there. You have to understand that the Company was huge and compartmented so most of the people knew nothing about the drugs. Of course the various DCIs did and Colby, who later was DCI, ran the drug business out of Cambodia. </p>
<p>GD: The Air American thing? </p>
<p>RTC: Among others. We actually used official military aircraft to ship when we couldn’t use our own proprietary people. Angleton had mob connections and they used him far more than he used them but he did not dare try to back out. It got way out of hand but none of us wanted to bell that cat, believe me. And we finally flew out Li Mi with thirteen millions in gold bars. Flew him to safety in Switzerland. </p>
<p>GD: That stopped the drugs? </p>
<p>RTC: No, it all came under new management. Colby was very efficient. </p>
<p>GD: As a point of interest here, Robert, is that why they snuffed him? </p>
<p>RTC: Partially. He knew too much and no one dared to gig him too hard over the civilian killings he ran in Vietnam. There was always the danger he would break down. He was getting along in years and that’s when we have to watch these boys carefully. A heart attack here, an accidental drowning there. After we drowned Colby, we tore his summer place to bits and then ransacked his Dent Place address. Not to mention getting our friendly bankers to let us go through his safe deposit boxes. After hours, of course. </p>
<p>GD: Of course. You weren’t involved, were you?</p>
<p>RTC: In what? Removing these dangerous people? In some cases. I had nothing directly to do with the drugs. That was mostly Angleton. </p>
<p>GD: He muse have gotten rich. </p>
<p>RTC: Not really. </p>
<p>GD: But Nixon….was he in the drug business too? </p>
<p>RTC: No. Nixon was a nut, Gregory. A poor boy elevated on high and couldn’t handle the upper levels. Very smart but got to believe his own power. The second election, a landslide, convinced him that he was invulnerable. He wasn’t and he began to play games with China. By playing nice with them, he outraged Taiwan and we all do much business with those people. Drugs and other things. Never mind all that because it’s still going on. Anyway, they bitched to us, louder and louder, that Nixon would listen to Mao and dump them. If they got dumped, they would tell all and none of us could stand that so we decided to get Nixon removed. No point of doing a Kennedy on him but he had to go. After Spiro got the boot, Jerry Ford took over and we knew we would never have any problem with good old Jerry. Hell, during the Warren Commission, good old Jerry ran to Hoover every night with the latest information so we knew he was a loyal player. </p>
<p>GD: And now did you do it? </p>
<p>RTC: Get rid of Tricky Dick? He did it to himself. We supplied him with a team of our men after we convinced him that everyone was plotting against him. I told you he was getting strange. I think paranoid is a better word. Anyway, we convinced him that McGovern was getting money from Castro and he sent our people to break into the Democrat offices in the Watergate. To get the proof that didn’t exist. They went there to get caught. They taped open the door and one of our people called local security. You know the rest I am sure. Nixon did it to himself in the end. We just supplied the push. And Ford did what he was told and everyone was happy again. </p>
<p>GD: No wonder they call the stuff powdered happiness. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) I haven’t heard that but it’s fitting. I remember we were afraid Nixon might call out the military so we stuck Alex Haig in there to keep him isolated. Haig was a real nut but he did his job very well. And another government change but this time there were no inconvenient questions about Oswald and Ruby types for the nut fringe to babble about. No, Nixon did it to himself. </p>
<p>GD: It didn’t do the country any good, this drawn out death agony. </p>
<p>RTC: It would not have been a good idea to shoot him, not after the fuss after Kennedy. And Formosa is happy and we are happy and the drugs are still moving around, making everyone money. Just think what we were able to do with our share of mystery cash. No Congress to badger us about our budgets at all. We got billions from them and more billions in cash from the other stuff so we were all sitting in the catbird seat. Nixon was one man and he had served his usefulness. Notice he’s had a nice retirement. </p>
<p>GD: And so has Ford. </p>
<p>RTC: Ford was a classic pawn. Washington is full of them, Gregory. And I strongly urge you to keep away from this subject if and when you decide to write about things. The Company is not as keen on killing everyone like it used to be but I don’t think you want to run up against the Mob. </p>
<p>GD: No, of course not. </p>
<p>RTC: That’s a smart fellow, Gregory. Go after dead CIA people but keep away from the Mob. Got it? </p>
<p>GD: Got it loud and clear. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 9:30 AM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2881.htm#003</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9586</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 34(i)</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9573</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9573#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transcripts with conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations reveal more hidden history. This week more on the Kennedy assassination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Thursday, January 23, 1997<br />
Commenced: 1:45 PM CST<br />
Concluded: 2:12 PM CST </p>
<p>RTC: Good morning, Gregory. What can we do for you today? </p>
<p>GD: I don’t mean to bother you, Robert, but I am doing some research on this Kennedy thing and I have a couple of questions for you. </p>
<p>RTC: I’ll do what I can. </p>
<p>GD: If it’s a problem…. </p>
<p>RTC: No, not at all. </p>
<p>GD: You were telling me Oswald was not involved. Why would anyone want to stick him with the thing?</p>
<p>RTC: He served his purpose. Jim Angleton was determined to blame the killing on the Russians. He hated them and Jim was a very single minded man and very determined. I guess later he began to get a little crazy but at that time, he was very good at his job. Look at it this way: Oswald was a public Marxist. He was ordered to be a Marxist by both the ONI and us. He defected to Russia. He married the niece of a top MVD officer. He came back to the States, pretending to be pro-Castro. He lived in Dallas when Dallas was chosen to be the place where Kennedy was nailed out in public. You see, Jim wanted Russia blamed for the killing. He basically wanted to have all paths lead to Moscow. </p>
<p>GD: He was inviting a war. </p>
<p>RTC: Of course he was. He wanted a war with Russia and said so many times to me and the DCI among others. Now when Oswald came back, he was still connected and got this classified job with the photography company. We do that for our people. If we hadn’t smoothed his way, he never would have gotten the job there. But he never knew a thing about the Kennedy business. He was a very convenient patsy with a wonderful and provable background of being a Soviet sympathizer. </p>
<p>GD: I know you were a friend of Angleton and I’m not questioning his intelligence. Mueller told me about him. He personally thought he was crazy however. </p>
<p>RTC: At the end, everyone else thought so. Towards the end, Jim became obsessed with things better left unsaid. He thought the entire Company was infiltrated by the KGB and that Colby himself, he was the DCI at that point, was a Soviet agent. And then there was the Nosenko business. That was this so-called KRG defector. You see, the Russians got wind of what Angleton was up to, stirring up a war and all that, and they sent this Nosenko over to us as a fake defector. His most important mission was to convince everyone that Oswald had nothing to do with their agency and they had nothing to do with him. In short, they had no prior knowledge of the Kennedy business. This terrified Jim who got his hands on Nosenko and locked him up down on the Farm for two years. Put him in solitary and kept everyone away from him. Jim was afraid others would believe Nosenko and then start looking where they should not. Finally, and it really saddened me, Jim got so crazy that they forced him out and cut his department back to almost nothing. Jim had lung cancer…my God, the man smoked like a chimney…and I remember my last visit with him. He died in ’87. We met him at the Army/Navy Club for dinner. Very, very sad occasion. He was a great man, or he had been in his prime, and to see him slowly dying and forced out by that asshole Colby was devastating. </p>
<p>GD: What happened to the Ukrainian? </p>
<p>RTC: What Ukrainian? </p>
<p>GD: Nosenko is a Ukrainian name, Robert. Ends with an O. </p>
<p>RTC: Whatever happened to him? They let him out, got him a set of new teeth and paid him a stipend for his troubles. </p>
<p>GD: Was he telling the truth?</p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes, of course. The Russians had nothing to do with the business. They are far too professional to use someone with such connections with them. A defector, married to the niece of a top intelligence officer, spouting Marxist propaganda on the street corners? No, they would have done what they did when they tried to kill the Pope in ‘81. Get the Bulgarians to hire a right wing Turkish terrorist. Plausible deniability. </p>
<p>GD: The favorite words of Ronnie Reagan. </p>
<p>RTC: Exactly so. No, Oswald had much closer connections with American intelligence that with the Russians and we both knew it. Jim did not know it, believe me. Once he got something in his head, he never let go of it. At the end, before they gave him the sack, he was probably paranoid beyond redemption. Not stupid but very deluded. He saw moles everywhere. He thought LBJ was a spy and half of Congress for God’s sake. And his fondness for college students was getting a little obvious. A genuine tragedy, Gregory, a fine mind gone to seed. </p>
<p>GD: Male college students. Mueller caught him in bed with one at the Plaza. </p>
<p>RTC: Leave town and enter a new and dangerous world. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 2:12 PM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2880.htm#006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9573</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 34</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9540</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9540#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More transcripts of conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations expose more hidden history; this week revealing why Jack Ruby was ready to silence Oswald and why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Wednesday, January 22, 1997<br />
Commenced: 10:01 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 10:21 AM CST </p>
<p>GD: Good day to you, Robert. Thank you for the mailing on Costello. I will send you his death certificate after the weekend. Of course it was AIDS. Lee was almost hysterical when I told him this. </p>
<p>RTC: I wonder why? </p>
<p>GD: He’ll probably rush to his doctor for a checkup. </p>
<p>RTC” Now, now, Gregory. Unkind. </p>
<p>GD: Well why get your balls into an uproar when you find out someone died of AIDS? </p>
<p>RTC: There could be many reasons. </p>
<p>GD: Yes, no doubt, but the first assumption is one of personal concern, not sympathy. I understand Costello’s brother, who is in the RN, refused to accept the body. Ah well, in the midst of life, Robert. </p>
<p>RTC: Of course. Just the certificate?</p>
<p>GD: And the post mortem report. It was the AIDS pneumonia that took him off on the plane. I wonder if rigor had set in when they landed? They would have to carry him off in a sitting position. Maybe they put one of their cheap blankets over him and pretended he was a broken seat. </p>
<p>RTC: You are in a fine mood today, I must say. </p>
<p>GD: I beat Jesus at poker last night and he wouldn’t pay up. He keeps hiding cards in that hole in his side. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) </p>
<p>GD: I wanted to ask you about this business with Oswald. You know, shooting with two guns out of the window, shooting some Dallas cop and so on. Can you give me any input here? </p>
<p>RTC: Oswald had nothing to do with the business. Nothing at all. He was an asset of ONI and he worked for both of us at Atsugi. That’s our U-2 base in Japan. He spoke Russian, after a fashion, and was instructed to act like a Marxist to rope in some Jap spies there. A clever young man but a bit of a trouble maker. No, Oswald had nothing to do with it. I said we had used him once and we had a dossier on him. He was perfect for the role of patsy. Married the niece of a top MVD officer, an avowed Marxist and so on. And, joy of joys, he worked at the book building. We had the presidential cavalcade rerouted to go right past it to be certain. And we had a resource in the Cuban Embassy in Mexico who swore Oswald was in there trying to flee to Cuba. It does pay to have people in the right place, Gregory. Never know when you might need them. </p>
<p>GD: Interesting. And he was using an Argentine Mauser which magically turned into a Mannlicher-Carcano. My God, you couldn’t his a barn with that piece of shit if you were inside it. The Mauser, on the other hand, was a good gun. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes. The Mauser belonged to the wrong people so the other piece was substituted. We made sure that could be traced to him. And we got the wife to admit seeing the wop gun. Of course in her condition, she would identify a crossbow or a polar bear. </p>
<p>GD: And the Ruby business. Too pat. </p>
<p>RTC: Of course. Ruby was from the Chicago mob and I had connections with them through my father. You see, Ruby had cancer and knew he was probably going to die soon enough so he was put up to silencing Oswald. Oswald was not involved and if it ever went to trial, it would all come out. The Navy didn’t want it to come out that they hired him and the FBI didn’t want it out that he had worked for them so everyone was happy when Ruby did his deed in the basement. Of course later, he found out they might execute him instead of letting die comfortably in a Dallas hospital so he got alarmed and was trying to get out of it. I don’t know why, Gregory. He knew all about keeping quiet but he was a Jew and very emotional. Not stable but he did his work as he was told. And we had some use for him earlier over sending guns to Castro. I suppose you knew that the Company was an early supporter of Castro? Put him in place, as it were. Now that was a classic mistake. I had nothing to do with that. We spent years trying to clean that one up. Kennedy found out about our role in that because he had Bissel’s phone tapped and loose lips can sink careers as well as ships. </p>
<p>GD: The tangled web. </p>
<p>RTC: What? </p>
<p>GD: ‘Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.” </p>
<p>RTC: Sounds like Shakespeare. </p>
<p>GD: Walter Scott to be exact. Anyway, given all the loose ends, I’m amazed none of this has come out. </p>
<p>RTC: No, we had an army of real idiots running around with fifty different weird theories and stories so the public had other things to amuse and entertain them. The umbrella man, the man in the sewer, the tramps in the railroad yard, shooting at General Walker and on and on. </p>
<p>GD: The Warren Report is an unindexed pack of creative writing. </p>
<p>RTC: Of course it is. Our many friends at the New York Times have been pushing that and the really silly Posner fairytale. Well, the Times is one of our finest assets right along. Not a bad paper but they do what they’re told. And Jerry Ford running to Hoover, tongue hanging out, with the latest news of the commission’s meetings. Of course Colonel Hoover knew the whole thing. What a huge farce all of that was. </p>
<p>GD: I wonder why none of the truth ever came out?</p>
<p>RTC: Gregory, the American public is as stupid as a post. They’ll go for fried ice cream every time. And the press knows where their bread is buttered so we never worry about them. Bought and paid for, Gregory, bought and paid for. And we had Ben over at the Post to cinch up matters there for us. Very reliable. He and Angleton cleaned up some of the messes after Kennedy was hit. No, the press can always be counted on. </p>
<p>GD: My late grandfather used to say something right on point. ‘Once a newspaperman, always a whore.’ </p>
<p>RTC: Was your grandfather a reporter? </p>
<p>GD: No, a banker. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 10:21 CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2879.htm#006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9540</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 33(i)</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9523</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9523#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More transcripts with the former chief of CIA Covert Operations reveal more hidden history. This week, among other things, insights into some U.F.O. sightings and Roswell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Saturday, January 11. 1997<br />
Commenced: 2:23 PM CST<br />
Concluded: 3:11 PM CST </p>
<p>RTC: Gregory, would you believe your nice present arrived here today? You mailed it on the fifteenth and it took almost a month to get here. Unbelievable. Symptomatic of the growing inefficiency in the entire bureaucratic structure. Nice book by the way. Who was Malaparte” </p>
<p>GD: Curzio Malaparte was the pen name of an Austrian journalist named Stuckert. A friend and adherent of Mussolini. The book is a classic study of the coup as you will note. Dutton put this out in ’32, just while the Depression was getting a full head of steam, and it was decided by those in power that it ought not to be circulated so it was pulled. I got your copy from a Denver dealer and I got mine from my grandfather’s library. Very interesting, especially the business with Trotsky in Petrograd. Have you read any of it? </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, actually I have read the Trotsky section. Very perceptive. </p>
<p>GD: And be sure to read the chapter on Trotsky versus Stalin. The differences between the two are well-covered. Trotsky was brilliant but mercurial and Stalin was equally brilliant but through, methodical and far more deadly than Trotsky. In Josef’s case, patience was a real virtue. </p>
<p>RTC: At any rate, thank you for your gift. I can assure you I will read it. </p>
<p>GD: You are the only person I know that might appreciate it. I can just see Tom Kimmel with it. Never read it. </p>
<p>RTC: Corson might. </p>
<p>GD: Yes, that’s true. </p>
<p>RTC: I’m sure they have a copy at Langley. </p>
<p>GD: I don’t doubt that at all. But they remind me of a dog I had once. He loved to chase cars. I wonder what would have happened if he caught one? </p>
<p>RTC: Now, they’re not all that bad. </p>
<p>GD: Perhaps not when you were in harness but some of the idiots they have working for them now certainly aren’t worth a pinch of sour owl shit. </p>
<p>RTC: I haven’t heard that one for years, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: I’m not young either, Robert. </p>
<p>RTC: Are you working on anything interesting these days? </p>
<p>GD: Still trying to create a structure for the Kennedy business. I translated some wartime German documents last week dealing with their flying saucer program. Habermohl? </p>
<p>RTC: I know that the Krauts had one or two but the name means nothing. </p>
<p>GD: They made and flew at least one prototype but the project was just one of many at the time. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, the U.S. built them after the war. Some place in Canada. </p>
<p>GD:AVRO. The Roe Company. </p>
<p>RTC: Doesn’t ring a bell. </p>
<p>GD: But that means we did have some examples. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes, that we did. I told you that the Russians thought these were ours and we thought they were theirs. I did some sit-downs on this one. Russian Intelligence was one of my fields as you know. And we did have some of these but we used them for high-altitude reconnaissance and photographing. The U-2 replaced them so we retired them. The Russians had at one working model, that I know. </p>
<p>GD: So all the sightings were of these planes, or whatever they called them? </p>
<p>RTC: No, not all. Most of the public sightings were basically wishful thinking or mass hysteria. But there certainly were other incidents that were not of our, or the Russian, construction. </p>
<p>GD: Where did they come from? </p>
<p>RTC: No one had any idea. Of course Truman had all of that shut up to prevent another Orson Wells panic. The idea was to make the whole thing look like a hoax so that people spotting something would ignore it at the risk of being branded a fool. </p>
<p>GD: Know anything about the Roswell business? </p>
<p>RTC: Oh indeed. Now that was the real thing, Gregory. And there were space cadets on board that one. They had to clamp down on the story and said it was a weather balloon. As I remember, they retrieved a lot of electronic gadgetry that was highly advanced. They reconstructed the thing, or did you know that?</p>
<p>GD: No, I did not. Did they fly it? </p>
<p>RTC: Too complex. Do you know about Groom Lake in Nevada? </p>
<p>GD: No. </p>
<p>RTC: We used it as a U-2 base. Out in the remote desert. They have several of these things there. One is a reconstruction and another one was fished out of a lake in Montana, intact, crew and all. That one they did fly around as I understand. </p>
<p>GD: Why keep it quiet? </p>
<p>RTC: As I said, panic. The Cold War was in full swing, Korea had happened and everyone was afraid of the Russians so it was decided to play it all down. We got certified idiots on board and got them to set up Flying Saucer clubs to attract the brainless moths and kept the pot boiling. You understand that once the government decides on a program, they never change it. They never do. Poor Tom keeps thinking they will rehabilitate his grandfather over Pearl Harbor but they never will. I told him that once and I thought he’d weep. First off, no one cares these days about Pearl Harbor and secondly, once a policy has been set, no one will change it later. Same with the saucers. </p>
<p>GD: They have no idea where they came from? </p>
<p>RTC: Absolutely none. But there were no attacks from any of them and the best thinking was that they were doing what we were doing and that is photo recon. They weren’t from us because no human could survive the speeds they could move at. Flatten them out. I hope to God you’re not going to get into that mess, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: Intellectual curiosity only. What did ours photograph? </p>
<p>RTC: The same things the U-2 did. Military bases like airfields, missile launching areas, naval bases. They took some wonderfully clear pictures. They had a building down on Fifth and K streets where they processed and printed these. It was the Steuart or Seward Building. I was in there a couple of times. And some very interesting buildings out on Wilson Boulevard. Remind me to tell you about them some time. Anyway, I recommend you keep away from the saucer side. As much as they hate you around here, that would all that would be needed to label you a certified lunatic. </p>
<p>GD: Oh, I know about the official stories about me. Once the Mueller book came out, they got Gitta Sereny to go after me. Do you know who she is? </p>
<p>RTC: She’s a friend of Wolfe. I looked her up once because he made it a point of shoving some piece of trash on me at the Archives about you she got published. A Communist dyke as I remember. She does not like you. </p>
<p>GD: (Laughing) Oh I know that and note that I do not like her. When I uncovered the fact that an SS concentration camp head had been declared dead and then put to work by the Brits and later by us, she came to see me in California, with the assistance of Wolfe, and with the sole intention of getting me to say something she could use to discredit me. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, they didn’t like it made public that this fellow worked for us. The same as your friend Mueller. What did she write? </p>
<p>GD: Long story. </p>
<p>RTC: I have plenty of time and you have the happy knack of making long boring stories interesting. Go on. </p>
<p>GD: She published a book in 1974 entitled <i>Into That Darkness</i>. This work purported to be based on an interview with Franz Stangl, an alleged SS officer who ran a camp in occupied Poland during the war where many prisoners were later stated to have been gassed. Srangl was not an SS man but Sereny never bothered to mention that unimporatnt vact The book contains a lengthy section quoting Stangl, who according to Sereny’s version, fully admitted his part in the purported killings and asks for forgiveness from God and his victims. The balance of the work consists of various supplementary testimonies from former associates and family members, all attesting to the evil nature of Stangl’s activities and all clearly acknowledging his willing cooperation in a state-sponsored program of genocide. </p>
<p>Of course Sereny has carved out her niche as a holocaust writer, trashing all the Germans and she has made a nice living out of it. But this particular book shows with great clarity the pitfalls that occur when a journalist, as opposed to a legitimate academic historian, produces a work which is not only entirely anecdotal in content, but ideological in thrust. There is no documentation, whatsoever, in this work which relies almost entirely on the author’s purported interviews with various people. Stangl died on the day following Sereny’s visit to him in prison where he was appealing his life sentence. </p>
<p>RTC: I agree. That makes no sense. This man was not an SS camp man? </p>
<p>GD: No. He is in none of the official SS personnel lists anywhere at any time. </p>
<p>RTC: Did he exist? </p>
<p>GD: Yes. He was an Austrian policeman. And she must have known it because she is tied up with Wolfe who has ready access to all the official lists. And herein lies the key to the questionability of the entire book. Stangl had been sentenced to a life term in prison. He, through his attorneys, was appealing this sentence. It is highly doubtful if either Stangl or his attorneys would permit such a damaging interview to take place and to permit Sereny, whose extremist views were well known, free and unfettered access to the prisoner. There would appear to be no question that Sereny and her photographer husband, Don Honeyman, did indeed visit the prison and did see Stangl. Sereny’s husband took several photographs of him, photographs which are extensively reproduced in the book. The published pictures, however, do not support statements alleged to have been made by the former Austrian police officer, but merely prove that he permitted himself to be photographed by his visitors. By making such incriminating statements as Sereny placed, post mortem, in his mouth, Stangl would have irrevocably destroyed any chance he might have had in his pending appeal before the German courts. </p>
<p>I think it is beyond reasonable belief that such statements were made under the circumstances indicated. A dead Stangl, however, could comfortably be alleged to have made any statement that the author chose to put into his mouth, and without the possible embarrassment to her or her publisher of an instant denial or possible legal proceedings. </p>
<p>RTC: These fabricators never use logic, do they. Lie like rugs, throw in a few fuzzy pictures of Hitler and Bingo, a new Holocaust book. Well, they have made quite a business out of it. </p>
<p>GD: Oh yes, and you dast not dare question them with inconvenient facts. If you have the time and the stomach to read the book, you can clearly see the author’s prejudice towards Stangl and the system he served, but also is entirely devoid of any facts to support her thesis. She notes that a number of witnesses died before the book was published, of course including her main source, Stangl. Much of the anecdotal material Sereny had put together to support her case is of such a nature as to preclude its ever being introduced in a court of law. Several examples are set forth as illustration. </p>
<p>In one, Sereny claims that Stangl’s wife wrote her a letter following an interview Sereny had with the wife in Brazil. In this letter, which is not reproduced, Frau Stangl allegedly states that in 1945 she was interviewed by two members of the U.S. Army’s Counter Intelligence agency, and that they knew of her husband’s whereabouts in an American jail. “I examined their papers,” she is quoted as writing, “I have no doubt whatever that they were genuine.” The flaw in this scenario is obvious. It is simply not believable that the wife of an obscure police officer would have the slightest idea what “genuine” U.S. CIC identification papers looked like. But Sereny states that the woman would have no reason to invent the incident. Perhaps the invention did not originate with Stangl’s wife, but with the author herself.</p>
<p>Robert, generations must pass before the fictive is eventually weeded out from the factual, and in the meantime an appellation which has been applied to the Sereny book, Dialogs with the Dead, could well be applied to other mendacious creative writing essays that people like Wolfe, who certainly will never be any kind of a successful writer or Sereny the ideological hack. </p>
<p>RTC: Maybe Sereny…what is that name, by the way? </p>
<p>GD: She’s a Hungarian Jewess but the name was changed somewhere years ago to become more Aryan. Anyway, she published some libels about me in two major British papers. I got a solicitor in the UK to represent me and not only were the stories pulled but dear old Gitta was sacked. It was either sack her for free or I would sue the papers for malicious defamation. There wasn’t any contest. One of the paper’s editors told me on the phone that she was a nasty old bitch and he was glad to be rid of her. Actually, she mumbled away about me for a little while more until I had to take certain actions that dissuaded her from future essays into more libels.</p>
<p>RTC: I don’t suppose… </p>
<p>GD: Not on the phone. Did I bore you? </p>
<p>RTC: No and none of that surprised me. You ought to have heard old Wolfe screeching about how evil you are. He sounds like you have a picture of him humping the neighbor’s cocker spaniel. </p>
<p>GD: (Laughter) I think it was a sheep named Minnie he keeps in his garage. By God, sir, with mesh stockings and lipstick, she drives men mad with passion. </p>
<p>RTC: Why don’t you turn him into the Humane Society? </p>
<p>GD: I’d much rather turn him into a pumpkin. Speaking of that, do you know what happened to Cinderella? </p>
<p>RTC: No, I don’t. She married her prince? </p>
<p>GD: Maybe but did you know what happened when the clock struck midnight? </p>
<p>RTC: Not offhanded. </p>
<p>GD: Her tampon turned into a pumpkin. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) Such an image! </p>
<p>GD: You see the connection, in my imagination at least, between Wolfe and a pumpkin? </p>
<p>RTC: It’ll give me something to think about over dinner, Gregory. Or are you equating Wolfe with a tampon? </p>
<p>GD: Pay your money, Robert, and take your choice. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 3:11 PM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2878.htm#004</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9523</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 33</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9508</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9508#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former head of CIA Covert Operations reveals that J.Edgar Hoover was really behind the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy and why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Thursday, January 9, 1997<br />
Commenced: 9:47 AM CST<br />
Concluded:10:28 AM CST </p>
<p>RTC: Ah, good morning, Gregory. Did you talk to Bill yesterday? </p>
<p>GD: Yes, he actually called me. He was discussing Kronthal with me mostly but I think he was on a fishing trip. Was asking me about the new Mueller book…what was in it and such like. </p>
<p>RTC: Did you tell him anything? </p>
<p>GD: No, not in specific. I find him entertaining and sometimes truthful but I don’t trust him. And I don’t trust Kimmel, either. </p>
<p>RTC: Probably a good idea. I rarely hear from Kimmel these days. </p>
<p>GD: I wonder why?</p>
<p>RTC: I think you’re the reason. Bill was cautioning me against talking too much to you because it might hurt my reputation. </p>
<p>GD: I think it must be the fact that I’m a practicing vampire. You know, Robert, it’ll be tough sledding this winter. </p>
<p>RTC: Why is that? </p>
<p>GD: No snow. </p>
<p>RTC: I walked right into that one, didn’t I? Has anyone discussed the Kennedy business with you? </p>
<p>GD: Corson did, once. Said he had the real story in his safe deposit box and Plato or Aristotle would get it when he was called to Jesus. </p>
<p>RTC: Plato. That’s the fix lawyer around here. Little favors for this person or that one, little jobs for the Company and so on. </p>
<p>GD: They probably deserve each other. </p>
<p>RTC: Probably. And how is the Mueller book doing? </p>
<p>GD: Well enough. I’m starting to block out the Kennedy book and yes, I know not to talk about it… </p>
<p>RTC: Or even write something up about it. If Tom thought you were into this, he’d have his boys do a black bag job on you and get into your hard drive. </p>
<p>GD: I could put a bomb in it… When they turned it on, somebody would be carrying a white cane and being nice to his German Shepherd guide dog. </p>
<p>RTC: Now, now, Gregory, not to make jokes about things like that. </p>
<p>GD: If people don’t want me to punt them in their fat ass, they shouldn’t bend over. On the other hand, it might be an invite for something more romantic. </p>
<p>RTC: I can see you’re in a good mood today. </p>
<p>GD: Foul mouthed as ever. </p>
<p>RTC: Sometimes but always entertaining. </p>
<p>GD: I know Kimmel doesn’t find me entertaining. I make fun of the establishment and he is so obviously a dedicated and vocal part of it. </p>
<p>RTC: Everyone has to have something to cling to. </p>
<p>GD: What a waste of time. People are so predictable and so pathetic. You know, Robert, it’s like visiting your ant farm every morning and watching the ants leading their programmed lives. </p>
<p>RTC: Isn’t that a bit arrogant, Gregory?</p>
<p>GD: It’s not that I’m so smart, Robert, although I am, but it’s because so many are so stupid. Anyway, enough weltschmertz. </p>
<p>RTC: Pardon? </p>
<p>GD: Pain with the world. Burned out. Bored. Frustrated. </p>
<p>RTC: I see. When you get to my age, that’s the whole thing. </p>
<p>GD: Well, if youth knew and age could, Robert. I think that’s from Mary Baker Eddy, the woman who invented aspirin. You know, God is Love, there is no pain. They ought to put that up in the terminal cancer wards. It would be such a comfort. I understand Mary was buried with a telephone in her coffin. High hopes and impossibilities sums it up and have an aspirin. </p>
<p>RTC: That’s Christian Science, isn’t it? You heard about the Christian Scientist? He had a very bad cold and pretty soon, the cold was gone and so was the Christian Scientist. </p>
<p>GD: That’s how it goes, I guess. Now let me get serious about this Zipper business. If you want me to do a treatment on this that will be to your benefit, I need to get from you, on the phone is fine, some kind of a rationale for what happened. I mean, that’s what you want, isn’t it? To let those who come after you fully understand the reasons for your actions. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, that’s it exactly. If that ever got out, though by now, it probably won’t, I don’t want my son and my grandchildren thinking I was just a common or garden variety assassin. They should know the reasons for why we acted as we did. </p>
<p>GD: Fine. Go ahead. </p>
<p>RTC: You must understand that we took our duties very seriously. Angleton was a first class counter intelligence man and very dedicated. And he discovers that the most important intelligence reports, the President’s daily briefings from the CIA, are ending up in Moscow.  Within a week of them being given to the President. A week. And this was not a one-time incident but had been going on for some time. We then tried to find out how this was happening. A major intelligence disaster, Gregory, major. Now there were several copies of this report disseminated, never mind to whom, so in each one, a little spice was put in. An identifier as you will. Nothing that changed the thrust of the report but a little bit of spice as Jim used to say. Jim’s contact in Moscow was a diplomat, never mind which country because we don’t need to make trouble for him. So from him, we got copies of what Nikita was getting. So can you imagine how stunned we all were to learn that it was the President’s copy that was being leaked? My God. So we couldn’t just walk up to him and ask him how come Khrushchev was reading his briefings a week after we gave them to him. Jim couldn’t find a way how this was done but then we had a report that Bobby, his brother, was known to be friendly with a prominent KGB fellow, Bolshakov. No question of who he was. The TASS man here. Top level. Bobby was known to have had at least one meeting with him. Hoover was having Bobby watched day and night because Hoover hated him and wanted to catch him doing something bad so he could leak it to the Post and get him sacked. Anyway, they found out that Bobby was talking to the Commie on the phone from his home so we, and Hoover, tapped his phone. Hoover didn’t know we were doing it too but that’s Washington politics for you. And we heard, for sure, that Bobby was sending thermofax copies of this report to him. I mean, there was no question. And, we learned too that Kennedy was keeping in direct contact with Khrushchev by Bobby and the Russian. I mean they were subverting the entire diplomatic system and God alone knows what Kennedy was talking about. We had to make sure of this, and really sure. It was explosive, believe me. Jim and a few of us sat down, listened to tapes and agent reports and tried to decide what to do. I mean, Gregory, here we had our President giving, actually giving, the most secret documents to our worst enemy, a man who swore in public he would destroy us. So, what to do? Make it public? Who would dare to do this? Of course we had strong media contacts but we all decided this was just too mindboggling and negative to let outside that room. And that is where the decision was made to simply get rid of Kennedy. He was too independent, he had sacked Dulles and Bissel over the Cuban thing and threatened to Mansfield to break the Agency up. And here he was giving our worse enemy top secret inside information. I mean it really wasn’t open to discussion. You can see this all, can’t you? </p>
<p>GD: I can see your point of view very clearly. </p>
<p>RTC: What would you have done? </p>
<p>GD: I’m not an important person like those people so what difference does my opinion make in all this? I’m just trying to find the rationale. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, do you have it? </p>
<p>GD: Yes, very clearly. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, the rest was lining up the players. Jim did his part, McCone did his part and he talked to Hoover to get his cooperation. We never went directly to him but we used Bill Sullivan, his right hand trouble-shooter. That’s how it was done. Hoover hated the Kennedys;, especially Bobby and we had to have him on our side because it was his people that would investigate any killing that had to be done. It took about a week of back and forth but finally it was agreed on. Johnson was no problem. He was a real rat; a wheeler-dealer whom you couldn’t trust to the corner for a pound of soft soap. The Kennedy bunch were treating him like shit and planned to dump him as VP so of course he went for the wink and the nod. Fortas was his bagman, just like Sullivan was Hoover’s. These are people who know the value of silence from long experience. And it went on from there. I have a phone conference record which I will dig out, when the time comes, and send to you. At this point are you clear on the motivations? I mean this was not just some spur of the moment thing, Gregory. We felt it had to be done to stop what we could only call high treason. Hoover and Johnson both went along on those grounds. A matter of treason. And it had to be stopped. I don’t see this as heroic but a vital necessity. For the country. </p>
<p>GD: I remember reading somewhere that treason doth never prosper for if it prospers, none dare call it treason. </p>
<p>RTC: Something like that. </p>
<p>GD: Very like. </p>
<p>RTC: But if you look at it carefully, and I hope you will, Gregory, you will see that Kennedy was committing the treason, not us. It was he and his vile brother who were passing our most sensitive and secret documents to our enemies. What were we to do? Confront him? We’d all be fired, or worse. What choice was there? Tell me that. </p>
<p>GD: From that point of view, none. </p>
<p>RTC: We are making progress. One thing…Jim was thinking about blowing up Kennedy’s yacht while and was sailing around off Cape Cod but since there certainly would be children on board, I put a stop to that. Kennedy is one thing but not the children. </p>
<p>GD: And the wife? Our American saint. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh that one. Don’t be fooled, Gregory. Jackie claims descent from French nobility but in fact, her French ancestor wasn’t a nobleman but an immigrant cabinetmaker. And crap about her being related to Robert E. Lee is more crap. That part of her family were lace curtain micks from the old sod. The woman is a fraud. She married Kennedy for his father’s money, that’s all. Wonderful backgrounds here, Gregory. Old Joe was as crooked as they come. He was an associate of Al Capone, a bootlegger, and worse, and in 1960, he and the mob rigged the election so Jack could get in. Yes, I know all about that. They did their work in Chicago with the Daley machine and the local mob. That’s right, vote early and vote often. They even voted the cemeteries. I never really liked Nixon but they connived and stole the election from him slicker than snot off a glass-handled door knob. </p>
<p>GD: Ain’t it nice living in a democracy? So Kennedy wasn’t a saint by any stretch. </p>
<p>RTC:We can overlook all the women and the wild drug and sex orgies in the White House but, Gregory, passing our top secrets to the enemy was too damned much. I would like you to show that very clearly if and when you get into this. </p>
<p>GD: Well, from a pragmatic view, Robert, it is the very best and clearest reason for the killing. A question here. </p>
<p>RTC: Certainly. </p>
<p>GD: A plot. Good but then how do you keep it quiet? Someone might talk. </p>
<p>RTC: Remove them, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: But what about those who remove those who know too much? Then they know too much. </p>
<p>RTC: Oswald knew a little too much, just a little but enough. And he could prove he never shot Kennedy. So he had to go before he started to talk. Oswald knew some of our people and he worked directly for ONI so there were dangers there. On the other hand, the man who shot King, Ray, knew nothing so he got to live and end up in jail until he died. He knew there was something wrong but, and this is important to note Gregory, he had no proof. </p>
<p>GD: You did King? </p>
<p>RTC: No Hoover did King. He hated him with a visceral passion. Hoover was a nut, Gregory, but a very powerful and very dangerous nut. There is a long-standing rumor here that Hoover had passed the color line and that he was part black. Hoover was a homosexual and there we have two reasons to hate yourself. King was black and he was a womanizer. And Bobby was AG and loathed Hoover. He used to go into Hoover’s office while he was taking his after-lunch nap and wake him up. And he laughed at him and called him a faggot behind his back. Not to do that to Hoover. He stayed in absolute power because he had enough real dirt on Congress to put most of them away in the cooler or the loonie bin. No, Bobby signed his death warrant when he did those things. No, Hoover did King and Hoover did Bobby. Not himself but he got Bill Sullivan to do it. Sullivan was his hatchet man and we worked directly with Bill. But then Bill got old and was starting to babble like old people do and he was hinting about Hoover, who had sacked him after he had used him. No, that doesn’t make it so some kid shot Bill right through the head. He thought he was a deer. My, my. </p>
<p>GD: And Bobby? </p>
<p>RTC: That was Hoover too. It was an agreement. We did John and Edgar did the others. We had one of our men there when they did Bobby, just to observe. We got George the Greek to keep an eye open. They got one of Kennedy’s people to steer him into the kitchen after a speech and the raghead was waiting. One of the Kennedy bodyguards did him from behind while all the shooting and screaming was going on. Much better than John. They had a real shooter in front of real people. None of the questions like we had in Dallas. No loose ends so to speak. And King was another clean job. Sullivan was very good. </p>
<p>GD: And that’s why he turned into a deer. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, he turned into a very dead deer. </p>
<p>GD: And you got Cord’s wife on top of it. </p>
<p>RTC: Jim said she was hanging around with hippies and arty-farty people and running her mouth. </p>
<p>GD: Did she know anything?</p>
<p>RTC: No, but she was well-connected and some people might believe her. She’d been humping Kennedy and they apparently really go along with each other. She was a lot more of a woman than Jackie and she never nagged Jack or acted so superior like Jackie loved to do. Her brother in law worked for us and we all agonized over this but in the end, Jim had his way. Of course Cord thought it was peachy-keen. He hated her but then Cord hated everybody. The vicious Cyclops! </p>
<p>GD: One eye. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes. Oh, and like Jim, he too was a profound poet. God, spare me from the poets of the world. You don’t write poetry, do you, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: No, but really filthy limericks, Robert. Would you like to hear some? </p>
<p>RTC: Oh not now. Maybe later. </p>
<p>GD: Probably just as well. Once I get started on those, I’ll be going strong an hour later. But let me tell you just one. Not a dirty one but after about an hour of limericks, I love to end the night with this one. Can I proceed? </p>
<p>RTC: Just one? </p>
<p>GD: Yes, just one. </p>
<p>RTC: Go on. </p>
<p>GD: ‘There was an old man of St. Bees,<br />
	Who was stung on the arm by a wasp.<br />
	When asked if it hurt,<br />
      He replied ‘No, it didn’t,<br />
    ‘I’m so glad that it wasn’t a hornet.’ </p>
<p>(Concluded at 10:28 AM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2877.htm#005</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9508</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 32</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9487</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9487#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further transcripts of conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations reveal more hidden history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Tuesday, January 7, 1997<br />
Commenced:  9:34 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 10:07 AM CST </p>
<p>RTC: Good morning, Gregory. I take it you have survived the holidays intact? </p>
<p>GD: Yes. Christmas is a non-event and as far as New Years Eve is concerned, all I can say about that is that I could hear the fireworks and the guns going off for about an hour. It sounded like the battle of Bull Run for awhile. And the next day I heard on the news that people were indeed shooting guns up into the air and the spent shells were pattering down on their neighbors and strangers. What they should do, is to stick the muzzle in their mouths and then pull the triggers. Make work for the ambulance people, the medical examiners and, of course, the unfortunate ones who have to clean the brains off the ceilings. </p>
<p>RTC: So graphic. Reminds me of Frank Wisner’s end. Polly complained that the ceiling was a mess and it took two weeks and much paint to cover up the evidence of Frank’s end. He used a shotgun. </p>
<p>GD: That will do it. How did his black boyfriend take it? </p>
<p>RTC: That’s a closed chapter. </p>
<p>GD: Well, I wonder how Costello’s equally black boyfriend took the news of his lover’s sudden demise in the lonely sky over the Atlantic? </p>
<p>RTC: I was not privy to that. I do understand his brother, who was in the RN, refused to accept the body. </p>
<p>GD: Infection. If they cremated him, perhaps his boyfriend could come over and claim him. At least John would get his ashes hauled for the last time. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter)You are not very nice, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: God, I would hope not. </p>
<p>RTC: How is the second Müller book coming along? </p>
<p>GD: Quite well. Now that I have Kronthal’s name and more input, it will be a worthwhile venture. </p>
<p>RTC: I have been asked, repeatedly, if you have mentioned a second volume but I always pretend not to hear the question. Being an old man has its advantages sometimes. No, you have stirred up a very vicious hornet’s nest, Gregory, and they won’t give up until they have either run you into the ground or bought off your publisher. </p>
<p>GD: They wouldn’t have any luck trashing me because I trash right back and while they are conventional in their character assassinations, I am  very unorthodox. They don’t have the intelligence to deviate from the usual badmouthing and I don’t have the patience to put up with their crap. You now, about a week ago, I rang up Raul Hilberg, the historian. He’s teaching up in Vermont and writes about the Holocaust. Still, he’s a competent and relatively honest historian. He told me a funny story about Bob Wolfe. Seems Wolfe sent him a copy of the Müller book with a enclosed note hoping Hilberg would trash the work in print. Hilberg told me he read it through and while he found parts of it very disturbing, he couldn’t oblige Wolfe because, from a historical point at least, it was very accurate. He said Wolfe said I was threatening national security with my writings. Hilberg said that the fact that your organization hired carloads of Gestapo and SS men who were wanted for anti-Jewish activities was not national security. </p>
<p>RTC: They are absolutely terrified that if this thesis gains popular belief, they will be unable to cope with the uproar. Critchfield has been pushing them to have you shot and from my occasional, unpleasant, meetings with Wolfe, he is desperate to ruin your reputation. But I don’t think national security has any part of this. </p>
<p>GD: What do you think? </p>
<p>RTC; Wolfe is a typical Beltway boy. He has carved out a niche for himself as an outstanding expert on the Third Reich.</p>
<p>GD: Nonsense. Wolfe is most certainly not a real expert. He pretends to be but he is not. Imagine what more I could learn if I were in his place. </p>
<p>RTC: He’s afraid you will start talking and show him up as a fraud. </p>
<p>GD: Aren’t they all? </p>
<p>RTC: Tell me, does Kimmel know Wolfe? </p>
<p>GD: Oh yes he does. We’ve all had dinner together at the Cosmos Club. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, that explains much. I should tell you that you are viewed here in the FBI and CIA nests as a real loose cannon. No one knows what you’ll come out with next and the idea is to get your confidence and then try to find something on you to discredit you. Kimmel is part and parcel of this game and they are using Wolfe as the resident expert, hoping he can trip you up. </p>
<p>GD: Robert, that won’t happen. If Wolfe is their front man, they’re all in bad company. Hilberg said Wolfe was an envious phony who was jealous of everyone and the only reason he had occasional dealings with him was because Wolfe was an outrageous suckass who had very good access to the official records. Tell me about that. Wolfe got into the prohibited files and sent me an Army General Staff document listing all the top Nazis brought into this country in 1948 and to include Müller and far more. This had been sealed by Presidential order but Wolfe made a copy of it and sent it off to me, hoping frantically that I would trust him and finally tell him what persona Heini Müller used while he was living here. </p>
<p>RTC: Of course they don’t know the name. He was under deep cover and I doubt if more than eight or nine people knew who he really was and what his former job had been. </p>
<p>GD: Truman knew, and Beetle Smith did for certain and of course Critchfield was the CIA man who hired him. Other than that, I don’t know who here really knew his given name. </p>
<p>RTC: And you can my name to the short list. Can you imagine the frenzy to find out what name he used so they could purify their files? The burn bags would be piled up by the furnace doors, believe me. And then they could say very smugly that they had searched their files and never found anyone with that name. </p>
<p>GD: That’s why Wolfe has been so friendly with me. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes, he has. But he hates you, Gregory, not because our leadership there hates you but because he’s afraid you will show him up as a fraud and, more important, he will fail in his mission. He does so want to get in with the Naftali CIA crowd and he wants your head on a platter to please them. </p>
<p>GD: He’s too eager, too treacherous and too obvious to be of any use to them. </p>
<p>RTC: Don’t forget, Gregory, this is the Beltway and they’re all the same. They are a bunch of gross incompetents who are prepared to pay homage to another Beltway boys self-serving lies about their importance if you will, in turn for other Beltway boys paying attention to theirs. You know and they don’t and they don’t want someone outside their circle who is more intelligent than they are to rock their boats. </p>
<p>GD: They must be afraid the Jews will get after them for daring to hire their enemies. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, that’s true but only up to a point. The Jews know when to shut up and they can use this to pry more money out of the government to assuage their wounded spirits. </p>
<p>GD: Well, in the next book, I will have some interesting things to say. The loose cannon rolls around the deck of the warship in a storm, battering holes in the sides of the ship. If I’m lucky, maybe they’ll all sink in shark-infested waters. But thinking about this, Robert, I’m sure there are things that even a shark wouldn’t eat. Yes, I do know more than they ever will. I know this sounds egocentric but it is true. I really enjoy encountering all the experts and observing them trying to find out what I know so they can pick my brains on the one hand, and trying to get me to turn my back so they can stab me in it on the other. Why are these despicable types attracted to government work?</p>
<p>RTC: Where else would they get a job? </p>
<p>GD: Mopping up after the elderly in a nursing home or doing vital work at the sewage treatment plants of America. </p>
<p>RTC: I have some interesting news for you. I have just had Greg ship you off a long list of Nazis who worked for us plus their new names and addresses here. Could you use that? </p>
<p>GD: Oh yes, how wonderful. What a wonderful Christmas present. Anyone I know?</p>
<p>RTC: That’s for you to decide. </p>
<p>GD: If I have the original names, I have the files that will let me check on them. Müller gave me a list of Gestapo agents, and more important, the V-Leute or German stool pigeons for the Gestapo. I wonder how many of them are working for Langley?</p>
<p>RTC: And don’t forget the Army got its share. </p>
<p>GD: Not at all. Müller gave me his old Army uniform, medals and all. It’s in my closet in a bag. The same uniform he was wearing in the Signal Corps picture of him in the White House with Truman and Smith. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh, do publish that. </p>
<p>GD: I will save that for the last. I’ll wait until Wolfe and the Inner Sanctum Hebrews are in full cry against me and then put out a number of things. It would be like throwing table salt on garden slugs and snails. Lots of yellow foam and a painful death. </p>
<p>RTC: Couldn’t happen to nicer people. You remember that Roosevelt/Churchill intercept I gave you? Kimmel had it checked out and once they decided it was original, he suddenly forgot all about it. Of course it would go far to exonerate his grandfather but he will never, never use it because it came from you and you are the spawn of Satin. </p>
<p>GD: Isn’t it funny. Robert? Instead of asking you, politely of course, to help them, they band together like frightened rats in a burning barn, shrieking how terrible you are. Besides their own stupidity, are they hiding anything? </p>
<p>RTC: I doubt it. My impression is that the intelligence community does not tolerate talent. </p>
<p>GD: The enshrinement of mindless mediocrity. Burial at Arlington and a star on the Langley wall. </p>
<p>RTC: And don’t forget a tree planted in the Holy Land. </p>
<p>GD: Their Holy Land, Robert, not mine. </p>
<p>(Concluded at10:07 AM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2876.htm#005</p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px">For more Conversations with the Crow see our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?ID=15">Hidden and Revisionist History archive</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9487</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 31</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9457</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9457#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More transcripts of talks with a former chief of CIA Covert Operations, this week encompassing religion, the Holocaust and the Battle of Armageddon  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Thursday, January 3, 1997<br />
Commenced: 1:35 PM CST<br />
Concluded: 2:10 PM CST </p>
<p>RTC: A New Year, Gregory. Will we see it out, do you think? </p>
<p>GD: Probably. Unless, of course, we have the Rapture and you and I are are left behind. Are you particularly religious, Robert? If you are, I will refrain from comment so soon after the celestial birthday. </p>
<p>RTC: Nominal, just nominal. Say what you like. </p>
<p>GD: I don’t know if you want that, Robert. I have very strong views on some aspects of religion. </p>
<p>RTC: A Christmas indulgence from me, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: Every society needs a moral core. Mostly, Robert, religion supplies this. For the Nazis and the Communists, Hitler and Stalin supplied the religious themes but not here. Why is America the compost heap that produces, not flies from maggots but the Christian Jesus freaks out of absolutely nothing but pulp fiction? The Gospels are all forgeries, written a long time after the events depicted in them and they have been constantly changed over the centuries to reflect various political and economic needs. I mean, Robert, that there is not one bloody word in the New Testament depictions of Jesus that could be considered to have even a gram of historical accuracy. I could go on for hours about this subject but the whole fabric of the Christian conservatives or the rampant Jesus freaks is that their dogma is based on total and very clear fraud. The so-called Battle of Armageddon, for example, is nowhere in the Bible… </p>
<p>RTC: Are you serious?</p>
<p>GD: Look it up, Robert. Revelations 16:16 is the sole mention of it. Just a geographical name, that’s all. No blitzkreig of Jesus versus the Evil Ones. Nothing at all. It was all pure invention. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, if not in the Bible, who made it up?</p>
<p>GD: One Charles Fox Parham, that’s who made it up. He was a very nasty type who ran a bi-racial church in Los Angeles around the turn of the century before he was chased out. And, of course, he did time in jail for defrauding his flock of money and, more entertainingly, buggering little boys in the fundament. Oh my yes, he made up the whole Rapture story and ranted on endlessly about a fictional Battle of Armageddon. It’s like having the Church of the Celestial Easter Bunny or the Devine Santa Claus. At least there really was a Saint Nicholas but the Easter Bunny is as fictitious as Jesus the Water Walker. </p>
<p>RTC: I don’t recall learning about that as a child at all. </p>
<p>GD: Of course not, you belong to the original Christian church, Robert, not one of the later cults. Neither the Catholics or the Eastern Orthodox people have this silly Rapture business anywhere in their early literature. This was a fiction started up at the beginning of this century by some nut named Blackstone who claimed that Jesus was coming. I think the word ‘rapture’ didn’t come I into use until about 1910. It’s just more nut fringe fiction, nothing more. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, I haven’t had much in the way of contact with these people except to chase off the Jehovah’s Witnesses who bang on my door and try to shove all kinds of pamphlets on me. In the long run, Gregory, you should learn to avoid the lunatics and concentrate on more important issues. There are always nuts. Didn’t they burn witches in Salem? </p>
<p>GD: The same types, only then they were in power. Now they lust after power so they can shove their fictional crap onto the sane part of society. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, then, what about the ones who don’t believe in evolution? </p>
<p>GD: The same types. We have them across the street. Told me yesterday the world was only 6,000 years old and dinosaurs and men commingled in Kansas somewhere. You can’t tell these people anything. They just keep repeating that whatever fiction you go after is in the Bible. When you ask them to show you, they get angry. Nuts always get angry when you puncture their fantasy balloons. </p>
<p>RTC: And Armageddon? I vaguely recall something about a battle between the Antichrist somewhere. </p>
<p>GD: But not in the Bible. The only reference to Armageddon is Revelations 16:16 and it just mentions the name of the place, nothing about a battle, Jesus, Satan, the Antichrist or my cousin Marvin. Nothing. But when you tell the nuts this, they almost froth at the mouth. They’ll tell you the battle is there and when you make them open their chrome-plated Bible and look, they flip back and forth and get more and more upset. Of course it isn’t there so they make faces and later they tell me, with great triumph, that they asked Pastor Tim and he said it was all there. Of course when I ask them for chapter and verse, they don’t have it. </p>
<p>RTC: Gregory, a word of fatherly advise here. Why bother with these idiots? Who cares what they believe? Are they of use to you in some project? If they are, be patient and go along with them. If they aren’t, drop them. </p>
<p>GD: But they are annoying. Robert, if I told you the Japanese attacked Spain in 1941, wouldn’t such stupidity annoy you?</p>
<p>RTC: No, it wouldn’t. When I was in harness, I heard worse than the babbling of the Jesus nuts, believe me. Senior Company people acting like spoiled children because no one listened to their pet theories about this country, that economy, that head of state, that foreign political party and on and on. Sometimes…. no more often than I liked, some rabid lunatic did us all kinds of damage as witness the Gottleib mind control stupidity. People like that, Gregory, should be taken out for a trip on your boat or a walk in the Pine Barrens and simply shot. What did Joe Stalin say? ‘No man…no problem.” I often had to listen to these boring nuts but you don’t. I had to make excuses to get away from them but you don’t have to deal with them in the first place. Most small minded people fixate on something utterly unimportant and think they have discovered the wheel. Yes, I agree that religious loonies are probably the worst but believe me, the political experts are almost as bad. They hop up and down shouting, ‘Listen to me!, Listen to me,’ and who gives a damn what they think? No, I agree with you about the Jesus freaks but there are legions, I say legions, of others that are just as fixated, just as crazy, just as annoying so you would be far better served if you just shut them out of your mind and turned your talents to other matters more important. Take some comfort in the thought that just as their lights go out and the darkness swallows them that they realize in the last second that there is no heaven, no Jesus and nothing but the embalmer’s needle and the worms. Nothing. But then their brains have turned to Jello and they don’t care anymore because they have returned to the dirt that they came from. </p>
<p>GD: I agree, Robert, I agree with you but I still get annoyed. But these nuts, and you can add the Jewish Holocaust nuts to the pile, demand you do not say this or read that or watch that movie. They aren’t content to live in their basements and talk to themselves or tyrannize over their poor children and wives, so they rush out into the street and issue orders as if anyone cared or worse, as if they really mattered. That I object to strongly. I have waded through tens of thousands of pages of official German papers and I can tell you, without any doubt, that the Germans did not gas millions of Jews. What do these creeps do? They tell the archives to seal the papers that make them out professional liars and attack anyone who dares to question them. The holocausters and the Jesus freaks are cut from the same piece of God’s underwear. I think the dirty parts to be sure. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) Oh, Gregory, such passion for so little. They both think they are really important and that people actually listen to them, and even care about their unimportant obsessions. Ignore the Jews, too, Gregory, like you should ignore the Jesus freaks. </p>
<p>GD: Ah, but the Jews control the media and most of the publishing houses. If you write, you don’t get published. Now if I made up some fantasy that said the Germans burned two hundred million Jewish babies, I would be a best seller, number one on the New York Times book reviews and a great one on the lecture and TV interview circuit. Of course about ten people would read my fictions but no one would be rude enough to talk about that. Christ, most of the Holocaust books are pure fiction and the rantings about the Rapture are right in with them. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, I can see some sense here and I admit it is difficult to get away from obnoxious Hebrews but why not try? I find that if you ignore people like this, eventually, they will go away and annoy people in public lavatories. Just another step to oblivion. </p>
<p>GD: I really shouldn’t bore you with you with my own obsessions but I do not suffer fools gladly. </p>
<p>RTC: God, there are so many of them. </p>
<p>GD: I remember my grandfather and one of his pet comments to bombastic idiots he encountered at social functions. He would smile and say, ‘I beg your pardon, sir, but are you anybody in particular?’ </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) I don’t suppose any of the gas bags got that. </p>
<p>GD: No, but grandfather did and so did I. I remember once my mother started yelling at me non-stop because I had come in late from a night with the ladies and the bottle. I listened to her rantings for about an hour and finally, after she ran out of steam, she asked me if I had anything to say and I told her, very politely, that I had been tying to tell her for the longest time that she had some hairpins coming loose just over her right ear.</p>
<p>RTC:(Laughter) My lord, Gregory, what a put-down. Whatever did she do? </p>
<p>GD: She was so worn out shouting that she just stared at me with her mouth open and before she could get her wind back, I went in my room and locked the door. She stood in front of it yelling that I was disrespectful until my father came out and made her go back into the house because the lights were going on in the neighbor’s homes. I had a warm and caring family life, Robert, believe it. But I didn’t have to listen to the braying of human donkeys all the time. Just the occasional parental psychotic episode. Now they come up with glazed eye and threads of drool dripping from their mouths while they clutch at you and screech, ‘Jesus, Jesus,’ or ‘six million, six million.’ Oh how I would love to give them lobotomies with a chain-saw. </p>
<p>RTC: I don’t think you would have much luck with a lobotomy, Gregory. Most creatures like that don’t have brains. </p>
<p>GD: No, Robert, they don’t. What they do have are knots on the top of their spine to keep their asses from plopping down onto the sidewalk. </p>
<p>(Concluded: 2:10 PM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2875.htm#004</p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px">For more Conversations with the Crow see our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?ID=15">Hidden and Revisionist History archive</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9457</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 29</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9446</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9446#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transcripts of conversations with the former chief of CIA Covert Operations reveal more hidden history. This week: more on who was behind Kennedy's assassination and their motives ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Monday, December 2, 1996<br />
Commenced:  9:45 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 10:21 AM CST </p>
<p>GD: Good morning, Robert. Well, we should be having a nice lunch in a week from today. </p>
<p>RTC: I’m very eager to meet you, Gregory. The telephone is fine but nothing like a face-to-face to really establish a good relationship. </p>
<p>GD: I agree. As I understand it, you will ship your annotated copies of the complete Warren Report to my hotel and you will bring with you the material on ZIPPER. And pass it to me away from the others. Right?</p>
<p>RTC: That’s the drill now, Gregory. I have the books boxed and you may have to take them with you as shipped baggage. A bit much to stuck into the overhead bins. </p>
<p>GD: Understood. But the rest of it? </p>
<p>RTC: No, that you can keep under your seat or up above. No problem with that. </p>
<p>GD: I am looking forward to all of this, Robert, but a little concerned about your friends. Kimmel I can do without, if you take my meaning. </p>
<p>RTC: Gregory, I will be there and he won’t stray off the path. </p>
<p>GD: That’s a comfort. Dueling with the blind is not entertaining. You know, I have been doing my homework on the ZIPPER themes and if you have the time, I have a number of questions. </p>
<p>RTC: Go ahead. </p>
<p>GD: Well, theories abound on this. One says this and another says that. You have given me your background, pretty much, and I am trying to pick the wheat from the chaff as they say. Why use Oswald? </p>
<p>RTC: Obvious, Gregory. We wanted a war with Soviet Russia, that’s why we used Oswald. Here he is, a professed Marxist and defector to the Soviet Union, shooting the president. We had to establish a trail to the KGB so we got, or rather Jim Angleton got, our station chief in Mexico City, Win Scott, to work up a scenario placing Oswald in that city and visiting the Soviet and Cuban embassies. They prepared a paper showing Oswald was in connection with Comrade V.V. Kostikov, head of the 13th section of the KGB…assassinations…and so on. They fucked the whole thing up so badly that we had to drop it. Fake pictures of someone not even remotely resembling Oswald, fake stories and they were working on a fake letter from Oswald to Kostikov in which he told him he was going to become a great hero by killing Kennedy. The motives? Kennedy’s humiliation of the Russians over the Cuban missile business. Howard Hunt was involved with this and he is a very vain and stupid person. He’s a little like Bill Corson, Gregory, but you mustn’t repeat any of this. Very self-important person, with delusions. </p>
<p>GD: Won’t say a word </p>
<p>RTC: I knew you wouldn’t. Bill can fool the Trentos who are as gullible as he is phony and they both deserve each other, believe me. No, they ruined the Russian plan at the beginning. You see, after Kennedy was dead, our agency would reveal to all the world that the Russians had plotted this and then Johnson would order a surprise nuclear attack on them. Of course Johnson was a gutless wonder, going this way and going that so unless we got the New York Times and other papers we influenced, to start a firestorm of anger in Americans, that one was as dead as the dodo. We had it all planned out, too. Later, they got Oswald’s bitch of a wife being deposed and two phony Russian translators who would claim that she had seen the very rifle in Russia. Of course that was a .22 target rifle and the one we planted was the cheap wop piece with a cheaper scope so that one went out. </p>
<p>GD: Posner claims that Marina’s uncle was only a deputy sheriff in Russia. He said uncle had been a local bigwig in the MVD which was “just like the sheriff’s office.” Even I know better than that. In fact, as you know, Robert, the MVD was the ministry that ran the KGB. Did Posner expect anyone to believe that silly shit?</p>
<p>RTC: I know what you mean but of course he did. Another self-important hebe with the brains of a cockroach but a willing tool, Gregory, You don’t have to love them to use them after all. </p>
<p>GD: So the war fell through. Did Johnson get wet pants? </p>
<p>RTC: No, it never went that far. Still, it was a distraction but I always wince when I read the breathless expose in the Warren sludge. </p>
<p>GD: And there are so many theories. </p>
<p>RTC: Tell me about it, Gregory. Some we cooked up but mostly they are the work of the tiny of brain and the huge of ego. Oh yes, it was the mob, out to get Kennedy because of his brother’s attacks on them ordered by Joe, the ex-bootlegger. Listen, I know people in the Chicago mob and as much as they detested Kennedy, and they did get him elected by voting every cemetery early and often, they are far too smart to even try to kill a sitting president. We had the cooperation of the leadership of the FBI, who would have the lead in the investigation but the mob would not and if that ever got out, Hoover would have to clean their respective clocks for them. No, in spite of their hatred of him, they would never have done such a thing. </p>
<p>GD: And the Cuban anti-Castro people… </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, emotional enough and after they felt Kennedy had deserted them during the Bay of Pigs disaster, they had plenty of motive but no opportunity and emotional as they are, they would boast and Hoover’s men would have nailed them. </p>
<p>GD: And Lansky and the mob people who wanted to get back into the gambling business in Cuba. </p>
<p>RTC: The same. Meyer Lansky was a very smart man and the same I said about the Chicago mob would hold true for him and his boys. They wished Kennedy dead but let someone else do it. </p>
<p>GD: Yes, and Castro. </p>
<p>RTC: Castro is not a stupid man and even though it leaked out, on purpose of course, that we were trying to kill him, Castro did not have the connections to reverse the attacks on him. Like the mob and others, he was not sad to see Kennedy killed but had nothing to do with any real plotting. This sort of silly shit keeps the buffs all a twitter and with all of the books, seminars, tapes and so on, they keep anyone from digging too deeply into the realities of the dastardly deed. All the stories about mysterious tramps, men with umbrellas, men in the sewer, fake epileptics throwing convenient fits and so on are just smoke and mirrors. All the mob bosses, Cuban exiles, rich Texas oilmen, Richard Nixon and anyone else suggested either couldn’t or wouldn’t have tried to shoot Kennedy. You see, we had Hoover and the Johnson people in our camp. With these, we could shut off any inconvenient revelations at any time. And we have iron influence, let’s call it, with the major media so no worry there. We have various retrospective television programs, usually somewhere around November 22 each year that rehash all the idiot stories and I watch them with great humor. Beats ‘I Love Lucy’ for real humor. </p>
<p>GD: When you started this, was it solely to provide an excuse for nuking the Russians? </p>
<p>RTC: No, that was a sort of afterthought, Gregory. Angleton hated the Russians and he did know that the Kennedy people were in touch with the KGB and Khrushchev people so he went from there. You might say that Jim was the sparkplug on that engine, right along. I wouldn’t pay any attention to the conspiracy books, Gregory. You know better than that, don’t you?</p>
<p>GD: Yes, of course, but if I am going to write about it, I will have to know what others have said. And I can just hear the squealings if and when I do this. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned or a tin-horned academic one-upped. </p>
<p>GD: That I agree with but the concept of one man, Jim Angleton, having the power to start a nuclear war is horrifying to me and I assume it will be to others. This is a manifestation of far too much power concentrated in too few hands. What kind of oversight was there? How many wars and assassinations were caused by someone’s upset stomach or throbbing piles? I said this Kennedy business is a microcosm of ill-advised plots and I hope you aren’t upset with me when I tell you that I am very glad it never happened. You sent me the German intercepts of the Roosevelt and Churchill talks over their secret lines and that smacks of the same thing. Personal spite, vaunting ambition and tens of thousands or millions die. Not good, Robert, not good at all. </p>
<p>RTC: If you ever walked in the corridors of power, Gregory, you would have a more realistic view. I don’t mind that you have occasional lapses into idealism but please don’t let it cloud your judgment. </p>
<p>GD: It’s a little like doing the breast stroke in a septic tank. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 10:21 AM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2872.htm#006</p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px">For more Conversations with the Crow see our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?ID=15">Hidden and Revisionist History archive</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9446</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 30</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9435</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9435#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further transcripts of conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Thursday, December 19, 1996<br />
Commenced: 12:12 PM CST<br />
Concluded: 12:38 PM CST </p>
<p>GD: Mrs. Crowley? This is Gregory. Is Robert able to come to the phone? </p>
<p>EC: Yes, dear, he’s much better now. I’ll get him for you. He’s trying to take it easy. </p>
<p>GD: If it’s any problem… </p>
<p>EC: No, no, I’m sure he’ll want to talk to you. Just a moment. </p>
<p>RTC: Gregory? Good to hear from you. I’m really sorry I couldn’t make it to the lunch. Pneumonia got me at the last minute. Did everything go OK? I haven’t heard a word from Kimmel and Bill’s wife is having some kind of medical problems of her own. </p>
<p>GD: It went off fine. A little bizarre if you ask me. By the way, I got the books and I have been going through them. I can certainly use some of your comments later on. Such a compilation of feces. </p>
<p>RTC: Welcome to Washington. Had you ever met Kimmel? I know you never met Bill before. </p>
<p>GD: No, I never had. He’s physically impressive and I’m sure he knows it. Bill looked like I expected him to. I was sitting in the lobby waiting for three people I had never seen and finally in came those two. They walked right by me and were standing in the center of the hallway, you know the one with the library door on the right? </p>
<p>RTC: Right. </p>
<p>GD: I didn’t see a third person, a tall man with a cane, so I walked up to them and introduced myself. That’s when I learned you had gone to hospital. We stood there making small talk and then went in to lunch. I had crab cakes, which I am very fond of, and they proceeded to impress everyone the table with their knowledge. We had just gotten past Pearl Harbor Day and that was the main theme. Kimmel on my left and Corson on my right, talking back and forth like two Irish maids over the back fence. Corson telling Kimmel about some secret person he met who knew all about the Roosevelt conversations with Churchill and Kimmel all rapt attention. I have to say I didn’t believe a word of it but Kimmel certainly did. These people do love to go on. </p>
<p>RTC: Did they ask you anything? </p>
<p>GD: Not that I recall. I think they talked more to the waiter than they did to me. </p>
<p>RTC: That’s unfortunate. Again, I’m sorry I missed you. I’m sure we can get together sometime in the future. Was the food good? </p>
<p>GD: Certainly it was. Of course, if you had come, it might have been a little awkward if we wanted to talk. Then, they would both have shut up and turned on their tape recorders. Kimmel did ask me if I spoke very much with you, how often and what did we talk about? </p>
<p>RTC: What did you say? Bill will be asking me. </p>
<p>GD: Trust is wonderful, Robert. I just said that we spoke on and off and my, how good the crab cakes were and how was the campaign going to get the Admiral back his stars? Kimmel went off on that subject but I can’t remember much of it. They have has much chance of rehabilitating Grandpa as they do of finding the Lost Dutchman Mine but I was not asked for any kind of opinion. I have a feeling that they were greatly honoring me with their presences and I could just sit there, basking in the warm glow from two, count them Robert, two suns. And eating crab cakes while getting a psychic tan. </p>
<p>RTC: No mention of Kennedy? </p>
<p>GD: Now that you mention it, yes there was. Corson asked me if we ever talked about that subject and I managed to look surprised. I said that it had never come up and then Corson said, with a really superior smirk, that when he died, the real truth would come out. It seems he had it in his deposit box. Before I could fall on the floor in awe, he smiled, held up his hand and told me that it was just too sensitive to talk about. He likes people to know that he is conversant with very significant information, given in confidence to him by very important, but unnamed people. I acted awed and they went back to impressing each other. I don’t remember the dessert. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof, Robert.  </p>
<p>RTC: I understand from one of my friends that Langley is getting quite annoyed with your book. Tell me, have…or rather has, anyone contacted you about this? About any proof about this you might have?</p>
<p>GD: Oh, God yes, Robert. Some weasel is always calling me on my unlisted number. It’s the same silly crap every time. ‘Oh Mr. Douglas, my name is Roger Tinkle and I was really thrilled by your book on Heinrich Mueller. A friend of mine is working on another book on him too. He is so excited. Do you think we might come and visit with you? Timmy can bring some documents he has that might be of use to you…by the way, are you going to write another book? When can we come?’ </p>
<p>RTC: Pitiful. The staff there has gotten much worse than when I was working. And what do you do? </p>
<p>GD: I would like to invite them over, receive a box of cheap candy as a token of their esteem, whack them over the heads with a croquet mallet, drag them into the garden and shove them into a wood chipper, one at a time of course, and mulch the garden. Of course I can’t do any of this but one can dream. What do I do with these idiot approaches? Tell them to bend over and I’ll drive them home? That would be very rude. No, I act thrilled and I always say that I’m expecting a Russian journalist any day and he, too, wants to see the documents so perhaps we can wait until after he and his photographer leave. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) My, my, that ought to pop the pucker string. </p>
<p>GD: (Laughter) No doubt it does. But think about that for a moment, Robert. The pucker string pops in their office, not my living room. Then it becomes their janitor’s problem, not mine. Listen, while you were incapacitated, I came across a book by someone named Peter Dale Scott. Is he one of yours?</p>
<p>RTC: Why do you ask? </p>
<p>GD: Well, he drags in every silly story I have ever heard. He takes a placid, clear pond and dumps two garbage cans of trash into it. You can’t see the bottom of the pond anymore and the flies are buzzing all over the place. By the garbage I mean the silly stories about men with umbrellas, the grassy knoll, Ruby’s dog, mysterious men in black underwear meeting in a pub in Philly, sabot shells and all the rest of the idiot crap. And by the flies, I mean the airheads who call themselves ‘researchers’ who swarm around like blowflies on pig shit with about as many brains. But what is really funny about this book…it’s on the table here…’Deep Politics and the Death of JFK’ published…oh here we go, the University of California. My, my, and I always thought they put out worthwhile books. But what is really funny is that the author solemnly talks about Occam’s Razor. He said, Occam did,‘entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,’ which translates into:  entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity. Are you into Latin, Robert? </p>
<p>RTC: Not really but you seem to be. </p>
<p>GD: I’m fluent in ten languages, Robert. My sister knows twelve but she can’t say ‘no’ in any of them. The original good time that’s been had by everybody. Anyway, Occam is dead on. If you take a complex subject like the Kennedy killing, strip away all the silly shit, you will find the answers you need. I think this Scott fellow stuck that in to impress people. Of course he went right on to violate the concept so I doubt if he had any idea what he was talking about. So few of them really do. I had to stop reading about every third page because I was laughing so loud. He, in essence, covers himself with his own confusion, as with a mantle. </p>
<p>RTC: Is that Occam? </p>
<p>GD: No, Psalm 109, verse 29. There are so many nice things in the Bible. Nice to quote but as history, as worthless as most of the Kennedy books. Apropos of nothing, speaking of worthlessness, do read some of James Montgomery Burns’ books sometime. He thinks the sun radiated out of Roosevelt’s raddled anus. Burns must have taught Posner his tricks. And if you want to read a really important book, read ‘The True Believer’ by Hoffer. A wonderful book, Robert. I met the man at a book signing at Paul Elder’s in the City once and paid him several visits later. It’s about fanatics and I highly recommend it. Or, if you want to go to sleep, read Hermann Hesse. He could put a speed freak to sleep. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, the body of literature on Kennedy is, as you said, full of yesterday’s dinner but we like it that way and, in point of fact, we have paid for some of it. We got Posner to whore for us and a number more but this Scott is not a name I recognize. </p>
<p>GD: But he, his wife and his cousin do. I am certain of that. You know, Robert, I like the outdoors because there are so few people around. I love the forest and every time I read these essays in mendacity, sired by broke-backed academics, I think of all the beautiful trees that were sacrificed for such a worthless cause. That’s a terrible cross for the CIA to bear, along with, naturally, all the killings and disruptions they fathered. No offence meant to you, of course. </p>
<p>RTC: Sometimes you are not kind, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: Sometimes? Always. Emily said you were resting. Am I keeping you up? </p>
<p>RTC: Not at all. I’m just a little worn out, that’s all. You did get the books? Good. I think you’ll find some interesting notes scattered around in it. And speaking of idiots calling you, I’m going to send you a computer printout with the names of thousands of people like the ones you are talking about. Thousands. Alphabetically listed. I used my own lists and the AFIO lists to put it together. And if someone rings you up and pulls that silly crap on you, you can look them up in the list immediately. </p>
<p>GD: I appreciate that, Robert. Can I publish that? </p>
<p>RTC: I would rather you did not, Gregory. It might stunt a career or two, especially in the media. </p>
<p>GD: They’re stunted to begin with. My late Grandfather, of blessed memory, once said that ‘once a newspaperman always a whore.’ </p>
<p>RTC: That’s hardly a constructive thing to say to an impressionable child, do you think? </p>
<p>GD: I told my son that once and now he’s working for a newspaper. They always defy the father, don’t they? </p>
<p>RTC: Not always. </p>
<p>GD: Well, listen, Robert, I am sorry I missed you but I am happy I can talk with you still. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes. I still have my case with all the Kennedy material in it. I will have it sent to you when I can find the right person to do it for me. </p>
<p>GD: Thank you very much, Robert, and in advance. If it’s as interesting as the annotated Warren Report, I can write a best-seller. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 12:38 PM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2873.htm#004</p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px">For more Conversations with the Crow see our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?ID=15">Hidden and Revisionist History archive</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9435</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 28</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9379</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9379#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More conversations the former head of CIA Covert Operations, transcribed in 1996 they contain some prophetic insights into what David Irving was subsequently to undergo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Friday, November 29, 1996<br />
Commenced: 8:45 AM CST<br />
Concluded: 9:22 AM CST </p>
<p>RTC: How are you today, Gregory? </p>
<p>GD: Been up since six working on the next Mueller book. Working on the concentration camp business. </p>
<p>RTC: A sensitive and profitable subject. For the same people. My God, what a money-maker that one is! </p>
<p>GD: Tell me about it. An established writer like Irving could never approach it. If he did, the Jews would go for his throat. Or his back more like it. Did you have many dealings with them? </p>
<p>RTC: As individuals or as professional agents? </p>
<p>GD: Either. </p>
<p>RTC: I have to tell you, Gregory, that I do not like Jews very much and I do not trust any of them. I know a few as individuals and some as agents. Jim loved them and spent half his time sucking up to the Mossad creeps. It bothered me because they were using him but Jim loved flattery and ate it up. I don’t and I’m an Irish Catholic boy from Chicago. Jim was part Mexican and maybe that was part of it. Anyway, with Jews, it’s take, take and never give. You can’t trust any of them to the corner for a pound of soft soap. </p>
<p>GD: I don’t get involved but I have had bad experiences with them. Always watch your back around them has been my experience. </p>
<p>RTC: I have a report for you made for the UN in ’48 listing all their crimes against the Palestinian. The abused child becomes the abusing parent. My God, those filthy Polacks did terrible, vicious things to the Arabs. Murdered them, poisoned their farm wells, killed their animals and finally slaughtered whole villages of them, women and children. The Jews claim they own the Holy Land but these are Polack Jews and had nothing to do with Palestine. The Russian Jews are the same breed and Stalin, who really hated Jews, used them to butcher Russian Christians whom they hated. And then Josef planned to kill off all the Jews in Moscow. </p>
<p>GD: What about that? </p>
<p>RTC: Round them all up, put them in boxcars and ship them off to Siberia in mid-winter. He planned to slaughter all of them. And after all the filthy work they did for him too! An ungrateful but realistic man. </p>
<p>GD: Why was this turn-about? He loved Jews, didn’t he? </p>
<p>RTC: No, he did not. Josef was far-sighted and knew, and said, that Jews had no loyalty to anyone except themselves. They hate all other people and feel that anything they do to them is justified. They claim centuries of persecution as their excuse. </p>
<p>GD: Yes, isn’t it odd that over thousands of years, everyone has persecuted the poor Jews. One wonders why. </p>
<p>RTC: Why? They burrow into the machinery of the state and the banking system and eventually take it over. And then, always, the locals get after them and either set them on fire or drive them out of their area or country. This has been going on for many centuries. One could say that the Jews of the world have been very unlucky or people know what they’re doing when they pile up wood for the burning pyres or set up camps. </p>
<p>GD: The stories about gassed millions is hysterically funny. Puts me in mind of the stories about the Easter Bunny or the Second Coming. Useful lies for children on one hand and a means to get money out of the suckers who actually believe the silliness about the Rapture, the Battle of Armageddon and other idiotic legends. Barnum was right. </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, he was. And I once looked into the camp story just because I could. There is much on this issue at the National Archives but most people can’t see it. </p>
<p>GD: Why not? </p>
<p>RTC: The Jews don’t want you to see any this. It would destroy the myth of vast gas chambers and soap factories. My God, Gregory, the Jews make enormous sums of money off these made-up stories. I can just hear some raddled Jewess moaning in a furniture store about how her whole family was gassed and can she get 50% off on that chair? Oh yes, I know all about such creatures. And now, the Mossad wants us to hunt down people they don’t like, or send them confidential files on people they want to blackmail. They robbed and murdered the Arabs so they have to hate them to justify their filthy behavior. The Arabs outnumber them 20 to 1 but the Israelis have us behind them so they literally can get away with murder. And how do they have our support? By working their way into the system, by owning most of the media, by bribery and blackmail, by political pressure. I could go on for days but I just ate breakfast and I don’t want to vomit onto my lap. </p>
<p>GD: I knew the Polish Jews in Munich after the war. Jesus H. Christ, Robert, I have never seen such really terrible people in my life. They were all up on the Muehl Strasse and going there to buy cheap butter for my friends was quite an experience. It was like tip toeing into a den of circling hyenas. I was always neutral as far as Jews were concerned but my experiences there radically altered my views. They were DPs. Displaced Persons. Couldn’t go back to Poland where the locals would have shoved them into barns and set them on fire. The Germans got blamed for much of that but it was the local Poles who snuffed all the Jews in the neighborhood once their central government fell apart in ’39. A friend of mine was a Major in the thirty seventh infantry and he said the Poles would round up all the Jews and barbecue them. Said some of the villages smelt like a badly-vented crematorium. And of course they got the blame for it. Well, they lost so they can expect this. I once bought a German steel helmet at a flea market in Germany and I was carrying it down the street under my arm and some old hag came up behind me, screeching like a wet pea hen. There was no one around so I bashed her on the head with the pot until she shut up. Had to wash the helmet off later. It looked like pink oatmeal on part of it. </p>
<p>RTC: Bravo. I suppose she was dead, Gregory? </p>
<p>GD: I didn’t stop to examine her but she had certainly shut up. </p>
<p>RTC: I suppose she was a Jew. </p>
<p>GD: I didn’t care who she was. She could have been anyone and I would have shut her up regardless. </p>
<p>RTC: You are certainly not a nice person at times. </p>
<p>GD: Oh, I love that, Robert. If I were in your house for dinner, I assure you my manners would be impeccable. But we digress. Can we find out more about that business you people had with the French getting us into Vietnam? </p>
<p>ERTC: I wrote on that, Gregory. I ought to send you my manuscript some day. I can’t publish it because I signed a pledge to never publish without permission and I am sure it would never be given. I know all about that slaughterhouse, believe me. A nation steeped in blood. Terrible business. Wars for nothing and when Kennedy tried to get out, that was one of the reasons he got killed. Too much money to be made in a war. It ruined Johnson. No chance of getting reelected. MacNamera thought he could apply business norms to a military business and he went as well. Probably be made the head of a think tank. My God, what a misnomer. ‘Think tank’ my ass. Bunch of loud-mouthed idiots running around babbling as if anyone cared what they thought about unimportant things. “I think…” is one of the worst openings for any kind of a conversation. Run into these congenital assholes at any Beltway social function and especially in the CIA circles. I say, who gives a damn what you think? </p>
<p>GD: I’ve been to Beltway functions, Robert. My God, if we could somehow trap all the hot air these methane monsters create, we could heat New York for ten years. Don’t light any matches and breathe very shortly but the gas is tremendous. “I think…?” I doubt it. Most of these self-important cow anuses should join hands and jump off the Key Bridge in the middle of winter. Right through the ice and then blessed silence. Downriver, however, all the marine life dies a terrible death. </p>
<p>RTC: (Laughter) Ah, well, it won’t happen. One day a Jew will sit in the Oval Office and on that day, we will drop atom bombs on anyone Tel Aviv doesn’t like.<br />
GD: Where is Genghis Kahn now that we need him? </p>
<p>RTC: Lee Harvey Oswald would be more to the point. </p>
<p>Concluded at 9:22 Am CST<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2871.htm#007 </p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px">More Conversations with the Crow can be found in our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?ID=15">archive of Hidden and Revisionist History</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9379</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 27</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9356</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9356#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transcripts of conversations with the former head of CIA Covert Operations provide more insights into hidden history. This week: more on Kennedy’s assassination and how Stalin was actually poisoned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Tuesday, November 26, 1996<br />
Commenced:  1:45 PM CST<br />
Concluded:  2:16 PM CST </p>
<p>GD: Good morning, Robert. Well, I have all my reservations lined up and we should be getting together on the 9th of December. I have hotel reservations and it isn’t too far to the University Club but I’ll take a cab. About noon? </p>
<p>RTC: Yes, that’s the drill. Now, look, Gregory, if you get there early and then Kimmel and Bill are there, be polite but non-committal with both of them. I should be on time but one never knows. Kimmel is looking for any way to discredit you so be very careful with him. Have you ever met him before? </p>
<p>GD: No, just talked on the phone. </p>
<p>RTC: A tall blonde fellow, a little past his prime but an impressive type. Has a deep, well-regulated voice and likes to overawe people. You won’t be overawed, will you?</p>
<p>GD: I doubt it. I am sure Mueller was twice the man Kimmel is and Heini never overawed me. We got along fine on those grounds. </p>
<p>RTC: Look, can you tell me the name of your hotel?<br />
GD: Certainly. It’s the Capitol Hill Suites. The phone number there is…just a second….202 543-6000 and my reservation number is C 1820CE8. I’ll be checking in on Saturday afternoon and I have a lunch date with Willis Carto on Sunday. He is doing a piece in his paper on the Mueller books and wants to do an interview. </p>
<p>RTC: Fine. OK, here’s what I have in mind. I have all the Warren Commission books, all 26 or so volumes. I have gone through every one of them and made notes all over the pages. You can read my writing very clearly. I have marked up all the irrelevant material, the fake material and the factual material. I think when you come to write about the ZIPPER business, this will be of great help to you. I will have them delivered to you in a sealed box over the weekend. And whatever you do, do not mention this to either Tom or Bill. Just leave the box sealed and take it back with you on the plane. When are you leaving to go back? </p>
<p>GD: The 10th. </p>
<p>RTC: Fine. And I have put together a big packet of material on the ZIPPER business that I will put into a briefcase and bring with me to the Club. After lunch, we can go somewhere and I can give it to you. Everything you want is in there, all original papers, notes, transcriptions and so on. But remember your promise to keep this under your hat until after I’m gone.  For some odd reason, Bill and Trento think they are going to get their hands on all this. I never made any concrete promises but when people pester me, I give satisfactory but non-binding comments. None of them would dare to publish a word of any of this and I know you will. I did give Bill a copy, but only a copy, of the Driscoll report and he thinks he has the world by the balls. Anyway, talk about Pearl Harbor and keep Tom happy. Also, try to keep your discussion of Mueller to a bare minimum. Tom is hot on Pearl but everyone else wants to find out about Mueller. What can you prove, what evidence, if any, do you have of his working for us and so on. I’ve warned you before on all of this but just be vague and go off on a story. But for God’s sake, don’t tell them stories about soap in the soup or things like that. Kimmel has no sense of humor and would try to accuse you of mass poisonings or something. Bill just talks too much. </p>
<p>GD: I appreciate the confidence but since the Mueller book came out, I’ve been bombarded with requests from broken down academics to stop by with their friend, Willy, just to look at my precious documents. I don’t know where they find these people, Robert, but they do not engender any confidence in our precious government. They should really keep their mouths closed or all the flies will get out. No, childish games like that go nowhere. What about the Kennedy buffs, as they call them? </p>
<p>RTC: Almost all of that is in the package for you. You see, we set up a disinformation group to spread confusion and to distract anyone from digging too deeply. You know, the man with the umbrella, the man in the storm drains, the wandering people in the train yards, the third figure on the sixth floor of the book building, Hoover on the roof of a building along with Nixon and the Hunt brothers. And a fake Oswald renting a car or buying a gun. Not to mention the really bad stories, which Hunt made up, of Oswald in Mexico City. God, reams of paper with no end. The truth, which is all there, is much more simple. </p>
<p>GD: Question, Robert. This business with Ruby. Was he involved? </p>
<p>RTC: Well, yes. The Chicago mob, with whom I have family connections, got him to do a job on Oswald. That was a setup. You see, Oswald had nothing to do with the business but was involved in other things for us. If he came to trial, very ugly things could have come out and we couldn’t control a courtroom scene. Better to insure it never went that far. </p>
<p>GD: And Ruby? </p>
<p>RTC: The locals were going to try him and he was starting to sweat the electric chair so he threatened to talk. </p>
<p>GD: But he died in jail. Did you get to him in there? </p>
<p>RTC: Certainly. Ruby died of rampant cancer. As you are aware, Gregory, we can give people fatal heart attacks and cancer is only a little more difficult and problematical. A medical examination, an injection with cells and so on. Ask a good oncologist. It is possible to do this. It takes more time but what did Ruby have? There was no immediate danger of him blabbing so we pacified him with stories of last minute rescues and let him die. </p>
<p>GD: I was watching the telly and I saw them bring out the rifle. I know a great deal about guns, Robert, and they showed very clear shots of it. Besides, the local cop who found it ran a gun shop and he must have known it was an Argentine Mauser and not a worthless Carcano 6.5mm. Why did they make the change? </p>
<p>RTC: As I recall it, they had ordered the smaller piece through the mail to a fake PO box in Oswald’s fake name. Oswald worked for ONI and used several names. </p>
<p>GD: Not the FBI? </p>
<p>RTC: Oh, no, the ONI. These people won’t allow their people to work for another agency. </p>
<p>GD: Just a point or two. These fake stories….how many of them are yours?</p>
<p>RTC: Gregory, when such things happen and cannot be instantly clarified, the lunatic fringe leaps up waving their arms with all kinds of strange stories. We have the Farrell woman who is their top librarian and we can plant any kind of a distraction we want but actually, most of the distractions are from the fertile imaginations of self-important people. The Russians must have had a wonderful time with all of this smoke and mirrors. After all, we used Oswald solely because of his Russian connections. We felt it would point right back to them again. We got two birds with one stone. But then the nuts were more interested in people with umbrellas and so on so we stopped pushing the Russian connection. Yes, Lee was in Russia and yes, he was working for the ONI. The Atsugi connection was what got their attention. Oswald was very smart but very abrasive and I notice his wife was the niece of a top MVD man. Figure that one out. Anyway, they are relieved. And besides, if they ever got their hands on ZIPPER, they would make hay. We have to be a little careful here because of the Stalin business. You see, L.P. Beria, their intelligence chief, had come over to our side in the early ‘50s. He built their atomic program but Stalin was getting senile and very dangerous. Beria knew his days were numbered so he made contact with us and agreed to work with us. Shutting off the cold war, getting Russian troops out of the DDR and so on. This progressed and as he grew more desperate with his sinking star, we hit on the idea of getting rid of Comrade Stalin and setting Beria up in his place. Old L.P. was a sex fiend and loved little girls and boys so it was no problem to keep him line. And of course the Jewish business cropped up. Stalin used Jews but he hated them and was, in his increasing madness, planning to exterminate them like he had exterminated so many others. Beria was Jewish as was Molotov’s wife so there was general fear that the axe could fall on all of them. </p>
<p>GD: Fouche used this ploy to bring down Robespierre. ‘Oh, you are on the death list’ and so on. </p>
<p>RTC: I didn’t know about that. </p>
<p>GD: There is no new thing under the sun, Robert. How did they kill Stalin? I assume he was well guarded. </p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes, and paranoid as hell. We got some rat poison that works on the blood. What… </p>
<p>GD: Wafrarin. </p>
<p>RTC: Something like that. Got it from people in Wisconsin. Anyway, Beria slipped it into Joe’s booze and off he went with a stroke. Of course he started bleeding from the mouth but no one noticed that and then Beria got in. Did you know that Stalin was going to transport all the Jews in Moscow off to Siberia in the middle of winter and freeze the lot of them to death? Oh yes, and they all joined forces to save themselves. I think rat poison was apt. Stalin was a terrible monster. </p>
<p>GD: He did thin out the Russian population. Did anyone here, besides your people, know about this?</p>
<p>RTC: Eisenhower was noticed on this and jumped at it. Thought it was a wonderful idea. You know, when I told you about the Army plan to attack American targets like aircraft and blowing up buildings and use this as a basis for attacking Castro, old Ike jumped for joy. Kennedy stopped it. </p>
<p>GD: Do you have anything on this? </p>
<p>RTC: The Stalin business? Yes, I do. The Army plan? No, I do not. </p>
<p>GD: Well, at least I know about it. Can I get the Stalin material? </p>
<p>RTC: I can put it into the packet for you. Now getting this to you might be a problem. Kimmel does not like the idea of me taking with you and at the lunch, will watch both of us like a hawk. I think after the lunch, we might go into the Club library. </p>
<p>GD: I have a better idea. I looked at a DC map and I see the National Portrait Gallery is nearby. I have an ancestor whose picture is up there and I always wanted to see it. We could take a cab over there because of your leg and leave Tom and Bill behind. </p>
<p>RTC: Might I ask who the ancestor was? </p>
<p>GD: Certainly. Robert Morris. He was a Philadelphia banker…Welling and Morris…and he financed Washington. They call him ‘Robert the Signer’ because there were other Morris people and he signed the Declaration of Independence. </p>
<p>RTC: That’s impressive. Be sure you mention this to Tom. That’ll get him ever more upset. His ancestors were farmers about the time yours was making history. Oh, yes, that will excite him. Just think, the evil Gregory Douglas is descended from an American hero, a founding father. I’d love to watch his face when you spring this one on him. </p>
<p>GD: It means less than nothing to me what people care about. Yes, and then you can give me your packet away from prying and jealous eyes. </p>
<p>RTC: We can push them into the Club bar, get them started…do you drink, by the way? </p>
<p>GD: No. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, I’ll tell them my doctor said I couldn’t so off we can go to look at your ancestor. My basic reason, Gregory, for getting you to do this is because it might come out in the future and I really want the American people to know that we had very good reasons for putting ZIPPER in action. It wasn’t just a South American junta. We had very good reasons and I only hope you make it clear that this had a real and solid basis for action. I don’t regret our actions for a minute but in the future, historians ought to have all the facts before they judge. You do see my point?</p>
<p>GD: Of course and there would be no reason to write this unless I explained why you and your friends undertook such a drastic action. That has to be part of the whole package. An interesting microcosm, Robert, a history of a major assassination plot, capturing world attention, all in a small book and very accurate. Instead of speculating on the sinking of the Maine or who told what to whom before Pearl Harbor, we have it all down nice and crisp and accurate. </p>
<p>RTC: Ah, there, you have the crux of it, Gregory. Now, let us return to our daily lives and look forward to our meeting. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 2:16 PM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2870.htm#005</p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px">More Conversations with the Crow can be found in our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?ID=15">archive of Hidden and Revisionist History</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9356</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with the Crow Part 26</title>
		<link>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9337</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=9337#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conversations with the Crow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conversations with the former chief of CIA Covert Operations reveal the existence of the Company’s very own <i>“fairy club”</i> – a CIA sub-section staffed with homosexuals and tasked with infiltrating gay circles and blackmailing prominent perverts  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Wednesday, November 20, 1996<br />
Commenced: 1:50 PM CST<br />
Concluded: 2:22 PM CST </p>
<p>GD: Good afternoon, Robert. Am I being inconvenient?</p>
<p>RTC: No, Gregory. I’ve finished lunch, done a bit with the Switzers, read the papers and the rest of the day is free. How are you doing? Getting ready for Thanksgiving? </p>
<p>GD: Oh yes. I was reading a Sheldon Furry Freaks cartoon that showed a bunch of hippies at Thanksgiving. One of them was making a terrible face and he said to the girlfriend, who had obviously cooked the bird, ‘This stuffing is really terrible. What is it?’ And she replied that it came already stuffed from the organic foods shop. It obviously had not been emptied of its innards and I was wondering how much of it they ate. </p>
<p>RTC: Typical long-hair stupidity. I take it your turkey is not from an organic turkey farm? </p>
<p>GD: Free range turkeys? No, they stuff them in little pens, fatten them and then into the eye with the icepick and into the defeathering machine. As Cromwell was supposed to have said about Charles I, ‘Cruel necessity.’ But it tastes fine if you aren’t socially conscious. </p>
<p>RTC: It smacks of the concentration camp soap stories. </p>
<p>GD: And don’t forget the shrunken heads and the lampshades while you’re at it, Robert. We mustn’t be callous and forget the crime of the century. Of course, it’s interesting that the Turkish murders of a million unarmed Armenians some years ago seems to be strangely forgotten. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, the Israelis are friends with Turkey and since they run the media here, they have an understanding about that. There can’t be stories that would eclipse their very own big money maker and which at the same time would offend one of their only allies. </p>
<p>GD: Oh, the bitter realities of <i>realpolitik</i>. You recall talking about the Pedophile Academy you people run? </p>
<p>RTC: I do. You aren’t interested in joining, are you? </p>
<p>GD: No, actually, I lust after sheep. Just think of it as Farah Fawcett in a fur coat and all will come out in the end.</p>
<p>RTC: A pun is the lowest form of humor, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: I know and I am so ashamed but they do look so cute in lacy panties. </p>
<p>RTC: I am certain you’re joking, Gregory. Do you have lamb at Easter? </p>
<p>GD: Sir, think you I am so callous? Months of true love to be followed by sordid death and the roasting pan? Terrible, Robert, terrible. Oh well, I suppose there in our imperial city things are really pure and noble. </p>
<p>RTC: Hardly. You mentioned the kiddie’s club. There’s a lot worse than that in our fair city, believe me. </p>
<p>GD: Oh, I am sure of that. Prominent Evangelical leaders meeting in a basement dungeon while someone like Pat Robertson, dressed in mesh stockings and a feather boa whipping teen-aged acolytes with a cat of nine tails. I’ve heard Washington is famous for things like that. </p>
<p>RTC: Actually, yes it is. For example, one of the less appetizing aspects of our little Company has been the fairy club. </p>
<p>GD: You mean you hire all those nasty florist types? </p>
<p>RTC: No, I mean we have an entire subsection devoted to the care and feeding of queers. Its under the Science and Technology people and consists of raging homos whose job it is to infiltrate groups of prominent Beltway queers, get the information on them so we can blackmail them into doing what we want. We’ve set up male whorehouses around here, all equipped with special mikes and cameras so we can get the evidence on the creeps and then twist their arms. They staff these places with young military personnel…mostly Marines but quite a few Army people, and naturally sailors. We have a lot of Congressmen in the basket and one hell of a lot of senior military people around to do what we want, not to forget foreign diplomats, important business people and, as you say, some impressive religious leaders. It’s mostly the military that we bag and a large number of the far right and the very fanatical religious types. </p>
<p>GD: That’s not surprising. Most of those people are drawn to strength and a well-muscled Marine with a leather belt is a pretty good illustration of what they consider strength. Far right types like leather boots and domination. I suppose the marks pay for sex? </p>
<p>RTC: Oh yes, and pay very well. First they pay cash and then they pay later in services. You would be astounded the number of fairies in high places here and most of them are in our little bags. And they do perform for us. A proper vote on yearly cash allotments, no questions asked, shutting off people who don’t like us, promoting or assisting those who are known to be on our good list. We have one Supreme Court justice, at least five appellate court judges, God knows how many senior FBI people, quite a few NSA personnel and, who would be shocked, enough State Department queers to stock a good hotel. I, personally, have nothing to do with this but my friend Ed is involved in the administration of this and he has mentioned governors, senior senators and so on that he can jerk around at leisure. Of course we set up the male whorehouses but never, never have any of our people on the premises. We have surveillance monitors all over the neighborhood and perhaps next door listening to the tapes and turning on the TV cameras but we don’t want one of our straight people bagged if the local cops raid a place.  The DC cops are stupid and corrupt beyond belief but one never knows if they’ll get a wild hair up their ass and pull a raid. If they did, of course, we could quiet it down in the court system here but it’s better to be safe than sorry. It does pay off, Gregory, and I can assure you that I, personally, have nothing to do with it. </p>
<p>GD: I don’t question that, Robert. Anyone I might know about? </p>
<p>RTC: Oh, God, it would be wonderful if you put all of this into your books but if you did, don’t talk about it in front or you would have many problems. Faggotry is a fact of life, Gregory, but none of these assholes want to be exposed. Nixon had his times with Bebe Rebozo too but of course never in one of our DC peg houses. That never went anywhere but I know it’s true. There are tapes. We bug all kinds of rendezvous places like certain motels, beach houses and so on. For example, we couldn’t bug Nixon’s place in Florida but we certainly could bug Rebozo. It’s quite an area of exploitation, Gregory. Once we nailed a very senior Israeli diplomat who liked to be whipped by muscular young blacks and when we wanted some information, Jim just casually showed him some stills from a surveillance tape and you would be amazed how much instant cooperation we got on a certain Arab matter. And speaking of diplomatics, the Saudis are absolutely the worst. They’ll fuck anything in sight if it’s warm, and my, they do have lots of money. </p>
<p>GD: I recall an old Persian poem I once read out loud in Lit class that goes, ’Across the river there is a boy with an ass like a peach but alas, I cannot swim.’ I had to go home for two days for that but the class had quite a laugh. </p>
<p>RTC: You must indeed have been quite a scholar. </p>
<p>GD: No, I was quite a trouble-maker. One of my teachers once told me, in front of the class, that I was an idiot’s delight. I told her right back that I was pleased to make her so happy. This time, I went on leave for a week. </p>
<p>RTC: Well, she had it coming. </p>
<p>GD: Oh yes, she did. They never liked me in high school, Robert and the feeling was mutual. Once, I entered a national patriotic essay contest and, by God, I won a big prize. I wrote about the joys of being a patriot and the usual drivel. Anyway, I got the letter at home and I assume the school was told at the same time. Wonderful responses from them. They had planned for a special assembly to honor the gifted one but no way would they do this for me. Do you know, they actually called me in and suggested, very firmly, that I step aside and let little Robbie the Pig get the prize? This was the son of the local Methodist minister and a real toad. Chubby, whining, self-righteous and a born stool pigeon. Learned the art from dad, no doubt. Anyway, I flatly refused to yield. Then they called my mother and went to work on her. Of course she didn’t need any leaning and for two weeks, I got nothing but stereophonic yammering from both parents. I just wasn’t a good advertisement for the school and a real gentleman would let them have a grand ceremony for Robbie the Pig. I still wouldn’t budge so they sent the award and the check to me at home and I had a hell of a time getting the check away from my father who tried to keep it. Lovely. </p>
<p>RTC: Not very civilized behavior, Gregory. I think you did the right thing then. </p>
<p>GD: Oh yes, Robert, and I certainly did the right thing about two weeks later. </p>
<p>RTC: I am almost afraid to ask. No more detergent in the school soup pot?</p>
<p>GD: No, this came before that. I felt I had been dishonored and as Mueller once said to me, I have a fine fourteenth century mind. One cannot permit that sort of thing. My revenge was fairly simple and direct. Of course no one suspected me, which is a little of a letdown, but the uproar was worth it. In the main hall of the school, right by the front office, was a large, bronze medallion with a depiction of the school symbol on it. It was let into the floor right in front of another bronze piece that listed all the former students of the high school who died in the Second World War. On both sides were flags, and during school hours, two members of the Honor Patrol stood on both sides of the sacred lares and panares to prevent careless or evil students from trampling on the school crest or not saluting, hand on chest, the plaque. My, my, what an inviting and sacred target. I broke into the school one Saturday night, very easy considering the very pickable locks and the better reality that there was no watchman. Now, I suppose, they would have surveillance cameras every ten feet but we were not so advanced then. I got into the chemistry lab, stole two bottles of concentrated nitric acid and a pair of acid-proof lab gloves, went down the hall and poured one bottle all over the floor relic. Much hissing and bubbling and clouds of stinking smoke. The second bottle I uncorked and poured the contents all down the wall piece. Much hissing, smoking and so on. Then, I tossed the bottles into a convenient trash bin and left by the front door. Outside they had the imperial flag pole in the courtyard. Every morning, the royal honor guard attended the morning flag raising while someone played some raucous piece, off key of course, on a bugle. As a sort of afterthought, I took out my Swiss Army knife and cut the halyards on the pole and pulled down the lines. The pole was about sixty feet tall and set in concrete so replacing the lines would be a major task. My, my, and I felt so good all the way home. </p>
<p>RTC: Your honor had been avenged? </p>
<p>GD: Yes, and the next day, it was even more pleasurable. I had so little to really enjoy in those days, I treasured every moment, believe me. Came into the school and saw no one. Halls empty. For a hopeful moment, I thought that there was no school but it was not to be. Walking around, I came to the main hall which was packed with very emotional fellow students. Weeping girls and outraged boys. I managed to work my up towards the front of the mourners and saw my handiwork, full in the face as it were. It looked like the sacred relics had been made of brown sugar and melted in great gullies. I didn’t obliterate them but you could only see a few letters on the wall plaque and the mess on the floor looked like it had been at the bottom of the sea for a thousand years. Police all over the place, taking pictures, very angry honor students, people in a state of anger and grief. And all over a few crummy pieces of bronze. Oh, yes, and a scene outside where a fat janitor was risking his life on a ladder that kept slipping, to replace the flagpole ropes. They had to get a local fire truck out later on to do the job. Oh, my and the police, who made Mongoloid idiots look like Harvard graduates, running all over the place with note books, interviewing everyone that would hold still. Massive grief and anger. A special assembly, mandatory attendance, in which the principal and other lesser lights offered a small reward to any snitches listening. You’d have thought someone took the Shroud of Turin and used it for toilet paper. Ah well, these rare and beautiful moments are ones to be treasured. </p>
<p>RTC: Simple but effective, Gregory. </p>
<p>GD: Always smile at a man when you kick him in the balls, Robert. Oh, that thing played out for about a month and then we were all asked to contribute to a replacement venture. When the collection cup came around in my math class, I spit into it. Another moment of perverse happiness. The soaping of the stock pot was a real, transcendent joy for me but the curtain raiser was almost as much fun. The thought, and the sight, of most of the student body soiling their clothes, and the floors, was good enough to keep me warm for months but the wailing and cursing of my fellow stoats at the scene of the great sacrilege in the upper hall was not to be denigrated. </p>
<p>RTC: Did you ever tell your friend Heinrich Mueller about this? </p>
<p>GD: No. I don’t think he would have approved of it and I admired him. Listen, do you think you might get a list of your limp-wristed victims? Of course, I assure you that I will publish it, know that in front. </p>
<p>RTC: Not while I’m alive, but yes, I think I can accommodate you. Too bad I wouldn’t be around to read about all the suicides or flights from Congress. </p>
<p>(Concluded at 2:22 PM CST)<br />
<span style="font-size:12px">http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2869.htm#008</p>
<p><span style="font-size:14px">More Conversations with the Crow can be found in our <a href="http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/category.asp?ID=15">archive of Hidden and Revisionist History</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=9337</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
