Stephen Lendman — Global Research May 24, 2013

Reports said two assailants hacked a British soldier to death. He’s been identified as Lee Rigby. He was killed in broad daylight. It was several hundred meters from southeast London’s Woolwich Royal Artillery barracks.

Weapons included a machete type knife. Alleged attackers remained on the scene. They did so until police arrived 20 minutes later.

Why wasn’t explained. Killers don’t usually stay around to be captured. Both assailants were shot and apprehended. They were hospitalized for treatment.

One allegedly said “(w)e must fight as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” Britain’s ITV news aired an edited video clip.

Allegedly an onlooker filmed it.

The clip showed a young Black man with blood dripping from his hands saying “(w)e swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you.”

”The only reason reason we have done this is because Muslims are dying every day.”

“The British soldier is an eye for eye, a tooth for a tooth.”

ITV edited the statement. It said nothing about “do(ing) this because Muslims are dying every day.” Unedited it said:

“There are many, many ayah (religious verses) throughout the Koran that says we must fight them as they fight us, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.”

“I apologize that women had to witness this today but in our land women have to see the same.”

“You people will never be safe. Remove your government. They don’t care about you.”

“You think David Cameron will get stuck in the street, when we start busting our guns?”

“You think your politicians are gonna die? not it’s gonna be the average like you, and your children.”

“So get rid of them. Tell them to bring our troops back, so you can all live in peace.”

Reports called what happened the first domestic Al Qaeda-inspired attack since the July 7, 2005 underground (so-called 7/7) bombings.

A series of attacks targeted the city’s public transport system. They came during the morning rush hour. They were for maximum disruption and casualties.

At precisely the same time, an anti-terror drill occurred. It simulated real attacks. It was no coincidence.

The real attack was a false flag. It was done to heighten fear. At issue was enlisting public sentiment to keep Britain allied with Washington’s imperial wars.

At the time, AP reported that Israel’s London embassy warned Scotland Yard in advance. Israeli Army Radio said:

“Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred.”

No action was taken. Israel’s then finance minister Netanyahu was told to skip a London economic conference. He was scheduled to speak.

Other officials were warned, not the public. Fifty-two people died. Over 700 were injured.

These type incidents automatically raise questions. Answers are needed before jumping to conclusions. The timing of Wednesday’s killing is very suspicious.

It comes when Washington, Britain, other NATO allies, and Israel head toward full-scale war on Syria. Secretary of State John Kerry’s traveling through the Middle East.

A so-called June peace conference is scheduled. It’s subterfuge. Prior peace initiatives failed. So will this one. Demanding Assad must go assures it. Washington’s proxy war was launched to do so. Expect no change of plans now.

Kerry met with foreign ministers of 11 so-called Friends of Syria countries and opposition group representatives. He discussed Syria with Netanyahu in Jerusalem.

Multiple Israeli provocations preceded his visit. On May 23, Haaretz said Israel’s “maintaining intense intelligence activity in Syria and working with local villagers.”

It’s considering a covert Syrian “proxy force.” It claims doing so will protect Israeli security. Israel’s armed forces are very able on their own.

A so-called proxy force, if established, is clearly provocative. It heads things closer to full-scale intervention. Washington and Israel partner in all regional belligerence. They jointly plan and implement conflicts.

Kerry’s trip coincides with Washington’s plan to ramp up support for so-called “rebels.” He demands Assad must go. He’s uncompromising. So is Obama. Full-scale conflict could erupt any time.

Manufactured pretexts make it easier. False flags are longstanding pre-war tactics. They’re US/Israeli specialties. Britain’s an active co-conspirator.

Muslim extremism was blamed for Wednesday’s London killing. We’ve seen this all before. Expect heightened Islamophobia ahead. UK, US, other key NATO allies, and Israel benefit most. They’ll take full advantage.

British MP George Galloway said “(t)his sickening atrocity in London is exactly what we are paying the same kind of people to do in Syria.”

True enough. He omitted explaining what appears most important.

Washington and complicit allies manufacture pretexts. They did so to justify proxy war on Syria. It’s a short step to intervening full-blown.

They’ve done it before. They manipulate public sentiment. They fabricated reasons to attack Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. They’re doing so against Iran.

They want public support. Stoking anti-Muslim rage enlists it.

Post-9/11, Bush’s Afghan war was popular. Few knew what’s now more apparent. Fewer understood Washington’s imperial agenda.

Multiple wars followed. New ones are planned. The entire region and beyond may become embroiled in conflict. Advancing America’s imperium matters most.

At issue is creating pretexts to do so. Perhaps London’s incident is the latest. The fullness of time will explain more.

Prime Minister David Cameron convened an emergency meeting. Top advisors and intelligence officials attended.

UK Home Secretary, Theresa May, called an emergency Civil Contingencies Committee (COBRA) meeting. Cameron chaired it. It includes cabinet ministers and high-level security officials. It deals with terrorism and other major crises.

COBRA refers to the room where committee members meet – Cabinet Office Briefing Room A. A terrorist alert was imposed. Heightened security steps were taken.

These measures don’t commonly follow street killings. It doesn’t matter how gruesome. Most incidents get scant coverage. Many go unnoticed.

This one suggests something bigger. What happened may be pretext for what’s planned. It remains to be seen what follows.

Peter Eyre is a Middle East consultant, geopolitical analyst, investigative journalist, anti-war activist, and valued Progressive Radio News Hour guest.

He jumped on the Woolrich incident. He discussed justifiable reasons to doubt the legitimacy of official reports. They have a distinct aroma. They fall short of truth and full disclosure.

On May 23, Eyre headlined “Woolwich beheading: Security tightened at all London army barracks.” His detailed analysis includes images.

“The gruesome scene of a decapitated actor with no police or paramedics at the scene and no blood,” he said.

The “offenders are shot by armed police who are in attendance in the background but the murder scene has not been secured!!”

Many awakened “to this amazing Shakespearean play that has unfolded in Woolwich, London where all the actors were so bad they would not even qualify for an interview as an extra in some third rate movie!!”

Eyre asked if police “drag(ged) the (victim’s) body around the corner?”

“BBC stated a man wearing a Help the Hero’s T Shirt was hit by a car, then attacked and killed with a machete or sword by the cars occupants.”

(S)o much vivid violence and yet still no blood at the scene…why?”

“(B)ecause the actors had not had time to splash it around before they filmed the scene.”

“(I)t was however added later as the picture (in his article) shows…the blood is only on the pavement and not on the road!!”

“(D)o you think they attempted to copy the Boston Bombing but somehow did not get it right?”

Eyre suggested that blood on a signpost was “Tomato Ketchup!!”

Key is calling the incident Islamic terrorism. Doing so automatically raises suspicions. Most often, the usual suspects are patsies. They’re props for planned state-sponsored mischief.

Expect UK, America, Israel and imperial allies to take full advantage. Police state harshness may increase. Waging war on Islam will continue.

Doing so full-scale against Syria appears likely. What’s long planned may erupt any time.

A Final Comment

UK media reports identified one alleged attacker. Twenty-eight year old Michael Abebolajo grew up in Romford. He comes from a Christian family. In 2003, he converted to Islam.

A man who knew his family said they were very pleasant. Friends called him very quiet. In school, he was a good guy, they said. They were shocked to learn a former schoolmate faces murder charges.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Source

By Chris & Sheree Geo — Truth Frequency Radio May 22, 2013

Two men allegedly beheaded a soldier in the streets of London today, in what is being described as a “brutal coordinated attack”. The perpetrators gave an interview after the fact, stuck around for about 20 or 30 minutes until police arrived, speaking to bystanders. Initial reports stated that they died in custody. The most recent reports say that they are alive in a hospital.

The world is all a stage. Call me jaded, cynical, skeptical or even out right crazy but this event has all of the same earmarks as the Sandy Hook, The Boston Marathon Bombing and so many recent events. The stage is a some-what well organized area, actors seem to be placed in strategic areas waiting for their cue and once again we see the remarkable absence of blood. The story as reported by Sky News and the BBC are also full of anti-Islamic propaganda, even going so far as to claim the “perpetrator” yelled“Allahu akbar,” just before beheading the man.

A man on a bus (on his way to a job interview) filmed the events and even managed to get an interview with the perpetrator. Despite a massive amount of searching we have been unable to find the raw footage of this event. The only video circulating is the same worn out ITV NEWS video claiming the man made the following statement:

““We swear by Almighty Allah, we will never stop fighting you until you leave us alone. The only reasons we killed this man is because Muslims are dying daily. This British soldier is an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. We apologize that woman had to see this today, but in our lands our women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your government. They don’t care about you.””

The man sounds like he has a natural South African accent posing as a man with a British accent. As we saw prior to the massacre of Gaddafi and the Libyan people, Israel, MI6 and the west often recruit African mercenaries to do their dirty work. It wouldn’t surprise me if this man is an African mercenary paid to play this role.

According to the mainstream accounts, the men got into a confrontation on the road which escalated into a “coordinated” beheading. Well, make up your mind! Was it well coordinated and premeditated or was it impulsive? In the video below you will see a woman with a shopping card passing through the set and right next to the attacker as he’s giving an interview after which the camera cuts away quickly. You would imagine that you would walk AWAY from a man wielding a butcher bloody butcher knife and a decapitated body but instead she walks RIGHT PAST the man!

The propaganda actors are out in full bloom too!

Another witness, who gave his name only as James, told London’s LBC 97.3 radio station that he saw two men standing by the victim on the floor.

At first he thought they were trying to help the man but then saw two meat cleavers, like a butcher would have.

“They were hacking at this poor guy, literally,” he told the radio station, as if they were trying to remove his organs.
“These two guys were crazed. They were just not there. They were just animals.

So we are supposed to believe these two men gruesomely beheaded a random stranger in broad daylight and everyone around is calm as can be? And the only blood anywhere to be seen is in the victims hands and on the knife? There is no blood on the victims clothes, no blood on the street, nothing at all, despite the fact that these were supposedly very crude cuts and “gruesome hacking’. And who walks around with meat cleaver? And who in their right mind wants to be seen on as many cameras as possible after committing a horrific murder?

He said after the “horrendous” attack, the two men, who were also in their 20s, stood around, waving knives and a gun, and asked people to take pictures of them “as if they wanted to be on TV or something”.

“They were oblivious to anything, they were more worried about having their photo taken, running up and down the road,” he said.

Although we’re no blood splatter analysts, something doesn’t look right with the amount of blood present on the scene. In the photos released by the media several hours afterward, there is a large amount of brownish-looking blood  smeared on the pavement, whereas in the picture above, that same blood is missing. Also, in one photo, the back end of the vehicle is intact ; In the next, it is smashed in. These are all indicators of two different crime scenes, not one.

It reminds one a bit of this old Monty Python sketch (actually, we’re being quite generous, really ; Monty Python was much more convincing).

The Case For Calling The London Beheading a Hoax

Even in the photo below, which some say “proves” this wasn’t a hoax, it looks like someone just smeared a small bucket of blood around, with no drag marks extending to the place where the body was filmed.

Update (As of 05/23/2013 at 3:07PM, there have been two more arrests of people, a male and female, both aged 29, “connected to the terrorist attack.” The two other suspects arrested were shot by the police and are in custody.

One of the suspects arrested today, Michael Adebolajo, is alleged to have connections to an “illegal Islamic group” in the UK called Al Muhajiroun, which, according to the National Post, “favors sharia law and publicly celebrated the Sept. 11 bombings in the U.S.”.

Previous Knowledge by MI-5?

According to the UK Mirror:

MI5 and police Counter Terror Command have known that something as specific as a beheading – preferably in public – has been suggested before.

In 2006, there was a plot by a Birmingham terror cell to kidnap a Muslim British soldier and film him being beheaded “like a pig”.

The plot was smashed by police and MI5 and the gang of five Islamist extremists jailed.

Knowing just how similar British Intelligence is to our own perverted, corrupt CIA/FBI/DHS, this comes as no surprise whatsoever.

Chris & Sheree Geo founded Truth Frequency Radio with the purpose of compiling an archive of information which can be used for generations to come. Not your typical radio show, Truth Frequency focuses more on the history of the occult and the deeper underlying conspiracy behind current events in an effort to predict the future by understanding the past. Chris & Sheree are not only researchers into the occult and esoteric but have also produced the musical album Global Resistance which is a mixture of rock, techno and hip hop with conscious lyrics exposing the New World Order.

Source

Nick Kollerstrom — Terror on the Tube April 7, 2013

On Sunday 31 March Tony Farrell gave a fine speech to a group of a hundred or so British Muslims. This is the first time that British Muslims have ever listened to a ‘truth’ talk about the London Bombings, apart from Dr Naseem speaking to his congregation at the Birmingham Mosque.

http://www.abubakrmasjid.net/Gallery/Entries/2013/3/31_False_Flag_Terror.html

Here is a ‘trailer’ for what the event was supposed to be but the the speaker on this more religious angle did not turn up.

The aim of Tony’s talk he said was to defend these three statements:

*   An understanding of the events that have shaped the last decade or so in the UK are predicated not so much on facts to be learned but secrets to be discovered.

*  Men and women become accomplices to the evil, they fail to oppose.

*    The price men and women pay for their indifference to public affairs is that they become ruled by evil men.

“On the subject of 7/7 itself, former Prime Minister Tony Blair said on the fateful day:  “We know this was done in the name of Islam”. In stark contrast, the Tony who stands before you today sees it very differently. I say categorically that the 7/7 London Bombings were not perpetrated by Muslims – they were in fact inside jobs perpetrated by agents of the state with media connections and blamed on innocent Muslim patsies. Successive UK Governments cover up the dreadful truth.

“The 7/7 atrocities were only done in the name of Islam insofar as the UK satanic state apparatus needed some catastrophic event so that it could blame Islam and  dampen down opposition to their own evil role as the carefully disguised aggressors in the middle east. As it was foretold by the Project for the New American Century and Zbigniew Brezinski Grand Chessboard, ISLAM had to be blamed so that middle-east resources could be plundered without stoking up public outrage on grounds of immorality.

“The truth is that 7/7 has all the hallmarks of an inside job and was a stage managed horror show perpetrated not by four Muslim lads from Beeston Leeds but by the Intelligence Services with all the white might of its controlling media tentacles in order to brainwash the nation into believing Islamic Extremists are a huge threat to our freedoms. These Satanists boasted to the mantra of “Outright terror bold and brilliant.” Outside of Canary Wharf HSBC on 7/7, two or three young Muslim lads were in all probability assassinated.  Most certainly they were not responsible for SIMULTANEOUSLY blowing up three trains and then a No 30 bus.  They did not kill 52 innocent citizens. They did not blast themselves to smithereens. One of the lads Shezhad Tanweer did not end up in 52 pieces while the person sat the other side of his supposedly detonated rucksack walked away relatively unscathed. No reliable evidence can place them at the crimescenes. Fact.

The new Britain

“Gone was Jesus’ great commandment of love thy neighbour. In Police State UK, the Metropolitan Police Communications Department were unleashing posters indirectly urging  Brits to spy on each other. Spy on one’s neighbour – Muslims being at the brunt of the marketing propaganda campaign.

“‘Don’t worry keep calm and carry on’ was the insipid message being put out by the Met Police to rekindle a misplaced Churchillian spirit against what they – by deceit – wanted us all to see as a common enemy. Young Jihadists and mad Mullahs.

“This spying on the Muslims was often referred to as “Rich Picture”. Gather intelligence on the Muslims especially in University Campuses and in the Mosques. Log anything that deviated from the norm.  Introduce business metrics and performance indicators counting how many intelligence logs we had on you.”

Arrest Peter Power!

“Warranting immediate arrest is this man of Crisis or should I say ISIS. If ever there was someone who needed to be arrested over 7/7 here is your main man. Peter Power. Visor Consultants. Terror drill specialist extra-ordinaire and front man for the BBC whenever the government sponsored terror threat propaganda machinery goes into full throttle. Check him out on Terror on the Tube.

“The strategy of lie and deny is tried and tested. It worked for the third Reich and its working for the Fourth, the New World Order. It’s vile but it’s well recognised and proven to work – just read what Hermann Goering had to say.”

Tony has now released the sequence of dossiers he has produced for his various trials and legal appeals:  http://www.thefarrellreport.net/report_7__four_bombings___a_tribunal.html including the complete text of his talk quote here.

Mr Arshad organising the meeting commented:

Our heartfelt thanks to Mr Tony Farrell for his talk today. This was an illuminating talk filled with his personal reflections and experience of standing up against the Government’s bogus terrorism agenda which works to vilify the Muslim community and Islam. Mr Farrell’s courageous stance and firm Christian belief for upholding the truth through all aspects of his life, including his work as the Principal Intelligence Analyst for South Yorkshire Police, cost him his high profile career of 17 years and resulted in his bankruptcy.

Mr Farrell stands today, a proud and honest voice against lies and oppression, and as an ambassador for genuine interfaith brotherhood. He is an inspiration to us all.

Source

No-one has been able to get into the Sandy Hook elementary school to verify if there are any bullet-marks, bloodstains etc, then on January 2nd  the children were transferred to another school some miles away: we assume the old Sandy Hook Elementary School will remain sealed off, and will be demolished. Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE. Was it all just an act, with kids hearing some bangs?  The new school will be patrolled by security guards permanently: presumably to maintain the kids in a state of sufficient trauma to prevent them talking, or remembering the wrong sort of thing.

The Mail Online 6 January shows this image, subtitled: ‘Chaotic scenes at the school as police work to secure the area and bodies are carried out of the school.’ But look carefully, no bodies are here, only some duffle bags – and some are doubting whether this is the school car-park.

In the London Bombings, the three train carriages were kept absolutely out or bounds then destroyed one year later: the blown-up bus was taken up to Sevenoaks Military establishment, i.e only the military can see it.

2.    CCTV switched off

The Sandy Hook Elementary School was in an up-market area of Connecticut, shown by the large majority of its children being from Jewish families. It would have had high-security equipment including CCTV cameras. We have as yet not been shown images from the time of the crime (curiously vague, but said to have been three minutes around 9.45 on 14^th December). There are no images of a ‘crime scene’ eg bullet-marks in walls or through windows. No wounded persons being interviewed.

During the London Bombings, as also for 9/11, the CCTV was switched off: no pictures, from the most heavily CCTV’d city in the world (until 3 years later when some rather dodgy ones were released).

3.    The patsy perpetrator(s), clueless and unmotivated, are themselves killed so they cannot defend themselves. Dead, then can be given all the blame.

There is no reason to suppose that the 20-year old autistic Adam Lanza had any expertise or practice in using guns, still less that his Mother went herself to a firing range or belonged to a rifle club and brought her son along. The car allegedly driven by him to the school turned out to belong to a shady felon, with FBI ties. Would or could any young man shoot his mother, take her car, drive it to a school to which he does not belong, be dressed in black, shoot his way into the school with several guns and kill virtually every target he aims at? How could anyone believe such a story? Then he kills himself – and then, goes over to his car and puts the rifle he has used back in the book. There is no conceivable motive for this physically quite impossible sequence of events.

The four alleged London bombers knew nothing about chemistry, never had any interest in it, and had no bomb-making skills that anyone ever heard about. Once dead they had no-one to defend their name against the official fictions. Not one of them had an animus against British society, to motivate any antisocial act.

4.      An ever-changing story

If a story is being made up, then different agencies will be spinning it, so it will never be very coherent. The Sandy Hook story became incoherent at the moment when CNN News announced that four pistols had been found in the school: presumably because the official coroner had averred that each of the 28 bodies had an average of seven bullet-holes in them, so they needed four pistols to credibly sound as if two hundred bullets had been fired. One young lad is not going tobreak into the school with four guns – after shooting his own Mother. .

The story of the rifle used – the Coroner averred that all injuries had been made with the rifle, then it was found to have been placed in the back of a car outside the school – can never make any sense.

First we were told she was a teacher at the school, and Adam went to that school, then later it emerged: A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff. “No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”

The 7/7 London bombings was truly an ever-changing story, with a narrative that relied heavily upon journalistic amnesia and credulity over the latest bit of unattributed gossip. Notably over what explosive had been used, which kept changing. The State lies to its own people. The State participates in killing its own people.

5.      Terror-Drills being run

On 17^th September 2010, HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program had a drill with FEMA at the Sandy Hook Fire Department, which is near to the Elementary School. On the day of the event, starting at 9.00 am, a FEMA exercise ‘Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters’ took place in Connecticut not far from Sandy Hook. Some conjecture that this got moved and happened at the school, which would account for the presence of Federal troops there seemingly much too early. There is probably a lot more of this to come out. There is a picture on the Web of children of Sandy Hook forming a chain and being told to close their eyes – that is what a kiddie terror-drill looks like – from a couple of months earlier.

“Sandy Hook has a recent history of federally staged Terror Drills. A mock school shooting drill was being conducted in Putman County only miles away on the very same day as the Sandy Hook events on December 14.”

The London Bombings had four main terror-drills leading up to it, the last of these by Peter Power on the very morning at the same three tube stations.

6.      Guilty culprits announced too soon.

At 9:53AM, no more than ten minutes after the reported shooting ceased, the Associated Press published a story, “Official with Knowledge of Connecticut School Shooting Says 27 Dead, Including 18 Children.” Neighbours of Nancy Lanza said that around 9:15am they saw police surrounding the house, taping off the neighborhood and telling everyone to evacuate.  Yet, they supposedly did not learn the identity of the shooter until c. 11:30am.  They identified the bodies of the “shooter” and his mother before the body identifying process even started, with names, occupations, “health issues”, marital status and residency.

On 9/11, news items started alluding to Osama Bin Laden about an hour after the event. On 7/7 Tony Blair announced that it was an Islamic crime at 5 pm on that day. The total of 52 dead was announced much too early, in fact while two of them ‘not yet dead’ were still in hospital.

7.      Film pre-announcement of the event.

The Batman film ‘Dark Knight rises’ alluded to Sandy Hook region of Gotham City, as a portion of the city of Gotham during a setup of one of the bad guy’s dirty deeds in that movie.  Earlier promotions of the film the year before did not (Alex Jones discovered) have that Sandy Hook reference.  The 2000 film ‘The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre’ has the killer strike in the aftermath of a hurricane.

Or, the ritual sacrifice of 22 children is portrayed in ‘The Hunger Games’ by  Suzanne Collins: she lives in Sandy Hook.

The London bombings were prefigured in the film ‘V for Vendetta’ about an Underground train primed to blow up. It was filmed in the months leading up to 7/7, so Warner Brothers had free run of the London Undergound tunnels. Its launch had to be postponed because it was too similar to what had just happened. Likewise ‘the Descent’ a horror movie scheduled to open the day after on 8th July, about people trapped underground and dying: its launch had to be postponed. Compare the classic film ‘The Matrix,’ where after 17 mins one sees 11 Sept 2001 on Anderson’s passport ID. 

8.      Families not allowed to see bodies of loved ones.

At least one family had the experience of not even being allowed to see the body of their loved one. “They told me, ‘You can’t see (the body),’” Gilles Rousseau told Radio-Canada, the French-language CBC. “  They would just be shown photographs. ‘Where are the Sandy Hook Bodies? Many are wondering, are there any bodies?

There was a bizarre aspect to the 7/7 tragedy, in the way families had to wait often over a week just to be told whether their loved one was dead, and then would be not allowed to see the body – with phoney tales that it might upset them too much – or else shown them embalmed with a policeman standing by. 

9.      Families not allowed to speak

On December 19 the Connecticut State Police assigned individual personnel to each of the 26 families who lost a loved one at Sandy Hook Elementary. “The families have requested no press interviews,” State Police assert on their behalf, “and we are asking that this request be honoured – a de facto gag order. What is it so terrible they might say?

In the 7/7 London bombings, ‘grieving parents’ would always be wheeled out to support the government narrative, but one could never get to speak to any of them.

10.  Identity Theft

Adam Lanza was a vegan because he ‘didn’t want to hurt animals’. Nancy Lanza ‘was a wonderful, beautiful, elegant woman who loved life, and most importantly she loved her son, Adam’ a friend has testified. They lived on a street named after the great Indian Yogi ParamanshaYoganada: what did this mean to them?

The Mother has been hyped as an Apocalypse-expecting gun-toting food-storing freak (as a prelude to demonising gun-owners in America, the whole point of this exercise)

Sid Khan especially of the 7/7 Four was a rising star of Beeston, and after his death he became the most thoroughly demonised of the Four. Seemingly endless terror-tales were woven around him. SidKhab was especially proud of his reputation for non-violent conflict-resolution (see my online talk, about MSK as a ‘local action hero’) Wherever false-flag terror is perpetrated, it is important to try and rescue the identity of the person who gets blamed and demonised (eg for the Bali Bomb of 2002, someone called Amrotzi, who was a quite sensitive and intelligent young man)

11.  Actors used

Actors? Click to enlarge

At least one ‘grieving parent’ at Sandy Hook looks as if he was acting a part. People are suspecting work by ‘Crisis Actors.org’: ”Trained players and actors making it real,’ available for ‘active shooter drills.’ They bring ‘intense realism to simulated mass casualty incidents.’

The London bombings had some actors spotted on the street that morning, presumably part of  the scheduled ‘terror drill’ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW089fj94vY ‘Wounded’ actors were especially noticed around Tavistock Square.

12.  Deaths not real

‘Even more unusual are the observations of Facebook pages of the deceased being created days or even months prior to the shooting, further suggesting the synthetic and premeditated nature of the event. For example, on March 23, 2011 a Facebook site was established, titled “RIP Emilie Parker,” for the daughter of Robbie Parker, now well-known after the soliloquy delivered on CNN and preceded by a gleeful chuckle and query as to whether he should read the lines provided him.’ One may doubt whether any of the 28 ‘deaths’ at Sandy Hook Elementary School were real.

The London bombings had one definite not-real-death, viz Myriam Hyman (but there may have been others). She’s on the plaque at Tavistock Square but no way did she die there. 

THE BIG DIFFERENCE

Normally when fabricated terror happens, the story is fake but the deaths are real. It is the dead bodies which give the air of gravity and solemnity, so that Those Who Create Delusion will be believed. The London bombings had dreadful scenes of carnage, seen by real witnesses.

Sandy Hook has only two dead bodies known: Adam and Nancy Lanza. On that morning, the local hospital went into lockdown and cleared four trauma rooms, but received only three patients, two of them dead children(according to the official story) and one mildly wounded adult.We saw locked-down kiddie-coffins in funeral services, but is that enough? The situation may remind us of 9/11, when airports that morning were waiting for the grieving relatives – but none came. The security forces averred that they had removed the bodies from the school in the middle of the night: had they?

Have children been stolen? Child slaves sell, we are told,for well over $200,000.

Source

Being a man of great courage and genuine integrity, Tony Farrell, sacked Principle Intelligence Analyst for the South Yorkshire Police, has just sent a letter to all Chief Constables and Principle Intelligence Analysts in the UK.

In it he directs these officers to sources that lay out evidence of 7/7 being a false flag attack. He expects them to look at this evidence, draw the obvious conclusions and respond appropriately.

The initial problem most people have when faced with assertions that any particular outrage was a ‘false-flag’ event is that the charge is just too ridiculous to begin to take seriously.

But this is not the case. I would appeal to such people to consider the following:

Some of you will be old enough to remember the premier  political controversy of the 1960’s and 1970’s, the Vietnam war. The ‘LBJ Presidential tapes’, declassified and released in 2001, prove that LBJ knew the Tonkin incident never happened.

It has also been proven that the NSA deliberately faked intelligence data to make it appear as if two US ships had been lost in the “attack”.

I was amazed to discover (from a student I was tutoring in Maths) that this truth is now, rightly and properly, taught as fact on ‘A level’ History courses in the UK.

…….it is understandable how very shocking and unacceptable the charge that an operation was a ‘false-flag’  should be to any decent and responsible citizen.

But there we are. It’s normal.

We must get used to it and get used to it now.

But by no means should we accept this kind of behaviour. 

An estimated 2 million Vietnamese deaths,  60,000 US military deaths and wounded on both sides amounting to millions more……..an all on the basis of a LIE dreamed up by the leaders of the military/industrial complex, OUR leaders, in order to advance their power and enrichment of an unseen cabal.

Of course, such truths of history are only normally revealed after the perpetrators of such great crimes have passed on  and there is no longer anyone available to prosecute.

But how different might history have been had brave individuals of the day exposed this great lie? How many lives might have been saved? How difficult might it have been for later regimes to again perpetrate this oft-repeated trick?

Unfortunately it is easy to demonstrate, to anybody who cares to know, that what was true for Vietnam is true for Afghanistan, Iraq and the ‘clash of civilisations’ today.

9/11 and 7/7 were, similarly, false flag attacks. 

This is provable in the case of 9/11 by the application of simple physics. The freefall collapse of WTC7 can ONLY have been a controlled demolition.

Likewise WTC1 and WTC2 came down at almost exactly free-fall speeds for part of their collapses. A building collapsing without resistance through itself (the line of greatest resistance) is, again, proof of demolition.

While it is feasible that arabs hijacked the aircraft that crashed into the twin towers (no plane hit WTC7, by the way), it is not feasible that arabs rigged up 3 major buildings in New York for demolition on 9/11. This is particularly true for WTC7, which was occupied by the CIA and the FBI, amongst other organisations.

Regarding 7/7 there is enough anomalous evidence and enough wilful official evasion of other evidence to convince the fair mind or experienced eye that this too was an obvious false-flag.

That so many innocent people should die as a direct result of such crimes is one thing. 

That our media and politicians and, indeed, ourselves should wilfully ignore the evidence that proves as much is a greater scandal still.

It should come as no great surprise that the mass slaughter that has defined much of human history over the last decades and centuries is stage managed by criminal degenerates.

However the fact that we, who like to think of ourselves as decent people, participate so quietly and willingly in the cover-up of these crimes, should surely give every sentient human being pause for serious thought.

Remember, the Gulf of Tonkin, one of oh so many fake events………remember the people of Iran. Are they not ‘decent people’ too. Their country has not invaded anyone during the last 300 years.

Remember ourselves and where all this organised mayhem appears to be heading.

COME ON YOU CHIEF CONSTABLES. DEMAND ANSWERS TO THE OBVIOUS QUESTIONS FROM YOUR SUPERIORS NOW! IF YOU DON’T GET THEM THEN GO PUBLIC WITH YOUR CONCERNS!

DEMAND THAT OUR REPRESENTATIVES, THROUGH THEIR INSTRUMENT NATO, STOP SENDING ARMED MERCENARIES INTO SYRIA NOW!

DEMAND PEACE!

IF WE GET WAR IT IS ONLY BECAUSE WE, THE DUMB MASSES, AND YOU (WHO SHOULD KNOW BETTER) ALLOW IT.

Source ]]> http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&p=53666 2 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=53072 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=53072#comments Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:11:04 +0000 wmw_admin http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=53072 Aaron Kalman – Times of Israel July 18, 2012

Taking into account the possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran during the 2012 Summer Games, the Olympic committee in charge of the London event has formed a special team to prepare for the contingency.

According to the Hebrew daily Yedioth Ahronoth on Wednesday., the team — consisting of politicians, diplomats, security officials and organizing committee personnel — wrote in a report that such a strike was entirely possible.

Yedioth reported that the team was also preparing for the possibility of an earthquake or volcanic eruption.

England is thought to be within the range of Iranian missiles and UK officials believe that a military confrontation between Jerusalem and Tehran could involve the country against its will.

The special team listed a number of steps that would need to be taken in the event of such a conflict, among them: opening a special command center, providing secret safe houses for foreign leaders wishing to meet for diplomatic purposes, and preparing for emergency evacuations of dignitaries.

The team said England would have to guarantee the safety of the athletes and the continuation of the Games, as well as make sure Israeli and Iranian athletes are kept away from each other.

Yedioth reported that the recommendations were passed on to the police, who practiced dealing with the mass protests that could erupt if war broke out

Source

The new Westfield Stratford City Mall, bordered on its north side by the new Stratford International Station, dominates the Olympics site, dwarfing the Aquatics Centre and Olympics Stadium to the south. Click to enlarge

Former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, 81, recently opened the Mega Mall adjacent to Olympic Stadium and Stratford subway station.

Frank Lowy was Larry Silverstein’s partner in the World Trade Center on Sept 11. 2001.

Over two-thirds of all those attending the Olympics stadium are expected to transit through Westfield’s new “Stratford City Center.”

Lowy, a dual Australian and Israeli citizen, is co-founder of the Westfield Group, operator of over 100 shopping centers in Australia, New Zealand, the United States and UK. They also own Marriott Hotels.

Both these companies have suffered a long list of “terrorist attacks” for which large insurance claims were made.

A commercial promoting the London Underground as the main mode of transportation between different game sites in the Olympic village has marked the Stratford stadium with a red line connecting to it…

The Stratford station is also a part of both the Jubilee Line and Jubilee Extension Line.  Insider “Red Ox” said on this site (Comments) that either the Jubilee and/or Jubilee Extension had been targeted for terrorist bombing since 1989 (23 years ago)! This  information was given to him by Stella Rimington, ex-head of the Mi-5.

More ominous facts:

Continues in full at source…

Maybe something dreadful will happen.

Maybe nothing will happen at all.

If something does happen it will probably be in a form or manner that surprises us all.

The predictive-programming ‘Conspiracy’ films have been out there for a long time.

The current security chaos surrounding G4S and its Olympic security contract could mean anything. Preparing the ground for coming disaster. Resistance within elements of the local powers-that-be……..

……anything. We cannot know.

What we can be sure of is this.

If any kind of mega-event takes place in London before, during or shorty after the Olympic games then the perpetrators will not be ‘terrorists’ or ‘aliens’ but persons acting under the direction of our real government, the international network of Judeo-Masonic finance oligarchs.

MOST OBVIOUS DAY OF DANGER

The opening and closing ceremonies have been flagged up as likely targets for terrorist attacks,  but it appears more likely that the most probable date for any such event is Monday 13th August.

This guess, right or wrong, is based on three pieces of information:

1) G4S Whistleblower Ben Fellows said he was advised that he would be involved in an event which he described as a “defining moment in the history of London” after the Olympics and so he naturally thought it would be during the Para Olympics……he was then advised it was nothing to do with the Olympics but with something else.

The 13th August is the day after the Olympics closing ceremony………..but perhaps the much-predicted ‘event’ could take place anywhere, even on an another continent, and be a ‘defining moment’ in the history of not only London but everywhere else besides.

2) A 2010 Rockefeller Foundation document entitled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”  ‘predicts’ that the decade of 2010-2020 will be named “The Doom Decade”, because of  a wave of terrorist attacks, natural disasters as well as civil uprisings and financial collapses.

The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped out Nicaragua, and the onset of the West China Famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change.

Looked at rationally, this ‘scenario’ is pure fiction. However, we know by now that the people at the centre of power are occultists who communicate with each other in numerical codes based on their own ‘magic numbers’.

Why the number 13,000? There is no obvious reason for choosing this. Such an article, however seemingly ridiculous, is certainly not purposeless. Michael Hoffman has written that it is part of the ‘occult trajectory’ for practitioners of the dark arts to signal their intentions to their friends and their victims in order to inform their friends and create a kind of  complicity in their victims and, thus, a real sense of helplessness in those outside the power nexus.

Does the 13 refer to the 13th August?

3) The 13th August 2012 can be written thus:

13/08/12 or, in the USA, 08/13/12

13 + 8 + 12 = 33

This is the most powerful and well-known masonic/satanic number after 666. 33 degree masons are said to have participated in the “Killing of the King“ ritual.

Speculation such as this about False-Flag terrorist events is written, of course, in the hope that 

a) the propagation of such speculation will prevent any such planned event from going ahead.

b) people will understand who is responsible and who is not, should such an event  take place.

Source

Jeremy Hunt, the Culture Secretary, confirmed that the Government has contingency plans for a further late deployment.

He spoke as Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, admitted that the existing deployment of 17,000 soldiers, sailors and airmen is undermining Armed Forces training programmes.

Ministers and Games planners are struggling to get a grip of security precautions for the Olympics after G4S, a private security contractor, admitted it is well short of the 10,400 guards it is being paid to provide.

Some 3,500 military personnel were drafted in at short notice last week to fill the gaps, and G4S’s recruitment and training has been exposed as deficient.

Mr Hunt told the BBC that it was “completely normal” for a firm like G4S to be unable to deliver on its commitments and praised the company as “honourable”. However, he added, ministers cannot rule out having to send even more troops into action over the Games. “We have contingency plans for all eventualities,” Mr Hunt said.

G4S has so far provided only around 4,000 security personnel for the Games, which start next Friday, although it says thousands more are in the late stages of training.

 Nick Buckles, the firm’s chief executive, will be questioned tomorrow over the £284 million contract he signed to provide security staff for London 2012. He has admitted his job is now on the line.

Lord Coe, the chairman of London 2012, yesterday insisted that the problem had arisen because many of those recruited by G4S had simply not come forward to work as they had agreed to.

“The question [for G4S] was not about supply, because they interviewed 100,000 people, but that when they expected people to turn up they did not materialise. That was when we realised we needed to fill the gap,” Lord Coe said.

“Security has always been at the heart of this project and for six years we have been working on it sequentially. But when people simply do not turn up it is a problem.” That view was echoed by the Dorset Police Federation, which said that Royal Marines have taken over security duties at the Olympic sailing centre in Weymouth & Portland because barely 40 per cent of allocated private guards had turned up for work.

Ministers have promised that troops will not suffer financial hardship because of their 11th-hour deployment, but there are growing political calls for G4S to fund bonus payments for military personnel forced to fill gaps left by its failings.

However, Mr Hammond yesterday played down the prospect of special awards, stressing that the Armed Forces exist for such contingencies. He insisted that the extra deployment would have “no direct impact” on the operation in Afghanistan, but admitted that training was being disrupted.

He said: “When we have to make people available for a task such as the Olympics that has an impact on other business-as-usual, day-to-day training activity and so on, and it will take us a little while afterwards to get everything back on track, but it won’t affect what’s going on in Afghanistan.”

Source

Lord Coe is right. Security at the Games has been not compromised but that is only after shortcomings were first exposed on the Internet. They are now being rectified as troops and military are being drafted in to plug the gaps.

Had the alarm over security at the Olympics not been raised on the web those lapses may not have been resolved.

When the corporate media was first informed about failings in Olympic security, it ran a whitewash on the story instead. Indeed, when whistleblower Ben Fellows persisted Channel 4 News told him there was a “media blackout” on the issue.

Only after those security concerns went viral on the Internet did the corporate media cover the issue.

Was Olympics chairman Lord Coe aware of shortcomings before? We cannot say with any certainty although he certainly knows about them now. However, it’s worth noting that a reader has informed us that Lord Coe has “Right of abode” in Israel.

Leaving aside that publicity over security shortcomings may effectively prevent a false flag, we thought Lord Coe’s “Right of abode” was notable.   

London 2012 security not compromised, says Coe

BBC Online – July 15, 2012

Security for the Olympics has not been compromised by the failure of G4S to recruit enough security staff, London 2012 chairman Lord Coe has said.

It emerged last Wednesday that 3,500 troops were being drafted in to plug gaps in security staff provision.

“We will work very hard, we will remedy this – security will not be compromised,” Lord Coe told BBC Radio 5 live.

“This is not about numbers, this is about the mix,” he said.

G4S has said it stands to lose up to £50m after being unable to provide the 10,000 staff it had been contracted to deliver.

“The reality is – and I can’t put it more simply than this – G4S expected people to materialise and when they didn’t, as the home secretary has said, we moved very quickly to fill that gap,” said Lord Coe

A “prudent and judicious plan” had been put in place, he said.

On Saturday, G4S chief executive Nick Buckles told BBC News he only “began to know it was going wrong eight or nine days ago”.

He said that, as large numbers were being interviewed, trained, licensed and accredited, “it is only when you get closer to the Games you realise that the number is not as high as you expect”.

Lord Coe said he would not comment on reports that ministers had known of problems earlier.

And asked whether Mr Buckles should quit, he said: “That is absolutely not for me to even speculate on.”

Source

By Salman An-Noor Hossain – (henrymakow.com) July 14, 2012

A Chinese advertisement was recently released for the Euro 2012 soccer tournament which created some controversy.

Even though the ad is for a soccer tournament, it strangely depicts war-like scenes with tanks and anti-aircraft batteries being shot at planes flying in the sky and even a bomb being dropped on the stadium itself. (Commercial is available here.)

The song being sung is the Chinese version of a Russian-themed masterpiece talking about the Communist-Russian Jewish song “Farewell Slavianka”…It’s all about rise, betrayal, and war.

The advertisement also suggests that the terrorist attack will be broadcast live on Television.

Right after the explosion, there is a quick flash with the words “NOW-TV” which implies that it will happen very soon as the commercial was aired recently during the Euro 2012 soccer tournament.

Were the Chinese secret services leaked intelligence on the Olympics attacks? Did they leak this warning out during the Euro 2012 soccer tournament?
   
One can’t help but notice that every-time there is a ball kicked, there is a trail of fire blazing through it. It seems like the Israeli team is persevering and trying really hard to score. Finally, there is a free-kick shot at the end of the game. The ball blazes through the goal-keeper and swooshes into the net. The tie-breaker has just been scored and there is no need for overtime periods or penalty shots to secure victory.
  
The numbers 1,3,6,5,2,4 represent the London Underground – Travel Card Zones 1-6. Perhaps it also reflects the order in which the bombs will strike the London underground. Another interesting thing to note is that when the string of consecutive natural numbers from 1to 6 are added together, they automatically equal 21 or a “Blackjack”!      
 
The Big Ben clock tower will be one of the main targets. In the animated commercial, we see that planes will fly over it dropping bombs on the stadium simultaneously whilst Big Ben is blown up by a bomb placed inside it. It is an important target not so much as in the expected casualties that will come from bombing that location, but more so in the symbolic value attached to it in the minds of the indigenous British public.
 
The underground subway, land buses and bus terminals, and the train station at Stratford in particular are potential targets.

Up to six bombs, possibly all of them nuclear will be placed underneath the different Travel Card zones. A seventh nuclear bomb or mega bomb will be detonated right underneath the stadium of the Olympic site.

The Rockefeller Foundation’s “Psychic Capabilities”

The Rockefeller Foundation recently released a document titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. The document presented the following scenario with regards to the elite’s plans for the 2012 London Olympics. (It is reminiscent of PNAC’s call for a “new Pearl Harbour” before 9-11.)

“One important – and novel – component of our strategy tool kit is scenario planning, a process of creating narratives about the future based on factors likely to affect a particular set of challenges and opportunities.” (pg. 4)

“The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped out Nicaragua, and the onset of the West China Famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change.” (pg. 34)

ZION LOGO

Continues in full at source…

Theresa May was last night under pressure to explain whether she could have averted the Olympics security fiasco as it emerged that the Home Office was warned 10 months ago that there were problems with the ability of G4S to provide security for the Games.

A confidential report by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary was presented to Home Office ministers in September 2011, which should have raised alarm bells about the readiness of G4S.

The report by the police watchdog into Olympics security preparedness – which has never been published – raised serious issues over G4S last year, The Independent on Sunday understands. It is not known whether the Home Secretary personally saw the report or whether it only went across the desk of James Brokenshire, her junior minister. But given Mrs May’s ultimate responsibility for policing and security during London 2012, she will be under pressure to explain why the crisis came to a head little more than two weeks before the opening ceremony.

The Home Secretary told the Commons last Thursday that the shortfall in guards which G4S could provide became clear only the day before, when the Government announced it was deploying 3,500 troops to cover the shortage.

In her statement, Mrs May said: “We were receiving reassurances from G4S until very recently, and the absolute gap in numbers was crystallised finally only yesterday.”

Opponents point out the Home Secretary’s careful choice of words could mean she was aware some time ago there was a general shortfall – raising questions over why it was left so late in the day to act.

In another development, ExCeL, the largest competition venue at the Games, last night revealed it had been raising concerns with Locog, the London 2012 organisers, about the handling of security by G4S for several months.

Lord King, the former Conservative defence secretary and a director of the ExCeL exhibition centre in east London, said that doubts about G4S’s security plans had been “an ongoing saga for some time”.

Last night, former Scotland Yard Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur, who headed security planning for the Olympics, said the problems were “predictable”. “I just couldn’t understand, when I was planning for it, how you could give such a contract to one company. Venues like Wembley already have their own security, and it is just logical to give it to those who are doing it day in and day out.” He said he also fought against the responsibility for operational planning going to the Home Office. “I was pushing for it to be kept in the Met. They already plan 3,000 to 4,000 events a year.”

As the row over Olympics security escalated, the IoS can also reveal:

* An insider said the root cause of the problem with G4S was its internal computer system which had failed to calculate staff rostering.

* David Cameron will convene a regular Olympics Cabinet from tomorrow to run throughout the Games, acting as the Government’s crisis committee. London’s mayor, Boris Johnson, will also attend.

* G4S won the security contract with Locog after submitting a tender at least 25 per cent lower than any other, which would have been hugely attractive to a British Olympic movement paranoid about going over budget.

* Hundreds of British soldiers face being stuck in Afghanistan for weeks longer than planned because of the knock-on effect of delays to training and holidays. One senior army source said bomb-disposal personnel were most at risk.

Nick Buckles, the G4S chief executive, apologised directly to troops yesterday as he revealed that the firm faces a penalty of up to £20m for failing to deliver on its £284m contract, as well as paying the Ministry of Defence for providing the troops, meaning the total loss will be up to £50m.

Three months after the critical HMIC report was handed to the Home Office last September, G4S’s contract to provide 2,000 staff increased to 10,400 personnel. It is not known whether the December increase was as a direct result of the police report, but 2012 insiders said that the leap in numbers should have forced the Home Secretary to keep a closer eye on G4S.

A senior source involved in organising the Games said concerns were circulating before the report was published. “For 18 months, there has been a worry about there being enough people,” he said. “I am surprised that senior people at the Home Office didn’t ask these questions.”

Mr Buckles, who faces a grilling by the Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday, said that he had realised only “eight or nine days ago” that there would be a shortfall. But he insisted the company had kept both the Government and Locog fully informed about what was going on.

Managers at ExCeL, which will stage boxing, fencing, judo, taekwondo, table tennis, weightlifting and wrestling, were stunned when G4S told them the in-house security staff would be “stood down” for the duration of the Games, to be replaced by inexperienced new recruits.

“We managed to get sense on that,” Lord King said. “We have been anxious to establish what the situation is, anxious to know who was going to be handling security. It has been an ongoing saga for some time.”

Lord King added that new personnel numbers had to allow for G4S staff and troops getting caught in Tube and road queues expected across the capital. “Whatever numbers the Army puts in, I hope that includes a safety margin to plug the gaps.”

Company file

* Founded in Copenhagen in 1901, G4S, based in Crawley, now employs 657,000, making it the world’s third largest private sector employer behind Walmart and Foxconn.

* Turnover last year was up 4 per cent to £7.5bn. The Olympics fiasco has wiped £140m off its value.

* It provides security at 14 UK airports and four ports. It also runs six prisons, four children’s homes and two immigration centres, and tags 14,000 offenders. It is responsible for security at 500 police stations and 30 custody suites.

* It makes 640,000 private ambulance journeys each year, delivers £300bn in cash in a fleet of 2,300 vehicles and takes 39 million meter readings for utility companies in the UK.

* In December, it paid £17m for Chubb Emergency Response, a key holding and mobile patrol business that covers 22,000 sites.

* It provides security for Wimbledon, golf’s Open championship and all the party conferences, but lost a European Parliament contract.

Source

Prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq numerous articles appeared in the corporate media speculating about Saddam’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. Coupled with Tony Blair’s now infamous 45 minutes claim they appeared to imply that “something must be done”.

No matter that the “45 minutes” claim later proved to be utterly groundless. For a while it did the trick and conveniently silenced any opposition to the invasion of Iraq.

Then in the aftermath of the invasion, as Hans Blix and his team searched for the elusive WMD it slowly dawned that there weren’t any. The threat that Saddam’s Iraq posed the world was an empty one; largely created by politicians working in tandem with the corporate media.

Between them they had essentially generated an illusion.

Is the Western public now any wiser to these contrived threats? Have we learned anything from Iraq other than it was an utter waste of lives?

The powers that be obviously don’t seem to think so. For a string of new reports recently appeared echoing those earlier claims; with mention of chemical weapons and Sarin nerve agents.

Only this time the guilty party is not Saddam’s Iraq but Assad’s Syria and Iran.      

Thus U.S. officials echoed by the corporate media recently warned that Assad has moved Syria’s chemical weapons out of storage. The implication being that he may be preparing to use them “against civilians”.

However, closer scrutiny reveals the corporate media is engaged in a campaign to condition the public mentally for military action. Similar to what happened in the run up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq; it is not so much “news coverage” as propaganda dressed up as to look like balanced reporting.

No matter that many of its claims have proven to be fabricated – such as photos the BBC claimed were of a Syrian massacre but which were actually taken in Iraq. Or a BBC news editor openly admitting that most of its Syrian coverage was based on “opposition propaganda”. The Western media appears to be operating on the principle that if you tell enough lies some, at least, will be believed.  

Western intelligence appears to operate on much the same principle. You may recall claims about Saddam’s mobile chemical weapons laboratories, when Colin Powell appeared before U.N. Security Council flaunting a vial of “Iraqi anthrax”.

In his speech he told U.N. delegates:

“Every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not assertions. What we’re giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence.”  

A Senate Report on Iraqi WMD Intelligence later concluded however:

“[m]uch of the information provided or cleared by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for inclusion in Secretary Powell’s speech was overstated, misleading, or incorrect.”

Which is another way of saying he lied.

Trouble is Colin Powell is now being echoed by MI6 chief Sir John Sawers who told senior civil servants that Britain had already foiled one attempt by Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. Nonetheless Tehran remains undeterred, Sir John says, and has continued its efforts to obtain WMD and may have them as soon as 2014.

Sir John didn’t offer any hard proof for these claims in his speech last week. Only the warning that without MI6’s work: “you’d have Iran as a nuclear weapons state in 2008 rather than still being two years away in 2012.”

Implying, in other words, that “something must be done”.

However I have news for Sir John and although I suspect he may already know, readers won’t.

It comes via a VERY RELIBLE psychic friend who over the years he has provided valuable insights. He spoke of the Iraq invasion ten years before it happened, adding even then that Iran was the ultimate objective.

Now he informs us that contrary to Sir John’s claim that Iran may have nuclear weapons by 2014, IT ALREADY POSSESSES THEM. They haven’t been flaunted or publicised because on the basis of a religious decree by Ayatollah Khamenei: “the production, possession, use or threat of use of nuclear weapons is illegitimate, futile, harmful, dangerous and prohibited as a great sin.”

Nonetheless, they are being kept as weapons of last resort. Weapons to be used in the event of a Western attack on Iran.

We suspect that Sir John already knows this. All his talk is merely to prepare the Western public for an all out first strike on Iran, one using nuclear weapons. Because the West cannot mount a conventional military campaign against Iran without sustaining unacceptably high casualities a nuclear first strike remains an “option”.

This is part of the reason why the West has been made so many veiled threats yet seems hesitant to strike Iran. It needs time to condition the public for what it is about to undertake.

The only thing required is a false flag: sufficiently bloody and destructive enough to warrant such a strike.  

When and where will that occur? There has been much speculation recently about an impending false flag at the London Olympics. While we agree that it would seem an obvious target several factors make us think that it won’t happen just yet: including the fact that the British Army has just been drafted in to take over some of the Olympic security arrangements.

More significantly however, our psychic friend says that the elite are highly “pissed” over the publicity given to a false flag at the Olympics. Such an event had indeed been planned, he says. However, the speculation on the Interent means that it may not go ahead as intended.

In less than two weeks we’ll know. Stay tuned…

Private security firm G4S says it stands to lose up to £50m after admitting it is unable to provide enough staff to fulfil its Olympic Games contract, a failure that forced the government to this week call up 3,500 troops to fill in at the 11th hour.

The beleaguered security company said on Friday night that it “deeply regrets” the problems, adding: “G4S accepts its responsibility for the additional cost of the increased military deployment resulting from the shortfall in workforce delivery.”

The company’s admission it is in line to take a major financial hit over the shambles came hours after the prime minister weighed into the row, warning that firms which failed to deliver on their contracts would be pursued for the money.

The security firm had been committed to supply 13,700 guards as demanded in its contract, worth £284m, which it now says it is unlikely to be able to fulfil. Overall, the 23,700-strong security force for the Games will include a mix of military, private security guards and at least 3,000 unpaid volunteers.

Contingency plans have also been drawn up for police officers to secure venues in the days leading up to the start of the Games because of G4S’s recruitment shortage. The original plan was for specialist police teams to search the venues, before lockdown was carried out by either G4S or the military.

But plans are now being made for the potential need to deploy hundreds of officers to control what goes into the arenas until the extra military personnel arrive.

Assistant Commissioner Chris Allison, head of Scotland Yard’s security operation, said: “Delivering a safe and secure Games is a priority but we will not compromise on keeping the streets and our local communities safe.

“The 12 venue police forces are working closely with the Locog [London Organising Committee], G4S and the military to ensure that the venues have the necessary levels of security as they move into lockdown.

“The police service always had to operate to a very tight timescale to deliver the defensive search regime at venues and so in some cases forces may have to deploy officers into duties at venues that we had not anticipated. Plans are being worked up to deliver this where necessary.

“These forces are taking measures to maximise available officers to support venues if necessary, on top of continuing to deliver policing to our communities. This is not impacting on our existing plans for the safety and security operation, which we are confident we can still meet.”

In a statement, G4S said on Friday: “The company is also incurring other significant costs as it endeavours to meet the contract challenges.

“Whilst it is not possible to gauge the precise financial impact, it is estimated that the company will incur a loss on the contract in the range of £35m to £50m, all of which will fall in the current financial year.”

The home secretary, Theresa May, had been pressing G4S to provide assurances over its commitments, but patience in Whitehall ran out last weekend and talks began to establish whether the Ministry of Defence could fill the gap.

As May came under sustained opposition attack in parliament this week, she repeatedly refused to spell out what penalties G4S would face, insisting that the contract was with Locog and not the Home Office.

The depth of the crisis over G4S’s Olympic security preparations became increasingly clear on Thursday as recruits revealed to the Guardian details of a “totally chaotic” selection process and police joined the military in bracing themselves to fill the void left by the private security contractor.

Nick Buckles, the chief executive of G4S, who has been summoned with his chairman to appear next week before the Commons home affairs select committee to explain the failure to provide sufficient staff, also issued a mea culpa as the firm tried to limit damage to its reputation.

“We are deeply disappointed that we have not been able to fully deliver against our contract with Locog and that it has been necessary to call upon the additional military personnel,” he said.

“In partnership with the military and Locog, we are working flat out around the clock to resolve the situation. We are determined that together we will deliver a successful and secure Games.

“I would like to thank the members of the current security workforce who are already on the ground securing many of the Olympic sites across the country.”

Opposition politicians have called for a pause in the award of any more government contracts to G4S, and there had been speculation in recent days that it would face financial penalties amounting to tens of thousands of pounds per venue per day for failing to deliver sufficient staff.

Locog, which has also been summoned to appear before the home affairs select committee along with the Home Office and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, admitted in December it had wildly underestimated the number of staff required to deliver security at 34 Olympic venues in London and around the country.

Source

The British Army has stepped in to plug gaps in Olympic security, after measures provided by private contractors were exposed as wanting. More significantly however, this story and the way it has developed raises more questions about the corporate media’s agenda.

Internet journalists first questioned security arrangements at the Olympics weeks ago.

However only after questions were raised in parliament over the security provided by G4S, the private company contracted to guard games venues, has the corporate media finally covered the issue.

Prior to this they ignored it. One might even say they did so deliberately. For when independent journalist Ben Fellows approached them with revelations about lapses in security, which he had uncovered while working undercover for G4S, the corporate media wasn’t interested.

Indeed, when Fellows contacted Channel 4 News with the story he was told “there’s a media blackout on this kind of story” and “that nobody would be interested in running it”.

That was a month ago but now the Army has been called in to cover gaps in security the corporate media can hardly ignore it. So like the Financial Times below, they are now reporting concerns over Olympic ‘security “shambles”’.

What they don’t mention however is G4S’s close links to Israel. As Nick Kollerstrom has pointed out:

“G4S provides services to Israeli prisons, police army. Palestinian political prisoners from the occupied territories are held by G4S in contravention of international law. It provides security equipment and personnel to shops, supermarkets and businesses in the illegal West Bank settlements”.

In fact Israeli security companies often seem to go hand-in-hand with terror atrocities. The way an Israeli firm handled the security arrangements at all the 9/11 airports. Or the way Israeli owned security firm ICTS has been linked to the London tube stations in the 7/7 attacks.  

Coincidence or not, we may breath a little easier now the army has been called in to plug gaps in security. For these lapses seemed an open invitation for terror, or at least a false flag.

Nonetheless, this whole episode raises serious questions about the corporate media’s coverage of events. Once again independent Internet outlets have provided groundbreaking news coverage; while the corporate media has tagged along behind and only reported what the authorities have allowed or what is simply too obvious to ignore.  

Army steps in as G4S falls short for Olympics

Helen Warrell and James Blitz – FT.com July 12, 2012

Olympic security organisers and G4S, the company contracted to guard games venues, were battling to restore faith in their operations on Thursday as the home secretary admitted the armed forces would have to fill a last-minute shortfall in private security staff.

Royal Navy Helicopter Carrier HMS Ocean moored in the Thames as part of security rehearsal for the 2012 Olympics. Click to enlarge

Amid fiery questioning from fellow MPs Theresa May denied charges from the opposition that she was presiding over a security “shambles”, and admitted that the G4S personnel shortfall had only “crystallised” 24 hours earlier, despite close Home Office supervision of the £284m contract.

G4S – the world’s largest security provider by sales – also came under intense criticism, as Keith Vaz, the Labour MP and chair of the home affairs select committee, said the contractual breakdown only 15 days before the games was a matter of “deep concern”.

“G4S has let the country down and we have literally had to send in the troops,” Mr Vaz said. Philip Hollobone, a Conservative MP, even suggested the company should not be awarded any other government contracts until it had paid “every last penny” of penalty costs.

While the company was contracted to deliver about 10,500 venue security staff, it only has 4,000 stationed at games venues and admitted on Thursday that 9,000 more people were “going through the final stages of the required extensive training, vetting and accreditation process”. A leaked email showed it was still trying to recruit former police officers with some level of security clearance to bolster its Olympic operation.

Calling on the armed forces to supply 3,500 more personnel on top of the 13,500 troops it had agreed to provide for the Olympics creates embarrassment for the Home Office, which is already fighting claims that it has not done enough to ease airport border delays for games visitors. The last-minute deployment triggered fury at the Ministry of Defence, coming at a time when the department is under pressure because of operations in Helmand and recent cuts to army units.

Philip Hammond, defence secretary, made it clear on Thursday that he would ask the Home Office to pay the full costs. “We [the MoD] will be reimbursed the full marginal cost of the additional military contribution, not just accommodation and allowances but the costs of training programmes being disrupted,” he told a committee of MPs. “The principle is that the MoD should not suffer any financial disadvantage from providing this support.”

Asked what this would mean for G4S, he said: “Home Office and Locog will have a commercial negotiation with [the company] and we would not want to interfere with that.” Ms May reassured MPs that all the costs would be met from the £553m budget for venue security, and that financial penalties would be imposed on G4S for failing to meet its obligations.

However, with Labour criticising the Home Office’s management of the contract and G4S’s performance, both have taken a battering to their reputations. G4S said it was still “committed” to the Olympics security plan, and argued that the “unprecedented and very complex security recruitment” exercise was being carried “to a very tight schedule”.

In a separate development, Surrey Police Authority admitted that the failure of G4S to deliver its games contract had been a factor in its decision – announced on Thursday – to suspend its participation in a £1.5bn Home Office-backed contract to outsource some of its operations to a private provider. The company already has a similar contract with Lincolnshire police.

Source

]]> http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&p=52406 2 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=52414 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=52414#comments Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:28:45 +0000 wmw_admin http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=52414 UKPA – July 13, 2012

The firm at the centre of the Olympic security row saw its contract to manage civilian staff increase by more than £50 million over the past two years, it has been reported.

With just two weeks to go until the opening ceremony, the Government has drafted in an extra 3,500 military personnel to protect London 2012 venues after private company G4S admitted it might not be able to provide enough guards.

Former Army chief General Lord Dannatt issued a plea for spectators at the Games to show their appreciation to the troops, some of whom have recently served in Afghanistan and are facing possible job losses as the forces are cut back.

Lord Dannatt told BBC2′s Newsnight: “When you see those soldiers checking your bag, checking your ticket, remember they would have been on leave and just say thank you to them.”

Confidential papers obtained by the Daily Telegraph indicated that the fee charged by G4S for “programme management” rose dramatically as the number of staff required grew.

G4S was initially contracted by Games organiser Locog in 2010 to provide 2,000 security staff for £86 million, but that figure has since risen to 10,400 personnel in a contract now worth £284 million. The Daily Mail have since reported that the people employed will include A-level students.

The documents seen by the Telegraph suggested that the firm’s management fee rose over that time from £7.3 million to £60 million. Almost £34 million of the increase was for the G4S “programme management office” overseeing the security operation, compared to an increase of just £2.8 million in the firm’s recruitment spending.

There was no immediate response from G4S last night to a request for comment on the figures.

Source  

Comment – July 13, 2012

Of course, speculation about a pending false flag at the Olympic Games is just that: speculation. It is however, chilling reminiscent of Larry Silverstein’s profit mongering in the wake of 9/11.

Echoes of that pathological profiteering can be seen G4S.

Is it a coincidence that Larry Silverstein made such an obscene profit from the collapse of the World Trade Center or that the firm handling security for the London Olympics, G4S has such close ties to Israel?

Of course speculation about a false flag at the 2012 Olympics is only speculation but this is worth bearing in mind if it does occur.  

By: Salman An-Noor Hossain – (henrymakow.com) July 123, 2012

 Part I – Mega Massacre Planned

Friday July the 13th —  I am predicting that there will be a massive event in London during the Olympics.

The Illuminati Mafia, headquartered in the City of London, are planning to murder tens or hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions.

The plans have already been in place. Explosives have most probably been planted already with very little need for modifications.  The “Illuminati” card game by Steve Jackson in 1995 reveals a lot of information to us.

In the pack of 330 cards, there is one main one that stands out from the rest. That is the “Combined Disasters” card which shows a lot of smoke with a crowd running.

The five main individuals in the crowd are wearing clothes with all the colors of the Olympic rings in them. Big Ben is shown as being blown up and toppled.

Continues at source …

Original source

The undercover journalist who blew the whistle on G4S, the security company responsible for the 2012 Olympics, along with shocking plans for an evacuation of London, has revealed his identity following fears for his safety.

‘Lee Hazledean’ – the whistleblower who exposed how he had infiltrated G4S as an employee and uncovered how security preparations for the Olympics were so poor that they were inviting a terrorist attack, has revealed himself to be Ben Fellows, an acclaimed director who has worked with Stanley Kubrick ^[1]. Fellows has also appeared in numerous popular television and theatre shows.

Fellows made the decision to reveal his identity, after having gone under a pseudonym for the purposes of radio interviews conducted over the last week, because of fears over his safety.

“With all sincerity I’m now afraid that I might be in physical danger from G4S,” Fellows told Infowars, adding that he feared the mainstream media was about to launch a character assassination campaign. “My only protection is to go public…. I have done nothing wrong and I stand by everything that I have said,” added Fellows.

Fellows also revealed that Andy Davies, Channel 4 News Home Affairs Correspondent, demanded that he retract statements made during a radio interview with BCFM’s Friday Drivetime in which Fellows said of Davies, “I sent him an email, I called, he wasn’t interested and he said there’s a media blackout on this kind of story, that nobody would be interested in running it.”

In a telephone conversation provided to Infowars, Davies claims that he never read Fellows’ original email and that the two never had a conversation about the issue.

“I emailed Andy Davies on the 13th of June and pitched the story to him, he then called me back and we talked,” claims Fellows, who is now going public to offset his concern that his name may have been privately passed to G4S.

Fellows’ revelations about how he infiltrated G4S and what he discovered were nothing less than astounding. However, the mainstream media chose to run a whitewash ^[2], focusing instead on relatively tame security lapses and ignoring Fellows’ story altogether, despite the fact that it had already gone viral in the alternative media.

During his time working for G4S over the past several months, Fellows learned of numerous disturbing developments. ^[3]

- Fellows was able to get the job of a security officer via a simple application process. No background checks were carried out and his personal references were not checked.

- Fellows was successful in taking guns, knives and explosives through both metal detectors and body scanners on numerous occasions during dummy runs.

- Fellows was told that metal detectors and body scanners would be deactivated at peak times in order to get crowds into the Olympic venue quicker.

- Fellows was also informed that 200,000 casket linings that can hold four dead bodies each have been shipped into London in preparation for the Games.

- Thousands of foreign troops under the auspices of the United Nations have also been brought into London.

- Plans for an evacuation of London in the aftermath of a deadly terrorist attack have been discussed at great length. G4S employees were briefed on the evacuation plan to a greater extent than the time spent on training them to conduct security screening.

- G4S security staff have been caught doing drug deals while in training with no retribution. Uniforms have also been handed out to unauthorized personnel as well as uniforms being stolen. G4S staff have also been caught taking photographs on their cellphones of secure locations.

- Fellows was told that Predator drones of the type used in Afghanistan and Yemen would be circling London during the Olympics.

- Fellows believes G4S security staff are so poorly trained and the security operation as a whole is so lax that terrorists could quite easily stage a “massacre” during the Games.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com ^[4]. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.

Source