Kevin Boyle — No One to Vote For May 17, 2013

This book is a masterpiece, one the very best I have read. Unpublished, because of its controversial subject matter for years, it is now available in the USA and the UK. It is also available free as a PDF.

As an introduction to this great work I can do no better than to reproduce commentaries (below) written by Dane, Knud Eriksen.

Douglas Reed and the Jews

by Knud Eriksen

In Dronten no. 4 (“The Dodo”) I first mentioned the once world famous foreign correspondent and author, Douglas Reed, who went from being widely known and respected before, during and after the II.nd World War to becoming an expelled and completely forgotten person.

Why was he “forgotten”?

It was simply because he wrote about “The Jewish Question!”

International Jewry responded to his frank description of the problem with total censorship, so that his new books could no longer be printed and the old ones would disappear gradually from the bookstores and even from the library shelves.

After a short period of slandering he was no longer mentioned at all in the world’s media.

As the author Ivor Benson (who has himself written a book on this subject: The Zionist Factor) says in the foreword to Douglas Reeds masterpiece The Controversy of Zion, which had to wait 22 years before it could be published, “the adversity, which Reed encountered, would have made a lesser personality give up. But not he“.

After his expulsion from the zionist-controlled media-world, he found himself free to start this most outstanding work, which all the years as a foreign correspondent in Europe and his earlier books had only been a preparation and an education for. His vision expanded from year to year and from book to book. It was an education, which was not available in any university.”

He spent more than three years away from his family in the early fifties in New York Central Library or in front of his typewriter in modest surroundings in New York and in Montreal. He rewrote the whole book with an epilogue i 1956, where the uprising in Hungary and the Suez-war were scrutinized as further examples of the talmudic co-operation between communism and zionism. Then, as mentioned, the book had to wait 22 years for a possibility of getting published!

It is instructive to observe how Douglas Reed gradually penetrates deeper and deeper into the Jewish problem from  that time, when he had hardly even thought about it in 1935 (as he writes inThe controversy of Zion) until he delivers his harsh judgement in the shape of The controversy of Zion.

The mood of gloom and doom is not his own, but due to the gloomy character of the subject, as he says in the epilogue to the book. In the cause of his work he has felt the evil as an almost physical presence in the plans, he reveals. As “forces from some dinosaur-lair projected into the twentieth century.” But, he says, it is not for him to judge, what is evil. God must have had an intention, in his wisdom, to allow this evil to exist, possibly for the progress of the soul. But in that case he, himself, feels like being also a part of God’s creation, who has the duty to reveal this evil, so that human beings can be set free from it.

Ivor Benson follows this line of thought in the epilogue to his own book on the subject (1986) The Zionist Factor, as follows: “There is no Jewish problem per se, only a gigantic 20th century problem, in which the fate and responsibility of Jews and Christians are inseperably intertwined”. The irresponsible world power, built on money and dominated by Jews, is, in its outstretched cob-web something, that we have all allowed to grow big and strong through our irresponsibility.

But if this power has now grown so strong, that it cannot be stopped, but must be allowed to continue its predestined course, until, finally, it devours itself like a worldwide wolf, what use is it then to us to get to know and fully understand what goes on in the world?”

Ivor Benson answers this as follows: “a short answer is given in a christian concept with even older sources: “Thou shalt know the truth and the truth shall set you free.”

Douglas Reed attempted to give you the best possible description of the way organized world-Jewry works and of the immense power it wielded in goading world-opinion against Germany…..”I imagine anybody who has read these two books will realize that I hold Germany to be a menace to England, but that I do not identify the cause of England with that of the foreign Jews.”

After he wrote Insanity Fair Reid was swamped by offers from American publishers for his next book. He signed a contract with one firm. “When I began Disgrace Abounding I did not know that it would be an anti-Semitic book. The anti-Semitic part is the result of my observation of the Jews in the last year and of my conviction that the mass influx of Jews to England is a political mistake and a national misfortune.”

The American publisher, after reading Disgrace Abounding, declined to publish on the ground that the Semitic part was ‘slanderous and libellous’. Read the Jewish part for yourself and see if this is true. I, for my part, declined to have the book published anywhere without the Jewish chapters. The real meaning of that decision is that, in America, you may ‘slander and libel’ Germany as much as you like, and be paid for it, but you must not discuss the Jewish problem, you must not assert that there is a Jewish problem.

I see very little difference between the Jewish and the Hitlerist method, in this matter of free speech and free discussion. The Jews are for free attacks on Germany, nothing else. The same thing happened in some of the Scandinavian countries, where Insanity Fair had great success and where publishers were clamouring for the next book – until they saw the Jewish chapters. They asked to be allowed to publish the book without them. I refused. The same thing happened in France even with Insanity Fair, where a publisher contracted for the book who apparently could not read English and only realized when he saw the French translation that there was a few passages in it which he did not consider sufficiently favourable to the Jews. He demanded their excision, I refused, and he sold the contract to another firm.

The importance of this, for you, is that you should realize that what is presented to you as ‘American approval’ or ‘American disapproval’ of this or that action of British policy is not American but Jewish opinion, and that this puts quite another face on the matter. If you are to fight Germany again, you must do it for England’s sake. You must not allow yourselves to be egged on by Jews masquerading to-day as ‘German public opinion’, to-morrow as ‘Czechoslovak public opinion’, the day after as ‘English public opinion’, and the next day as ‘American public opinion’. If England suffers disaster in coming years, the Jews who have come to England in these latter years will not suffer that misfortune in like measure; they will not feel it as Englishmen will feel it, they will prosper in chaos, and when they feel that a lean time is coming for them they will make up their minds to sail away.

As I came up the Thames I wondered what my own future would be. I had promised myself to decide within a very few days whether I would continue to write about the daily European scene or whether I would cut loose [ed: altogether?] together, go to Polynesia, Patagonia or Peking, write about other things than Hitler’s eternal invasions.

I have no inferiority complex, but only the most normal longings for England to be better. I have a heavy foreboding for England, whose rulers have made every mistake they could. I want to see England safe at home and abroad. Safe at home for the British Derelict Aryans, not for the Foreign Non-Aryans. Safe abroad from Germany.

Neither of these things is being done. The danger of a German ultimatum has been drawing daily nearer. What shall it profit Britain if she lose her whole Empire and gain only the Jews? Now, at the last moment, a faint hope offers that a stand will be made – over Poland. Then why not for Czecho-Slovakia? Why have we handed over the Czech Army, the Czech Air Force, the Skoda Works, the Czech gold, to Germany? If we were from the beginning prepared to make this stand, we should have made it years ago. Then you would have had none of this trouble. You could have satisfied Germany’s just grievances – but you could have compelled her to keep the peace…….”

Knud Eriksen, feb. 1998

Douglas Reed

The Controversy of Zion
A Summary

by Knud Eriksen, 1998

In the foreword to the 1985-edition of Douglas Reeds book, the author Ivor Benson describes, how the intervening years from 1956, when the book was completed, until 1985, have confirmed Douglas Reeds interpretation of the past 2.000 years of history in every way. He covers the continued role of the Middle East as the tinderbox, that can become the cause of the next world war, and the continued suppression and misrepresentation, in the media, of all news and discussion.

It was only the few who knew the background of talmudic Zionism and Communism, who had a chance to understand such decisive events as the so-called “Six-days-war” and the later massive invasion of Lebanon i 1982. The invasion was supposed to do away with the PLO, it was said, but in reality it was simply a part of the old Great-Israel-plan (Eretz-Israel). Just as is today’s invasion of Iraq.

The worlds pro-israeli mass media picture of Israel as a small, innocent democracy, which was constantly in need of help, became more and more untrustworthy, so not many were surprised, when the English Institute of Strategic Studies could report, that Israel had become the worlds fourth greatest military power after The United States, Soviet and China, but way ahead of nations like England and France. After the fall of the Soviet Union, this country, with a population about the same size as the tiny danish one, may even have risen further on this top-4-list!

The change in the reactions of the Jews themselves at this time – 1982 – was significant: After the massacre of 1.500 men, women and children in two palestinian refugee-camps in Beirut, the Western media timidly withheld comments, while 350.000 inhabitants of Tel Aviv protested against their own government.

Douglas Reed seems to have foreseen this development also, for among the last words in his book – from 1956 – are the following: “I think, that the Jews of the world are beginning to realize the wrong of revolutionary Zionism, the twin of the other destructive movement, Communism, and that towards the end of this 20th Century they will finally have decided to join in the ranks of mankind.”

The book starts out with a 1789-quotation from the philosopher Edmund Burke who, in Reflections on the Revolution, directed a literary attack on the French Revolution:

“Something has happened which it is hard to speak about and impossible to keep silent about.”

World Revolution, Zionism and World Government

The World Revolution, which in this century (20th) has destroyed human civilization to an unheard of degree – so far – was only one of the two revolutionary movements, which spead like an epidemic pest over the world from the same week in October 1917. Both sprang from talmudic-lead Eastern Jews. The World Revolution has been the climax, so far, of judaic world conquest. The defeat of the Revolution is only apparent. Its destructive effect continues a bit more covertly without Soviet, but still with China as an example of this type of terror-lead slavesociety, and with judaic agents solidly placed on the most important posts in the world. All the “spiritual values” continue, as f.ex. also in the EU.

And its twin, Revolutionary Zionism, grows ever stronger towards the envisioned Eretz-Israel – Great Israel, which is to stretch from the Nile to the Eufrat in the whole “original area”, with all the”Jews” of the world brought together there, and with Jerusalem as the world capital and centre of the “World Peace of the World Government”.

Everything is supported by the Pentateuch of the Old Testament, supplemented by the Talmud, concerning the predestination of the “Chosen People” to exterminate or subjugate all other nations. Among the Zionist leaders this is taken one hundred percent seriously. Like a military operation the two groups work together with incredible synchronisation towards the all-domineering World Government. It will not be long before it becomes a reality. We see it happening every day: UN, NATO, EU, WTO, International Treaties and Conventions, International Courts with transnational jurisdiction and the hundreds- even thousands – of international mergers and take-overs in business.

Also the idea of world government has its background in The Old Testament and the Talmud. It is “The Chosen People”, which arranges matters according to the text, with the rest of the world as slaves. The greatest achievements of both movements took place in the periods of confusion close to the end of-, and right after the two worlds wars, which were started by the leaders of these two movements. Only the Revolution and Zionism came out as winners after the two global wars, with their inconcievable suffering.

Victors in the first global war

After the First World War the Revolution was fixed in Russia with terror and extermination of all “classes” down to – and including – the culac, a farmer with 3 cows. It was an almost exclusively Jewish government, which wielded this terror. It was to last for 70 years, with roughly 20 million murders on its conscience (And Communism worldwide a total of 100 million).

Although western media, especially from 1952 on, carried on about “anti-semitism” in the Soviet, this was never anything but bluff, because these Soviet Jewish leaders simply got cold feet as the reign of terror came to be known as the Empire of Evil. In reality it was only different fractions fighting each other. The most obvious “Jewish” representatives were withdrawn, but the power structure, especially in the secret police, that had the decisive power, remained “Jewish”. “Anti-semitism” was severely punished (right up until the fall of the Soviet Union, and possibly still is) and was therefore quite unthinkable.

Right after the Revolution there was a death penalty for being in possession of “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, which was appearantly one of the “Jews’” plans for world conquest through revolution, and for breaking down Christian countires.

At the same time Zionism, with the Balfour-Declaration of October 1917, had obtained a promise from Great Britain, in return for bringing The United States into the World War, to give to the Jews “a national home” in Palestine.

Slowly the pressure on the politicians of the West was increased, in order to make this a reality. Especially on the American ones, who were surrounded by Jewish “advisers”, and the immigration to the area increased enormously by the miraculous remedy of “Anti-semitism”, combined with the support of jewish tycoons and western pro-Zionist leaders in the inter-war period.

And the League of Nations became the first core of the World Government, also with Zionists on high posts, pulling strings.

And in the next global war……….

In the same way it was only these three movements – Communism, Zionism, and World Government, that profited from the suffering and destruction of the Second World War. The Western Powers helped the World Revolution to entrench itself deep in Europe.

General Eisenhower ordered the Western generals to stop at a line Vienna-Berlin. All of the Eastern European countries, the “liberation” of which had supposedly been what the whole war was all about, were sacrificed to the revolutionary terror at the Yalta-conference.

At first Zionism supported Hitler financially and with a hesitant or even obliging press. Then, in 1933, it declared Holy War on him.

Zionists obtained so much compassion for Jews after the persecution and the much-advertised extermination, that the world powers and the populations of the West accepted a division of Palestine and the “re-settling” of Jews in the area. The arabs were deliberately sacrificed, and this started one of our times’ most dangerous anti-Western hate-waves – strongly maintained ever since.

Reed gives many examples of the “special sufferings” of the Jews during the war being only media-fabricated lies. In ratio to their numbers they didn’t suffer any more or any less than other people, but this was an example of the phenomenon, that everything must focus on Jews. Other peoples have suffered far more, numerically. At the end of the war, and shortly thereafter, Zionists received enormous loads of weapons from the Soviet Union. And several hundred thousands of Jews emigrated from a country, which no-one else could get out of, so that soon they became a well-armed majority, being able to drive the original population away by Old Testament terror. The result was 600.000 miserable refugees.

The United Nations, which was originally planned and organized by Alger Hiss and and the Jew Harry Dexter White, both later exposed as communist spies, was to become a temporary climax of a judaic-dominated World Government. It’s many ramifications all had as their most important purpose to reduce the sovereign nations to municipalities, and to give unlimited power to the organisation itself. Naturally in order to “secure peace”, just like the League of Nations. For many years the organisation was communist-dominated, and its many condemnations of israeli terror were never followed up by action.

The unconditional support from Western leaders for an ever-growing Great-Israel leads towards a World Government with-, or without a Third World War. Israel’s open nationalism and racism gets no serious criticism from a Zionist-dominated “public opinion”. The West is closing down its own states as “antiquated”, and they are more and more under the control of the swelling international organisations, dominated by “Jewish” agents. The pattern of setting Western powers up against each other and letting them bleed to death, is now worked in thoroughly, and has become almost an exact science.

The “Jewish Agents” of the West, who are working for either Zionist or Communist success, are now behaving in an unrestrained, treasonable manner and quite in accordance with “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” for destruction of “Christian Nations”. A Third World War could be the third act, which these forces consider necessary to gain complete control in the ensuing need and confusion.

Sacrificing many of their “own people” has been acceptable, even necessary, before, in order to maintain a government based on fear, and also for populating Israel through manufactured “anti-semitism”.

And then we get the war … unless enough people, the world over, wake up and pull the war-mongers away from the “handle for the big bang.”

The history of the previous 2.000 years

The author supports his arguments by quoting statements, writings and actions made by “Jews”. The desciption of the development of Zionism, in the last Century, for instance, focuses on Chaim Weizmann, who was a key figure in the political Zionist intrigues, and who became the first president of Israel. A special source is Weizmanns auto-biography from 1949, Trial and Error.

The Jewish background of Communism and World Revolution is a fact, and enormous amounts of money have been spent exactly to try to hide this. Probably no other secret has cost as much to maintain. But Jewish sources exist, that admit it. Both Jewish historians, communist leaders, newspaper articles and reports from the time of The Revolution are used as source material.

As to the longer historical perspective, Reed particularly supports his arguments by reference to the stongly Zionist historian, Dr. Josef Kastein, whose book, History and Destiny of the Jews, appeared in 1933. However, he also uses many other sources, all mentioned in the bibliography in the book. Kasteins book covers the same time-span as “The Controversy”, and much information in Dr. Kasteins book can be taken as direct evidence of Douglas Reeds conclusions.

The Master Race

The misery began in the year 458 b.C., when a small tribe in the old Judea accepted a creed based on race. The tribe had previously been expelled by the Israelites for such racism. This seemingly unimportant event has probably caused more destruction for Mankind than both the existence of explosives and epidemics. The tribe adapted the creed of the Master Race as nothing less than “The Law”.

The Judeans were a small tribe under the Persian king. The creed of Judaism was not the beginning of monotheism, as has been propagated. Monotheism dates all the way back to The Egyptian Book of the Dead, 2.600 years b.C. and maybe even further. Judaism, on the contrary, was the exact anti-thesis, namely the worship of a racist tribal god.

“The Law” or “The Pact” was – and is – unique in being based on a statement from a tribal god, to the effect that his “chosen people”: “the Israelites” (in reality, the Judeans) would be set above all other peoples and settled in a “promised land”, if only they would stick to all of his rules and judgements. If Jehova, then, was to be worshipped in a certain place, it followed, that when the worshippers were not actually in that place, they were being “persecuted”, in “captivity” and had to “destroy” the “strangers” that “kept them in captivity”. Only in this way was Jehova to be a god for all other peoples – as the punishing god, who punished his own people first – by a “captivity” among the heathens for their “transgressions against the law” and then, as by an exact script, punished the strangers by a predestined extermination, when “the chosen people” had followed all the rules to the letter.

It was probably not even a pact with the Judaeans, for according to “The Holy Scripture”, the pact was made with the Israelites, who had long since mingled with the rest of Mankind, and who have never known this racist creed as far as we know. The Jewish Encyclopaedia says, that the Judeans “probably were a non-Israeli tribe”. The Israelites turned away from the racism of the Judeans. The creed has gone down in history as having been created by the Levites from Judea.

What happened before 458 b.C. is mainly mythology, unlike the later, most important events. The written record predates 458 b.C. by a couple of centuries, when the Israelites rejected the Judeans. The history of Moses was taken by the Israelites from the widespread mythology, which goes all the way back to the history of the Babylonean king, Sargon the Elder, 2.000 years earlier. The ten commandments are much like similar commandments from the Egyptians, the Babyloneans and the Assyrians. These common ideas about one god for all mankind, the Levites, the rulers of Judea, then put in reverse, when they wrote down their laws. They founded the permanent counter-movement against all universal religions and identified the names Judea and Jews, with the doctrine of self-made separation from Mankind, racial hatred, murder in the name of religion, and revenge. Also the personification of treason, a Judas, was included right from the beginning of Judea.

The stories of Moses, leading a mass-exodus from Egypt, can not be true, even according to Dr. Kastein. It was invented, as a necessity, in order to fit into the pattern of “Jehovas revenge”, the destructive basic principle of Judaism.

The Israelites had, as the larger part of a segregated group of people, settled in the northern part of Canaan. In the south, sorrounded by the original canaanites, the tribe of Judah took shape. Thus the name “Judaism” and “Jew”.

This tribe was isolated from-, and did not get along well with, the neighbours, right from the start. There is much mystery concerning it, including its beginnings. It seems more to have been expelled than chosen. And in the following editions of “The Holy Scriptures”, written by their scribes, who wrote whatever suited them arose, in the course of the centuries, and in more and more places, the commands “destroy completely”, “tear down”, “exterminate” etc.

The Israelites had withdrawn, then, from the Judeans’ racist beliefs and had mingled with the rest of Mankind. They “disappeared” in this way as a separate people, while the Judeans kept to themselves by strict racial laws.

In the course of time these were further sharpened and expanded to regulate even the most trivial daily details. The punishments for breaking the laws were severe, and common “Jews” came completely under the control of the scribes. It was this spiritual ghetto, which became the forerunner for the physical ghetto and for the antagonism and exclusion by others, of the Jews, as a retribution.

Talmud and Treason

In the Babylonean “captivity” the scribes added four “Mose”-books to the 5th, which had been the first. They expanded, in this way, further the intolerant racial religion, which would keep the Jews separated from the rest of mankind forever, if it could be enforced. And in Babylon they found the means. The religious leaders actually succeeded in keeping their congregation completely separated from the surroundings. They obtained authority with those, who kept them “in captivity” for use against “their own”, and finally, in the year 536 b.C., to show their gratitude, they destroyed the entire host-country through treason, through the help of the army of a new ruler, king Cyprus of Persia, who, in turn, they then destroyed etc……..the well-known pattern, which was later perfected and used, among many other occasions, in the two world wars in The 20th Century. “The Jews”, by the way, at least the leaders, had a fine time in Babylon, according to Dr. Kastein. They were completely free. The narrative of the destruction of Babylon created an image of an irresistible destructive power. This was another pattern, which was further expanded by the scribes.

Treason was always the return for hospitality. According to Dr. Kastein, the Jews were instrumental in the destruction of the Babyloneans, the Persians, the Egyptians, the Greeks and the Romans. Each time by “stretching out open arms” to a conqueror.

This situation has continued up through the centuries. Simultaneously, the chains of the common Jews were tightened more and more, and from the time of Jesus the Talmud had been developed, as a collection of scriptures, which contain rules of conduct for everything, particularly directed against Christianity. The new religion of tolerance, which was the direct opposite of the Levitical racial hatred, constituted the worst danger for the scribes – that of loosing their grip on the congregation. If the many Jewish rules of conduct were broken, this was punished severely, even by death. The Jewish authorities held the common Jews in a grip of terror by means of an authority, given them by the “Christian” rulers. After Rome had lost its patience with the Jews, Jerusalem was destroyed in the year 70 and the Jews were scattered in the surrounding countries.

Sanhedrin

The world leadership in Judaism, which in Jerusalem was called the Sanhedrin, “the wise men of Zion”, moved around during the next centuries, as a mobile government with incredible power over the scattered congregations. After the destruction of Jerusalem the headquarters were moved to Jamnia, where it remained for about 100 years. Thereafter it was Usha in Galilea, then, as always because of “persecution”, it moved back to Sura in Babylon. For 600 years the world leadership remained in Jamnia, Usha and Galilea, in the oriental climate, where it belonged. When the world center was then moved to Spain, as a result of the moslem conquests (!) a long painful coexistence with the Christian countries began, in which the “oriental” mentality was not understood and appreciated. These sufferings are about to destroy the West in our time.

Treason in “Spanish”

In the Christian Spain treason was repeated. As in Babylon and Egypt the Jews turned against the people among whom they lived. They opened the gates of the city for the conquerors and was thereafter given custody of the raped city by the moslems … against whom they also turned in the end. Once more they were thrown out for bad behaviour, in 1492. They obviously were identified with the moslem conquerors and thrown out together with them. Among the worst “persecutions” they had had to endure, was being forbidden to keep slaves! (prof. Graetz): “hereafter the Jews could neither buy Christians as slaves nor recieve them as presents.”

They had, by this time, been in Spain for 800 years. Most of them went back to Northern Africa, from where they had come, or they went to Egypt, Palestine, Italy, The greek Islands and Turkey. Other colonies had arisen in France, Germany, Holland and England, and these also recieved some of the expelled. Wherever they settled down, the religious leaders always had the local prince help them retain power over their congragation. Total power. Some of these Jews became very wealthy and they particularly developed loan capitalism as their power base. They lent large sums to extravagant princes, and in return for these recieved many privileges as court Jews. The best known representative for this money-power was the Rotschild family, which in the 19th century had become the real rulers of Europe.

Then the world leadership of Judaism was then moved to Poland.

The Chazars

This is one of the central mysteries. Why Poland? There was no information about any considerable part of the Spanish Jews having moved to Poland, or information that any earlier mass-immigration of Jews into Poland had taken place. In the 15-hundreds a (Jewish) population, counting millions, suddenly arose (Dr. Kastein). But populations of millions do not suddenly arise, and Dr. Kastein evades the question. Behind this suppressed knowledge lies the key to understanding the following history of Zionism. The Jewish headquarter was established amidst these so-called Eastern Jews, of whom even the Western Jews had, until then, only heard rumors, and of which the rest of the world knew nothing. From then on they took over the leadership of World Judaism. They were descendants of the Chazars, a people of Turkish-mongoloid origin, who had converted to Judaism around the 7th Century a.C. From here an even harsher segregation was ordered by “the wise ones”. Meanwhile, the western Jews were slowly becoming “assimilated” in the Western European population, especially after the legislation that followed the French Revolution, which gradually gave them full civil rights. This eastern group gradually took over the leadership of “Judaism” to such a degree, that the Jewish “statistics” – which by the way have always been quite untrustworthy – practically let them disappear. Today eastern Jews constitute at least 90 % of all Jews, according to these statistics, both in Israel and in the rest of the world.

The western Jews who, by using fantasy and a maximum of twisting of truth, claimed to have once lived in Palestine, were slowly becoming assimilated, after having been thrown out of Spain, and almost “disappeared” as en entity. In their stead appeared the Eastern Jews, an Asian people, which had never had the slightest connection with Palestine.

And, suddenly, also the world headquarters of the Jews disappeared. According to Dr. Kastein it “ceased to exist”.

World Government without Address

There was, however, not much indication that this was so. But it became secret after 1772, when Poland was divided, and the larger part of the Jews came under Russian rule. Such a world headquarter had existed for over 2.500 years, and now it was supposed to have suddenly disappeared. It could, nevertheless, be assembled, when Napoleon called in “The great Sanhedrin” in 1807, in order to get clarity concerning the loyalty of French Jews or lack of same. Dr. Kastein, himself, reveals joyfully, that “in the 19th Century a Jewish International took shape”.

The 19th Century belonged to the revolutionary conspiracies of both Zionism and Communism, which unfolded in the 20th Century. It was also in that Century, that the physical ghetto was replaced by a mental one: the fear of “Antisemitism”. In Jewish families, the question was whether to further Revolutionary Communism or Revolutionary Zionism (Weizmann). It ended up being both. Communism should tear down all nations. Zionism should establish one. A World Government without an address was becoming a fashion, which has been followed undeviatingly all through the 20th Century.

World Revolution and Master Race

The British statesman, Benjamin Disraeli (a baptised Jew) said, that Jews were behind all the revolutions in the middle of the Century (from 1848), and there was significant participation by Jews also in the French Revolution. However, according to Reed, no Jewish leadership of the initial intrigues has been traced. It was secret societies, especially the Jacobins, who played the leading part, and these could be traced back to the German professor Adam Weishaupt, who in 1776 founded the Illuminati, a secret society, directed against all Christian authorities. Soon it had infiltrated all of the European freemasonry and it then went on to America. The conspiracy of the Illuminati, which was accidentally revealed by the Bavarian government in 1787, contained almost, word by word, the same text in their program as the later “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” (Nesta Webster) and it was clearly recognizable in the theories of the Russian Revolution. The “Russian” Revolution was the first, which was Jewish without any doubt (around 90% of the leaders were Jews) and this revolution, along with the First World War was the first clear evidence, that “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” were being followed literally in the major events of the world.

Reed gives several other examples of this script being an exact prophecy for the nearest future or a frightening plan for world conquest. (See Chapter “The Protocols”, in Reeds book and the whole text of the Protocols under “Links” and “More”). It may never be proven, whether they are “Jewish” or not. More importantly, Reed frequently points out, that it has been mostly Jewish dissidents, who have warned against them. He mentions several. But the details of the World Government are being put in place day after day.

Knud Bjeld Eriksen, February 6., 1998

Source

JFK Assassination Enablers? – by Hugh Turley

http://www.dcdave.com/ via Henry Makow.com May 16, 2013

No pictures of Eugene Dinkin are extant online. This adds credibility to this story — Henry Makow Ph.D.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and stories about that fateful day in November 1963 have already started appearing in the American media.  It is a popular belief that if there were a conspiracy, someone would come forward and the press would tell us.

Then why is there still no news about Pfc. Eugene Dinkin, a cryptographic code operator for the Army? Declassified CIA and FBI documents released in the 1990s reveal a strange tale that raises the question: Could Dinkin have learned the details of an assassination plot from the classified documents he handled, or was he a paranoiac who somehow made a number of amazingly accurate prophecies?

Continues …

Introduction by Gilad Atzmon — May 16, 2013

Every so often we come across a secular Jewish ‘anti’ Zionist’  who argues that Zionism is not Judaism and vice versa. Interestingly enough, I have just come across an invaluable text that illuminates this question from a rabbinical perspective. Apparently back in 1942, 757 American Rabbis added their names to a public pronouncement titled ‘Zionism an Affirmation of Judaism’. This Rabbinical rally for Zionism was declared at the time “the largest public pronouncement in all Jewish history.”

Today, we tend to believe that world Jewry’s transition towards support for Israel followed the 1967 war though some might  argue that already in 1948, American Jews manifested a growing support for Zionism. However, this rabbinical pronouncement proves that as early as 1942, the American Jewish religious establishment was already deeply Zionist. And if this is not enough, the rabbis also regarded Zionism as the ‘implementation’ of Judaism. Seemingly, already then, the peak of World War two, the overwhelming majority of American Rabbis regarded Zionism, not only as fully consistent with Judaism, but as a “logical expression and implementation of it.”

In spite of the fact that early Zionist leaders were largely secular and the East European Jewish settler waves were driven by Jewish socialist ideology, the rabbis contend that “Zionism is not a secularist movement. It has its origins and roots in the authoritative religious texts of Judaism.

Those rabbis were not a bunch of ignoramuses. They were patriotic and nationalistic and they grasped that “universalism is not a contradiction of nationalism.” The rabbis tried to differentiate between contemporaneous German Nationalism and other national movements and they definitely wanted to believe that Zionism was categorically different to Nazism. “Nationalism as such, whether it be English, French, American or Jewish, is not in itself evil. It is only militaristic and chauvinistic nationalism, that nationalism which shamelessly flouts all mandates of international morality, which is evil.” But as we know, just three years after the liberation of Auschwitz the new Jewish State launched a devastating racially driven ethnic-cleansing campaign. Zionism has proven to be militaristic and chauvinistic.

Shockingly enough, back in 1942 as many as 757 American rabbis were able to predict the outcome of the war and they realised that the suffering of European Jewry would be translated into a Jewish State . “We are not so bold as to predict the nature of the international order which will emerge from the present war. It is altogether likely, and indeed it may be desirable, that all sovereign states shall under the coming peace surrender some of their sovereignty to achieve a just and peaceful world society (a Jewish State).”

Some American patriots today are concerned with Israeli-American dual nationality and the dual aspirations of American Jews. Apparently our rabbis addressed this topic too. According to them, there is no such conflict whatsoever. All American Jews are American patriots and all American decision makers are Zionists. “Every fair-minded American knows that American Jews have only one political allegiance–and that is to America. There is nothing in Zionism to impair this loyalty. Zionism has been endorsed in our generation by every President from Woodrow Wilson to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and has been approved by the Congress of the United States. The noblest spirits in American life, statesmen, scholars, writers, ministers and leaders of labor and industry, have lent their sympathy and encouragement to the movement.”

Back in 1942 our American rabbis were bold enough to state that defeating Hitler was far from sufficient. For them, a full solution of the Jewish question could only take place in Palestine. “Jews, and all non-Jews who are sympathetically interested in the plight of Jewry, should bear in mind that the defeat of Hitler will not of itself normalize Jewish life in Europe. “

But there was one thing the American rabbis failed to mention – the Palestinian people. For some reason, those rabbis who knew much about ‘universalism’ and in particular Jewish ‘universalism’ showed very little concern to the people of the land. I guess that after all, chosennss is a form of blindness and rabbis probably know more about this than anyone else.

Zionism: An Affirmation of Judaism

ZIONISM AN AFFIRMATION OF JUDAISM A Reply by 757 Orthodox, Conservative and Reform Rabbis of America to a Statement Issued by Ninety Members of the Reform Rabbinate Charging That Zionism Is Incompatible with the Teachings of Judaism

THE SUBJOINED REPLY was prepared at the initiative of the following Rabbis who submitted it to their colleagues throughout the country for signature: Philip S. Bernstein, Barnett R. Brickner, Israel Goldstein, James G. Heller, Mordecai M. Kaplan, B. L. Levinthal, Israel H. Levinthal, Louis M. Levitsky, Joshua Loth Liebman, Joseph H. Lookstein, Jacob R. Marcus, Abraham A. Neuman, Louis I. Newman, David de Sola Pool, Abba Hillel Silver, Milton Steinberg, and Stephen S. Wise.

WE, THE UNDERSIGNED RABBIS of all elements in American Jewish religious life, have noted with concern a statement by ninety of our colleagues in which they repudiate Zionism on the ground that it is inconsistent with Jewish religious and moral doctrine. This statement misrepresents Zionism and misinterprets historic Jewish religious teaching, and we should be derelict in our duty if we did not correct the misapprehensions which it is likely to foster.

We call attention in the first place to the fact that the signatories to this statement, for whom as fellow-Rabbis we have a high regard, represent no more than a very small fraction of the American rabbinate. They constitute a minority even of the rabbinate of Reform Judaism with which they are associated. The overwhelming majority of American Rabbis regard Zionism not only as fully consistent with Judaism but as a logical expression and implementation of it.

Our colleagues concede the need for Jewish immigration into Palestine as contributing towards a solution of the vast tragedy of Jewish homelessness. They profess themselves ready to encourage such settlement. They are aware of the important achievements, social and spiritual, of the Palestinian Jewish community and they pledge to it their unstinted support. And yet, subscribing to every practical accomplishment of Zionism, they have embarked upon a public criticism of it. In explanation of their opposition they advance the consideration that Zionism is nationalistic and secularistic. On both scores they maintain it is incompatible with the Jewish religion and its universalistic outlook. They protest against the political emphasis which, they say, is now paramount in the Zionist program and which, according to them, tends to confuse both Jews and Christians as to the place and function of the Jewish group in American society. They appeal to the prophets of ancient Israel for substantiation of their views.

TREASURING the doctrines and moral principles of our faith no less than they, devoted equally to America and its democratic processes and spirit, we nonetheless find every one of their contentions totally without foundation.

Zionism is not a secularist movement. It has its origins and roots in the authoritative religious texts of Judaism. Scripture and rabbinical literature alike are replete with the promise of the restoration of Israel to its ancestral home. Anti-Zionism, not Zionism, is a departure from the Jewish religion. Nothing in the entire pronouncement of our colleagues is more painful than their appeal to the prophets of Israel—to those very prophets whose inspired and recorded words of national rebirth and restoration nurtured and sustained the hope of Israel throughout the ages.

Nor is Zionism a denial of the universalistic teachings of Judaism. Universalism is not a contradiction of nationalism. Nationalism as such, whether it be English, French, American or Jewish, is not in itself evil. It is only militaristic and chauvinistic nationalism, that nationalism which shamelessly flouts all mandates of international morality, which is evil. The prophets of Israel looked forward to the time not when all national entities would be obliterated, but when all nations would walk in the light of the Lord, live by His law and learn war no more.

Our colleagues find themselves unable to subscribe to the political emphasis “now paramount in the Zionist program.” We fail to perceive what it is to which they object. Is it to the fact that there are a regularly constituted Zionist organization and a Jewish Agency which deal with the mandatory government, the Colonial office, the League of Nations and other recognized political bodies? But obviously, even immigration and colonization are practical matters which require political action. The settlement of a half million Jews in Palestine since the last war was made possible by political action which culminated in the Balfour Declaration and the Palestine Mandate. There can be little hope of opening the doors of Palestine for mass Jewish immigration after the war without effective political action. Or is it that they object to the ultimate achievement by the Jewish community of Palestine of some form of Jewish statehood? We are not so bold as to predict the nature of the international order which will emerge from the present war. It is altogether likely, and indeed it may be desirable, that all sovereign states shall under the coming peace surrender some of their sovereignty to achieve a just and peaceful world society.

Certainly our colleagues will allow to the Jews of Palestine the same rights that are allowed to all other peoples resident on their own land. If Jews should ultimately come to constitute a majority of the population of Palestine, would our colleagues suggest that all other peoples in the post-war world shall be entitled to political self-determination, whatever form that may take, but the Jewish people in Palestine shall not have such a right? Or do they mean to suggest that the Jews in Palestine shall forever remain a minority in order not to achieve such political self-determination?

PROTESTING their sympathy both for the homeless Jews of the world and for their brethren in Palestine, our colleagues have by their pronouncement done all these a grave disservice. It may well be that to the degree to which their efforts arc at all effective, Jews who might otherwise have found a haven in Palestine will be denied one. The enemies of the Jewish homeland will be strengthened in their propaganda as a result of the aid which these Rabbis have given them. To the Jews of Palestine, facing the gravest danger in their history and fighting hard to maintain morale and hope in the teeth of the totalitarian menace, this pronouncement comes as a cruel blow.

We do not mean to imply that our colleagues intended it as such. We have no doubt that they are earnest about their fine spun theoretical objections to Zionism. We hold, however, that these objections have no merit, and further that voicing them at this time has been unwise and unkind.

We have not the least fear that our fellow Americans will be led to misconstrue the attitudes of American Jews to America because of their interest in Zionism. Every fair-minded American knows that American Jews have only one political allegiance–and that is to America. There is nothing in Zionism to impair this loyalty. Zionism has been endorsed in our generation by every President from Woodrow Wilson to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and has been approved by the Congress of the United States. The noblest spirits in American life, statesmen, scholars, writers, ministers and leaders of labor and industry, have lent their sympathy and encouragement to the movement.

Jews, and all non-Jews who are sympathetically interested in the plight of Jewry, should bear in mind that the defeat of Hitler will not of itself normalize Jewish life in Europe.

An Allied peace which will not frankly face the problem of the national homelessness of the Jewish people will leave the age-old tragic status of European Jewry unchanged. The Jewish people is in danger of emerging from this war not only more torn and broken than any other people, but also without any prospects of a better and more secure future and without the hope that such tragedies will not recur again, and again. Following an Allied victory, the Jews of Europe, we are confident, will be restored to their political rights and to equality of citizenship. But they possessed these rights after the last war and yet the past twenty-five years have witnessed a rapid and appalling deterioration in their position. In any case, even after peace is restored Europe will be so ravaged and war-torn that large masses of Jews will elect migration to Palestine as a solution of their personal problems.

Indeed, for most of these there may be no other substantial hope of economic, social and spiritual rehabilitation.

THE freedom which, we have faith, will come to all men and nations after this war, must come not only to Jews as individuals wherever they live, permitting them to share freedom on a plane of equality with all other men, but also to the Jewish people, as such, restored in its homeland, where at long last it will be a free people within a world federation of free peoples.

Of the 757 Rabbis listed below, 214 are members of the Central Conference of American Rabbis (Reform); 247 are members of the Rabbinical Assembly of America (Conservative); and the rest are affiliated with the Rabbinical Council of America (Orthodox) or the Union of Orthodox Rabbis. The total represents the largest number of rabbis whose signatures are attached to a public pronouncement in all Jewish history.

To see the scanned image in PDF format with the list of signers, click here

Note: A version of the above statement was released to the press on November 20, 1942. By that time 818 rabbis had signed on. It appears in Samuel Halperin’s The Political World of American Zionism. (Detroit: Wayne State UP, 1961) 333.

http://zionistsout.blogspot.com/2008/03/zionism-affirmation-of-judaism.html

Source

by Olivier Lelibre — via Henry Makow.com May 15, 2013

20^th Century Mexico’s Catholic Uprising

In 1924, Plutarco Elias Calles became President. For this descendant of Spanish Jews, a 33rd degree Mason, “the Church is the unique cause of all Mexico’s misfortunes.” For him, too, she had to disappear. [He was a tool of the Illuminati bankers, the masters of the Mexican economy in 1914: Rockefeller (rubber), Goblentz (textiles), Guggenheim (mines), Hearst (alias Hirsch) who owned 3 million metric acres, and the Kuhn-Loeb bank, which financed Lenin.]

In 1926, the president and his clique launched a new offensive which they hoped to be definitive: “Now there must be a psychological revolution,” Calles declared. “We must penetrate and take hold of the minds of the children and the youth because they must belong to the revolution.”

The Catholic schools were shut down, the congregations expelled, Christian trade unions forbidden, numerous churches confiscated and profaned (turned into stables or halls) or destroyed. Public school attendance became mandatory, atheism was officially taught, and religious insignia (medals, crucifixes, statues, and pictures) were forbidden, even at home. God was even chased from the language! The use of such expressions as Adios, “If God wills,” or “God forbid,” was subject to a fine.

Continues …

World Bulletin — May 15, 2013

An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”

The article explains that the conference discussed a paper from the English Zionist Federation “proposing the re-establishment of Judea as an independent State, suggesting the purchase of the Maccabean sites in Palestine, and the beginning of the work by the establishment of a Jewish colony and a Jewish Agricultural College there.”

It further clarifies that “The site to be purchased comprises about fifty acres, six miles from a station on the railroad between Jappa and Jerusalem, and within sight of the sea and a large stretch of the Palestinian coast.”

It notes that English Zionists have gathered 2,500 dollars in the currency of the period and request that quantity from the American Zionists.

The article also explains that “On motion of Dr. Wise, the Federation voted $100 as the nucleus of the required fund of $2,500, the remainder to be raised by subscriptions from the 125 societies and individuals, both Jews and Gentiles. A general appeal to the public will be made.”

It also conveys that delegates will be elected at the Zionist meeting in Baltimore

The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers.

Source

Courtesy ReporterNotebook

By Gilad Atzmon — gilad.co.uk May 14, 2013

Cafe Palestine Freiburg won a landmark victory against Freiburg University in the German administrative court last Friday.

Six months ago Café Palestine filed  a complaint against the University in the Administrative Court following the University´s refusal to let the Palestinian solidarity group use a space for a lecture by Paris University professor Christophe Oberlin.

On Friday, the  Administrative Court of Freiburg  made of five judges found that the University  acted illegally.

Freiburg University together with Dr. Heinrich Schwendemann, who was the main actor against the Café,  were highly criticized by the court.  Schwendemann is one of the founders of the German Holocaust memorial site shoa.de.

As far as I am aware the University will have to pay a penalty. I guess that Dr. Schwendemann may need to consult with a legal expert soon. Apparently the Shoa expert was lying in court and he may face a further legal  humiliation soon.

To read more …

by David Livingstone — (from his upcoming book, Black Terror, White Soldiers: Islam, Fascism & the New Age) via henrymakow.com May 8, 2013

There have been widespread rumors that Hitler was himself Jewish. It has been suggested Hitler was the illegitimate grandchild of a Rothschild. But, according to Rabbi Marvin Antelman, these theories are incorrect. Rather, he claims, Hitler was the deliberate creation of a ritual participated in by his mother, Klara Polzl, and a Sabbatean Frankist.

The ritual was held on the 9th of Av, known as Tisha B’av, which is observed by Jews as a fast day commemorating the destruction of the First and Second Temples, but commemorated by Frankists as Sabbatai Zevi’s birthday, which they celebrate with their sex rites. [Other views trace Hitler's Jewishness to the Rothschilds through his grandmother who purportedly was a servant. She received child support from a Jewish man for Hitler's father.]

In fact, Hitler’s Jewish and African ancestry has been confirmed through recent genetic studies.

Like Napoleon, Hitler belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup E1b1b, which is rare in Germany and even Western Europe. According to Ronny Decorte, genetics expert at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven who sampled Hitler’s current living relatives, “the results of this study are surprising” and “Hitler would not have been happy.“10

Continues …

by Henry Makow Ph.D. — (from Nov. 4, 2009)

When a reader tipped me to a talk entitled “The Making of a Slave,” delivered by a slave owner in 1712, I decided to compare past and present.

Past methods of enslavement were highly sophisticated, and closely resemble modern feminist social engineering.

Willie Lynch, a British slave owner in the West Indies, was invited to the colony of Virginia in 1712 to teach his methods to slave owners there.

He advised slave owners to foster division, “fear, envy and distrust for control.” Pit young versus old, light skinned versus dark skinned and most importantly, male versus female.

In a section called “The Breaking Process of the African Woman,” he advocated shifting her dependency from the African male to the slave owner.  This is achieved by beating and humiliating the male in front of the female. Then, beating the female if she doesn’t get the message. This instills a kind of frigidity.

“We reversed nature by burning and pulling a civilized nigger apart, and bull whipping another to the point of death, all in her presence. By her being left alone, unprotected, with the male image destroyed, the ordeal caused her to move from her psychological dependent state to a frozen independent state. In this frozen psychological state of independence, she will raise her male and female offspring in reverse roles.”

“For fear of the young male’s life, she will psychologically train him to be mentally weak and dependent, but physically strong. Because she has become psychologically independent, she will train her female offspring to be psychologically independent. What have you got? You’ve got the nigger woman out front and the nigger man behind and scared. This is a perfect situation of sound sleep and economic [gain].”

She will teach her female offspring “to be like herself, independent and negotiable (…we negotiate her at will.)” She will raise her “nigger male offspring to be mentally dependent and weak, but physically strong, in other words body over mind.”

“We will mate and breed them and continue the cycle. This is good and sound and long range comprehensive planning.”

Sound familiar?  We recognize these patterns in the US Black community and, thanks to the hidden agenda of feminism, increasingly in White society as well.

AVOIDING SELF CORRECTION

Continues …

By Dr Michael Salla — Exopolitics May 3, 2013

In sensational testimony submitted on the final day of the Citizen Hearing on [UFO] Disclosure, six former members of the U.S. Congress heard from a former CIA agent about an incident involving President Eisenhower and extraterrestrials. In a video testimony played today before the retired US Congress members, the agent alleged that President Eisenhower sought to gain information from a secret control group called MJ-12 about alien related projects at a facility near Area 51 called S-4, both of which are located in a remote region of Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. When denied the requested information, Eisenhower allegedly authorized a personal message that the agent and his immediate superior would deliver to those in charge at Area 51 and S-4. The message was a direct threat that the President would authorize a military invasion of Area 51 and S-4 if his request for information was not carried out.

The former CIA agent is currently aged 77 and suffering from acute kidney problems and has only several months to live. A 15 minutes segment was played out of a longer interview where he went on the public record about how he was recruited by a senior CIA operative located out of Langley, Virginia to work with the CIA on the issue of extraterrestrial life. At the time of his recruitment in 1958, he had just completed training at the US Army Signal Training Center, and began working as an Army cryptologist. He said that he was recruited by the CIA operative because it would give him significantly more money than he was earning in the Army. His first assignment was to examine files on UFOs and extraterrestrial life submitted from USAF base at Fort Belvoir, which were different to the Project Blue Book files studied at Wright Patterson Air Force Base that were eventually released to the general public.

In response to questions from UFO historian Richard Dolan, the former CIA agent went on to explain how in 1958, he and his boss – the CIA operative – were summoned by President Eisenhower to the Oval Office. The President, who was accompanied by Vice-President Nixon, told the agent and his boss that he was trying to get information about efforts to learn about extraterrestrial life and technology. The agent said that according to President Eisenhower: “MJ-12 was supposed to find out, but they never sent reports to him.” The CIA agent said he and his boss were called into the Oval Office”. President Eisenhower said:

We called the people in from MJ-12, from Area 51 and S-4, but they told us that the government had no jurisdiction over what they were doing…. I want you and your boss to fly out there. I want you to give them a personal message…. I want you to tell them, whoever is in charge, I want you to tell them that they have this coming week to get into Washington and to report to me. And if they don’t, I’m going to get the First Army from Colorado. we are going to go over and take the base over. I don’t care what kind of classified material you got. We are going to rip this thing apart.”

In response to Dolan’s question, “Eisenhower was going to invade Area 51?” the CIA agent confirmed that Eisenhower indeed planned to so with the First Army.

After traveling to Area 51 and S-4, the CIA agent said that he saw several garage type doors with flying saucers in them. He described seeing a Gray alien at the S-4 facility that his boss “partially interviewed”. Upon returning to the White House, the agent and his boss relayed what they had seen at S-4. Significantly, the FBI Director, J. Edgar Hoover, was also present during the debriefing of the CIA agent and his boss over what they had witnessed at S-4 and Area-51. According to the CIA agent, Eisenhower was shocked.

The testimony of the CIA agent was admitted into the Citizen Hearing by the main organizer, Stephen Bassett, since he thought it was credible based on the research of Linda Moulton Howe and Richard Dolan. The CIA agent’s testimony yields important insights among which include:

1. President Eisenhower had lost control of extraterrestrial related projects to a control group called MJ-12. This is precisely what Stephen Lovekin, who served in the White House Army Signals Corps, said motivated Eisenhower to give his departing Military-Industrial Complex speech in January 1962.

1. The CIA was tasked with the study of extraterrestrial life and technology, and had access to USAF files located at Fort Belvoir. This helps confirms leaked Majestic documents that President Kennedy first approached the CIA to get access to MJ-12 documents dealing with UFOs and extraterrestrial life.

1. Extraterrestrial technology was being studied at a secret facility, S-4, located near Area 51. This helps confirm the testimony of Robert Lazar who was the first to describe the secretive facility S-4 facility having several extraterrestrial vehicles in them.

An extraterrestrial, a Gray, was secretly being housed at the S-4 facility. This helps confirm the testimony of witnesses such as Bill Uhouse that aliens were assisting engineers working on black projects attempting to reverse engineer alien propulsion technologies.

Source

by Jyri Lina — “The Fight Against Usury” (Excerpt from The Barnes Review, Oct 2004)

In November of 1688 (under the sign of the scorpion) the Catholic king of England James II (Stuart) was overthrown through a well-organized invasion financed by the moneyed Jews of Amsterdam and led by the Prieure de Sion and the Orange Order.

The king was exiled to France and in February of 1689 William of Orange, the prince of Nassau, was put upon the English throne. This became known as the “Glorious Revolution.” Even official historians admit that the people did not participate in this coup.

England was in poor condition after 50 years of war with France and the Netherlands. William III asked several powerful bankers for help. They provided the English state with a loan of 1.25 million pounds but only delivered 750,000 pounds. The terms of the loan were as follows; the names of the lenders were not to be revealed, and these were guaranteed the right to found the Bank of England, whose directors were able to issue loans to a value of 10 pounds for each pound of deposited gold in the bank vault. They also were allowed to consolidate the national debt and secure payment for annuity and interest through direct Taxation of the people.

The privately owned Bank of England was established in 1694 with absolute control over the currency (the right to issue bank notes). The lending of money on usury continued at an even larger scale. Thus the English people suffered a huge national debt. Taxes had to be raised and prices doubled. To the Masonic bankers it was necessary to have a monopoly on money issuing. That way they were able to make enormous profits and also control political processes.

The Bank of England was allowed to lend money to an amount 10 times the security the lender put. up. With 5 percent interest it only took two years for the bank to earn back an amount equal to the original security.

By the year 1698, the national debt had risen from one and a quarter million pounds to 16 million. In 1815 it was 885 million pounds and in 1945 it had grown to 22.5 billion pounds. By 1995 the national debt had risen to more than 300 billion pounds, equal to 45 percent of GNP.

Not even the Macmillan Committee, which was appointed in 1929, managed to find out who governed the Bank of England. Only one name has leaked out–that of Rothschild. All great wars have been started and financed by the economic conglomerate emanating from one single banking family–the Rothschilds.

SPREAD OF CENTRAL BANKS

Continues …

Compare the article below with this review of a new book “FDR & the Jews” which portrays FDR, an Illuminati Jew, as a Christian, and whitewashes his role in the holocaust. As The Holocaust Conspiracy demonstrates, historians hide the Illuminati role in the holocaust, which was designed to justify the creation of Israel and replace the crucifixion of Christ as the central metaphor of divine sacrifice.

by Henry Makow Ph.D. — (from Feb 27, 2008)

In 1938-39, just before Europe erupted in an inferno for Jews, all the exits were sealed shut. The Nazis had no problem allowing Jews to leave.  The problem was that no country allowed them to enter.

In May 1939, the passenger liner “St. Louis” carrying 900 German Jewish refugees was turned away from Havana. The passengers’  costly tourist visas had been revoked by Cuban authorities. The liner lingered near the coast of Florida but FDR refused to let it dock. Reluctantly, the ship returned to Europe where the refugees were divided among four Allied countries, of which three soon were overrun.

The image of unwanted Jews was seared into the collective Jewish psyche. It argued the necessity of a homeland in Israel as insurance against anti-Semitism. Millions of Jews devoted their money and lives to wresting Israel from its rightful owners and building a Jewish sanctuary there. Millions of non-Jews were recruited to this cause. World peace has hung in the balance ever since.

FDR famously said nothing in history happens by accident. The possibility that this gruesome spectacle was staged to manipulate Jews, and give them a kind of moral impunity, is repugnant to consider.

However, a book, “The Holocaust Conspiracy” (1989)  shows how Allied and neutral governments ensured that most Jews would remain in Europe and would burn. The author William R. Perl argues that  a parallel Nuremberg Trial is necessary for “those leading figures in the Allied and neutral camps” who “knowingly and willingly co-operated in the German annihilation scheme.” (34)

William Perl (1906-1998) was not some armchair conspiracy theorist like me.  He was a lawyer in Vienna in the 1930′s who helped organize illegal transits to Palestine  for the Revisionist Zionists.  He negotiated with Adolf Eichmann face-to-face; and after the war, he prosecuted Nazi war criminals.

In this book, Perl argues that the Jewish holocaust was part of an international conspiracy. But of course, he didn’t understand that the perpetrators were “the Illuminati,”  the highest rung of Freemasonry empowered by the world central banking cartel.  Their goal is to create a world government tyranny dedicated to Lucifer with its capital in Jerusalem.

Holocaust means “burned offering.” By what logic can we call this genocide a “sacrifice”?  By Illuminati logic of course! They sacrificed Jews to hoodwink the world into establishing a Masonic state in Israel. The design of the Israeli Supreme Court is proof that this is exactly what has transpired. Modern Israel was Masonic from its conception.

This begs the question: If the Jewish holocaust was contrived by the people who run the world, would they do it again?  I’ll address this question at the end.

PERL’S CASE

Continues …

T Stokes — April 12, 2013

The death of Sir Anthony Montague Browne on April 1, 2013 aged 89, who was the last secretary to Winston Churchill leaves me free to set the record straight on a few misunderstood aspects on Churchill’s premiership.

Sir Anthony, who was a likeable man with a very dry sense of humour, joined Churchill’s team in 1952 but from that vantage point was able to gain unique insight into what had happened in the years before. Apart from having access to all his private correspondence and discussions, Sir Anthony differed from Churchill’s bodyguards and secretaries in that he was chosen by the Treasury after  a short political and psychological assessment,

Sir Anthony said many times Churchill was more worried about being assassinated by his own people than the enemy, for taking them into another needless war.

Churchill’s stated reason for Britain entering WWII over Poland was another one of history’s great falsehoods. The real motive had more to do banking interests.

Adolf Hitler was adamantly opposed to Communism and was supported in this by Britain and the USA, right up until he threw out the bankers. At that point Churchill was manoeuvred into power by the bankers to bring Germany back under their control.

No matter that a world war followed that left millions dead or that the Soviet Union was left in control of most of Eastern Europe. As far as the bankers were concerned Churchill had fulfilled his task. For far from being a great leader, he was simply a servant of the money powers who had helped them reassert control over Europe.

Sir Anthony had a better grasp of this than Churchill. In fact Sir Anthony was to say Churchill had a poor grasp of politics and international intrigue, and would concentrate on relatively minor matters to the exclusion of the bigger picture. On his own initiative, Sir Anthony presented Churchill with the most important papers and ideas leaving Churchill’s subordinates to deal with less important affairs.

Without Sir Anthony’s scrutiny and prioritization, Churchill could have been easily have been sidetracked and bogged down in less important tasks.

Nonetheless, Churchill still made key decisions, for better or for worse. During WWII one such was the Allied bombing campaign of German civilians and despite what the history books may say, this was not Bomber Harris’s brainchild.

Sir Anthony claimed that Lord Cherwell had more influence on Churchill than almost anyone else and it was Cherwell  together with Churchill who had masterminded taking the war to the wives and children of German soldiers. In this too Churchill was fulfilling the bankers wishes. For the money-powers wanted the German factories intact to later seize as war reparations.

So civilians had been targeted instead in an effort to undermine Germany’s war morale.

Moreover, according to Sir Anthony Churchill had also implicitly sanctioned General Eisenhower’s campaign of genocide against German Prisoners of War, in which more than a million and some estimate as many as 9 million German POWs died.

Churchill’s quote, “A prisoner of war is a man who tries to kill you and fails, and then asks you not to kill him.” was cited by Lawrence Burgis as proof that Churchill knew what Eisenhower planned to do at the war’s end.

Nor should we forget that Churchill was loathe to feed and house hundreds of thousands of German prisoners and refugees. For Churchill it was easier and more cost effective to bomb and burn them in their homes, or order the RAF to strafe refugee columns, as they did.

This alone has prevented the wartime bomber crews ever getting any medals.

Lord Cherwell was said to spend more time with Churchill than even Rothschild or Churchill’s wife and Lord Moran, Churchill’s doctor often wondered if she really knew real Churchill’s sexual tastes.

Quite possibly she didn’t as Jock Colvile was known to bring him prostitutes. While Sir Anthony was to admit Churchill liked to visit Morocco the homosexual hide away of the time where young boys were easily available.

As with so many of history’s victors, the less savoury aspects of Churchill’s past have been airbrushed out of the official record.

After Churchill’s resignation in 1955 Sir Anthony was suddenly brought back from the Foreign Office to be Churchill’s private secretary  to discuss the blossoming Suez crisis. When Nasser demanded payment from the international community for using the Suez canal, the Israelis demanded that Britain go in and take it for them.

Meanwhile, Churchill seemed unconcerned as the crisis unfolded.

Instead he fell and broke a hip while drunk in the South of France and Sir Anthony  described him as laying there like a drunken stag and joked with Churchill’s doctor Lord Moran that it should stop his political meddling .

After the broken hip the RAF flew them both back to London and when Churchill died on 24 January, 1965 Montague Browne signed the death certificate.

Sir Anthony would tell the story of  how while at a gambling casino, Churchill was spotted by singer Frank Sinatra, who came past with his group and made a big thing of recognising Churchill and shaking his hand profusely, saying “I always wanted to do that” to his little entourage.

Whereupon Churchill turned angrily to Sir Anthony and said “who the hell was that”?

T Stokes London

Further reading-

The Brotherhood Stephen Knight

The Needless War – Archibald Maule Ramsey

From Admiral to Cabin boy- Admiral Barry Domvile

Lies in wartime- A Ponsonby

They used dark forces  -Dennis Wheatley

Works of- Dr Alexander Cannon

New Lies for old- Anatoli Golitsyn .

Igor Gouzenko

]]> http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?feed=rss2&p=68814 2 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=68774 http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=68774#comments Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:22:43 +0000 wmw_admin http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=68774

Stuart Winter — Express.co.uk April 7, 2013

A 63-year-old memo sent to the legendary FBI director J Edgar Hoover has become one the most read files on the internet with its report of flying saucers and 3ft tall aliens.

The single page note tells a story as intriguing and far-fetched as anything investigated by Special Agents Fox Mulder and Dana Scully in the popular television sci-fi drama and has been viewed a million times.

In vague terms, it describes how a United States Air Force investigator had reported three flying saucers being recovered in New Mexico in the early Fifties with each one “occupied by three bodies of human shape but only 3ft tall, dressed in metallic cloth of a very fine texture”.

The report added: “Each body was bandaged in a manner similar to the blackout suits used by speed fliers and test pilots.”

A high-powered radar system was blamed for bringing down the saucers in a remote area of desert after interfering with the UFOs’ controlling mechanisms.

The neatly-typed memo, dated March 22, 1950, was sent by FBI field office chief Guy Hottel.

However, to add to conspiracy theorists’ suspicions of government attempts to cover up visits by extra terrestrials, the informant’s name has been redacted in black ink.

The memo, first made public in the late Seventies, appears not to be linked to the 1947 Roswell case when US Air Force officials said they recovered a UFO in the New Mexico desert, only to say later it was a research balloon.

The practice of FBI agents investigating UFO sightings on Hoover’s orders ended in July 1950.

The electronic FBI reading room, the Vault, holds about 6,700 items.

Source

A suburban Stockholm politician resigned after questioning the Holocaust, becoming the third public figure in Sweden to be embroiled in controversy involving anti-Semitism in recent weeks.

Alexander Kieding, an alderman in Jarna, resigned last week from his rightist Swedish Democrats party and the City Council hours after the publication of an interview in which he said the Holocaust may have never happened, or that “Israel inflated the number” of victims.

The online edition of the Expo Idag daily, which published the interview, reported that Kielding left at the request of the leadership of the nationalist party, which was founded in 1988 but crossed Sweden’s 4 percent voting threshold only in 2010. It now has 20 seats in the 349-seat parliament and also is represented in 612 of Sweden’s 12,978 municipal councils.

On March 20, another one of the party’s aldermen, Mikael Hoglund, said in an interview with Expo Idag that the party “hates Muslims” because of Jews. Hoglund, of Upplands-Bro near Stockholm, singled out one of the party’s prominent lawmakers, Kent Ekeroth, who said in 2010 that his mother was a Jew of Polish descent. Hoglund also said Jews control the White House.

The party, which faced condemnations from across the political spectrum for the words of both representatives, has distanced itself from their statements.

Meanwhile, the left-leaning Social Democratic party of Sweden — the country’s largest — also has been criticized for what was perceived as a display of anti-Semitic sentiments by one of its representatives.

Expo Idag published an article this week alleging that Omar Mustafa, the chairman of the Islamic Association in Sweden and a member of the party’s steering committee, showed support on Facebook for anti-Semitic Muslim preachers, including Yusuf al-Qaradawi, an Egyptian cleric who encourages suicide attacks against Israelis and has called the Holocaust “Allah’s punishment.”

Source

Allies boast of killing 1,000,000 German POWs in 21 days

Source

Also see: In ‘Eisenhower’s Death Camps’: A U.S. Prison Guard’s Story

Tomorrow, Monday April 8 is Holocaust Day.  Ever wonder why Organized Jewry keeps pounding this drum?

They don’t give a hoot about the holocaust or its victims. A recent survey of “holocaust survivors” in Israel shows that more than half live in poverty and think Israel is neglecting them. No surprise here. Zionists collaborated with the Nazis and sabotaged efforts to save Jewish lives.

The Illuminati designed the holocaust to justify the creation of Israel. Holocaust commemoration gives Organized Jewry moral and political immunity to complete the Illuminati agenda, a world police state.

The holocaust meme equates anyone who opposes the fascist New World Order with a “bully,” a bigot, a Nazi mass murderer and a “hater.”

In the eyes of the goyim, it gives Jews a moral sanctity as the world’s preeminent victims. At the same time, it reminds Jews they can be victimized again unless they obey their Zionist leaders. You know it’s a psyop because it totally ignores the 60 million non-Jews who perished in WW2.

I am a Jew. My grandparents all died in the holocaust. My parents barely escaped by posing as Gentiles.  Nevertheless, I can only make sense of history in the following way:

1. There is a Cabalist sect within Judaism who are Satanists (the Illuminati),  who control the world from behind the scenes using financial leverage and Freemasonry. Their agenda is to enslave the human race, mentally if not physically.  They use many Jews to advance this agenda and the holocaust gives these Jews immunity. They masquerade as Jews themselves but in fact they intermarry with generational satanists of different races.

2…

Continues…

On March 3, 2013, Erich Lichtblau reported in a New York Times article titled “The Holocaust Just Got More Shocking” on recent research into the “Holocaust” as presented at a panel discussion at the German Historical Institute (GHI), which was organized in cooperation with the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM). In our illustration to the right we can see the GHI-Panelists Martin Dean, Omer Bartov, Hartmut Berghoff, Sybille Steinbacher and Geoffrey Megargee. During the discussion, researchers reported having cataloged some 42,500 German ghettos and camps throughout Europe.

GHI Director Hartmut Berghoff, quoted in the Times, noted that this number was “much higher than what we originally thought.” Some years ago, researchers at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum began the task of documenting all the ghettos, labor sites and concentration camps that the National Socialists had set up throughout Europe.

Hartmut Berghoff (since April 2008 Director at the German Historical Institute GHI, Washington, DC) and Geoffrey Megargee, a researcher at the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies in the USHMM, stated:

“Most people are unaware of the full extent of the Nazi camp and ghetto system. Behind the well-known names, such as Auschwitz, Dachau, Treblinka and Warsaw, there was a vast universe of facilities, more than 42,000 of them, that formed the heart of the Nazi regime.”

The project lead researchers, Geoffrey Megargee and Martin Dean, estimate that 15 million to 20 million people died or were imprisoned in the sites that they have identified as part of their multi-volume Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933-1945.

“You literally could not go anywhere in Germany without running into forced labor camps, P.O.W. camps, concentration camps,” he said. “They were everywhere.”

STOP!

While the task of accumulating data and examining it seems a basic scientific endeavor, it is necessary to fully understand the issues involved. For this we need to remember that during WWII Germany was forced to fight a war against the entire world, which was out not only to eliminate the “Nazis,” but Germany and the German people as such. It was a world war of extermination against the German nation. In that desperate situation, Germany sent almost every German man capable of holding a weapon to the front, whereas millions of foreigners, most of them voluntarily, but many of them also coerced, worked in Germany’s offices, factories and on German farms to replace the missing German male labor force.

The question arises: Where were these millions of foreigners housed, and how were they treated?

As the war progressed, Germany faced an increasing housing shortage, not at least caused by the Allies’ genocidal bombing campaign. It goes without saying that placing these millions of almost exclusively male foreigners in crammed German households among the German maidens whose men were fighting and dying by the millions at the front was no option. Hence most of these foreign laborers were housed in makeshift barracks or labor camps close to the enterprises where they were working. Germany was littered with factories, and so it was littered with labor camps close to them – thousands upon thousands.

The next question is: were these housing units really “terror camps”?

The late Hans-Jürgen Witzsch, once a history teacher in Bavaria, Germany, and founder of the “Arbeitskreis für Zeitgeschichte und Politik” (Work Group Contemporary History and Politics), has taken a closer, skeptical look into the nature of many of these 42,500 “terror” camps already in the 1990s. In 1999 he published a paper on it, which in 2003 also appeared in an English edition: “Foreign Workers in the Third Reich”. I may quote only a few sentences from his trail-blazing work:

“In order to fill millions of free work places, which became vacant by the widening of the war, the employment of millions of foreign workers was required. Contrary to concentration camp inmates and POWs, the foreign workers usually came voluntarily to Germany for work. [...]

Although during wartime it became very difficult for companies especially in German cities to ensure suitable accommodations for the foreign workers as a result of the destruction of residences by the allied carpet bombings, the results of the joint efforts by the German authorities and company managements were astounding. [...]

Several testimonies mention a camp contest, during which a prize for the most beautiful camp of the district and its areas was awarded on an annual basis. [...]

[...] at the end of the war there were more workers from abroad working in the Reich than there are foreigners in Germany today.”

Although now 14 years old, Witzsch’s paper annihilates the USHMM’s fraudulent claims in an instant and exposes their Encyclopedia as a mere work of propaganda designed to further the goals of Shoah business: the more camps, inmates, terror and suffering, the more attention, “reputation,” “moral superiority,” political sway and money the Lobby can get. The Holocaust, Zionism’s Sword and Shield, is being wielded again, and how dare anybody stand in its way!

As revisionist research dismantles one mainstream legend after the other, the orthodox version of the so-called Holocaust is suffering a complete metamorphosis into a mythical entity.

—Adrian Gauss

Media Items

German-language media coverage:

• Interview with GHI Director Hartmut Berghoff on the surprising findings of the USHMM encyclopedia: “Die Deutschen konnten sehen: Hier passieren schreckliche Dinge,” Süddeutsche Zeitung, March 7, 2013
• ZDF television interview with GHI Director Hartmut Berghoff, “Mehr Straflager als gedacht,” ZDF Morgenmagazin, March 6, 2013
• Katja Tichomirowa, “Viel mehr Lager als gedacht,” Frankfurter Rundschau, March 6, 2013
• ZDF television reportage featuring GHI Fellow Stefan Hördler: “Neue Studie 42.000 Orte des Schreckens,” ZDF heute journal, March 5, 2013
• Deputy Director Uwe Spiekermann and Research Fellow Stefan Hördler interviewed on the implications of the USHMM Encyplopedia: Stefan Koch, “Neue Studie deckt Netz der 42.500 Nazi-Lager auf,” Hannoverische Allgemeine Zeitung, March 5, 2013
• Sven Felix Kellerhoff, “Nazis unterhielten mehr als 42.000 Gefängnisse,” Die Welt, March 4, 2013
• Bernhard Schulz, “US-Forscher: 42.500 Lager in der Nazizeit,” Der Tagesspiegel, March 3, 2013
• “Mehr als 40.000 Nazi-Zwangslager in Europe,” Die Zeit, March 2, 2013

International media coverage:

• “Worse than the world ever imagined: True scale of the Holocaust revealed as it’s discovered Nazis created 42,500 camps and ghettos to persecute Jews – not 7,000 as previously thought,” Daily Mail, March 2, 2013
• Michael Walsh, “New Study says Holocaust infrastructure was far larger than thought: 42,500 sites across Europe,” New York Daily News, March 2, 2013
• “Holocaust Researchers Catalog 42,500 Nazi Ghettos, Camps; Numbers Are ‘Unbelievable’,” The Huffington Post, March 2, 2013
• Sacha Kester, “Nazikampen en getto’s in Europa in kaart gebracht: aantallen ‘ongelofelijk hoog’,” de Volkskrant, March 2, 2013
• “U.S. review raises extent of Holocaust,” UPI, March 3, 2013
• “Timur Moon, “Nazis May Have Built 42,000 Death Camps, Not 7,000,” International Business Times, March 3, 2012
• “Holocaust sites numbered 42,500,” The New Zealand Herald, March 4, 2013
• “Nazis may have killed up to 20m, claims ‘shocking’ new Holocaust study,” The Telegraph, March 4, 2013
• Sarah Pinard, “Une étude revoit à la hausse le nombre de camps nazis,” Le Figaro, March 5, 2013

Source

A condensed and edited version of an interview with Greek Holocaust denier Konstantinos Plevris, the first Holocaust denier in history to be tried in a court of law and found ‘Not Guilty’ — much to the anger and alarm of organized Jewry.

The full interview may be read in the Barnes Review under the title Interview with a Gutsy Greek Patriot.

Pictures, captions and comments by Lasha Darkmoon.

LD:  Greek nationalist lawyer and self-confessed anti-Semite, Konstaninos Plevris, author of The Jews: The Whole Truth, was initially found guilty of inciting racial hatred against Jews in December 2007, this verdict being based entirely on outspoken quotations found in the above-mentioned 1400-page book.

Thus Plevris described Joseph Goebbels as “one of the brightest minds of the century, a philosopher with a deep understanding of mass psychology”. He called ZYKLON B gas “merely a poisonous gas used to fumigate the concentration camps … extensively publicized as the gas used to put Jews to death in special gas chambers which have not been found.” Finally, Plevris’s praise of Adolf Hitler was not appreciated by the Jews who regard Hitler as the most evil man in history—second only in infamy to Jesus Christ, of course, who is now being burned in hot excrement in hell according to the Talmud. “The tragic leader of the German Third Reich is certainly the most impressive leadership figure of the modern age,” Plevris enthuses about Hitler, adding ruefully, “He could have rid Europe of the Jews, but he did not.”

Other complaints against Plevris is that  he subscribed to “the myth of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” that he characterized Jewish children in the concentration camps as “very fat and well-fed”, and that he regarded Jews as “mortal enemies” and as  “subhuman”. (See here)

Plevris appealed the court ruling, and on the 27th of March 2009 the court of appeals overturned all charges against him. His complete exoneration by the most distinguished legal brains in Greek jurisprudence was to prompt angry charges from Jewish sources that there had been a “miscarriage of justice”.

However, it was not easy to prove that admiration of Adolf Hitler or doubts about the Holocaust could in any way equate with incitement to violence against Jews; nor that failure to love Jews or hold them in high esteem was in itself a crime.

PETER PAPAHERAKLIS [TBR]: I am here at the home of Mr Konstantinos Plevris to interview him and learn about his beliefs. Specifically, about his very big and important book, “The Jews: The Whole Truth”, which is not yet available in English. Mr Plevris has some introductory remarks…

KONSTANINOS PLEVRIS: Three years ago, I published in Athens my book “The Jews: The Whole Truth.” (Picks up book and shows it to camera.) This is 1,400 pages long. This book is full of facts, proofs, references to 270 authors, writers, other books and of course photos. Immediately after the publication of my book, the Central Council of Jews in Greece and the European Jewish Congress started a campaign against me. They went to the prime minister of Greece asking me to be condemned. They went to the Justice Department, and, after three years of legal fights, I have finally won 100 percent in the Supreme Court of Athens. Justice prevailed; the court proved itself to be independent and not under Jewish control.

TBR: What do you think of the Jewish “Holocaust” hypothesis?

PLEVRIS: I don’t believe in the “Holocaust.” Of course many Jews died during WWII, but there is no proof the Germans planned to exterminate them.

TBR: We understand that you do not now believe in the Jewish “Holocaust” of World War II. But did you at any point in your life believe it?

PLEVRIS: No, I never believed in the “Holocaust.” That is the reason that I have examined the figures that they have given. In 1968, more than 40 years ago, I published a book on it with the title The Myth.

According to the evidence that we have, it was impossible to have killed 6 million Jews — because in all the countries that were occupied by Hitler there were only 4,200,000 Jews according to the official statistics. Even if he arrested all of them, he still could not come up with 6 million.

But Hitler never planned to kill the Jews. He only wanted to transport them to the island of Madagascar or some other place.

Anyway, almost 3,300,000 Jews have received money from West Germany in the past because they claim that they were arrested and put in concentration camps. All this is explained in detail in my book.

TBR: Have you ever been to Auschwitz or related sites?

PLEVRIS: Of course. I have been to Dachau, Auschwitz, all of them. There are no gas chambers in any of them.

TBR: Is it illegal in Greece to question the “Holocaust” theory?

PLEVRIS: No. Absolutely not. In Germany and in Austria they feel guilty for the Jews, and there it is illegal. Not here. Here we have freedom of speech. You are free to express your ideas and to state your opinion.

TBR: Did not the ancient Greeks almost invent freedom of speech?

PLEVRIS: Yes, of course. Don’t forget that here we believe in dialogue. You speak, I give my answer, and we discuss things. Many times I called on the Jews to come on my TV program to speak in a public, free dialogue, and they refused. Why? Because they know they are wrong and I am right. And it’s not only about the Jewish “Holocaust” of World War II. Most of my book involves the crimes the Jews committed against the Greeks throughout history.

TBR: WWII was a terrible time. How many Greeks died in the war?

PLEVRIS: Half a million; 520,000 to be exact.

TBR: What other holocausts have the Greek people survived?

PLEVRIS: We had the 1922 genocide in Pontus, the area around the Black Sea. Around Greece there are these states — Albania, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Turkey — and all these states were founded on Greek territory. They enslaved the Greek population. So, we Greeks have had genocides. Real genocides!

And no one gave us any money!

The Jewish “Holocaust” is for me an enterprise. It has an economic goal. The Jews gained money from it. Thirty years ago, I remember, it was written that 4 million Jews were killed at Auschwitz. Later, they changed this to 1 million. But the Jews collected money for 4 million.

LD:  Actually, the official figures for Holocaust victims at Auschwitz were revised downward from 4 million to 1.5 million in 1989. So it was officially admitted at that point that the figure of 2.5 million needed to be subtracted from the 6 million figure. Incredibly, no such subtraction has ever taken place. The magic 6 million figure remains unaltered. And merely to question it is an imprisonable offense in seventeen countries: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Switzerland.

BR: The Roman historian Dio Cassius said in the 2nd century A.D. that the Jews killed 220,000 Greeks in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus. What do you think about that?

PLEVRIS: Yes, it is not only Dio Cassius who said this. Modern historians say it too, including  Edward Gibbon in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. It’s a fact. Maybe the numbers are a bit exaggerated, but it is a fact.

TBR: What details of the Holocaust myth do you call into question?

PLEVRIS: First of all we have to use common sense. If the Jews are telling the truth, if they are right in what they say, they don’t need to legally penalize so-called “Holocaust Deniers.” If you’re right about something and someone denies it, you can prove that he is wrong. But the Jews use the penal law. This is unbelievable to me. I can say that the American Revolution never happened. Does that mean that I should be condemned for saying it? That I should go to jail because I expressed my opinion?

If the Jews are right, they are obliged to accept a public dialogue. This they refuse. It’s not only forbidden to deny that the “Holocaust” occurred as such — even to doubt it is a crime!  In Germany and Austria you are not even allowed to express doubts about the “Holocaust.” Unfortunately, there is no more any Deutschland. Instead there is “Judenland.” If you go to Germany, you will see “Holocaust” monuments and memorials everywhere.

TBR: Are there any other specific details you call into question?

PLEVRIS: Look, I always use either scientific arguments or common sense. The Germans came to Greece in 1941. They went to some town in Greece. They arrested some Jews. They put them in train cars. They sent them somewhere into Poland or Germany, where there was a concentration camp. For what reason? The Jews say: “to kill us.”

I’m asking: Why didn’t they kill them in Greece?

Is it necessary to go through all the trouble of organizing the camps, and the trains, and all that? So it comes down to common sense.

It just doesn’t add up.

TBR: How has your latest book “The Jews: The Whole Truth” been received by the Greek-reading audience?

PLEVRIS: Now, after three years, it is in its fourth edition.

TBR: It is indeed a massive work.

PLEVRIS: Yes, it definitively closes the case. And don’t forget that my victory in the Greek court is final. There are no more appeals. Also, this is the first time in Europe that the Jews lost a case.

TBR: How do you feel about the way that the Israelis have been treating the Palestinians, Lebanese, and others in the Middle East, such as the holocaust against the people of Gaza?

PLEVRIS: I have inside my book more than 50 photos, unbelievable photos of Jews killing children — and they wanted to kill them. If you look, all the proof is inside the book. Of course, this is a war crime. But there is no new Nuremberg for Zionists unfortunately.

TBR: I really was struck by the photograph in your book of the two Palestinian children throwing rocks at an oncoming tank. That picture speaks a thousand words.

PLEVRIS: Yes, exactly. And don’t forget that anyway, had the Jews not crucified Jesus, no one would know anything about them. No one would mention them…. What we do know for sure about the Jews is that they were slaves: slaves to the Assyrians, slaves to the Babylonians, slaves to the Persians, slaves to the Greeks, slaves to the Romans, slaves to the Byzantines, slaves to the Arabs, slaves to the Turks, slaves to the Germans. And now they have a state, not because they are able to have a state on their own, but because the United States helped them. This is clear. If the United States dumps them, they will be slaves to someone else!

TBR: Are you aware of the Israeli attacks on the USS Liberty in 1967 and on Rachel Corrie and other Americans, as well as some Europeans and Japanese newsmen? Can you comment on that?

PLEVRIS: Yes. For the USS Liberty I have a chapter in my book, because the Jews don’t have any gratitude for the American help. There are many Jews convicted as spies against the United States. I believe that the Jews—and when I say “Jews” I don’t mean ALL Jewish people, because there are also good Jews. I am referring to the Zionists: the Jewish Zionists. So, if there is a Jew that does not believe in the Talmud, of course I don’t have a problem with him. But I don’t personally know a Jew who does not believe in the Talmud, and who does not believe in the chosen people.

During my trial I said to the court: “Look, these people claim that they are God’s chosen people, and they have the nerve to accuse me of being a racist! How can I be the racist here when it is they who claim that they, the Jews, are chosen by God?”

Anyway, when I say something I try always to prove it. For this reason, the solution of all these cases concerning the Jews is only one: free public dialogue. Everything in the open, everything in the light. Everything clear, to see it and discuss it. The Jews, they refuse. For this reason I suspect something is wrong. Because they refuse free dialogue … They refuse!

TBR: Apparently the Jews claimed that they were somehow being defamed by your book. Is that right?

♣

PLEVRIS: The president [of the court] was against me. After the process, I was condemned to a suspended sentence of 14 months in prison. After this, because this judge acted absolutely illegally, I made a counterattack against him — and now he has been kicked out of the justice department! I made the appeal, and it was in a superior court of five judges and a prosecutor. The five judges unanimously ruled that I was not guilty!

Never in my book did I say, “Do something illegal! Be violent against Jews!” Never! I spoke only the truth, and I proved that I spoke the truth. And if the Jews were able to discuss my book and prove that I am wrong, they would do it. But they are not able to prove it. They cannot prove it. Because it’s the truth I speak. So they followed legal proceedings. And they lost — they totally and definitely lost!

TBR: What was the role of Ms Andrea Gilbert, head of the Central Board of Jewish—

PLEVRIS: Please! . . . I have no wish to enter into discussion about a lesbian! A woman who will not respect her own nature is unlikely to have any respect for the truth! Not only is she a lesbian, she is also the president of the Lesbian Federation.

LD: An additional black mark against Plevris is that he is an unabashed “homophobe”.

TBR: So what is this Central Jewish Council of Greece?

PLEVRIS: The Jewish Council went against me. They said:  “When Plevris published this book. . . . after its publication. . . . someone went to the city of Patras and desecrated the Jewish cemetery there by painting swastikas on the Jewish graves.”

I asked “Has the perpetrator been arrested?” He had been arrested, and he was the son of a rabbi!

TBR: So it was reported in the news that he was the perpetrator?

PLEVRIS: Absolutely. He was an agent provocateur!

♣

TBR: So you do not sanction or incite anyone to violent acts against the Jews? Nor do you justify similar practices that others have done in past?

PLEVRIS: I don’t agree with violence. When you have 100 percent  truth on your side, you don’t need violence. Anyway, what violence? The Jews accuse us of violence? They are the first teachers of violence! Look at what is happening in Palestine!

“The best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed.”

— Rabbi ben Yohai in the Talmud, quoted also in the Jewish Encyclopaedia.

TBR: It seems your enemies were extremely selective in what they quoted from your works. For example, I believe your most notorious book contains extensive quotations from the Talmud. And a huge stock of historical evidence of Jewish anti-Christian hatred. Of this, they said not a word.  Can you comment on that?

PLEVRIS: The Jews are afraid of any public dialogue. I mentioned that earlier.

TBR: How do you see the political future of Greece?

PLEVRIS: The future of Greece is very difficult because we have many problems. Two million immigrants have come into Greece: from Albania, from Pakistan, from Africa, from everywhere. They came to Greece, and we have a big problem. They have changed the national composition of our country.

TBR: What is the population of Greece currently?

PLEVRIS: We are 11 million, and almost 20% are foreigners. We don’t want them. We don’t accept them. They have to return to their countries. But the political parties play the game of parliamentarianism and human rights. Human rights for the others, not for the Greeks. There is a racism in Greece from the foreigners against the native Greek population.

♣

TBR: I understand that you wrote about the “Holocaust” in 1968. Can you tell us more about that book?

PLEVRIS: The book’s title, as I mentioned earlier, was The Myth. This offered evidence and proofs that what the Jews claim about the Holocaust never actually happened.

TBR: So, at the time you wrote this book in 1968 you were one of the pioneers on this subject worldwide?

PLEVRIS: Yes, that’s true. Of course, the Jews complained. But I didn’t care about them. I was very strong then. I was General Secretary of the Ministry of National Security, and I didn’t pay any attention to them at all. Also I was only 28 years old. When you are 28, you’re  not afraid of anyone!

TBR: Have your Revisionist books been translated into other languages, and do you have plans to translate them into English?

PLEVRIS: No, only The Myth has been translated into German and Arabic. I want to translate my other works into English, but the work of every day has not given me the opportunity.

TBR: How well has your book “The Jews: The Whole Truth” been received?

PLEVRIS: I think about 20,000 to 30,000 copies have been sold.

TBR: Is there anything else you would like to say for our audience, which is mostly American?

PLEVRIS: Yes. Of course, we belong to different nations, but most of us are white. But white, red, yellow or black, our race is the first thing we have to keep intact. The Jews want all the non-Jews to be blended into a “universal goy.” I am not a racist under the bad meaning of the word, because it is not by my choice, or the choice of any mortal, that we have people being mostly black in Africa, mostly yellow in Asia, and mostly white in Europe and North America. Rather, it is the natural order of things for the races to be geographically separated. So, the first thing we have to protect, for all non-Jews, is our race: our right to be white, yellow, black or whatever race we are.

TBR: Mr. Plevris, thank you very much for your time.

Source

by William Ramsey – (henrymakow.com) March 28, 2013

On October 13th, 1974, Arliss Perry, a nineteen-year-old from Bismarck, North Dakota, was found murdered in the Memorial Church on the Stanford university campus. She had been in California for only six weeks.

Recently married to her high school boyfriend, Perry (formerly Dykema) moved with her husband to the campus while he studied at Stanford. Perry’s dead body was said to be found to the left of the altar, partially disrobed, and in the words of a church official—-lying in a “ritualistic and satanic” position.

However, I heard a rumor that her murderer(s) actually laid her body on the central altar of the church, but that the authorities had her body moved to another location in order to maintain the sanctity of the church. Found on her back, naked from the waist down with her legs spread wide apart, her pants were carefully placed over her legs to form oppositional, triangular shapes.

Perry’s blouse was ripped open and her hands held a votive candle folded across her chest. Horrifically, another votive candle protruded from her vagina. Evidence indicated she was beaten, then choked. The savage blow of an ice pick behind her left ear caused her death. Its handle was seen protruding from her skull when a security guard found her body. The presence of the ice pick at the scene indicates premeditation—the murderer brought the unusual weapon to the church with the intent to kill.

Horrified and shocked by the crime, the local authorities kept the occult signatures of the murder from the public. Initially, local police believed a local sexual psychopath committed the killing. Santa Clara detectives knew that personal possessions of Arlis Perry were removed from the murder scene as either souvenirs or proof that the murder occurred.

On October 15th, a memorial service was held for the young victim. The presiding minister noted that Christ, too, was “cruelly murdered by cruel and perverse men. He was a victim. Arlis, in her death, was like her Lord…Violence has swept the very altar of God.”1

The occult murder of Arlis Perry remains unsolved.

THE ULTIMATE EVIL

Continues …